GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

human capital

Comptroller’s audit criticizes city’s handling of ATR pool

Chart from Comptroller John Liu's audit of the Absent Teacher Reserve.

The Department of Education could potentially be doing more to help teachers whose positions have been eliminated find new jobs.

That’s one conclusion of an audit conducted by Comptroller John Liu of the DOE’s efforts to help members of the Absent Teacher Reserve, the pool of teachers whose jobs were lost to budget cuts, enrollment changes, or school closures. The audit concluded that the vast majority of ATRs — 95 percent — are working full-time in teaching jobs, but that the department doesn’t maintain data sufficient to conclude whether its efforts to help the teachers find permanent positions are paying off.

“Without such information, we believe that DOE is significantly hindered in its ability to evaluate the success of its efforts in helping ATR teachers find permanent positions,” the report concludes.

The audit is not meant to dictate policy and is intended only to draw attention to what the report said was an information gap within the DOE on the ATR pool.

But an unwritten conclusion also seems to be that the city is wasting money by hiring new teachers when ATRs are licensed to do the job.

Two charts billboard the number of positions for which ATRs were eligible that instead were filled by new teachers. Last year, the audit documents, 1,796 new teachers were hired for positions that 273 ATRs could have filled, the charts show. The report estimates that the city could have saved $12.4 million if all 273 ATRs had filled the positions for which they were eligible, and the city hired 273 fewer new teachers.

Under the principle of “mutual consent,” adopted in the 2005 teachers contract, teachers gave up the right to claim positions without principals’ approval, and the city gave up the right to place teachers unilaterally into open positions. The change gave principals more control of their staffs but also created the ATR pool.

In a response appended to the audit, the DOE’s deputy chancellor in charge of human capital, David Weiner, says the charts signal that the comptroller would prefer that the city abandon mutual consent in favor of forced placement.

The audit’s “analysis regards teachers not as individual professionals with unique strengths and/or weaknesses as candidates for teaching jobs in unique schools, but rather as fungible, replaceable parts,” Weiner wrote. He echoed language in the 2009 “Widget Effect” report by The New Teacher Project, which has urged the city to save money by terminating teachers in the ATR pool.

A spokesman for Liu said the charts are merely food for thought in a 20-page audit intended to spur the department to gather and crunch more data about the ATR pool.

“There may be cost-effective ways for placing ATR teachers that the DOE may not have considered,” said Matt Sweeney, a Liu spokesman. “One of the audit functions is to provide the agency as much information as possible that it may have overlooked.”

Other interesting data points uncovered in the audit: the DOE sometimes assigns ATRs back to the schools where they originally worked, despite a policy prohibiting that practice; no formal review took place before the DOE decided to eliminate salary subsidies for principals who hired teachers from the ATR pool; and more than 300 teachers in the pool as of March 1 had landed there after settling or being cleared of misconduct charges, likely many after the city rushed to close the “rubber rooms” several months earlier.

Teachers union president Michael Mulgrew said the audit vindicated the union, which has always said that teachers in the ATR pool were pulling their weight within the system.

“[Ex-]Chancellor [Joel] Klein’s constant public pronouncement that this was costing the city $100 million was fraudulent and that’s the nicest way that I can say it,” he said.

Mulgrew said the biggest force keeping teachers in the ATR pool is the fact that DOE charges principals for the real salaries of their teachers, creating a disincentive to hire senior teachers when newer ones are available.

The ATR audit is one of several audits that Liu undertook into the DOE after a series of town-hall meetings where New Yorkers suggested topics for investigation. At least three other DOE audits are expected to be released this month, according to Crain’s New York.

  • Toby

    LIU FOR MAYOR! 

  • Fourth Year Teacher

    John Liu please run for Mayor.

  • I noticed that…

    What candidate will the union support for mayor in 2013 ?  I hope it’s John Liu!

  • Fsmedu

    Re ATR Pool of September 6, 2011 Despite all the agreements put into place, in addition to the teachers’ contract, by the UFT and DOE NYC , the ATR pool has increased than decreased by September 6, 2011 as if  the more things change the more they remain the same. And yet more educators retired this year than any time.  Honesty has ceased to be the best policy under mayoral control of the City Schools.  It is a moral disgrace to observe how Bloomberg, Tweed and the UFT have been deceiving the people of the City of New York on the ATR pool they have founded in the history of the NYC School System. Numbers do not lie. The ATR nightmare is evidence of Tweed failed leadership.  A pool which is by all standards is “separate and unequal”. Why is it being maintained? The school system never had it since educators were either working as professionals or fired for incompetence or else by arbitrators.  Here is the twisted logic behind the hiring of educators in the Bloomberg’s bogus enterprise. Educators rated satisfactory in the system for years by NYC school supervisors are to be sent to the ATR pool and must go into a vetting process all over again from other NYC school supervisors in the same NYC School System when excessed in order to get reappointed into permanent positions since previous annual evaluations and years of experiences in the NYC Public School System don’t matter. And consequently, the media, politicians, businesses and lawyers among others are questioning any policy or number coming from the school system.PeaceFSMEDU    
     
     

  • Pogue

    This is great.  There are so many experienced teachers getting screwed.  I see fresh, new teacher faces with permanent assignments throughout my building, while ATR’s report for temporary duty.

    I’ve got nothing against new teachers, in a natural attrition/retiring setting, positions become available.  As it is now, new hires come at the expense of people who’ve dedicated years of service to children.

    “Yes, but what about the bad teachers. Blah, blah, blah…”  Principals have the power to FAIRLY assess teachers’ performance.  It’s their job to help their staff help the children.

    The current system is a crime.  Go John Liu.

  • old teach

    Using department of education data to refute department of education rhetoric is just wonderful. Mulgrew’s comments say it all.

  • Philly Friend

    Get used to this nonsense. The only job Weiner cares about is his own. We are so glad he’s gone!

  • cl_pixie

    Bloomberg is squandering DoE funds when placing ATRs would save the city so much money.  But this still goes back to Weingarten agreeing to this horrible clause in the contract, and teachers, only caring about the raise not caring about their own future in this profession.  Shame on those who voted Yes to the ’05 contract!!

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

1 comment so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031