GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

reading list

A one-time critic of testing finds uses for it in her own classroom

It’s a common refrain: Teachers say that high-stakes tests constrain them in the classroom.

At our “On Education” panel last week, high school history teacher Stephen Lazar said he would would trade a higher salary for freedom from the Regents exam his students must pass to graduate.

“I would give up any raise in a second if you told me that once I showed that I can get my kids to pass the Regents — which I’ve shown over the past six years — that I can throw [the tests] out the window … and then I can really teach [students] how to think,” he said.

But what if the exams aren’t as limiting as Lazar and other teachers say? What if they’re actually useful? That’s the argument that Ama Nyamekye, a former city schoolteacher, makes in the Community section today.

In “A Teacher Finds Good In Testing,” Nyamekye describes what happened when she stopped resisting the Regents exam and started learning from it. She writes:

I once dismissed standardized testing for its narrow focus on a discrete set of skills, but I learned that my self-made assignments were more problematic. It turned out they were skewed in my favor. I was better at teaching literary analysis than grammar and punctuation. When I started giving ongoing standardized assessments, I noticed that my students showed steady growth in literary analysis, but less growth in grammar and punctuation. I was teaching to my strengths instead of strengthening my weaknesses.

Read Nyamekye’s complete essay, which originally appeared yesterday in the Commentary section of Education Week.

  • I noticed that…

    Once again GS is posting the pseudo-pedagogical comments of someone who was in the classroom 3 years and touting her an expert.  OMG, why, oh why, is GS giving credence to people who have no genuine classroom and teaching experience, to spew their philosophical, education belief in the media.  I feel that this another avenue to promote the notion that you don’t need to have years in the classroom to become an “expert”.  You are brainwashing society to accept the notion that senior, veteran teachers are not the experienced educators.  I’m fed up of this BS!

  • http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ Norm

    “Ama Nyamekye taught high school English in the New York City public
    schools from 2004 to 2007 and now works as a communications consultant
    for nonprofits.”Jeez, like giving credence to a 3rd year medical student who advocates the use of leeches to cure cancer. Speaking of leeches…..I’m amazed that Gotham and Ama don’t get it. The problem is not standardized testing but high stakes outcomes based on the tests. Ignoring the high stakes aspect is the ed deform way of deflecting what the issue is all about. GS must start defining these nuances. This is not about pedagogy but about politics.

  • John G

    Norm,
    Of course, GS gets it. They are some of the most intelligent , dedicated people examining education hat New York City has and they clearly understand the criticism of high stakes outcomes for standardized exams.And they also understand the multiple years it takes a teacher to mature into a confident educator AND the nature of the learning curve that new (less than 5 years) teachers struggle with AND are, in my opinion, aware of some of the techniques new teachers use to get around that learning curve. They write about stuff. Of course they know.No, no. This piece doesn’t come from someone who doesn’t get it. It is an example of willful ignorance about the true nature of teaching and about the reasons for the dissent around standardized exams in New York, and the US.

    At least I hope it is an example of that. If this really is where the level of conversation about teacher growth and about standardized exams lies, then we’re in pretty big trouble.

  • flerpo

    Lord, ease up a bit, folks.  GS appears to have a whopping *three* staff members, who together do the site’s reporting, copyediting, and proofreading, write the headlines, make editorial decisions, and generally manage the web site (including the comments section).   They’re young, paid little, and don’t have employment contracts or pensions.  It may surprise you that generating a constant flow of well-written and interesting content is not easy.  So GS ”welcomes” (i.e., is practically begging for) columns from teachers, parents, students, or anyone else willing and able to type out several hundred words and send them in (to Ms. Cramer, who then has to edit the piece while doing the rest of the stuff listed above).  I’m sure they’d accept submissions from one of the scores of commenters with decades of experience teaching in the NYC public school system.

  • Smith

    Lazar was talking about a high-stakes test that determines the content he must teach in his history classes and how he teaches it.    The other teacher seems to be talking about using diagnostic tests to assess students’ reading and writing skills.

    The debate is more about how these tests are used.

  • http://twitter.com/BNiche B

    Be careful. That is the most over-stated piece of advice I’ve been given in my last three years of teaching and, frankly, is one of the best pieces of advice I’ve been given. Everything that you say or write, critical or not, CAN be used against you, depending on who’s reading the post and who’s using that info.

    Currently, GS does NOT accept submissions of teachers for their Community section who refuse to use their full name in their posts. There are a host of reasons why some teachers of any number of years feel uncomfortable submitting any sort of criticism of the system, their school, or whatnot, be it a vindictive principal, administration, or staff overall. 

    With the pushing of changing LIFO, removing tenure, and a host of other concerns, I can see why some teachers refuse to attach their full names to their writings. Why set yourself up to get fired over a blog post, no matter how truthful it may be? It doesn’t deter from the quality of their postings however. If GothamSchools allowed for pseudonyms, I can almost guarantee you there will be more writings posted by all sorts of teachers.

  • el flerpo

    Sounds like a worthwhile proposal to me, actually. 

  • EdintheApple

    Thr PARCC Common Core assessments will totally change the testing landscape – check out the Common Core and PARCC websites … as far as Lazar is concerned: what does he mean by “really teach student how to think,” and how would we know it?  What evidence would we have?  There still are a handful of schools that have Regents waivers from the SED and use portfolios/roundtables … and they do as well or better in college!!

  • http://twitter.com/BNiche B

    What do you mean by “worthwhile proposal”, if I may ask?

  • el flerpo

    Printing submissions from teachers using pseudonyms.

  • Youratroll

    Again its so over your head.The troll in you just can’t stop. You have all the sympathy for the poor overworked people In GS but you don’t have any for the teachers in this world.I finally figured it out your Ruben’s Dad and you ran out of money trying to find a job for him.I guess you stopped following all the ambulances and this is where you landed.You always get two like’s for everything you write.You and Ruben.

  • http://bubbler.wordpress.com/ Mark

    “Youratroll,” thank you for your exemplary model postings demonstrating exactly what the definition of an internet troll is.

  • John G

    I logged on to say just that. Mark beat me to it -and said it better.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

9 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031