GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

human capital

Principals cut 2,000+ teaching jobs; city plans school layoffs

Budget cuts caused principals to cut thousands of positions this year, but the total number of teachers without permanent jobs rose only slightly, the Department of Education revealed today.

The Bloomberg administration also announced plans to lay off nearly 800 school employees who do not belong to the teachers union, which negotiated a deal in June to avert layoffs. Most of those employees — 737 of 777 — belong to DC-37, which represents school aides and other auxiliary school personnel. The layoffs are set to start in October.

When the city announced in July that schools would have to cut an average of 2.43 percent from their budgets, many principals complained that they had little fat to trim. They said they would have to turn to eliminating necessary positions and sending junior teachers to the Absent Teacher Reserve, the pool of teachers whose positions were cut or lost as a result of school closures or enrollment changes.

In the end, they sent 2,186 teachers to the ATR pool this summer. More than a thousand of those teachers have already left the pool, either by finding new positions or leaving the system. A DOE spokeswoman said many of the teachers were rehired by their original schools after funding became available to keep them there.

That leaves 1,940 teachers in the ATR pool with just weeks before the start of the school year.  Last year, the pool contained 1,779 teachers just before classes began.

Though small, the growth in the size of the ATR pool still places added financial stress on the department. That’s because teachers in the pool draw their regular salary even as they work in temporary positions, this year changing schools weekly as the result of the city’s budget deal with the teachers union. Ex-Chancellor Joel Klein’s last message to principals before he left the DOE took aim at the cost of maintaining the ATR pool: He asked for permission to lay off the reserve teachers, saying that the city was spending as much as $100 million a year to support teachers who “don’t care to, or can’t, find a job.”

Teachers union officials speculated that the excess numbers rose only slightly because more teachers exited the system completely this year. Nearly 2,500 teachers have retired this summer, 23 percent more than last year, the union reported.

The city had speculated that 2,600 jobs would be lost to attrition this year. Attrition includes retirements, resignations, and terminations.

The layoffs announcement surprised union officials with the most at stake. Lilian Roberts, DC-37′s executive director, said she had not received “official notification of layoffs” from the DOE and was “deeply concerned.” She added that she remained “hopeful that both sides will look for resources to avoid the need for any layoff.”

Marc LaVorgna, a City Hall spokesman, said in a statement that the Bloomberg administration that the layoffs were necessary because the unions had not signed on to cost-cutting concessions. “Unfortunately in this case, the unions involved would not agree to any real savings that could have saved these jobs,” he said.

  • nuff said

    2500 retired+2186 sent to atr pool+how many newer teachers left(normally 50% in the first 3 years)-so what approx 1200(who knows)=5886 total——hmm miraculously close to the 6000 threatened layoffs in Feb—-imagine that——–checkmate

    =

    =

  • nuff said

    2000 jobs cut by Principals due to budget cuts in july–and the total will be  1940 in the ATR pool(being paid their salary by the City)—so if their was NO budget cuts there would NOT be an ATR pool? Since the City is paying them either way- wouldn’t it make more sense to let the Principals have them back and reduce class sizes?——-just a thought-seems like an artificial cut 

  • Seeker

    “The ATR pool still places added financial stress on the department”. How about the stress of those teachers who are actual ATR’s? The city has a lot of nerve making complaints about the ATR situation when it was the city who created this mess. With a record amount of school closings in recent years, this situation will only continue to grow. The UFT better stand it’s ground and not even begin to negotiate a new contract with Bloomberg at this time. He wants to fire ATR’s after a certain amount of time of being in the pool. Every teacher in this city has something at stake here as you never know when you might become an ATR.

  • nuff said

    you are correct it is a manufactured issue for the sole purpose of busting the union and trying to force people to quit-if the school budgets were not cut there would be NO ATR’s–and since the budget cuts equal the ATR salaries that the DOE is paying anyway——–why not keep them in the classroom and lower class sizes

  • Grammarpolice

    Marc LaVorgna, a City Hall spokesman, said in a statement that the Bloomberg administration that the layoffs were necessary because the unions had not signed on to cost-cutting concessions.

    This sentence requires revision.

  • Roma Giudetti

    The ATR situation is ridiculous  – just assign these teachers to a school already.  I mean if these principals are such fantastic managers, they’ll be able to handle one or two teachers, they did not personally choose to employ.  The ridiculous emphasis on having only people in a school building that were chosen by the principals themselves is just absurd.  Put teachers in the classroom where they belong so that kids can have reduced class-size and stop worrying about principals.  I mean all this talk of corporate reform – don’t managers in corporations inherit people they themselves did not personally pick?  And don’t these same managers figure out how to effectively manage people even if they did not personally choose to employ them?  Isn’t it all part of being a “leader”?  Again, the ATR situation is ridiculous and absurd and emblematic of all that is wrong with the “reform” model.

  • Fsmedu

    Re ATR Aug.23 2011
     
    Source URL: Source URL http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/education/24excess.html?ref=michaelrbloomberg
    NYTIMES
    “The biggest joke about this whole thing,” she said of the fair, “is that there are all these excessed teachers, but they keep hiring all these new kids.”
    As part of the agreement between the union and the city that averted teacher layoffs, the teachers in the reserve pool will be called upon more frequently as long-term substitutes for a particular school, replacing colleagues who might be on leave for health reasons, for example, or be moved among schools in the same district from week to week. Previously, principals often hired substitutes who were not in the pool.

    As of Aug. 19, there were 1,940 teachers in the reserve pool, including 454 who have been there since last summer, 155 who joined it in the summer of 2009 and 68 from the summer of 2006, months after the pool was created. “
    By FERNANDA SANTOS Aug 23 2011‏
    Jessica Bell contributed reporting.

  • On the verge of poverty.

    i am a per diem sub.  am i still going to have a job?  if not, will i then be able to file for unemployment?  i am 27, career change, looking to go to grad school for education, and hoping to eek out a living as a sub in the meantime.   am i out of luck?  

    a $24 billion dollar department and they have to cut my $154.97 a day?

    also, under the new agreement, wouldn’t ATRs be doing the same exact job that i do at $154.97 a day for $65,000+,  plus benefits?   get these ATRs out of the system.  either fire time or hire them to a full time slot. 

  • sharese

    if a principal likes you, they will find a way to keep you as a “long term sub”. meaning you are working for a teacher that’s out on leave for a long period of time. I did it for 2 years until a school was able to hire me. yes, you can collect unemployment, I did. Its what you say in your application that will determine your eligibility for unemployment

  • sharese

    One more thing i used to be bitter about ATR’s. but they did not create this mess and its an unfortunate situation. Do not wish to”get these ATRs out of the system.  either fire time”. Because the way this system works, we are all vulnerable to become an ATR. Food for thought!!!!!!!! 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031