GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

timeshare pitch

City billing teacher-sharing as a way to keep arts positions filled

More than 50 schools have signed up for a new matchmaking program to help them pool positions.

The Department of Education has created a centralized process for principals looking to share teachers with another school —having a teacher work a few days a week at one school, and the rest of the week at another. In a notice to principals, the city said sharing teachers “may be a particularly efficient way to provide arts instruction.”

In the process’s first month, 38 schools have indicated interest in gaining a shared teacher. Eighteen of the schools are looking for an art, music, or dance teacher. Another 28 schools have indicated that they have someone to share, including nine arts teachers, according to DOE spokeswoman Barbara Morgan.

It’s a positive step toward providing more students with access to the arts, according to Richard Kessler, director of the nonprofit Center for Arts Education. But he’s not convinced principals have the support they need to share teachers effectively.

Splitting teacher schedules presents a logistical challenge for the principals who pay their salaries and teachers who might have to travel. Kessler said those logistical difficulties are one reason why the practice has become rare after being relatively common in the 1980s.

“The majority of principals just don’t know how you share faculty from school to school,” Kessler said, adding that he did not know of any schools currently sharing arts teachers. “There was a reason why it disappeared — it gets tricky traveling from one school to another. But in tough times, this is certainly better than nothing.”

Morgan said the city has always encouraged schools to share teachers. But at a time when principals citywide have been forced to excess teachers because of budget cuts, making it easier to share teachers (and, therefore, share their salaries) has obvious appeal.

Doug Israel, CAE’s director of research and policy, said he sees sharing teachers as common sense, especially as the increase in small schools and co-located schools has created many small staffs in close proximity to each other. His worry is that the city is encouraging the practice for big schools, too. For those schools, teacher-sharing could allow a reduction in arts staff rather than an augmentation.

“It’s a double-edged sword,” said Israel, who wrote a report released in June that detailed a steep decline in the city’s arts education funding since 2006. “You don’t ever want to see principals getting rid of their teachers.”

The teacher-sharing system was also listed as a step forward in a recent report from the Arts Education Committee to the Panel for Educational Policy, which outlines a set of basic goals for arts instruction by 2014. The report’s first goal is for all schools to comply with state and city requirements, including providing instruction by certified arts teachers.

“We need to maximize the impact of all teachers of the arts across school sites to assure that certified teachers are reaching as many students as possible,” the report says.

Even if the teacher-sharing initiative is widely used, it would only address a small piece of the larger problem of a lack of funding for arts programs. According to Israel’s report, 23 percent of city schools had no licensed arts teachers last year, even on a part-time basis.

  • John G

    This isn’t new. Principals did it for years back when they had the freedom to do so.

  • guest

    Are the arts (music) part of the common core?  I hope so.  It would force schools to have the classes and they are so important.

  • Seeker

    This is good and bad news. The good news is more students will be exposed to the arts. The bad news is these teachers are still in a kind of “limbo” if they are nor permanently appointed to an individual school. 

  • Pconrad

     a possible benefit to this, for teachers who were working happily in one building, and suddenly find themselves “shared” out to several others. They’ll get to meet other principals and see other schools, and possibly one of those principals will be more committed to arts education — and say, “Hey, this is a good teacher. I’m going to offer her or him a full time position.” Or do the rules prevent this kind of cherry-picking?

  • Mslisalee3

    hi sara.

    is there a way for an art teacher like myself to apply or express interest in joining the network that is looking for positions?  how does one get the info if he/she is seeking to split between schools?

    thanks.
    lisa

  • Just some teacher

    Depends on who you ask and what educational legislative framework you they believe in. NCLB legislation lists music as a common core standard, but most people disagree with the legislation, so they don’t consider music common core. Plus, on the elementary school level, it is a requirement that students get x amount of arts education a week, but does not specify that the teacher needs a license in one of the arts education disciplines. The big idea now are the common standards that address ELA and math proficiency that EVERY teacher, including arts, are to be addressing in their classroom. What makes a subject “important” in our educational system, is how much money the district can get for a high score on an objective assessment given by the state. Until, that happens for the arts, no matter how passionately we feel about our discipline, our impact on changing school curriculum will be no grater than Don Quixote battling windmills.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031