A new city initiative targets black and Latino men, and Mayor Bloomberg is giving $30 million. (Times)
Schools are competing for space once slated for a charter school that was shut down. (Riverdale Press)
A Harlem school is under investigation for giving students credits they didn’t earn. (GothamSchools)
Bloomberg is 1 of 6 donors paying to restore January Regents exams. (GS, NY1, Times, WSJ, WNYC)
The Wall Street Journal says a leaked presentation shows the AFT is not on parents’ side.
Ms. A
It’s so amazing that Bloomberg doesn’t recognize the irrefutable correlation between unfair funding/cutting the budget in “our” public schools and the subsequent failure of it’s students(black and latino). Afterall, the last time I checked, 1 + 1 = 2, right?
Something is very wrong with this picture…..
Roma Giudetti
I was reading Aaron Pallas’s blog the other day and he calculated that under the policies of Mr. Bloomberg about 12% of Black and Latino kids are ready for college when they graduate from high school. Mr. Bloomberg doesn’t take any responsibility for that low number instead preferring to blame teachers. So basically Mr. Bloomberg’s throwing money at a problem he helped create. If he had worked for 10 years at giving public school kids (70% of whom are Black and Latino) a decent school system than maybe he wouldn’t have to donate this money to help them find jobs.
Just Some Teacher
Of course this is very result ordered thinking, the emperor does not see the entire process as a continuum, and is not happy with the result so lets try to change the end product. Where did all these unemployed Black/Latino men come from? Answer- underfunded,neglected elementary schools, middle schools and high schools (assuming they did not drop out after middle school). It also came from underbudgeting social services programs so parents could spend more time with their children to provide homework help, and a sense of value and responsibility. This Bloomberg initiative should specifically go to improving social services programs to help families navigate the NYC school system from elementary school to high school, and improving the districts so that every area of the city has the resources that District 2 and 3 have. This Bloomberg initiative as it stands now, is purely cosmetic because it does not take into account the root of the problem.
flerpo
bloomberg gives $30 million of his own money to a program designed to help the marginalized, and he gets attacked for that here. that pretty much sums up the mindset here.
Pogue
Yup. You can throw in Gates, Walton, Broad, and Tilson while you’re at it.
it’s not that bloomberg is giving money to a program designed to help the marginalized, it’s that he’s giving money to try and solve a problem that he created in the first place by under-funding essential public services.
so if you’re implying that critical thinkers who remember their history and articulate the issues with bloomberg’s duplicity, then yes, that IS the mindset here, and i’m happy to be a part of it.
flerpo
reasonable people can disagree, and even have interesting arguments. that you take it as an unassailable fact that the mayor himself created this “problem” suggests that you’re either given to hyperbole or not reasonable.
and correct me if i’m wrong, but i believe nyc spending on education has increased every year that bloomberg’s been mayor.
so maybe it’s not quite so simple as bloomberg’s a bad guy. (or “the emperor,” as people here like to say — why does everyone seem to adopt the insipid style of maureen dowd around here? it is putrid.)
Co-winky-dinky!
And these two Bloomberg-funded initiatives come out just when his numbers in the opinion polls are way down….
The answer, my friend….
Dear Flerpo,
When was the last time any of these “feel good” “help” programs like this new Black/Latino men’s initiative ever had a deep and permanent impact, whether funded by the public sector or funded by the private sector?
Among other things, this is another tax deduction for Bloomberg and his cronies.
I know your heart is in the right place. I’m with you there, brother or sister. At least it’s private money, and not public money. And I do applaud his challenging other fatcats to chip in their surplus money to help people. The money would probably be better spent on other more worthy endeavors, however.
Let’s follow this men’s initiative program’s participants for the next ten years. I’d of course like to see them succeed and break out of crime and poverty. If this works, great. But I don’t see how this is substantially different from Job Corps, CETA, CDBG, and many other well-meaning programs. Did they make substantial, permanent differences, after all of the billions thrown at them over the years? How much did each true and permanent “success” cost?
But it’s an awfully pretty band-aid, ain’t it?
bee
Co-winky-dinky, of the $130 million, Bloomberg is paying for $30 million, Soros is paying for $30 million and we, the taxpayers, will be paying $70 million. Again, the taxpayers are being exploited and teflon Mike gets oodles of good PR for an infinitesimal amount of his excessive fortune.
GC
Flerpo, He is called the Emperor because he bought a third term, creating an exception to the term limits law agains the will of the public for himself alone. The following pretty much sums it up for those who have been sleeping for the past decade, from NYC public school parents blog: “This is not democracy—letting people yell and scream,” the mayor declared on his weekly radio show. “That’s not freedom of expression—that’s just trying to take away somebody else’s rights.” How positively Orwellian hearing Mayor Bloomberg lecture us on what is or is not democracy. This is the man who fired every member but one of the Panel for Educational Policy who didn’t agree with him on grade retention and replaced them with members who did—and always will. This is the man who said he strongly supported term limits until he came to the end of his second term, and then forced the city council to overturn the will of the public so he could run again. This is the man who dipped into his inexhaustible personal fortune to fund the most expensive campaign per voter in history, thereby creating such an uneven playing field that any challenge to him was impossible. This is the man who chose a school chancellor from his circle of country club friends and denied the public any input in the selection process. In fact, there was no selection process. This is the man who tolerates a “democracy” where 400 people spoke against school closings last year, only one spoke in favor, and the PEP voted with the one. In a nutshell, the mayor’s version of democracy and freedom of expression comes down to telling the opposition to just let him do what he wants.-Lynne Winderbaum, retired teacher and former UFT representative for Bronx high schools
Uncle Bill
Wow, now we have to beg the minorities to even “take” a job and come out with special initiatives because somehow, they were unjustly favored against or something like that. Unreal! Hey, here’s 30 mil, please take the job man. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous
If the top 1% payed appropriate taxes, then, there could be money for a jobs program which would address our broken infrastructure,or perhaps for special programs that would comprehensively address the needs of this population who have become un- hirable dropouts.Cuz the programs now in place, really don’t cut it. This population ,however, is also affected negatively by a multitude of social factors that are caused by themselves, as well as the larger societal inequities/systems.
enpassant
CHILDREN FIRST!
So the scores on the ELA and math tests were released today to Principals. Students who were sent to summer school in error, they actually scored a 2 on the spring exams are being made to come in and take the summer exams……even though….the DOE KNOWS these students have already passed. Why? Because the State is WAITING until Monday to release the scores to the public. Shame. Children First!
guest
How is a 2, which is below standard, considered a “pass”? Those kids are lucky that they needed to come into summer school and try to get ahead, since a 2 isn’t going to get them anywhere.
flerpo
yes, i understood why y’all refer to him as “the emperor.” i just find the pep-rally mindset tiresome.
enpassant
The City implemented a policy where students needed at least 2 to be promoted. Students who did not meet a “cut score” were not allowed to attend graduation and had to retake the test in the summer. The DOE then finds out that some of the kids actually received a 2, knows it, but makes the kid take the exam again because NYS Ed takes four months to grade an exam that was scored 4 months ago
flerpo – i didn’t articulate my thoughts clearly, and i want to thank you for calling me on it. i do not feel that bloomberg is solely responsible for the current state of educational affairs in nyc, and you are correct that it would be unreasonable of anyone to think that.
our current public education system is a hot mess, and i think that there is a general consensus about that – although there are varying opinions as to how to remedy the situation. i WISH it were as simple as “bloomberg’s a bad guy” because then hey, presto! we’ve got a solution. but we cannot place all of the blame on bloomberg, just as we cannot place all of the blame on teachers, or all of the blame on administrators. our current situation in education is an amalgamation of issues that needs to be addressed holistically as well as systemically.
the frustration with bloomberg (for me) stems in large part from the fact that we have an individual in a position of power who has had ample opportunity to effect positive change in our public school system, and has not. he has opted to throw money at a program aimed at assisting black and latino men, and i applaud that effort when considered in isolation. but here we have a mayor who has had the opportunity to prevent (to some extent) the need for such a program by creating a stronger public education system, and he has not. that’s what’s frustrating to me, and that’s what irks me about this action. as the saying goes “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”
i believe you are correct that education spending has increased during bloomberg’s tenure, however it is my understanding that it has been a disproportionate increase. to clarify, per pupil spending in nyc is still skewed in such a way that not all students receive the same amount of funding. so school A may receive $18,000/pupil in funding while school B (still in nyc) receives $5,000/pupil in funding. if you give each school an equal increase in per pupil spending, they are still not equal. and more often than not, the students who are in school B are black and latino.
i welcome discussion and debate, and would be happy to hear your thoughts on this – either here or over at my blog (which is still in its infancy).