GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Temporary Solution

Local donors save Jan. Regents exams, but only for one year

East Bronx Academy for the Future Principal Sarah Scrogin speaks at a press conference today announcing the one-year restoration of January Regents exams.

Students and principals who were thrown off guard by the state’s decision to cut January 2012 Regents exams can relax: The exams will be offered after all.

Mayor Bloomberg and Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott announced triumphantly today that they had secured funding for the exams, which had been eliminated as part of $8 million in cuts to the state’s testing program. But the save came not from the legislators they lobbied but from private donors in New York City, including Bloomberg himself.

With its own budget crunched, the Board of Regents voted in May to eliminate the exams, to the dismay of school administrators and some students who needed to take those exams to graduate. About 150,000 Regents exams are taken each January in the city, and city officials pushed back against the cuts, saying that the exam date was worth its relatively small cost.

Bloomberg and Walcott said today that they asked legislators to restore the funding but turned to private donors when negotiations were unsuccessful. 

Five donors and Bloomberg Philanthropies, the mayor’s private foundation, each donated $250,000 to cover the cost of administering the exams statewide in January 2012. Bloomberg would not identify the other five donors but said they were not government officials, parents of young children, or companies.

Bloomberg stressed that the donations were a “one-time fix,” and he said he would not ask private donors to cover the costs again.

“We just cannot get the private sector to fill in for the state every single time,” Bloomberg said.

“It’s sad in some senses that the state didn’t do what it had to do, but it is heartwarming to know that there are some individuals who care enough about the city and can do what we all know is right,” he said.

Regents Exams are administered in August, January and June of each year, and 2012 would have been the first year without January exams. Students must pass five Regents subject exams to meet the minimum high school graduation requirements in New York.

“For many students the January Regents exams are the gateway from high school to colleges and careers,” Bloomberg said.

Principals who joined Bloomberg and Walcott at the announcement said that without the option to take the January exams, some students would be at a higher risk of dropping out.

“We deal with students who typically struggle with school, so they need the most opportunities as possible to take these high-stakes exams,” said Paul Thompson, principal of the Urban Assembly School of Music and Arts in downtown Brooklyn. “I could have 30 to 40 percent of my students who need to pass a Regents in their senior year.”

Sarah Scrogin, principal of East Bronx Academy for the Future, said several of her students rely on the option to take the exams in January when life circumstances such as incarceration or unplanned pregnancy make it difficult for them to take classes on schedule. Scrogin and Alisa Berger, another principal who spoke at the announcement, criticized the exam eliminations in an op-ed in the New York Daily News last June.

“When things get in the way we often have ways of catching up. That’s what the exams were,” Scrogin said.

  • AngryAP

    All that it takes is 1.5 million dollars!  The first thought was to eliminate the regent exams to save 1.5 million.  What a joke!  Seriously, what a joke!  

  • Miss Eyre

    Hey, I’m happy to eat my hat and say that Mayor Bloomberg did right by the schools for the first time in a long time.  This will come as a huge relief to students, families, teachers, and principals.

  • Miss Eyre

    Hey, I’m happy to eat my hat and say that Mayor Bloomberg did right by the schools for the first time in a long time.  This will come as a huge relief to students, families, teachers, and principals.

  • Anonymous

    Miss Eyre,
    While the mayor “did right,” he did it to save his own skin.  Without January Regents a lot of kids will not graduate; he doesn’t want a lower graduation rate to affect his numbers while controlling the school system.  He did it for selfish reasons, not for the kids.

  • Miss Eyre

    A point well taken, but the kids will still benefit.

  • Ellen

    “We just cannot get the private sector to fill in for the state every
    single time,” Bloomberg said.”
    Why not?  They do it for Charter schools

  • Jeff S

    Of course, the whole thing was ludicrous to begin with. For example in math because students have such deficiencies they bring in from elementary and middle school (and even frm some of the so called better private schools), it almost became the norm for students to take what was then called the Ninth Year Math exam and latyer beame the Sequential Math I exam in their third term in school i.e. in January of their sophomore term. This supposedly would allow more time to properly prepare for this exam. When the state introduced the total disaster known as Math A, it was basically thought that exam should be given to on track students in January of their sophomore year (they’ve since gone back to Algebra but many schools now give it in 3 terms and almost consider the 3 term version the normal one and the two term version only for superior students!). But things work in mysterious ways sometimes. Believe me, I’m not dfefending SED’s original decision to cancel the January exams but if we think back six short months ago, the Emperor was forced to close schools during one of the days of the January testing period due to snow and weather is always an issue upstate at that time of year. Many school districts upstate never give January regents exams and I think it had something to do with the SED decision not to continue producing January regents exams. Of course, given the size of the budget, the money being saved by not having these exams is minimal. But wouldn’t it be ironic after all the hoopla being generated by the Emperor if there was a snow day forcing students to miss next January’s exams. It never should have come to this of course.

  • John G

    Wow what a good point. I’m embarrassed I hadn’t thought of it. A million and a half dollars and instead of finding the money, they were going to sell poor and minority urban students down the river.
    But 900 million on tech here in the city alone.

  • bee

    Indeed, 900 million if spent on things that really matter, (not ala Bloomberg) would really come in handy.

  • Vincent Muccioli

    I am happy to hear that people are solving the funding problem. What I have not heard yet is whether the STATE will actually do it. I want it to happen, but it is totally possible that the state gives some B.S. excuse about not having exams ready or being unable to change at this point. 

  • Vincent Muccioli

    I am happy to hear that people are solving the funding problem. What I have not heard yet is whether the STATE will actually do it. I want it to happen, but it is totally possible that the state gives some B.S. excuse about not having exams ready or being unable to change at this point. 

  • guest

    Exactly!

  • Blue Ray

    I am really happy to hear it. I am feeling like I get my soul back after I hear it. Thanks a lot to those people who effort for it.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930