GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

sidenote

Rupert and Wendi Murdoch backed a scandal-ridden city school

Besides his Joel Klein hire, his company’s $27 million state contract, and his entrance into education politics, there’s another schools angle to Rupert Murdoch, the embattled media tycoon.

Long before Murdoch’s News Corporation was accused of employing illegal news-gathering strategies, Murdoch and his wife, Wendi Deng Murdoch, were supporters of the Shuang Wen School. The Chinatown dual-language school was revealed last year to be illegally charging families for mandatory Chinese instruction.

In 2004, the Murdochs pledged three years of financial support for Shuang Wen’s after school programs, according to an article published in a city’s Chinese language paper at the time. That pledge amounted to half a million dollars, the Grand Street News later reported. In 2008, Murdoch praised the school during a lecture delivered in Australia.

Shuang Wen’s longtime principal, Ling Ling Chou, was removed several weeks ago under cloud of at least nine separate investigations into the school. Her interim replacement, Iris Chiu, has not received a warm welcome: Shuang Wen parents are defending Chou and fighting against the DOE’s investigations and oversight. They have filed a lawsuit alleging that discrimination is behind the city’s scrutiny, and some say they might withdraw their children in protest.

Wendi Murdoch’s relationship with the city schools extends beyond Shuang Wen. Until at least last year, she was a board member of the Fund for Public Schools, the Department of Education’s private fundraising arm. It’s unclear whether her tenure on the board began before or after Rupert Murdoch approached fund vice-chair Caroline Kennedy for help getting Grace, his oldest daughter with Wendi, into the private Brearley School.

  • emma

    why exactly was it illegal to charge parents for Mandarin? Many school PTA’s collect funds to add another teacher, when the DOE can’t afford it.  Does anyone have any more detailed info on these nine investigations?

  • emma

    why exactly was it illegal to charge parents for Mandarin? Many school PTA’s collect funds to add another teacher, when the DOE can’t afford it.  Does anyone have any more detailed info on these nine investigations?

  • emma

    why exactly was it illegal to charge parents for Mandarin? Many school PTA’s collect funds to add another teacher, when the DOE can’t afford it.  Does anyone have any more detailed info on these nine investigations?

  • Orbinharrisdr4

    Thank GOD I only have a few more years in this disgusting system filled with lies and money hungry bastards.  Murdoch, Bloomberg, Klein, and more who are JUST CONCERNED about $$$$$.  Minority students EQUAL $$$$$.  That’s it, bottom line.  These guys give each other contracts to make bigtime money.  They are so damn smart and get away with everything because as we are finding out each day, more and more people are on the payroll.  I wonder how many inside deals with $$$$$ have been made to grant contracts to Murdoch and Klein?  The kids are last!  Why in the world is the “slogan” Children First?  It’s the Children Last Network and that’s the truth.
    The Charter schools are mostly cheating to get the best kids in.  The public schools are being pushed out slowly every year.  The kids go to schools an hour away from their homes.  We have networks and divisions and deputies and liasons and principals and assistant principals, and coordinators and much much more.  Thank goodness I moved from the Bronx and was able to get a place in Westchester where my kids go to a school with no “extra chaos.”  3 elementary schools and you go to your zoned school.  No B.S.!  You want to attend a better school, you move to that area, period!  I told my sons teacher to check this Gotham site during the year.  Today I saw him in the market and he told me he put everyone onto it at the school.  They use it as a laughing device while reading these sick stories of destruction concerning the D.O.E. and how it operates against the teachers and against the parents.  We don’t have this problem.  Of course it’s a smaller environment but I mean gimmie a break, this stuff is ludacris! 
    I read several times on here that it’s about survival which is now the reality of the profession.  If you’re lucky enough to land in a school that somehow is getting the “right” kids then you can survive until certain students start attending.  It’s all just a disgrace.  I feel for the parents and kids who have to attend this twisted system which is crumbling right before our eyes. 

  • Ken Hirsh

    I guess Shuang Wen becomes more newsworthy when Rupert Murdoch can be connected to a “scandal-ridden city school”!  Meanwhile, I, too, would love to know more about the nine investigations.  

  • schoolsrimportant

    I understand the parents love Shuang Wen.  Isn’t the mandarin part of an after school program?  Why would it be illegal to charge for an afterschool program?  And how is the Murdochs pledging half a million to a public school be a bad thing?  Just because it’s a Murdoch pledge doesn’t automatically mean it’s corrupt or bad. 

  • emma

    I agree on both points.  I read a few articles alluding to the fact that there were investigations going on at this school, but not one of them discussed what they were investigating.  Weird.

    I visited that school when it was in its second or third year.  I spent several hours there.  It seemed like a well-run school with strong teachers.  I liked what I saw.  This is why I’m so curious about what these allegations are.  I hope it’s not some trumped up, political scenario.

    My brother and sister-in-law contributed to a fund to hire a second teacher for my neice’s class.  This is  a fairly common practice in fairly affluent neighborhoods.  The logic is that it is still less expensive to do that then pay for a private school. 

    If this Mandarin program is a similar situation, this it does sound like this school is being scapegoated. 

  • Anony mouse

    Wendi’s in town?  Lock up Mr. Schlossberg.

  • Cecil Scott

    You are not the only ones who would love to know what the investigations concern.  We Shuang Wen parents have been pleading with the DOE for more than a year to tell us what the charges are and how we can help either get to the bottom of them or put them to rest if there is no basis for them.  During that effort, we have discovered that a shocking number of the investigations concern false allegations.  Some of the investigations have been open for more than two years.  All of them are being used to justify punitive measures (like removal of PA funds from parent control and reassignment of the principal) and misinformation given to the press — some of which is printed in this article.  Not one investigation has been closed.

    Example: DOE is apparently investigating admissions to the school, which they claim are racially discriminatory and controlled by the (now reassigned) principal.  (We learned that from press accounts.)  But DOE has been handling admissions to the school by lottery since 2006.  They seem to be arguing that the school’s 85% Asian majority is a consequence of post-lottery “over the counter” admissions.  So they want us to believe that over-the-counter procedures defeat a perfect racial balance achieved in the lottery, and transform it into an 85% Asian majority.  This doesn’t pass the giggle test.  They just don’t want to take responsibility for the Asian majority or admit that it might just reflect the applicant pool.Most shocking of all, DOE regulations require that the content of complaints be communicated to the targets so that they have an opportunity to respond.  DOE has not complied with its own regulation.  But don’t get me started on that.Finally, we have learned that DOE has been sued in the past for harassing teachers and parents with investigations of false and trumped up charges. It’s just possible that this is the way they force changes on communities that they don’t feel comfortable openly proposing and putting to a parent vote.

  • Cecil Scott

    The DOE fully supported the formation of SWAN, the non-profit organization that founded the Shuang Wen School and continues to administer the after-school.  It was a win-win situation for the DOE.  They did not have to pay for the Mandarin instruction, which would have cost quite a bit more than regular NYC instruction.  The Mandarin instruction was limited to the after-school and paid for by SWAN.  The after-school was represented to be mandatory because the school’s mission was to produce bilingual/bicultural kids.  

    Then the school started doing well, so DOE wanted it to grow and serve more kids.  Understandable enough.  The problem was that funding the free after-school became more and more difficult the larger the school grew.  By 2006, there were more than 550 kids in the school, more than 10 times the number who were enrolled when the school opened in 1998 (42 kindergartners).  The recession hit and made matters worse.  The question became: do we close the after-school because we can’t make it free anymore, or do we keep it open, make it non-mandatory and impose a charge?  SWAN decided to do the latter, and their decision was ratified by the high percentage of parents who decided to continue enrolling their kids in the after-school (about 95%) despite the charge.  SWAN continues to fund-raise, and its work allows the costs of the program to stay low — $1,000 per child for the entire year of 5 days per week instruction from 3:00 to 5:30.  SWAN also offers scholarships and some financial aid.  But the bad press the school has been getting as a result of the DOE’s harassing investigations is making it much harder for SWAN to raise the money for these initiatives.

    Seventy percent of the student body of Shuang Wen qualifies for free lunch, by the way.

    So, to answer your question, it is NOT illegal to impose a charge for a non-mandatory after-school program.  The problem is that apparently some people (and definitely some news reporters) define “mandatory” in their own way, ignoring that several Shuang Wen families opted to withdraw their children from the after-school while it was still free; these families never suffered negative consequences to their kids’ enrollment or academic performance at the school.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829