GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

breaking

Partial teacher evaluation deal clears way for improvement funds

After months of negotiations, the city and teachers union announced a deal today on a set of reforms that will allow the state to claim millions of dollars promised to struggling schools.

The announcement comes a week after the state ramped up pressure on the city to finalize its plans for how to improve its lowest-performing schools. The state’s deadline to complete its application for federal School Improvement Grants is just two weeks away. New York City is eligible for up to $65 million to help 33 “persistently low-achieving” schools undergo one of four processes over the next two years.

The 33 schools will undergo one of two revamp options, “restart” and “transformation,” according to the agreement. Those models are the least aggressive and also the least objectionable for the teachers union: They do not involve removing teachers or asking them to reapply for their jobs. “Restart” assigns a new management organization, and “transformation” replaces the principal and brings in additional resources.

Decisions about which model each of the 33 schools on the list would undergo will be made “over the next week,” according to the city’s press release. Last year, 11 city schools underwent the “transformation” process, and nine schools are undergoing the restart process this fall.

The city’s press release is long on relief but short on specifics other than that the city and union have agreed to implement the state’s new teacher evaluation model — but only in the 33 struggling schools.An impasse over the evaluations had caused the months-long holdup in negotiations. A key sticking point was whether teachers would be allowed to discuss their observations with their principals: The union wanted meetings built into the agreement, but the city said the extra step would add unnecessary delay to the evaluation process. The issue is absent from the city’s press release but union officials said it had been resolved.

Supporters of the state’s toughened teacher evaluations said today’s agreement could be a blueprint for the rest of the city’s schools.

“This agreement is a good first step towards placing highly effective teachers in every classroom, but I urge both sides to institute this evaluation system across the board immediately so that every child has a chance to learn from the city’s best educators,” said Joe Williams, executive director of Democrats for Education Reform, in a statement.

The city’s press release also heralds a performance pay program for teachers at the struggling schools that was finalized more than a year ago. That performance pay program will now be aligned with the state’s teacher evaluation law, and only teachers who fall into the highest of four tiers will be able to occupy higher-paying “master teacher” and “turnaround teacher” positions.

UFT President Michael Mulgrew looked only to the future in the city’s press release. Reiterating the union’s concern that the city has inadequately invested in struggling schools in the past — a concern that fueled the union’s lawsuit to halt 22 school closures — he said the priority is to direct the new federal funds to needy schools and their students.

“This agreement helps lay the groundwork,” Mulgrew said. “Now we have to focus on providing the resources these struggling schools need to make a real difference in the lives of their students.”

AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TEACHERS’ UNION WILL HELP SECURE $65 MILLION IN FEDERAL FUNDS FOR STRUGGLING SCHOOLS

DOE-UFT agreement also includes a new, 4-category teacher evaluation system in these schools

Schools Chancellor Dennis M. Walcott and United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew today announced an important agreement that will help secure up to $65 million over the next two years in federal School Improvement Grants, a U.S. Department of Education program that provides funding to help transform our nation’s struggling schools.  The funding will go to implement either “restart” or “transformation” at 33 City schools identified by the State as persistently lowest achieving (PLA) and therefore at risk of being closed.

“With this agreement, we will be able to bring millions of dollars in federal funding to these struggling schools and recruit top quality teachers to help students succeed and mentor other staff,”  said Chancellor Dennis Walcott. “I also want to thank Michael Mulgrew for his commitment to working with us to implement a more effective and meaningful teacher evaluation system to in these schools.  I believe our collaboration on matters like this is critical to student success.”

UFT President Michael Mulgrew said, “This agreement helps lay the groundwork.  Now we have to focus on providing the resources these struggling schools need to make a real difference in the lives of their students.”

In the 33 schools, the DOE and UFT have also jointly agreed to implement a new teacher evaluation system that is aligned with the State’s new teacher evaluation law.  The evaluation system in these schools will be based on a four-category rating system of highly effective, effective, developing and ineffective, instead of the current system that simply gives teachers a rating of satisfactory or unsatisfactory.

Federal guidelines identify four models for school improvement—a “transformation” model, a “turnaround” model, a “restart” model, and a “closure” model—each  involving different strategies to improve low performing schools.  Last year, 11 of these 33 schools were chosen for “transformation.”

Under the “transformation” model, the principal of the school is generally replaced, and the schools will be able to hire new teachers in the categories “Master Teacher” and “Turnaround Teachers.” A Master Teacher working in a PLA school will receive 30% above their base salary and is expected to serve as a mentor for other teachers in the school, working an additional 100 hours per year.  A Turnaround Teacher working in a PLA school will receive 15% above their base salary and open their classroom up to other teachers to learn best practices, working an additional 30 hours per year.  To remain eligible for either position, teachers must maintain a rating of “highly effective.”

Under the “restart” model, schools will be teamed with a non-profit educational partner organization (EPO) that will work with the principal and school staff to make recommendations on specific interventions to raise student achievement. This model does not require leadership or staff changes, but also allows for the hiring of master and turnaround teachers.  All proposed changes from the EPO will need to conform to collective bargaining agreements.

The City will work with the schools over the next week to determine which model suits the 33 schools best.  The following is the full list of schools:

02M460           WASHINGTON IRVING HIGH SCHOOL
02M500           UNITY CENTER FOR URBAN TECHNOLOGIES
02M615           CHELSEA CAREER AND TECH ED HS
05M685           BREAD & ROSES INTEGRATED ARTS HIGH SCHOOL
08X405           HERBERT H LEHMAN HIGH SCHOOL
08X530           BANANA KELLY HIGH SCHOOL
09X022           JHS 22 JORDAN L MOTT
09X339           IS 339
09X412           BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
10X080           JHS 80 MOSHOLU PARKWAY
10X391           MS 391
10X660           GRACE H DODGE CAREER AND TECH HS
14K126           JOHN ERICSSON MIDDLE SCHOOL 126
14K610           AUTOMOTIVE HIGH SCHOOL
15K136           IS 136 CHARLES O DEWEY
15K429           SCHOOL FOR GLOBAL STUDIES
15K519           COBBLE HILL SCHOOL OF AMERICAN STUDIES
16K455           BOYS & GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL
19K166           JHS 166 GEORGE GERSHWIN
20K505           FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT HIGH SCHOOL
21K540           JOHN DEWEY HIGH SCHOOL
21K620           WILLIAM E GRADY VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
22K495           SHEEPSHEAD BAY HIGH SCHOOL
32K564           BUSHWICK COMM HIGH SCHOOL
24Q455           NEWTOWN HIGH SCHOOL
24Q485           GROVER CLEVELAND HIGH SCHOOL
24Q600           QUEENS VOCATIONAL & TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOL
25Q460           FLUSHING HIGH SCHOOL
27Q400           AUGUST MARTIN HIGH SCHOOL
27Q475           RICHMOND HILL HIGH SCHOOL
27Q480           JOHN ADAMS HIGH SCHOOL
30Q445           WILLIAM CULLEN BRYANT HIGH SCHOOL
30Q450           LONG ISLAND CITY HIGH SCHOOL

  • Davidcbloomfield

    Anyone asking why, after 10 years of this administration, so many — and more — schools are failing?

  • Ralph

    Curious… my school is one this list and we were already told by our administration that we are getting the restart model.  Does this mean that could change?

  • bee

    Excellent question, alas, one that will probably not be answered truthfully.

  • Ralph

    Those of us in the classroom and some administration certainly know why this mess has happened… but we don’t have any say in how to properly change it… just like we have no say in this agreement between the union and Bloomberg.

  • http://nyceducator.com/ NYC Educator

    So we get 65 million bucks, and all we have to do is enact an unproven evaluation system based on methods that have proven not to work elsewhere? Are we allowed to use the money to improve schools or must it be devoted to “reforms?”

  • Francis

    Re Newly Modified and Agreed Upon Teacher Evaluation System for Just 33 of the  NYC Public Schools

    A note for the public record.

    The latest NYS teacher evaluation system was put into place by the NYS Legislature and NYS Education officials when it became obvious that the Seniority Law could not be eliminated as Mayor Bloomberg had wished due to the lack of votes in the State Legislature and across-the-board consensus on its proposal to layoff teachers and other professionals in the New York City Public Schools.
    Accordingly the teacher evaluation system in question is for all intents and purposes an instrument designed to do away with teachers for budgetary concerns.
    Besides, the teacher evaluation system is plainly predicated upon the premise that our educators are full blown professionals since no step- by -step process on how teachers can perform effectively, highly effective or can achieve maximum professional efficiency is outlined in the document. The observation herein is the supervisor’s way or the highway for our educators in this 21st century and quite frankly it did not have to be like that. It comes down to let’s hold the educators accountable for all our social ills if need be. Put it another way the incoming teacher evaluation system is unambiguously a state-sponsored machination to fire educators regardless of rank.

    Tweed/NYC DOE is now formulating a rubric in association with the teacher evaluation system for our educators but rubric will not do any good to us if we do not have videotaped lessons of effective or highly effective teachings from school -based supervisors who are or will be involved in observing our educators.

    Talk and recommendations on observation report are cheap instead show us “how” on videotape of your effectively-rated lesson in my field/subject area as an example. Videotaped lessons of the school-based supervisor/s as well as evidence of her/his academic background in the area/s of observation will help us otherwise it will still be an exercise in futility.

  • Ms. A

    I ask that question every single day David! I think the answer is transparent for all to see.

    I have another question: Why is every school that has been targeted for “restart” or “transformation” on the secondary level? 

    Any competent educator can tell you that children do not begin to struggle academically on the secondary level. This is and will continue to be a waste of resources. Why isn’t this money/effort being used for early intervention/prevention, universal Pre-K, etc….?
    This plan of action is completely asinine, short-sighted and it’s only purpose is perpetuate failure. Sickening.

  • http://www.accountabletalk.com/ Mr. A. Talk

    Does this mean that the teacher evaluation model will NOT be implemented in the rest of the city’s schools?

  • Vote NO!

    This  means  that  the  majority  of  teachers  in  those  33  schools  will  be  on  their  way  to  the  “unemployment  line”  in  2  to  4  years.  This  evaluation  system  is  not  there  to  do  anything  but  FIRE  teachers.  The  vast  majority  of  the  teachers  will  be  rated  “developing”  or  “Ineffective”  based  upon  the  rubric  the  Regents established  in  May.  NYSUT  went  to  court  to  stop  the  implementation  of  the  new  evaluation  system.  Why  is  the  UFT  “making  deals”  when  the  state  union  is  in  court  to  stop  the  May  Rubric   for  the  new  evaluation?

  • I noticed that…

    I am confused by the union’s move to allow this deal with the DoE.  Does it mean that NYSUT went to court for the counties that does not include NYC county?  If NYSUT wins the lawsuit does it mean that NYC will have to implement the new evaluation system?   Why is the union making deals with the DoE when they are notorious for their underhanded tactics of not keeping their end of the deal? 

  • http://profiles.google.com/grantwriter119 katherine mancuso

     Before becoming a grant writer, I worked as a teacher for 12 years and will never forget how difficult it was in the beginning.   This is especially true in a time in history when teachers are once again being knocked around in the media.  If you know of any new or veteran teachers who need inspiration, please tell them about my new book, My Mother Killed Christ: But God Loves Me Anyway.  It’s my memoir as a Catholic school girl who was raised by a mentally ill mother who believed she killed Jesus.  I get so tired of hearing the 24-hour media whining about how to improve education to better serve at-risk children.  More testing is not the answer.   My brothers and sisters and I grew up on welfare, with a mentally ill mother and an absentee father.  When we were teens and my mother was committed again and again to mental institutions, we had to steal food, clothing and toiletries to survive.  Yet, today, we have all broken the cycle of poverty and abuse for ourselves and our children.  How? We had exceptional teachers.  They didn’t just dispense facts.  Instead, they provided opportunities for us to confirm our self worth.  Money is not what is needed to improve education.  Making it possible for caring, competent teachers to make a meaningful connection with EVERY child in the classroom makes all the difference. A high school teacher’s few positive comments scribbled in my weekly journal were enough to sustain me for a week. Soon, one week led to another and before I knew it, I was graduating from college.  This magical connection in the classroom can never be measured by a standardized test.
     
    Please spread the word about the magic of teachers.
     

  • Ms D

    That is so true Ms. A. As an educator who has worked both in elementary and middle schools, “struggling” students have been allowed to move to the next level because of a system that says all a student has to do is receive a level 2 on the state test and they get move on to the next grade. As a result, many of these students get to high school, and it appears as if the high schools are doing these students an injustice……

  • guest

    Great to see some progress here.  I think this is a big win for students, and for teachers who want to advance but aren’t interested in administration.  30% salary increase is significant.  Congrats to UFT and DOE.

  • http://www.grants-scholarships.com grants for college students

    Seems like the United Federation of Teachers finally came through with this deal. It is a pitty that so little is done to secure the school system. Some of the will need it more than other but, I thing the size of the fund, although it seems huge will be far from enough to fix all the problems. As stated on http://www.grants-scholarships.com the volume of school funds are much higher (relative) in other cities and europe. But it is a start

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

1 comment so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031