GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

next big thing

Momentum growing for new ‘core’ standards and their architect

David Coleman presenting to principals. View his talk here.

A couple of weekends ago, with temperatures climbing toward 90 degrees, 1,400 school administrators stuffed into a non-air conditioned high school auditorium and listened to education officials talk policy.

“Energetic” isn’t the first thing that springs to mind from that scene, but that’s just how Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott and other attending principals characterized it yesterday.

“The energy in that room was off the chart. Truly off the chart,” Walcott said on NY1 last night. He and principals had described the event in similar terms at a press conference earlier in the day.

So what exactly went on inside Brooklyn Technical High School during the June 4 conference for principals?

Besides a virtuoso performance by an all-freshman string quartet to welcome the audience, much of the excitement surrounded a presentation by David Coleman, a charismatic and self-effacing speaker who helped write the new academic standards being rolled out by the Department of Education.

Coleman, a public school product who attended P.S. 41, I.S. 70 and Stuyvesant High School in Manhattan, is the founder and CEO of Student Achievement Partners, LLC, a kind-of think tank of education leaders to improve student achievement. His standards, known as Common Core, have been adopted by 48 states and he spends much of his time promoting them in speeches to principals and administrators. A video of a presentation he made in April has been shown during teacher training sessions in schools across the city.

Coleman joined the DOE’s chief academic officer, Shael Polakow-Suransky, and education consultant Charlotte Danielson at the conference to form a trio of heavyweights whose vision will help steer education policy in New York City over the next several years. The city is using Danielson’s “Framework for Teaching” to guide its new teaching standards.

Coleman’s presentation touched on Common Core’s specific demands, such as a deeper focus on just a couple of math topics per school year and a greater emphasis on informational text readings versus literary text. Students, he said, should be able to “read like a detective and write like an investigative reporter” if they are proficient in Common Core standards.

Watch the whole thing here.

  • Curioso

    This is the kind of article that should spur conversation on GS–not mean spirited barbs against charters, E4E or TFA. This is the future whether you like it or not. Teacher performance will be tied to these results.

    What do you say to well-reasoned and efficient demands made for student achievement? What is wrong with this model? I only ask because I am seriously debating the ideas presented by Mr. Coleman.

  • not so dumbo

    I find little to disagree with in the Common Core and Coleman is a compelling and disarming speaker, but there is a lot of mystery about how one teaches students to reach these standards, and there is an education industrial complex that is developing ways to teach to the Core and make billions of dollars. Rather than continue down the Race to the Top path, we should push Duncan and Gates to produce an engaging curricula that schools and teachers can use free of charge if they so choose. Klein is poised and ready to capitalize on the CC as is Pearson. That is not what is best for our public schools children. Keep the money in the hands of the people. Not lining Rupert Murdoch’s pocket.

  • Diana Senechal

     was a bit startled by Charlotte Danielson’s statement, near the beginning of her speech, “It would take breathtaking audacity to say right now the specific content of what we would want our students to know 25 years from know, 40 years from now, when they’ll still be in the workforce. It would take breathtaking audacity. And so, we have to of course teach them things, but mostly what the Common Core standards are asking us to teach are the tools, the tools of learning, the tools of generating new knowledge….”
     
    The standards focus on tools for a simple reason: they leave it to the curricula to specify the knowledge. This does not imply the superiority of tools, nor does it mean that there’s any arrogance in requiring students to know certain things. 
     

  • Pingback: » Common Core Director to You: “No One Gives a S**t What You Think or Feel.” The Line

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

3 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031