GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

timing

City to renew $4.5 million contract with Wireless Generation

New York City’s Department of Education already has contracts with Wireless Generation — a Brooklyn-based education technology company — but the timing of this latest one is bound to cause a stir, fairly or not.

About six months after former Schools Chancellor Joel Klein joined News Corporation and the company bought Wireless Generation, the DOE plans to renew a $4.5 million contract — $1.5 million a year for three years. The document describing the contract says only that it is for “published and copyrighted assessment and testing materials.” A spokesperson for the DOE said a fuller description of the contract was still being written and would not be available until several days before the Panel for Educational Policy meeting on May 18, when the contract will be voted on. She said the city has been using Wireless Generation’s software for seven years and is voting to renew a long-standing contract.

[Update 5/5/11]: Wireless Generation spokeswoman Andrea Reibel said that the contract permits schools to purchase assessment software from the company. The software allows teachers to watch their students as they read or work on math problems and enter their observations into a program on a mobile device that can then sort and analyze the data.

“The $1.5 million is their [the DOE's] estimate of what the expenditure is likely to be so they can provide the Panel for Educational Policy with a sense of how much money we’re talking about,” Reibel said.

“It’s all dependent on how many schools purchase the software; there’s no guarantee there.”

When it was announced last November that News Corporation would acquire 90 percent of Wireless Generation, the New York Times wrote that conflict of interest laws would bar Klein from handling any business between the city and Wireless Generation. The paper noted:

City employees are never allowed to disclose confidential information about the city’s business dealings or future strategy, and they cannot communicate with the agency for which they worked for one year after they leave. The rules also bar them from ever working on matters they had substantial involvement in as city employees.

The contract description from the Panel for Educational Policy May 18th agenda:

  • HDoaneWatson

    Another conflict of interest: The School of One Contract should also be given close scrutiny. It is now an NFP corporation but was started by and funded within the DOE. Now it is run by a former DOE Deputy and has received $4.5 million in funding from the city and an equal amount from the Feds. Wireless Generation is just one of its corporate partners.

  • noryeln

    I wonder if the unnamed individual described as a “higg official” in the DOE is none other than our former Chancellor?

  • noryeln

    sorry
    “high official”

  • http://www.anurbanteacherseducation.com The Reflective Educator

    It’s stuff like this that killed my idealist nature.

  • Anonymous

    why not just sell our schools to Murdoch, Klein, Gates and Pearson to run and put us out of our misery?

  • http://profiles.google.com/patk.j.sullivan Patrick Sullivan

    looks like Joel’s company is seeking 1.5 x 3 years = 4.5 million

  • Anonymous

    Patrick’s right; you ought to change your headline.

  • JUNEJULYAUGUST

    I LOVE IT. WHAT A GREAT COUNTRY WE LIVE IN. YOU CAN DO WHATEVER YOU WANT AS LONG AS YOU GOT $$$$$$$. THE FUNNIEST PART IS THAT IT CAN BE DONE OUT IT THE OPEN LIKE “HEY HEY” WHAT ARE YA GOING TO DO ABOUT IT???? NOTHING!!!!!!!

  • chris

    This is an absolute sham. The fact that this is happening shows the complete disdain that the DOE has for the people of NYC. They are essentially saying that they don’t give a rat’s arse what is right. I hope Klein, Bloomberg, Gates, Moscowitz, Rhee, Duncan, and all these other arse clowns get what they deserve. What a bunch of garbage.

  • bee

    It’s reprehensible, unethical, and dishonest. It’s alarming that this type of behavior is the hallmark of our profiteer pseudo-education leaders, and that we seem to be powerless to stop it. Stop it we must!

  • Landparent

    Why do the conflict of interest rules only apply to some and not others? It’s sickening.

  • http://www.dianasenechal.com Diana Senechal

    And what about the intended use of these funds? Software that “allows teachers to watch their students as they read or work on math problems and enter their observations into a program on a mobile device that can then sort out and analyze the data?” Who says teachers want their classrooms to be turned into psychology labs?

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Leonie,

    “Why not just sell the schools to Murdoch,Klein, Gates and Pearson…?

    But why should they pay for something that Bloomberg (and Emmanuel, Booker and their ilk) are eager to give them for free?

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

25 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930