GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Running the Gauntlet

Persistence Through Failure

One of the hardest parts of being a new teacher is that you inevitably feel like a failure. It’s impossible not to, in those rare reflective moments when you are honest with yourself. Why? Because teaching is so incredibly complex, and the demands so overwhemingly urgent, that until you’ve gained the capacity to competently manage all the sundry daily tasks, you are struggling merely to keep your nose above the water.

Let me frame this from my personal perspective: I teach all subjects, every day. In order to teach something, you have to be capable of breaking down concepts to their fundamental components, most especially for students with exceptional learning needs and who are English language learners. Do you feel qualified to do that in every aspect of math, science, social studies, reading, and writing (and social skills, organizational skills, self-regulatory skills — if we acknowledge the “hidden curriculum”)? Yeah, neither do I. So while I might be good at teaching certain concepts, in some areas I just don’t have the capacity nor training yet to truly excel. I will, with time. But that will take focus, professional development, curriculum development and adaptation, and research.

So in the meantime, I often just feel like a failure. My students need so much from me, and I can’t always give them everything they require. This is a terrible feeling, and I believe it is one of the main causes of new teacher burnout (for ideas on retaining teachers, read Stephen Lazar’s excellent suggestions). I’ve known new teachers who have left the classroom because they could not deal with this overwhelming sense of failure. This is not because of a lack of dedication. Nor is it due to a lack of academic ability. I have a sense of failure because 1) I don’t have the experience yet to be a pedagogical and content master of all subject areas; 2) I don’t have the therapeutic experience yet to address all of my students’ social-emotional needs; and 3) I’m not Superman.

But something I’ve been thinking about is that it’s OK to be a failure —most especially in your first years of teaching. How could you not be? In a field that combines such a dynamic and vast range of skills — from time management, to organizational systems, to data analysis, to developmental psychology, to therapy, to leadership, and so on, ad nauseam (fill in any professional skill you can think of here) — there is no way you can be a master of all areas, even after a lifetime of dedicated service. It’s that complex.

Learning is fundamentally about persistence through failure. In “We Were Born to Learn,” Rita Smilkstein presents research that supports the premise that all children are naturally capable learners, needing only practice and effort in order to develop. I presented this brain research and information to my students at the beginning of the year, and they responded positively to the idea that they are capable, natural-born learners. Students with exceptional learning needs are acutely aware (thanks to the inevitable callousness of other students) that they are labeled as “special ed,” and it affects their self-perceptions greatly. They need their natural abilities and strengths to be affirmed. They need to be reminded that it is only through practice over time that we can become better — and smarter — at anything.

Smilkstein lists in her book fundamental learnings from neurological research, and the one that most stands out the most to me is that to practice anything is fundamentally about “making mistakes, correcting mistakes, learning from them, and trying over, again and again.” In other words, if we aren’t making mistakes, then we’re not learning anything.

Deborah Meier, in her book on trust in schools, puts it this way:

There is no way to avoid doing something dumb when you are inexperienced or lacking in knowledge, except by not trying at all, insisting you don’t care or aren’t interested, thinking the task itself is dumb (not you), or trying secretly so no one can catch your mistakes — or offer you useful feedback. Of course, these are the excuses we drive most kids into when they don’t trust us enough to make mistakes in our presence.

As a teacher, I have to have the humility to acknowledge that I am not always the master of content and knowledge in my own classroom. I am learning alongside my students. I make mistakes, and I have to be willing to point out that I have made a mistake, and what I have learned from it. Sometimes, I have to admit that I don’t know how to explain a concept better, or that I don’t know how to best deal with a situation. It also means that I have to be willing to listen to my students — really listen, not just focus on the objective of my lesson. Students are constantly telling me what they need to learn, but most often I don’t really hear it, because I’m just trying to get to the “right” answer so I can move on in my agenda for the day.

Learning takes time, and it takes a lot of effort — both on the part of teachers and of students. And we have to be willing to risk failure. The important part of learning is not that we fail, nor even that we fail over and over again. The important part is that we persist. And with time and the proper support, anyone can get better.

  • Gideon

    Great post. In an ideal world, new teachers would get to team teach with more experienced teachers for a couple of years with a gradual release of responsibility so there was room to make mistakes and learn while ensuring the kids still get the support they need. In the current system, it is often the kids who need the best teachers who are taught by the new teachers still learning to teach. Also, new teachers need frequent observation and feedback so they have some help identifying the mistakes they don’t even know they’re making. How can a new teacher learn if she doesn’t know what she doesn’t know.

  • Ruben

    I thought about this constantly during my first year of teaching, and continue to wonder how we can make the first year more of a success for teachers and for the students in their classrooms. I really like the idea of a co-teaching scenario where a new teacher shares the responsibility. I envision either a setting where two new teachers share a classroom, with consistent professional mentoring or a new teacher with a mentor teacher who is only there to help and support, but not to run the classroom. Either seems like a better model than what we’re doing now.

  • Anonymous

    Reassure yourself that, for a substantial portion of the children you teach (though this is a smaller proportion than when I was a child), they’ll survive your inexperience perfectly well. It will even be part of the learning experience, for them, that you’re not 100% in all the ways that it would be good to be. It will make demands on them that they will rise to. I had plenty of first-year teachers as a kid (born in 1946, ever5y schol I went to scrambled desperately to find the number of new wteachers needed to accomodate the leading edge of the baby boom. Some, like your colleague, left after one year (or in one memorable case, halfway through the year.

  • nophcora

    Amen. =) Great post! So true!

  • Sick of Bloomberg

    “Rita Smilkstein presents research that supports the premise that all children are naturally capable learners, needing only practice and effort in order to develop.” Unfortunately, it is fundamentally flawed statements such as this one that contribute to the difficulty of the teaching profession. Although we would need a small book to explain the logical errors in this statement, let’s sum it up with the addendum, “in a perfect world.”. Also, you should be aware that the current culture in the DOE is one of creatng feelings of failure even in experienced teachers. They call it “keeping teachers out of their comfort zone”. It’s basically psychological abuse. You are correct about persistence, but that must be tempered with an awareness of reality. We do a major disservice to children by giving them false ideas of success. The fact is that everyone does not succeed in this life and that we all do not succeed, when we do, along the same path or timeline. K-12 education is full of boundaries by nature and yet expects all students to end up at the same place. That is fantasy and will never be achieved. The system has also moved al of the responsibility for learning from the student and placed it on the teacher. That is impractical. Finally, mistakes without consequences, a situation that exists in NYC schools, do not yield learning experiences. Education in NYC has begun to resemble video games where you get 1,000 lives and anytime you make a mistake you just access another “life” and all is well. If only the real world were like that!!

  • http://www.outsidethecave.org/ Stephen Lazar

    Nice post, Mark. I’ve been thinking about trying to write something that captures just how complex any given minute of teaching can be. It takes time, but it’s worth the struggle of the first few years.

  • http://bubbler.wordpress.com/ Mark

    Thanks, Stephen. I would love to see a piece that addresses the insider play-by-play of pedagogy, so that people can understand just how complex it really is!

  • Jeanne Dodd

    Excellent article! I just completed my final internship and really was considering not pursuing teaching. The inadequacy can be overwhelming.

  • Pingback: Curriculum « Manderson's Bubble

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

1 comment so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031