GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Classroom tales: A diary

Why Teachers Like Me Support Unions: An E4E Take on Edusolidarity

This post is one of many published as part of the #EDUSolidarity project.

There are plenty of times when I disagree with Michael Mulgrew and the UFT. There have been more than a few occasions in conversations about teaching when I’ve had to admit my own confusion or frustration with the union. But these instances will never change the fact that I am a proud supporter of the teachers union.

In a bizarre era where policy experts are calling attention to the need to attract better teachers while policy makers simultaneously decry our “lavish” benefits, the need for a strong union becomes increasingly acute. The blatant attacks on collective bargaining rights in Wisconsin and elsewhere do nothing to improve education. During such a time, I am grateful for the hard-fought union battles of the past that protect me from discrimination, support my instruction and planning, and encourage my professional development.

When I think of one of the most vital roles of the union however, I think of the protections that allow me to advocate for my students. At a school with more than 33 percent of students requiring special education services and an even larger number who are considered English language learners, I understand how crucial it is that I can speak up for these students if they aren’t getting legally mandated services. This is arguably the foremost job of a teacher, to speak up for his or her students. By protecting teachers who do this, the union is protecting the city’s neediest children. The union is at its best when it is in this role.

I know I don’t see eye to eye with the UFT on every issue. I don’t agree with LIFO. I think in the past tenure has been granted too swiftly and easily. In other areas, like the need for a stronger evaluation system, I hope the union will take more of a leadership role to create a system that differentiates more clearly between our best and worst teachers and provides feedback to help the latter group change their practice.

I think these changes will elevate the status of teachers, but also create better classrooms for our students. I know the union has an indispensable role in the future of education reform. In the meantime, I am grateful for the freedoms the union provides me that make me a better teacher to my students. I’m equally thankful to be a part of a group that welcomes discussion within its ranks. The debates within our group can only make us stronger.

  • Mustafa

    “The blatant attacks on collective bargaining rights in Wisconsin and elsewhere do nothing to improve education.”

    That’s funny, E$E is doing just that in NYC.

    You’re too new to the system to realize it and you’re blindly following the agenda of hedge fund people who don’t have benevolent intentions and have never stepped into a public school.

    Ruben, again I’ll ask, do Evan and Sidney each make over $100,000 a year? And if so, in your opinion do they deserve it?

  • BronxEnglish

    The amazing thing, Ruben, is that you behave as though the union has anything to do with the granting of tenure. For the billionth time. . . tenure is not a guarantee of lifetime employment. Tenure is granted by the ADMINISTRATION. Tenure can be withheld at any time. Indeed, every colleague I have EVER discussed this issue with agrees that we all wish administration would actually not grant tenure to incompetent, uncaring teachers who are literally there for the paycheck. (And believe me. . .as a thirteen-year veteran. . . these incompetents are few and far between. I know of exactly FOUR. Of 400+ teachers I’ve worked with. To find these incompetent, idiotic boobs, all you have to do is to conduct a thorough survey of students. Every student in a school knows who teaches, and who is an incompetent jackass.)

    UNIONS ROCK (although the UFT needs major work).

  • http://thejosevilson.com Jose

    Let me say for the record that, as someone who helped organize the EDUsolidarity project, we respect that you respect the #EDUsolidarity project. However, from everything I’ve seen from E$E (appropriate because when you hit shift+4, you get $), you really want to take down the union, not actually help it progress. You and your group have made it so a discussion proliferates between younger and older teachers would rift, not amend, the tenuous relationship between younger and older teachers in our system. As a younger teacher, I’m disappointed that your group also aligns itself unabashedly with anyone willing to corrupt our (albeit not perfect) union.

    While we welcomed anyone to contribute to EDUsolidarity, please note that, as divergent as our opinions are, our main message and works support a general collective bent on producing more collectivity. I’m afraid yours promotes quite the opposite.

  • Mustafa

    Bravo, Jose!

  • http://www.outsidethecave.org/ Stephen Lazar

    Ruben – I’d like to ask you a question about this post off the record before I publicly respond. My email is my first name dot my last name at bronxlabschool.org. Please give me a way to get in touch with you.

  • Ruben

    Hi Jose,

    Thanks for your comments. I’m a big fan of your writing, so thanks for your feedback. I have to disagree with your characterization of E4E however. Personally, I don’t think that the relationship between senior and newer teachers is strengthened by the current layoff system. In fact, I think when newer teachers look around and see that senior teachers are protected regardless of performance, it breeds resentment, rather than respect.

    Meanwhile, I have nothing but respect for the veteran teachers who continue to work hard and refine their craft. I have benefited immensely from the help of veteran teachers in my short time in the classroom. Changing the layoff law is not about attacking veteran teachers (as I’ve said before). Rather, it’s about finding a better system based on performance rather than “time served”.

  • Ruben

    Mustafa,

    I don’t know Evan and Sidney’s salary sorry, but I don’t believe it’s considerably more than their salaries as teachers. Either way, I don’t think it’s relevant to this conversation. I also disagree that E4E’s agenda is at all equivalent to Gov. Walker’s assaults on worker’s rights in Wisconsin. Changing the layoff system is not comparable to outright dismemberment of worker’s rights.

  • KatzB

    NOTHING is changing people. E4E is a bunch of jokers who think they’re going somewhere special. You bitches aint going anywhere except back into your nasty ass classroom within your unionized building. Laughing stock!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    As usual, Ruben Brosbe is grossly uninformed.

    Tenure predates the union’s collective bargaining rights by decades, and is embedded in state law, not the union contract.

    Second, what Evan and Sidney and their fellow fifth columnists earn at ME$ME is far less important than who pays them and calls the tunes they dance to: Bill Gates and the hedge funders behind Ed Reform Now. Their approach to destroying the union and teacher rights – despite Ruben’s late and perfunctory nod to them – is stealthier than Walker’s, but not much different.

  • Mikb79

    Listen things change in life and you never expect it to happen. Family members get sick you have a disagreement with administrators you have an arguement with another staff member. So many things can change.One thing stays the same the protection you get from the union. They will defend you at all times. To weaken them by negociating things that should be done by the experts puts others in harms way. You need to look very closely at what is happening at this time in other states. Why would you give away rights that are being taken away in other places. No one sees eye to eye with everything the union does but it will be there when you need it.

  • Mikb79

    One more thing When you get into trouble and it will happen. Who are you going to call to help you? Bloomberg, Klein, Black, Rhee, Gates I know the answer and so do you.

  • http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ Norm

    A teacher advocates for their children. Who does that teacher advocate with? Most often the principal. Who most often gets pissed off at advocating teacher- with threat of U rating to follow if teacher doesn’t stop advocating for children. E4E’s answer? Fire that teacher.

    “I don’t think that the relationship between senior and newer teachers is strengthened by the current layoff system. In fact, I think when newer teachers look around and see that senior teachers are protected regardless of performance, it breeds resentment, rather than respect. Meanwhile, I have nothing but respect for the veteran teachers who continue to work hard and refine their craft. I have benefited immensely from the help of veteran teachers in my short time in the classroom.”

    A misleading lack of logic on Ruben’s part. In fact LIFO protects newer teachers as much as senior teachers. A third year teacher gets priority over a first year teacher. And gets called back in the order of layoff. E$E is trying to exploit the vulnerability of newer teachers through the Gates/DFER funded political, having nothing to do with education) campaign.

    If Ruben has such respect for vet teachers “who continue to work hard and refine their craft” he must be talking about vet teachers who do not work hard and continue to refine their craft. Where are these people? Does he know them from his own school? Or is he talking from theory – that they must exist because Bill Gates and Bloomberg tell him they exist. And where are their principals (or principles)? Where is Ruben’s principal if these vets exist in his school?

    Read about E$E coming to your school? at today’s posting at ed notes.

  • http://twitter.com/SoBronxSchool Bronx Teacher

    Hmmmmm

  • http://twitter.com/SoBronxSchool Bronx Teacher

    southbronxschool.blogspot.com/2011/03/two-faced-ramblings-of-e4es-ruben.html

  • http://twitter.com/SoBronxSchool Bronx Teacher

    Whoa! I knew I just typed something? Where did it go? OK, I’ll do it again.

    Ruben, it is time for you to be honest……

    What exactly is your role with E4E?

    Other than the Gates Foundation, what other sources has E4E solicited, received monies from?

    Have you ever solicited monies for E4E?

    How many teachers at your school have signed a loyalty oath to E4E?

    At what point will you, of course with names redacted, share the score of your students?

  • Miss Eyre

    I disagree. I think it’s very relevant. I think it’s also highly problematic that E4E refuses to reveal its funding sources. I’d like to know if it is registered as a 501(c)(3), a PAC, what have you.

    For the record, I don’t much care if they’re making seven figures, but I think they should be honest about they’re coming by the money.

  • Mustafa

    What exactly is Ruben’s role with E$E?

    Good question.

    He titled his piece “Why Teachers Like Me Support Unions: An E4E Take on Edusolidarity”. Did he have to get Evan and Sidney’s permission for that? Is he the official new E$E blogger?

  • Smith

    What happened to my comments?

  • http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ Norm

    Hey Ruben, E4E argues this teacher should be fired:

    UFT chapter leader at Brooklyn school attached by principal in an incredibly ugly smear campaign:

    The Manhattan district attorney’s office, state Human Rights Commission and teachers union are all investigating the anonymous letter. But Department of Education lawyers argue there is “no evidence of a hostile work environment” and have asked the human rights commission to drop the case.

    http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/136187/ny1-exclusive–city-principal-investigated-in-retaliation-probe

    So many chapter leaders seem to be under attack; one wonders what the UFT strategy is on this.

    03/24/2011 08:13 PM
    NY1 Exclusive: City Principal Investigated In Retaliation Probe

    By: Lindsey Christ

    A veteran public school principal is under investigation for allegedly attempting to smear one of his teachers through a hate-filled letter.
    Last June, an anonymous letter was sent to the managers of Michael McPherrin’s co-op. It contained ugly allegations against McPherrin, a public school teacher, and his longtime partner Andre Lopes.

    “As you read, your jaw just keeps dropping because it just gets worse,” McPherrin said.

    There were private details, like the couple’s HIV and immigration status, as well as allegations of drug use and pedophilia. It said, in part:

    “The talk of the building is that both Mike and illegal immigrant Andre suffer from full blown AIDS and have no problem infecting others including the underage boys they bring to the apartment.”

    “This was an attempt to destroy our lives and me professionally,” McPherrin said.

    The writer claimed to represent concerned residents, but the building management called it “anonymous hate mail” and wrote McPherrin that, “our records indicate there are no complaints against you or your partner.”

    McPherrin says he knows who sent it: his boss, Ron Smolkin, the principal of Independence High School in Manhattan.

    Since the addresses on the anonymous letters were handwritten, McPherrin hired a handwriting analyst who found it “highly likely” they matched samples of handwriting McPherrin said were Smolkin’s. Then, there was the information in the notes.

    “That we are HIV positive. That Andre has an outstanding immigration issue. That we have a second residence. The social security number. That information could’ve only been gotten from my personnel file,” McPherrin said.

    McPherrin says his trouble with Smolkin started after he became the teacher’s union rep and organized staff members concerned about Smolkin’s leadership.

    “He has a history of retaliatory vindictive actions,” McPherrin said.

    Other staff members at the school make the same charge. In one case, a judge ruled Smolkin falsely accused a school aide of an assault inside the building and fired her without benefits. A former assistant principal says Smolkin had her removed on trumped-up charges after they hadn’t been getting along. Current staff members also gave NY1 other examples — off the record — saying they were afraid of further retaliation.

    The Manhattan district attorney’s office, state Human Rights Commission and teachers union are all investigating the anonymous letter. But Department of Education lawyers argue there is “no evidence of a hostile work environment” and have asked the human rights commission to drop the case.

    Smolkin would not speak with NY1 on the record but through a lawyer says he denies the allegations. Also, the DOE and the groups investigating him all have policies against speaking on the record about ongoing cases.

    Meanwhile, McPherrin says the principal continues to target him and has slapped him with four disciplinary charges this school year. He says they’re the first in his 23 years of teaching.

  • GC

    Go down to the 7th Floor at 65 Court St. and see what happens when seniority rules and tenure are not applicable to teachers who advocate for children without the approval of the administration. It’s called a discontinuence hearing. Seniority rules are the keystone of the arch of unionism; if that stone is taken out, the entire edifice collapses.

  • Mustafa

    Ruben, your group and Governor Walker are both being funded by the same people. Yes, it’s an equivalent analogy.

  • http://twitter.com/SoBronxSchool Bronx Teacher

    What happened to my link? It was on topic.

  • Pingback: You Don’t Stand With Us: My Response to an #EDUSolidarity Highjacking Attempt « Outside the Cave

  • http://www.outsidethecave.org/ Stephen Lazar
  • ex teacher

    could not agree more. spot on.

  • Mustafa

    Well said, Stephen. I love how you pointed out the differences between those of us who have chosen to be career educators/activists and those in E$E who see the profession as a stepping stone to something else.

    Bravo!

    Ruben has been PWNED!

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

15 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031