GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

he said/he said

UFT: City changed its mind mid-teacher evaluation talks

Teachers union officials fought back today against the city’s claim that they’re delaying negotiations over a new teacher evaluation system.

Responding to a story in the New York Post about the stalled talks over a pilot teacher evaluation program in 11 schools, union officials said negotiations were progressing smoothly until city school officials decided to turn one aspect of the evaluation system into a sticking point.

According to United Federation of Teachers Secretary Michael Mendel, when talks began last summer, he told city officials that the union would not agree to let teachers’ first evaluation under the new system affect their job security. But after the first year, if a teacher received two “ineffective” ratings in a row, the termination process would begin.

“I said we can’t attach any high stakes to the ratings in the first year because it’s a pilot, it’s a brand new thing,” Mendel said. “They [city officials] never said a word. We went along and negotiated under the assumption that they didn’t disagree,” he said.

Months later, city officials revived the “ineffective” ratings issue, Mendel said. This time they demanded that a teacher’s “ineffective” evaluation during the first year count toward eventual termination.

City officials said today that the union doesn’t understand the urgency of getting bad teachers out of these schools.

“They’ve been perfectly happy to sit down and negotiate, they’ll talk to you all day, but what they haven’t been willing to do is to negotiate an evaluation system to remove ineffective teachers,” an official said.

The two sides have had better luck negotiating the rubric that the 11 transformation schools will use to judge their teachers. But on other topics, they haven’t seen as much progress. Mendel said that the city and union still have to work out an agreement outlining how many times transformation teachers will be formally observed, and they also have no agreement on what the “local assessments” that count for 20 percent of a teacher’s evaluation will be.

  • Ralph

    Do we know which schools these eleven are?

  • Invictus

    The 11 schools chosen for the ‘transformational’ model of the restructuring choices.

  • Mustafa

    So Deputy Chancellor, and TFA alumni with a whole two years in the classroom, John White lied to the Post and they printed it like it was the gospel? Say it isn’t so!

    Seriously, they’re all a bunch of liars and yes men. How about we layoff some of these Deputy Chancellors?

    Better yet, GS should run a contest, give the best creative response to this and win coffee at Starbucks with the lovely (and I mean that sincerely) Liz Green. Here goes…

    How many Deputy Chancellors does it take to screw in a PCB contaminated lightbulb?

    (Answer away!)

  • Ralph

    Oh yeah, the eleven announced last May or June right? I’m still awaiting which model my school will be using; that announcement comes May 1st. I love how Bloomberg says he wants to give teachers enough time to find a new job in September when it comes to his political policies, yet the 200 teachers in my school have to wait until at least May for our fate as a P.L.A. school. Thus, if we get the turnaround model, there’s another 200 atr’s from one building.

  • michael

    To all the parents reading these articles. Eventually, there will no longer be any experienced teachers left in the system. If the DOE gets their way your children will be taught by inexperienced teachers just getting out of college. It takes a teacher almost 3 years to understand the fundamentals of teaching in a urban setting. Picture that.

  • Neil Friedman

    What does the D.O. E really want? Dr. Freud where are you? Does the Mayor really expect us to believe that it is the union that is unwilling to negotiate an evaluation system ?
    If I recall, it was the union that proposed a “fair and efficient” evaluation system that includes an effective procedure for dealing with the issue of “ineffective teachers”.
    The real reason behind the Mayor’s misrepresentation of the facts is that he has become accustomed to having things his way and anyone who disagrees or opposes him must be demonized and then destroyed.
    What does the Mayor want? The destruction of the UFT and complete and utter control of our schools.

  • http://theeducationstandard.wordpress.com/ Ari

    Yes, everything must be one side’s fault. It’s all the administrations fault or it’s all the union’s fault. At least the articles themselves don’t have the tunnel-vision that the commenters do. Hopefully the comments here only represent those who are reactionary and not the general readership.

    However, I’m not so clear on what the hangup is. Is there a difference in opinions in whether the first year of the program will count or a teacher’s first negative evaluation at any point. I can understand wanting to run it a first time and see if it works, but it would be absurd for it to take two years to get rid of an under-performing teacher no matter what.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

17 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031