GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

teacher u evolves

A new graduate school of education, Relay, to open next fall

The logo of Teacher U, whose founders will create a stand-alone graduate school of education called Relay.

The founders of Teacher U, the nonprofit organization that developed a novel way of preparing teachers for low-income schools, will create their own graduate school of education, following a vote by the Board of Regents last week.

The new Relay School of Education will be the first stand-alone graduate school of education to open in New York since 1916, when Bank Street College of Education was founded, and the first in memory to prepare teachers while they are serving full-time in classrooms. The new institution will open its doors next fall; current Teacher U students will remain enrolled at their partner school of education, the City University of New York’s Hunter College.

The Regents’ decision inserts a new model for preparing K-12 teachers into New York’s education landscape. Unlike alternative certification programs such as Teach for America and the New York City Teaching Fellows, Relay will not rely on existing colleges to provide its teachers with coursework required for certification; the new graduate school of education will design and deliver all of those courses itself. And Relay will likely take teachers who come into the school system through alternative programs like TFA.

Meanwhile, unlike most traditional schools of education, Relay will make training teachers its sole priority and will make proven student learning gains a requirement of receiving a Master’s degree.

The new school has already generated opposition from several existing schools of education, including from a top official at CUNY. In formal responses to the Teacher U group’s proposal, leaders of existing schools cited concerns about quality and the fact that, as officials at Fordham University put it, a new graduate school of education would be “duplicative in a market with sufficient program offerings,” according to a summary of concerns(PDF) made public by the Regents.

The Board of Regents approved the proposal with a unanimous vote and one abstention last week nevertheless, said Tom Dunn, a spokesman for the state education department. He added that State Education Commissioner David Steiner, who helped form Teacher U in his last job as dean of the school of education at Hunter College, recused himself from discussions about the application.

During recent visits to Teacher U’s current program, instruction topics ranged from how to tailor reading discussions to the racial and class backgrounds of students to how to write on a white board without covering your face with your writing arm. Much of Teacher U’s curriculum is devoted to passing on lessons learned by teachers at the charter schools that founded Teacher U, such as those collected by Uncommon Schools managing director Doug Lemov in his book Teach Like a Champion.

Teacher U also breaks students into groups arranged by subject matter and grade level to study what Atkins termed “pedagogical content knowledge” — the specific kind of knowledge needed to teach particular academic subjects. The term draws from the traditional academy; Stanford professor Lee Shulman coined it.

The new Relay model is in line with a push by Steiner and Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch to rethink university-based preparation programs. In 2009, Steiner announced that the state would consider giving alternative preparation programs the authority to certify teachers.

Teacher U CEO Norman Atkins, who will be the president of the new graduate school, said that Relay students will have to prove that their own students have made at least a year’s worth of improvement on standardized assessments in order to graduate. To do this now, Teacher U students use a mix of New York state assessments and, for grade levels and courses that are not tested by the state, select outside assessments to prove their effectiveness, Atkins said.

Response to the Teacher U program and the new graduate school reflects divided views about how to improve teacher education programs — and, in some quarters, about how much change is actually needed. Reaction also reflects contentious opinions about the founders of Teacher U, three charter school networks with impressive student achievement records but which operate outside traditional school districts: KIPP, Achievement First, and Uncommon Schools.

Locally, the new graduate school’s entrance has already generated resistance from traditional colleges and schools of education, including Teacher U’s current host, CUNY.

“We welcome alternative approaches to teacher preparation,” CUNY’s executive vice chancellor and provost, Alexandra Logue, wrote in a letter to state officials last December. “However, New York City already offers a rich set of alternative approach programs, and so adding another player right now seems unnecessary given what is already a highly crowded field.”

Atkins said the program needed to become independent in order to innovate and achieve financial sustainability. As a certified graduate school, Relay can charge tuition and its students can receive federal student loans; neither is possible as a 501(c)3 nonprofit.

The Teacher U team did address one concern before receiving Regents approval. The team had wanted to call its new school the Teacher U Graduate School of Education, but existing education schools complained that the letter “U” might cause the mistaken idea that the school is a university. It will actually be only a graduate school.

The founders — led by Atkins, board chairman Larry Robbins, and KIPP co-founder David Levin — selected Relay School of Education.

“In this race to close the achievement gap, we believe the baton of learning must be passed from master teachers to as many other teachers as possible,” Levin said in a statement. “Relay is designed to ensure that every teacher has the opportunity to be that excellent teacher.”

Steiner played a role in creating the program as dean of Hunter’s education school, and Hunter has continued to adopt some innovations led by Teacher U into its own separate program. One of these is the practice of giving teachers portable video cameras to use to record their teaching — and then have faculty members study the video results and respond with feedback.

CUNY raised concerns about the program nevertheless, urging the Regents to take “extreme caution” in considering the Teacher U group’s application.

“What TUGSE is proposing is essentially a similar educational model as the existing Teacher U/Hunter College partnership program, except that TUGSE would lack the depth of intellectual and other resources that a university brings to a partnership,” Logue wrote in the December letter.

Atkins described his organization’s relationship with CUNY’s Hunter College as solid. “We’ve loved working with Hunter College and continue to feel that Teacher U can continue to do terrific work in partnership with Hunter,” Atkins said. “At the same time, the founders were eager to develop an independent institution of higher education that could push on innovation and become financially sustainable.”

Logue’s letter went on to criticize Teacher U for having “no track record of successful teacher preparation as an independent entity” and for basing its program on “the presumed superiority of charter schools in securing great pupil learning and achievement gains.” But, she wrote, “data on charter school successes are mixed.”

As evidence of Teacher U’s effectiveness, Atkins cited the student achievement reports that Teacher U’s first class at Hunter College compiled in order to graduate. Seven out of 110 teachers did not receive Master’s degrees because they could not show that their students had made at least a year’s worth of academic progress. Of the 103 who graduated, 52 percent demonstrated that their students made at least one-and-a-half years of growth, Atkins said.

Teacher U has received praise at the national level, including from a group that has defended traditional schools of education in the past: the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. James Cibulka, the president of NCATE, submitted a letter to the Regents endorsing the Teacher U team’s application, citing a recent report by NCATE that cited Teacher U as an “exemplar” of needed efforts to “turn teacher education in the United States ‘upside down.’”

A partnership of three local charter school networks — KIPP, Uncommon Schools, and Achievement First — produced Teacher U three years ago. The groups’ decision to create a teacher training program represented the next step in a learning curve that traces its roots to the founding of Teach For America 20 years ago. Whereas Teach For America, which trained many of the charter schools’ founders, began by offering vague summer training to its corps members, the program has concluded that more support is necessary.

Teach For America teachers are now among the students at Teacher U, which builds in more than 300 hours of classes taught by experienced teachers, many of whom still work full-time in the classroom.

Relay faculty include Levin and both charter and district school educators, such as Julie Jackson, the principal of the North Star Elementary School in Newark, New Jersey, and Jodi Freidman, a teacher at P.S. 63 in Chinatown.

The Relay School of Education intends to prepare teachers to teach in both charter and district schools, Atkins said. While most of the program’s first class of graduates taught in charter schools, 18% taught in New York City public schools.

  • http://www.classsizematters.org leonie haimson

    ” Relay students will have to prove that their own students have made at least a year’s worth of improvement on standardized assessments in order to graduate.”

    We know the state tests are unreliable, and moreover, no matter what the test, these results are going to vary from year to year, depending on the particular cohort and/or what test and/or formula is used, as in the teacher data reports. This requirement will thus base the graduation of of their teaching students on chance more than anything else. Caveat emptor!

  • Michael Fiorillo

    I didn’t know you could get a Master’s in test prep. How entrepreneurial.

  • Pogue

    TeacherU, DoctorU, LawyerU, SurgeonU, Airline PilotU…

    Will there ever be an OligarchU?

  • bkteacher

    Caveat emptor is correct on several levels.

    Public institutions should be wary of partnering with privatizers. Hunter and CUNY should have never partnered with Teacher U in the first place. Hunter and CUNY legitimized Teacher U. 

    Now Teacher U and Relay U are coming to eat your lunch. I feel sorry for Hunter and Cuny. They are now in a position of trying keep out someone, who they previously invited to walk into the door.

    Again, be wary of privatizers. They are often wolves in sheep’s clothing.  

  • Michael M.

    Pogue,

    It’s called IOU.

  • I noticed that…

    Wait! You mean Teacher U doesn’t mean the philosophical understanding of the u-ratings when they graduate? I thought it was a college that prepares them for all the u-ratings they’ll receive based on students’ scores. U gotta to be joking.

  • Anne Honig

    Can someone explain how they extrapolate ” a year’s growth” on a state test that doesn’t have grade equivalents and is not vertically aligned from one grade to the next?

  • http://SchoolhouseMingle.com Eli

    i wonder if i can get a job teaching there lol

  • teacher

    Two things should be noted as well here: One, while Steiner may have recused himself from the application discussion, other conflicts of interest remain. Norman Atkins, now president of Relay, is the founder and former CEO of Uncommon Schools. As well, John King, current Deputy Commissioner for NYS Department of Education, (who was appointed under Steiner) is a founder and former managing director of Uncommon Schools. It also seems necessary to shed light on the fact that many faculty at Teacher U don’t actually have Masters Degrees. There are charter classroom teachers (many of whom can be found in Doug Lemov’s teaching videos), without credentials, designing, writing, and teaching the apparent graduate level courses.

  • Elizabeth Green

    Teacher,
    Actually, the faculty at Teacher U do have Master’s degrees or higher degrees.
    Best,
    Elizabeth

  • teacher

    Elizabeth, I am a product of Teacher U and an employee of one of the charter schools involved in its creation. I know for a fact that at least some of the math instructors, who were classroom math teachers at the charter school where I work, and who do NOT have masters degrees, were hired to write the curriculum for and teach (both in class and online) some of the math classes for Teacher U. I invite you to dig a little deeper in your research and analysis of the program. Sincerely, Teacher

  • Chris

    I feel like some people would rather have teachers learn from ed professors who have never even taught or are decades away from the classroom, which is standard for many programs. That’s the equivalent of someone who’s read a bunch of medical research teaching doctors how to operate, rather than having someone who’s actually getting it done share best practices. It feels like some people would rather not have any measurement for how well a teacher does and so have no rigor to the program. Teachers are monitoring student growth and being asked to help their kids learn to read (for example) on a daily basis. Standards based tracking of growth (measuring where your students start then individualizing feasible goals for them) is what schools should be doing. This is not an argument about the reliability of value added test scores, which is an important argument but should not be conflated with the potential requirements for this program.

    I remember my 1st year in my “teacher training” program, an educational philosophy class. I was taught by a philosophy major in college, who had never taught, and who had never cracked a book on educational philosophy. We had to write a 15 page paper on Paulo Freire, ostensibly as preparation to be an effective urban teacher. The class did not help me become a better teacher – my mentor was solely responsible for that. Let’s get away from the rhetoric and conspiracy theories and start asking meaningful questions about the limits and possibilities of a program like this.

  • Linda Delgado

    I rankle at the notion that improved test scores, authentic, pertinent curriculum, and meaningful teaching and learning are in any way mutually exclusive. In truly effective classrooms each may– hold on–must be present. I know it is possible to combine these goals, having achieved the blend in an urban, diverse charter middle school in the East Bay area of San Francisco.I am proud to have co-founded that school, served happy families and students for ten years, and worked with students, families and teaching colleagues to put that school at the top of this large district’s scores.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Linda Delgado,

    In the interest of transparency and comparability, please inform the readers of Gotham Schools about the following:

    - What was the percentage of special ed students in your charter school compared to the local districts schools?

    - What was the percentage of ELLs in your charter school compared to the local district schools?

    - What was the percentage of SIFE students in your charter school compared to local district schools?

    - What was the percentage of students in temporary housing in your charter school compared to the local district schools?

    - What was the percentage of students receiving free lunch (not free and reduced lunch) at your charter school compared to local district schools?

    Unless your data is comparable with the local public schools in the district, then readers are justified in asking, “And your point is?”

    I can’t speak for the East Bay, but here in NYC there is frequently no relationship whatsoever between test scores and authentic, pertinent curriculum. The tests and their scores are politically manipulated, invalid and and largely fraudulent. In view of that, what would you suggest we do?

  • James

    Linda–Thanks for making it happen for the kids of the East Bay. Keep on doing what you and your team are doing. Please notice that Michael offers no potential solutions here. He, just like most of the educational theorists at work in traditional schools of education, answers questions with more questions. He’s choosing to chill in the cheap seats on this one.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    James,

    It was Ms. Delgado who was implying that her school had found a solution, and I merely asked if that solution also included comparable percentages of groups that local public schools serve. 

    As for solutions you claim I don’t propose, my main solution is the full-time teaching I have done (quite effectively, by the way) at a highly successful, unionized  NYC public school for the past 14 years. Where you got that, “…educational theorist at work in traditional schools of education” thing is beyond me. Or was it just a straw man diversion from questions that so discomfort charter school supporters, and which they studiously ignore or dissemble in response to?

    By attacking me, were you hoping to distract readers from my questions? If so, it probably didn’t work.

    And how was the TFA Summit this weekend? I hear they were playing a repeating loop of “The Stepford Wives.”

  • Ruth

    Chris,

    I understand your point, especially given your experience with ed school (which is really different from my own). But with respect to your point about doctors: you wouldn’t want a medical professor who had no MD to teach you, no matter how awesome he or she is at surgery, right?

    That’s the key difference: we’re not comparing an experienced and trained practitioner to an unexperienced theorist, here — we’re comparing someone who was never adequately trained to enter a classroom but struggled through, to a theorist; though, at my ed school, I’ve never had a professor who wasn’t a teacher, first.

    Hopefully, a college grad off the street wouldn’t be given the opportunity to operate on kids without being trained in how to do so, no matter how sincere his rhetoric. But the premise of Teacher U is that it’s no big thing to put someone who may never worked for a living at all, let alone worked with kids, let alone attempted to teach them, into a classroom.

    I’m dubious; I’ve worked with program previously and they really don’t have anyone with higher than a Master’s, which means no one who’s done any significant research into how to teach, how learning works, etc. They don’t think they need it, because test prep and class management aren’t just the nuts and bolts; to them, that’s ALL These Kids really need.

    But the biggest problem is that, even if their program becomes state of the art, why should students get untrained, inexperienced college grads who haven’t really considered what they’re doing in education, or learned how to do it, or, often, even mastered the relevant subject material fully (Kenyon College might not require math, but your average charter school does) instead of a teacher who was willing to find and pay for teacher training, the same way they would law school or med school?

    Charter schools use this program as a way to hire candidates on the basis of their ideas about education, and, in particular, candidates who adhere to a particular model of how minority and low income children should be educated — a model that I feel becomes increasingly untenable once you, say, understand something about how learning disabilities, phoneme awareness, higher-order thinking, or actual, legitimate assessment works. These schools couldn’t get trained, experienced teachers to work in them, because what they do with their students doesn’t make sense a lot of the time. So they’ve developed their own theory of education and their own system of measuring success, and they say: look! on the standards we select to measure our students all of our students are successful. There’s a logical fallacy there, I think.

    In my experience, kids in schools like these do well on that one measure of success — usually a questionable and un-ambitious bar — and then crash and burn when presented with any other requirement: write an intelligent essay, learn calculus, AP exam, SAT, college. The best charters are trying to address this. Teacher U wants to market it.

  • Chris

    Ruth,

    I am all for putting the best person in the classroom.  Part of this is getting and keeping experienced, highly motivated, and effective people in the classroom.  Totally agree.

    It’s very easy to speak in ideal terms.  I could do this all day and in my experience it is what academics do best (criticize and speak in ideal terms).  This has its place in figuring out what is possible and where we should focus our attention as well as pointing out our blind spots.

    However, we all have to confront the REALITY of what is going on.  What does the data say about this?  Experienced teachers are retiring!  New teachers comprise a great majority of the teaching workforce:  http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/01/19/17coggins.h30.html?tkn=UTVFr+FclV9iOUD53hS75CJnYKj65sGHYPdL&cmp=clp-edweek.  

    Shouldn’t these new teachers be given the best training possible?  Whether this is someone with a higher degree and ample teaching experience, or someone who really does know teaching inside and out and truly helps teachers as indicated by their satisfaction and teachers’ implementation in the classroom, regardless of what degree the person in front of teachers has or doesn’t have.

    Moreover, urban schools and poor kids are incredibly hard pressed to get teachers to work in them in the first place.  Please look at the data for where most teacher ed programs (besides places like UCLAs urban ed school) send their teachers.  I’ll give you a hint:  it’s NOT in the schools that need them most, which to TFAs and NYCTFs credit, is the case (and I will point out, who Relay will serve in part).  There is a HUGE need to recruit and retain new teachers, particularly in urban schools.  The most consistent reason these teachers leave urban schools is because they are not fully prepared or supported.  Research consistently finds this.  Check out Susan Moore Johnson’s work at Harvard for data.  

    As far as the charter school talk, I am ignoring this because I am focusing the conversation on preparation of new teachers, not the pros and cons of charters, which is a separate (though I agree, related) debate.  Please look at the data before getting on the soapbox.

  • Ruth

    Chris, 

    Wasn’t aware I was on a soapbox, actually. Among the data that I’m assuming you’ve considered is the reality that in most areas, New York City has a hiring freeze. These teachers – who are currently teaching in New York City schools, regardless of where they may end up – are not meeting an unmet need as of today. The are teaching in an area in which there are currently no jobs. 

    The issue of charter schools is unavoidable, I think, given that none of the Relay School’s teachers can teach in a public school as they are not yet certified when they enter the program and are all teaching in childhood Ed classrooms. There is no need or these teachers unless there I some cmplln reason why none of the current DOE teachers and no traine teachers outside the district are practical options for these charters. 

  • http://cjyabraham.com Chris Abraham

    test comment

  • Pingback: Duncan’s Friday Afternoon News Dump: Test Scores to Make or Break Teacher Preparation Programs – @ THE CHALK FACE knows SCHOOLS MATTER

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

10 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031