GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

layoff likelihood unclear

Cuomo suggests cutting city school funds to near-2007 levels

Governor Andrew Cuomo is suggesting that the state cut its contribution to New York City public schools by nearly $600 million from the level that schools received this year.

The budget, released today, proposes reducing statewide school spending by $1.5 billion from this year’s level. Activists said that would be the largest dollar figure cut to public schools in New York’s history.

The proposal would bring the state’s contribution to city schools close to the level received in 2007. That year ushered in substantial funding increases after a court ordered New York State to reduce historic funding inequities by pouring billions of extra dollars into the New York City schools.

picture-16

Governor Andrew Cuomo's proposed budget for fiscal year 2011, denoted with the asterisk, would reduce the state's spending on New York City public schools to $7.5 billion.

Planned increases have since been frozen, cut, and now frozen again. Cuomo’s budget suggests postponing them into the future.

Mayor Bloomberg described the budget in drastic terms, comparing Cuomo’s proposed city schools allocation — $7.5 billion — to the figure state budget officials projected last year. That projection was $8.8 billion, a nearly $1.4 billion difference.

In a statement this afternoon, Bloomberg argued that a cut of that size would lead to “thousands of layoffs in our schools and across city agencies.” He pushed Cuomo and the state legislature to reduce the loss to city schools by cutting teacher pensions and loosening requirements for special education.

The New York City teachers union downplayed Cuomo’s budget. United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew said that Chancellor Cathie Black should be able to make the needed cuts without laying off teachers.

“The Governor’s planned cut to New York City schools amounts to about three percent of the school system’s budget,” Mulgrew said in a statement. “We have every confidence that Cathie Black, whose management skills the Mayor has repeatedly cited, will be able to manage a reduction like this without laying off teachers and raising class sizes.”

The contrasting statements reflect the different political priorities of the union and the mayor. While the mayor has long argued for reductions in rapidly rising teacher pension costs, the teachers union has pushed the Bloomberg administration to preserve teacher benefits by cutting central programs instead, such as the data warehouse known as ARIS.

Last year, a similar back-and-forth — with Bloomberg warning of teacher layoffs and the union downplaying — ended when a combination of a wage freeze and the federal stimulus prevented any teacher layoffs. This year, there is no stimulus funding to plug holes.

“There’s no way that you’re not going to be cutting around the state teachers, programs, psychologists, librarians — you name it,” said Geri Palast, the executive director of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity. “This is going to be the worst year yet. There’s no question.”

Bloomberg’s teacher layoff predictions have swung wildly this year. He began 2011 by predicting that the city would have to lay off 6,100 teachers and by the end of last week, had reached an estimation of 21,000 teachers. He eventually backed away from that figure, noting that it was not feasible and promising to find other ways to make cuts.

In his statement on the governor’s budget, Bloomberg did not say how the proposed cuts would affect the city’s layoff estimates, though he numbered likely school layoffs in the “thousands.” He also called — again — for an end to seniority-based teacher layoffs and asked for the state’s help with rising education costs.

The governor’s budget does indicate that Cuomo intends to lower these types of mandated cost increases, but it’s not clear how. The budget states:

“State Aid reductions are coupled with a mandate relief effort, undertaken by Executive Order, which will lower the system-wide cost of providing education services, thus mitigating the impact of decreases in aid.”

Under Cuomo’s budget, the city would also lose $305 million in unrestricted aid that the mayor had figured into his 2012 budget projections. While that funding is not specifically set aside for schools, it could have been used as needed.

Cuomo’s budget also includes competitive funding pools — designed like state versions of the Race to the Top competition — that would reward school districts for cost-savings and academic improvement. He first proposed the pools last month.

  • Joe Schmo

    Here is how I see things taking place in the coming months: No layoffs for appointed teachers but there will be backdoor deals between the UFT/DOE to fire ATR’s who do not “find” a job by the end of the school year. The DOE will also get “approval” from the state to fire some U rated teachers. I also predict a new contract with no raises in exchange of eliminating the 37.5 extended day minutes. I’m not saying I agree with the above mentioned items. However, this is just what shows up in my crystal ball!

  • My Glass is Empty

    Joe, I like your crystal ball, especially when it comes to losing those horrible 37.5 minutes!!!!

  • teacher

    Mulgrew, a few weeks ago, sounded like he wanted to wait Bloomberg out on the contract.  I think Mulgrew would sell us out, but right now, he won’t.  The tide is turning against Bloomberg in lots of ways.

    I do like that Mulgrew is using Cathie to make Bloomberg look bad.  Very smart statement:

    “We have every confidence that Cathie Black, whose management skills the Mayor has repeatedly cited, will be able to manage a reduction like this without laying off teachers and raising class sizes.”

    He is making Bloomberg OWN his decision to hire Cathie Black.  If she is a good manager, she should be able to make a number of cuts with going near schools.  Also, I think Mulgrew expected much deeper cuts to school budgets.

    I just saw a few seconds of Mulgrew on NY! and he seemed upbeat.  Interesting.  We shall see, but Bloomberg has spent a few days backtracking.

  • Tim

    I’m having trouble downloading the appropriate dataset from See Through NY, but if I recall correctly, DOE central administration salaries in 2009 were $700 million, give or take. 

    I realize that some of this would have gone to people who work in schools with real-life children, but it doesn’t seem rational to me that this bucket wouldn’t be the *first* place that’s looked to for cuts. 

  • Mama Bear

    I’m okay without ARIS. It doesn’t seem to offer me much more information than the parent-teacher conferences. I especially think it’s a waste of money to get kids signed up on ARIS at the pre-k level, which my son is. If anything, they could offer ARIS for older kids, if it’s needed. I don’t see the value of it right now. (My kids are seven and four.)

  • Mama Bear

    Again, maybe I need a RttT tutorial, but didn’t we just get money?

  • GC

    RTTT cannot go to the classroom, only for the so called reforms like data collection systems.

  • Roget

    Daddy Bloombucks has made more than $10 billion since he became mayor. Why doesn’t he just put up a couple billion to close the NYC budget gap, buy-out senior teachers with retirement incentives and give unhirable ATRs a one-time cash offer to leave that they can’t refuse?

    What does the UFT give him in return? It capitulates on LIFO and supports changes in education law, revisions of the contract and the removal of procedural impediments that make it difficult to get rid of lousy teachers. It also agrees to pension plans that are less costly to the city.

  • An Effective Teacher says…

    Without a contract we’ve gone with a raise for over two years. How can this possibly be equivalent to losing a mere 37.5 minutes? And most teachers, like me, work well beyond our school “day” to ensure quality lessons & thorough responses on grades, and additional extra help to our students which we’re already not paid for. For many, if you calculate the number of hours we’re actually putting in during the week, weekend, and even summers and then use that to compute our per hour wage we’re working at minimum wage or below.

    Not that the UFT would actually care to ask its members for a vote on the issue, but rather another back-door deal with a forced vote by its delegates, but I’d vote no.

    Pay teachers what they deserve. The average salary of a person with a Masters degree in NYC is 80k. A teacher does not earn that amount unless they’ve put in 18 years of service (according to the schedule with just a Masters).

    Stop squandering money on “programs” and no-bid contracts which give us the lowest quality for the highest price to Bloomberg’s “friends” and start spending it where it counts – on after-school programs for our students and towards reducing class-size. Stop blaming teachers for everything and take responsibility for the mess you’ve created.

  • John

    I said back when the contract expired that we, as a union, should settle for a 2 year contract of 0%/0%, like we did in ’94, in exchange for the elimination of the 37.5 minutes. Teachers, going against the pattern bargaining (which we haven’t gotten, mind you), would have been heralded as heroes for excepting no raise. Now, two years later, we would be in a better place. Who cares if some loose lipped politic slipped that Bloomy put 8% away for teachers raises at that time…LOOK WHERE WE ARE NOW!!!!!!!!!! All readers of this site are as scared as I am at the shift in this country overall…it used to be that crooked or monopoly like deals would be punished…now, its just accepted. Thank you for your time.

  • Pingback: New Opportunities for your Business With the Innovative Technologies of Laser Cutting and Laser Engraving

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

29 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930