GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

campaign trail

In State of the City, mayor calls for an end to seniority layoffs

Mayor Bloomberg renewed his push today for the end of seniority-based layoffs for public school teachers, who are facing greater odds of losing their jobs this year than they have in decades.

During his State of the City address this afternoon, Bloomberg said that his first priority for legislators in Albany is pension reform. But a close second is ending last-in first-out — the seniority rules embedded in state law that could force the Department of Education to lay off teachers based on when they were hired.

New York City has not had to lay off teachers since the 1970s and, though it came close to layoffs last year, the city dodged them by taking away funds that would have gone to giving teachers raises. But this year, the city is operating without stimulus funds and with the expectation of deep education cuts from Albany. In his November budget address, the mayor predicted that the public schools would have to lose 6,100 teachers this year.

In his speech, Bloomberg noted that laying off the schools’ most recent hires, who are also the cheapest employees, will mean losing more teachers than if the city laid off older, more expensive teachers. It will also mean larger class sizes, he said, in an unusual appeal to some parents’ concerns about overcrowding. DOE officials typically downplay the importance of class size, and the mayor’s statement comes after Chancellor Cathie Black caused an uproar by joking that parents in Manhattan should use more birth control.

The mayor also argued that laying off the city’s most recent hires will mean losing some of the best talent in classrooms. “But this year, if we are forced to lay off teachers, we will be forced to lay off some of the most effective, and keep some of the least effective,” he said.

The DOE has not made public data proving that its most recent hires are actually its most effective, or that older teachers have lost their touch. A New York Times analysis of city teachers’ effectiveness scores, which are based on how much they raise students’ test scores, showed that teachers with at least five years of experience have the highest ratings. Before that point, they often struggle, and after the 10 year mark their scores level off.

United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew said he found the mayor’s comments “disgusting.”

“I never thought I would hear a mayor of New York City stand up and say you need to let us lay off senior people who make more,” Mulgrew said. “He was telling people if you dedicate your life to being in the classroom, and things get tough, we should be able to get rid of you.”

As for using teachers’ effectiveness scores to guide layoffs, Mulgrew said: “It’s wrong and it would hurt the school system.”

The mayor’s remarks on education and his full speech are below:

“There is one more piece of our legislative agenda that is critical to our future, and that I want to mention today, and it concerns education. Our new schools chancellor, Cathie Black, has a deep understanding of the skills our students need to succeed in the job market — that’s why I picked her. She knows that first-rate teachers are the key to success.

“But this year, if we are forced to lay off teachers, we will be forced to lay off some of the most effective, and keep some of the least effective. State law says that the last ones to be hired – no matter how good they are — must be the first ones to go. By not allowing schools to take merit into account, the State would not only deprive our children across the city of great teachers, it would increase class size, because more teachers would need to be laid off, since the newest teachers get paid lower salaries.

“It’s not right. It’s not fair. And it’s not something we can allow to happen. We’ve made too much progress. Our kids deserve better. Parents and taxpayers deserve better. Teachers deserve better. We’ve got to change the law and change it this year.

MAYOR BLOOMBERG DELIVERS 2011 STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS – PROGRESS AT WORK

The following is the text of Mayor Bloomberg’s State of the City address as prepared for delivery at the St. George Theatre on Staten Island

“Thank you. Good afternoon and welcome.

“First, let me thank Borough President Molinaro for those kind words.  I also want to thank sisters Doreen and Luanne for opening the St. George for us today.

“There’s not much that Liza Minnelli, Tracy Morgan, and I have in common, but someday we can all say we appeared on this famous stage.

“The first movie to ever play here back in 1929 was called So This Is College. For those who haven’t seen it – which is probably everyone – here’s the synopsis: Biff and Eddie are best friends and star teammates on the football team. Then a flapper named Babs enters the picture. Biff and Eddie start competing for Babs and the rivalry affects their ability to play football together. Fortunately, the Coach is able to mediate just in time to win the big game.

“I don’t know if there’s a great message in that film for us today, but I do like the ending, because at no time has it been more important for us to put aside rivalries and focus on what’s truly important: winning the big game. And of course, I’m talking about the Jets winning the AFC Championship game on Sunday.

“Last year, when we gathered together to consider the state of our city, I spoke of the twin challenges we faced: creating jobs in the midst of a national economic downturn and balancing our budget in a way that protected vital services and taxpayers.

“Today, I am glad to report that over the past 12 months, we have met both of those challenges better than almost any other city in the nation.

“Last January, I said we’d lead the nation in job growth, and you know what? We have. We have created jobs at nearly twice the national rate. And compared to the rest of the state our job creation rate is eight times as high.

“Jobs bring hope and opportunity, independence and security and creating them is our job number one. Too many New Yorkers are still struggling to find work and our unemployment rate is still too high, but over the past year, we have added 51,000 private sector jobs – in industries with average salaries between $35,000 and $92,000.

“For instance, last year we passed Boston in venture capital funding in technology, putting us ahead of every place but Silicon Valley. We also had a big year in tourism, in spite of fierce competition from cities around the world. The number of people employed in tourism hit a record high here and for the second straight year, we remained America’s number one tourist destination.

“And with growth occurring in many other industries, unemployment is down from a year ago, commercial vacancy rates are down and home values are up.

“In fact, for the first time in decades – New York City entered a national recession later than the rest of the country and now, we have come out of it faster and stronger than the rest of the country.

“We’re not out of the woods yet – not by a long shot, but we sure are going in the right direction.

“City government cannot end a national recession – nor can we control the business cycle, but we can shape our own destiny, and we have.

“We’ve done it not only by spurring new jobs in growing industries, but by managing our budget to protect the vital services that are so crucial to our economy.

“We cut crime to record lows. We kept the welfare rolls at historic lows. We cut fire deaths to their lowest level since before 1919. We raised graduation rates again -  they’re up 27 percent over the past four years, compared to just three percent in the rest of the state.  And that means 15,000 students who would not have finished high school did finish and earned a diploma that will change their lives for the better.

“We’ve gotten those results by working closely with the City Council and Speaker Chris Quinn to manage our budget carefully – and reduce spending responsibly. Over the past three years, we’ve cut spending nine times for a total of $5 billion, including a $1.6 billion cut this year.

“But now, the cuts we face are more severe than ever. Because of unfunded mandates and pension benifits, we face multi-billion dollar deficits for years to come. And there is no magic wand to make them disappear. There is no rabbit left to pull out of the hat. And there is no windfall coming from Albany or Washington this year. There is only us. Our resolve. Our courage. And our commitment to the fiscal discipline we have shown over the past nine years.

“We have several options before us. We can stop investing in the future and watch the gains we have made in public safety, education, and every other area disappear before our eyes.

“That is one choice. And it would be an utter disaster. We all know how it turned out in the 70s – and we paid for that mistake for decades to come.

“Yes, the city is now far stronger than it was then. Yes, we are far more resilient. Progress, however, is not inevitable. It’s up to us to create it. And I guarantee you: we will not walk away from what we have built. We will continue driving progress every single day.

“Another choice would be to raise taxes. But as New Yorkers know all too well,our taxes are already too high. Higher than most other places in the country. With the national economy still struggling, and even though job growth here has been strong, raising taxes now would undermine our recovery by driving people and businesses to lower-tax cities and states and deterring investment from overseas.

“So let me be clear: we will not raise taxes to balance the budget.

“Instead, we will choose a third approach – a smarter approach. An approach that respects the short-term needs of taxpayers, and protects the long-term prospects of our economy. We will grow our way out of these tough times, by shrinking the costs of government.

“Every mayor who comes into office faces a defining challenge. For Mayor Koch, it was bringing the city back from the brink of bankruptcy. For Mayor Dinkins, it was uniting a city torn by racial tension. For Mayor Giuliani, it was proving that New York City could be made safe again.

“When I first came into office, it was bringing the City back from the attacks of 9/11 and turning around a broken public school system.

“We’ve made enormous progress doing both – and now, a new defining challenge confronts us: forcing government to live within its means, by forcing government into the 21st century. I believe we can do it – because we must do it. The economic future of New York City is hanging in the balance.

“We can look back and continue funding a government operating system that was built for another era. Or we can look forward and continue rebounding, continue growing, continue forging ahead and leading the nation.

“But we cannot do both. That is the choice we face.

“The State of our City is strong, but to remain strong, we must make the right choices. We must embrace the future. If you stand with me, I promise you we will look forward – and move forward – together.

“In many ways, this beautiful old theatre represents the choice we face. As you heard, for most of the past 30 years, it sat vacant and padlocked - falling apart and fading away. It seemed destined for the wrecking ball until Mrs. Rosemary and her daughters came along. Their vision and passion brought this tarnished treasure back to life and brought new energy – and new jobs – to the Saint George community.

“I asked Doreen and Lou Anne to sit on stage today – surrounded by some fellow

Staten Island business owners. These are the people whose faith and hard work have been responsible for a true recovery and I wanted to acknowledge them.

“That work of transforming the old and making it new, not to recover a bygone past,

but to re-imagine a brighter future lies at the heart of the challenges we face this year.

“We must continue transforming our economy into a more diverse, more dynamic, and more durable engine of growth. And to do that, we must transform the way government serves the public and the way it spends the public’s money. Today, I’d like to outline our plan for achieving both goals and keeping New York City moving forward.

“Let’s start with how we’ll continue to transform our economy into a 21st century engine of innovation.

“Just as Mrs. Rosemary and her daughters transformed a decrepit old movie house into this spectacular new theatre - spurring new jobs and economic opportunity, we must make those transformations across all five boroughs, creating new reasons for people and companies to invest their future – and their finances – in New York.

“In 2011, the progress we are making transforming old into new will be more visible than ever. Just around the corner from here, we’ll begin seeing it at the old Navy Homeport – abandoned for nearly 20 years. This year, we’ll begin turning it into a Home-Park – with 800 apartments, shops and a waterfront walkway.

“We’ll see the transformation across the Narrows at Coney Island, once a sad shadow of yesteryear, and long written off by skeptics, but now drawing record crowds with new amusements and new excitement.

“This year, we will break ground on Steeplechase Plaza, and we’ll open the new ‘Scream Zone’ a one-of-kind amusement area that will include a ‘Human Slingshot.’ On Governors Island – off-limits to the public for decades – we’ll expand our work to create a one-of-a-kind park in the heart of the harbor.

“We’ll see the transformation at the old piers that are now becoming Brooklyn Bridge Park, where a new carousel will open this year. At the Brooklyn Navy Yard, which we’ve transformed into one of the country’s most successful, and greenest, urban industrial parks, Steiner Studios will begin to double what are already the largest soundstage and production facilities on the East Coast. And they’ll partner with Brooklyn College to create the first graduate level film school of its kind in the region.

“In Queens, shovels will go into the ground at Hunters Point South, where we’ll begin to transform long vacant land into a new middle-class development fueled by $2 billion in private investment that will create 4,600 jobs.

“All along the East River, with support from Speaker Quinn, we’ll begin running a new ferry service with stops at Long Island City, Greenpoint, Williamsburg, DUMBO, Wall Street, and 34th Street.

“And at Willets Point, once the inspiration for F. Scott Fitzgerald’s ‘valley of ashes,’ we’ll begin building roadways and waterlines that will give rise to whole new neighborhoods with good jobs, and affordable housing.

“And in the South Bronx, we are transforming an abandoned dead end street into Hunts Point Landing – new waterfront open space and a fishing pier next to the bustling Fish Market.

“All of these projects are happening because of dedicated civic leaders like the ones who have joined us on stage today. Thank you all.

“All of these projects share something else in common: they lie along our waterfront. And they are part of what is one of the most sweeping transformations of an urban waterfront in American history.

“Across the city, we are reclaiming our waterfront from decades of decline and disuse and investing hundreds of millions of dollars to build and expand parks, and create jobs.

“At the same time, through the Green Infrastructure Plan we launched last year, we are cleaning our waterways by not spending $2 billion on tanks and tunnels, and instead capturing storm water before it reaches our sewer system.

“This year, we’ll invite New Yorkers to help us green their communities, by launching a new grant program that will empower local civic groups to help us build a more environmentally sustainable city, with projects that are right for their neighborhoods.

“Together, we will continue transforming the old into new across the city. We’ll open the second section of the High Line – once an abandoned eyesore, now the most popular railroad trestle in the world.

“In the Bronx, we’ll join with the Van Cortlandt Park Conservancy to do something that has been talked about for more than a decade: we’ll turn unused tennis courts into an ice-skating rink open all winter long.

“We’ll also invest in our cultural infrastructure: new homes for the Staten Island Museum and the Whitney Museum. New facilities for the Queens Museum of Art and the Bronx River Arts Center. And the expansion of downtown Brooklyn’s cultural district.

“Now, let’s be clear: money is tight. Very tight.

“We will have to reduce our capital spending. Some projects will have to be slowed down.  Others will have to be scaled back. Others will require more private funds.

“But we will not forget the single most important lesson of the 1970s: when you stop investing in the future, the future hits the road. Jobs, people, capital – they all leave. We didn’t allow that to happen after the attacks of 9/11 and I promise you we won’t allow it to happen now.

“The investments we are making create more than infrastructure. They create something you can’t see or touch. It’s that feeling you get when you come to New York.

“The feeling that anything is possible in this city – that the future happens here first. This feeling – of energy and optimism – is why our population is growing and why more and more young people, in particular, are moving to our city.

“Many of them come in search of jobs, but more and more are coming to start their own businesses right here. Recently, New York was named the number one city for young entrepreneurs and that’s a great sign for our future, because as much as we are competing with places like London and Hong Kong for private investment we are competing with places like Boulder and the Bay Area for the college graduates whose ideas will attract investment, and power the 21st Century economy.

“We have a few of them with us onstage today and let me just mention the companies they’ve started: there’s ZocDoc, a web site that makes it easy to find doctors and dentists in your neighborhood – and named by Crain’s the number one place to work in New York City in 2010.

“There’s Energy Hub, which builds electromechanical systems for NASA’s Mars missions. Pixable is a photo management web site that was the first company to graduate from the small business incubator we started in 2009.

“Rent the Runway allows you to rent clothes at a 90 percent discount, making fashion more affordable. And then there’s the social networking site that was started around a kitchen table in the East Village and that now has more than 5 million users: Foursquare.

“All of these companies have been started in the past few years by young entrepreneurs. All of them are succeeding. And – most importantly – all of them are hiring.

“Thank you all. And be prepared to get a few resumes.

“This year, with Deputy Mayor Bob Steel leading the charge, we’ll do more to continue attracting the next generation of industry pioneers.

“We’ll launch business incubators that will hatch more start-ups in new media, fashion, the arts, and other industries where innovation is key. We’ll bring together the leaders in ‘eds and meds’ - our academic institutions and bioscience firms – to map New York’s course to the top in that growth industry.

“We’ll look to partner with a top university to build a new applied sciences and engineering facility. We’ll fuel the growth of clean energy firms by encouraging new wind and solar power projects. And joining with Columbia, NYU-Poly, and CUNY, we’ll create a center connecting green building pioneers to real estate developers and building owners.

“Of course, the single biggest step that we can take to promote innovation in New York City, and across the country, is to fix our broken immigration system.

“It’s not only hurting national security, it’s the most ruinous economic policy you could ever conceive of.It’s destroying American jobs every single day. We’ve got to change it.

“We are a nation made great by immigrants. And if we are to remain great, we cannot turn our back on our history, our heritage, and our highest values.

“It’s a national issue, and that’s why I enlisted Rupert Murdoch in creating a national coalition of business leaders and elected officials and we are going to work with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle to pass sensible, economically smart immigration reform and pass it this year.

“We can’t wait. Every day businesses are starting overseas, and we want them to start here. Let’s make it happen.

“Of course, we won’t wait for Washington to act. We’ll do what we can on our own.

“We’ll launch a new program to connect immigrant entrepreneurs to the information they need to open small businesses – and the loans and expertise they need to grow and expand. We’ll also enter into a new partnership with a major bank – Citi – that will get credit flowing to hundreds more qualified small businesses in all five boroughs.

“In addition, a new loan program will offer minority- and women-owned businesses access to loans covering their upfront costs when doing business with the City. That’s just one way we’re going to strengthen efforts that, in just four years time, have nearly tripled the value of City contracts going to MWBE firms. New business assistance programs will help certified MWBE firms and small businesses compete for City jobs.

“And to help connect growing businesses to the employees they need, we’ll expand our Workforce One Career Centers – I just stopped at one on the way here, and they’re doing a great job.

“Last year, as tough as the economy was, our Workforce One centers connected New Yorkers to more than 30,000 jobs – compared to only 500 in 2005.

“One of those former job hunters is a man named Arian Lena. Born and raised in the Balkans, he arrived in our city seven months ago. Like so many immigrants before him he didn’t have a job. But thanks to Staten Island’s Workforce 1 Career Center, today he is working in a private investigation firm, steadily improving his income and getting his new life started in a new land.

“I would like to introduce you to him, but he couldn’t be here. He’s working.

“This year, we’re increasing our goal from 30,000 job placements last year -

up to 35,000, and we’ll reach it by opening ten new Workforce One Express Centers across the City, including one here on Staten Island.

“We’re also setting the goal of placing 10,000 more welfare recipients into jobs – going from 75,000 last year to a record 85,000 this year. Instead of the City using tax dollars to support them, they’ll be paying tax dollars to help support the City.

“At the same time, we’ll help more New Yorkers stay self-sufficient, by taking a privately funded pilot program - the one-on-one counseling at our Financial Empowerment Centers - and use public funds to expand those critical services, which will help more residents eliminate their debt and increase their savings.

“It’s a hand-up, not a hand-out and it’s one of the best ways we can keep our welfare rolls down and our neighborhoods strong.

“One of the biggest employers in New York City is the restaurant industry. Last year, in partnership with Speaker Quinn and the Council, we launched a ‘new business acceleration team’ to help restaurants cut through red tape and open their doors faster.

“We’ve since helped more than 200 new restaurants open up months early, including Big Benn’s Restaurant on Richmond Terrace. Lorenza and Leodore Benn came here from Trinidad worked hard and saved and now, they’ve opened a Caribbean restaurant. I hear your chicken roti is delicious.

“Last year, Health Commissioner Tom Farley implemented a plan that hands out letter grades to every restaurant based on their cleanliness, because the public has a right to know and because the grades are an incentive to run a clean kitchen.

“If a restaurant doesn’t get an A, it gets re-inspected as an incentive to improve its grade. But a re-inspection can also mean more fines, even if the restaurant gets an A. The cost of fines cuts into the tight profit margins that small businesses run. So from now on, we will add a new incentive: any restaurant that earns an ‘A’ -either on its initial inspection or on a re-inspection – will not have to pay one penny in fines for any violations found on that inspection. Not one penny.

“This year, we’ll build on the customer-service model we’ve created to help cut red tape for restaurants, and offer those same services to the small retail shops that define our neighborhood main streets.

“At the same time, again working with the Council, we will fundamentally simplify the number of approvals necessary and the means for securing them. I think mom and pop deserve that, don’t you?

“Making it easier for businesses to open and expand is just one part of a broader vision for City government that we call: Simplicity.

“It’s an effort being led by Deputy Mayor Steve Goldsmith and it’s based on the very basic idea that government should be organized around the needs of its customers – and that means taxpayers, businesses, and service users.

“Over the past year, we’ve been working to consolidate the City’s real estate holdings, reduce our vehicle fleet and streamline our technology infrastructure and back-office operations. By 2014, these steps together will save taxpayers $500 million dollars annually. But that’s just the start.

“Simplicity is about transforming all of City government by modernizing it making it smarter, more efficient, and oriented around customers.

“For instance, why shouldn’t homeowners know when they have a leaky water pipe that’s running up their water bill? It happens more than it should. This year, through the wireless water meter readers we’re installing at properties across the city, they will know and they’ll be able to fix problems before they become major drains on their finances.

“And why shouldn’t someone in the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, or Staten Island be able to hail a legal cab on the street? 97 percent of yellow cab pick-ups happen in Manhattan or at the airports – even though 80 percent of New Yorkers live outside of Manhattan.

“This year, we’ll establish a new category of livery cars that can make on-street pickups outside of Manhattan. It will give New Yorkers in all five boroughs another safe, reliable and convenient option for getting around. Because whether you’re standing on 42nd Street in Manhattan or 42nd Street in Sunset Park, Brooklyn or 42nd Street in Sunnyside, Queens, you ought to be able to hail a cab.

“At the heart of Simplicity is the belief that government should make it easier to live and work in New York, not stand in the way. In the year ahead, we’ll launch online forums where every City employee – and every New Yorker – can post ideas that he or she thinks will improve services or save the City money. Others will be able to comment on those proposals, and then we’ll implement the best ones.

“This kind of open call for ideas – or ‘crowdsourcing,’ as it’s called – has helped cutting-edge companies like Facebook and Netflix improve services and save money. And with more than 8.4 million people in our crowd, imagine what we can come up with.

“Saving money is a critical part of Simplicity – and we’re going to need every penny. But right now, we are spending more and more on pensions, health care benefits, and other unfunded mandates, and that leaves us less and less to spend on the services and investments that are so crucial to our economy.

“We will continue cutting budgets, but to reduce the pain New Yorkers feel, we will need help from Albany. In the 1970s, after years of fiscal mismanagement, the City was forced to ask Albany to step in and manage its affairs.

“Today, after years of responsible management, we have a different request of Albany: let us manage ourselves. Let us manage areas that should be matters of local policy, not State law, and let us achieve the savings that would result.

“Let us save tens of millions of dollars on our workforce by reforming the antiquated Civil Service laws that stifle innovation and add unnecessary costs.

“Let us save money on our legal bills, prohibiting people who are harmed in accidents from suing the City for millions of dollars if the City is not primarily at fault, or at fault at all. That costs taxpayers more than $30 million a year.

“Let us save money on our administrative costs by letting the City’s Department of Finance administer City income tax collection instead of paying the State absurdly inflated costs to do it.  That would save us save tens of millions of dollars.

“Let us save tens of millions of dollars on procurement costs by freeing us from overly restrictive rules that force us to buy inferior products.

“And let us save more than $100 million a year in wasted education spending by capping the amount of time a teacher can spend in the Absent Teacher Reserve pool. Right now, it can stretch on for years, and this year, as it stands now, we’ll have to fire teachers so we can pay those who don’t have full-time teaching jobs. It’s ridiculous.

“Most important – most important of all – allow us to reform our pension system to make it fair for workers and taxpayers.

“This year, we will spend $7 billion on pension costs, up from $1.5 billion in 2001. That means this year, the average New York City tax filer will be paying $2,400 more to cover pension costs than they did back then. And next year, we’ll be paying even more.

“If all consumer prices had gone up at the same rate as the price of our pensions, the subway fare would be $7.05 this year and $8.39 next year. For the same service we’re getting now. New Yorkers can’t afford those subway fares, and we certainly can’t afford pension costs on that level either.

“City workers deserve a safe and secure retirement, but right now, they receive retirement benefits that are far more generous than those received by most workers in the private sector – and that provide for a much earlier retirement age. It would be great if we could continue to afford such generous benefits, but we cannot.

“The only way to protect pensions for our City workers – including our police officers, firefighters, teachers, sanitation workers, and correction officers, is to reform the system so we can afford it, and at the same time afford the vital services that New Yorkers want and depend on. We have proposed and pushed pension reform before, and we have achieved some improvements with the United Federation of Teachers. But now we must go further – and capitalize on the reform agenda that Governor Cuomo has brought to Albany. Governor Cuomo campaigned on pension reform, and he will have our full support.

“In the weeks ahead, we will make pension reform our number one priority in Albany. And today, I’m glad to announce that a great New Yorker has agreed to take up our cause: Mayor Ed Koch. Last year, he formed a group – New York Uprising – that convinced a majority in both houses, and Governor Cuomo, to pledge their support for redistricting reform, something I strongly support, too. This year, he’ll expand his crusade and if you know Ed, he won’t do it quietly. Thanks, Ed.

“Working with Ed and our partners in State government, we will work to pass several basic reforms to bring our pension system into the 21st century.

“First, we can save $8 million a year right off the bat by consolidating pension systems, an administrative reform that will not affect benefits at all.

“Second, we’ll seek a new tier for employees hired in the future that would raise the retirement age to 65 for non-uniformed workers. That would produce billions in long-term savings, and bring our retirement age in line with the private sector, even as we offer far more generous benefits. We can also save another $200 million every year by eliminating, for future uniformed retirees, what is effectively a $12,000 annual bonus, paid on top of full pension benefits every year around the holidays. City taxpayers just cannot be expected to give substantial holiday bonuses when so many of them are out of work or having their own wages frozen or cut.

“The third piece of our pension reforms would overturn the State law that prohibits the City from negotiating pension as part of the collective bargaining process. Pension and health care benefits are a substantial part of a City employee’s compensation, and so it only makes sense they should be part of the collective bargaining process.

“Right now, State elected officials are setting pension benefits for City workers, and sticking another group – city taxpayers – with the bill. Again, our message to Albany is: we’ll pay the bills, but let us get better prices. And the only way we will be able to afford raises for City workers in the future is if we can find some savings in our pension and health care bills. That is not a negotiating stance. It is reality.

“And so today, I will make this commitment: I will not sign a contract with salary increases unless they are accompanied by reforms in benefit packages that produce the savings we need to continue making investments in our future and protecting vital services.

“All together, the reforms we are asking of Albany would allow us to save billions of dollars in the years ahead and continue making the investments that we need to strengthen our neighborhoods and our economy.

“We understand how serious Albany’s situation is. And we are not asking them to spare us from budget cuts. We are willing to do our part to close their deficit.

“We are willing to do our part to close their deficit. But we are asking them to ensure those cuts are fair, and to give us the ability to save money, so we can off-set some of those cuts. That is our ask – and we will package these reforms together into a Financial Reform Bill that will put our financial house in order not just for this year – but for years to come. It’s the single most important thing we can do for our city’s future, and this is the year we must do it.

“Otherwise, we face even more severe cuts and layoffs, and that will harm our ability to invest in our economy and create jobs. We just cannot allow that.

“There is one more piece of our legislative agenda that is critical to our future, and that I want to mention today, and it concerns education. Our new schools chancellor, Cathie Black, has a deep understanding of the skills our students need to succeed in the job market – that’s why I picked her. She knows that first-rate teachers are the key to success.

“But this year, if we are forced to lay off teachers, we will be forced to lay off some of the most effective, and keep some of the least effective. State law says that the last ones to be hired – no matter how good they are – must be the first ones to go. By not allowing schools to take merit into account, the State would not only deprive our children across the city of great teachers, it would increase class size, because more teachers would need to be laid off, since the newest teachers get paid lower salaries.

“It’s not right. It’s not fair. And it’s not something we can allow to happen. We’ve made too much progress. Our kids deserve better. Parents and taxpayers deserve better. Teachers deserve better. We’ve got to change the law and change it this year.

“The last major area I want to touch on today underlies everything else, and that is the centerpiece of our efforts to continue growing the economy and creating jobs: public safety.

“Over the past nine years, we’ve driven crime down 35 percent. We’ve done it through innovative new law enforcement strategies that have focused on preventing crime. We are not giving up one inch in that battle, and to take it to the next level, we will launch a comprehensive new effort to prevent young people from getting off track and keep them connected to family, school, and job opportunities.

“For instance, we know that truancy is an early warning sign of trouble, and so this year, we will double the number of volunteer school mentors who are currently helping over 2,000 students overcome chronic absenteeism.

“We also know that summer jobs lead to high school graduation and college, and so this year, we’ll make up for cuts in Federal funding to summer youth employment by raising private money that will put thousands of young New Yorkers into jobs that can change their lives forever.

“And as part of our Fatherhood Initiative, we’ll construct three new family centers on Rikers Island to provide incarcerated fathers more opportunities to spend time with their visiting children, so that their time apart does not become a lifetime, and hopefully that connection will also impart some tough life lessons.

“We can’t keep every young person out of trouble – but we can do more to get them back on track. This year, we’ll work with the judiciary and the Center for Court Innovation to develop a Youth Justice Center that will handle delinquency and criminal cases for young people up to the age of 21, engaging the community in preventing crimes.

“We will also work with Governor Cuomo and our partners in Albany to overhaul the State’s juvenile detention system so we can keep more young offenders in supervised, secure programs close to their homes and families instead of hundreds of miles away upstate. We know we can do a better job of helping young offenders turn away from a life of crime, and if Albany will allow us, we will.

“One of the best ways we can prevent crime from occurring is listening to community members. This year, we’ll expand a promising partnership that began several months ago, when a group of Brooklyn Clergy members approached the NYPD with a proposal: tell us more about the violence in our communities, like where and when it is occurring, and we’ll work with you to help eradicate it. Now, more information is flowing from precinct to pulpit, and back. And that is truly good news.

“This year, we’ll also conduct a pilot program to bring more mental health services right into jails, as a way to help inmates with mental illness and reduce violence among them.

“Eleven days ago in Arizona we saw the horror that can result from mental illness and drug abuse and we must pledge ourselves not only to do more for the mentally ill, but to do more to keep guns out of the hands of people who, by Federal law, should not have them.

“Our bi-partisan coalition of Mayors Against Illegal Guns has been working to close gaps in the Federal background check system, gaps that allowed both the Virginia Tech shooter, and the Arizona shooter, to buy guns.

“There has been a lot of focus in Washington lately about the Constitution. But we must remember that we have a duty to honor and uphold not only the Bill of Rights, but also our Founding Fathers’ common purpose: to ‘establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty.’

“As long as we allow dangerous and deranged people to buy guns, the promise of a more perfect union will remain empty for the thousands of Americans who are murdered with guns every year.

“We cannot ignore that reality. We cannot accept that defeat. This cuts to the core of who we are as a country. We must continue fighting for gun policies that protect innocent Americans no matter what the politics are, and we will.

“As we find new ways to crack down on crime of every kind – from forming a new Domestic Violence Rapid Response Team here on Staten Island with District Attorney Dan Donovan, to mining financial data to stop those who engage in mortgage fraud – we’ll also expand our efforts battling a threat that, as we saw all too clearly in 2010, remains very much with us: the threat of terrorism.

“The NYPD is building the most comprehensive counter-terrorism system in the world, and now, as we prepare to open the World Trade Center site to the public for the first time in a decade, we’ll take the next step.

“Last year, we signed an agreement with the Port Authority that gave the NYPD a lead role in the security of the World Trade Center complex. This year, we will begin staffing the World Trade Center Command within the NYPD’s Counter-Terrorism Bureau. By September 11, 2011 more than 100 NYPD personnel will be securing the area as thousands of visitors return to the site for the first time in 10 years.

“The transformation taking place at the World Trade Center site is a powerful reminder of our city’s determination not only to remember, but to rebuild and renew.

“And as I close, I think it’s a reminder we also feel here in the St. George. It’s that feeling of energy and optimism that has always defined our City.

“Just six weeks before this theatre opened in 1929, Wall Street had crashed – and the Depression lay ahead. And yet through it all this theater survived. It survived a world war. It survived competition from new technology like television. It even survived years of mismanagement and abandonment. And because people came together, strong, united, and determined – a family, the business community, City government. Now this place not only survives, it thrives. Today, tomorrow, and forever.

“And that, I truly believe, is the State of our City. Strong.  United. Determined. And ready to meet any challenge. Today, tomorrow, and forever. Thank you very much.”

  • Ellen

    “Today, after years of responsible management, we have a different request of Albany: let us manage ourselves. Let us manage areas that should be matters of local policy, not State law, and let us achieve the savings that would result.”

    Or

    The 80 plus million in CityTime cost over runs was not my fault!

  • Mitch

    The final gasps of the last dodo…sad, but poetic….

  • John

    So, as a senior teacher, I am too expensive and not as good as a new teacher, according to our a** of a mayor. Is he kidding? Not all decisions are dollars and cents. I am way better than any rookie at what I do, and if the mayor has his way, I have to kiss the a** of my principal or be fired. I took this job because I truly enjoy what I do AND because of the other, non-monetary aspects of the job. I taught what I didnt want to but had to teach, knowing I would gain seniority as the years progressed. I hope he fails in his bid to change the law. If not, I will quit!

  • Tired of the Game

    I say we fire the Mayor.  Have him live by his own words.  He actually is older and experienced.  He’s ineffective.  Get rid of him!!!  But wait – that’s what happens when you elect a mayor that doesn’t need the job, just an ego massage.  Way to go NYC voters!

  • Joe Schmo

    There is no way the New York State Legislature will get rid of LIFO for teachers. This law is the cornerstone for the majority for all civil service employment throughout the state. If it is eliminated for teachers; cops, firemen, sanitation, corrections, will all be next. Bloomie is basically calling for the destruction of the middle class with his nonsense. I really don’t think it will happen. HOWEVER, I would not be surprised in the least if the DOE/UFT hatch yet another secret deal to sell out members by changing pension contributions for NYC teachers. (In other words, the city and the UFT change the retirement age from 55 to 65 for new members. This way the head honchos at the UFT can keep their jobs and retire early while newbies have to work till 65)

  • KitchenSink

    LIFO shmIFO. What teachers should be fighting for is respect. There’s nothing worse than an abusive principal, but if the conditions are there to ensure that bad principals are removed, there is no legitimate argument for LIFO. Teaching is a highly specialized knowledge profession and should not be lumped in with firefighters, police, sanitation, etc. Last time I checked you did not need a masters degree to be a firefighter.

    No one should be subjected to the capricious whims of an abusive supervisor. But in the 21st century, teachers need to perform or get out of the way.

  • Bronxactivist

    Suprise Bloomberg is defending the rights of business over labor. He is fighting for tourist but not doing much for the outer boroughs or NYC residents living in poverty or close to poverty. The middle class is being attacked at all cost. Once again he has singled out teachers because they get paid not to work like Bloomberg stated. That is a total lie ATRs are covering classes and are a result of the mayors neglect. I am sure in his cocktail parties his billionaire friends are asking when can we increase our profits and turn education into our industry. When will the teachers stop fighting for the children they serve?
    Cancel all no bid contracts worth 100s of billions of dollars. Fire all high priced consultants

  • Joe Schmo

    Last time I checked, you don’t need a masters degree to be Chancellor. And yes, teaching IS a civil service job just like firefighters, police officers, and correction officers. That is why there are New York State laws to protect these workers from unfair, age-related, retribution in the event of layoffs.

  • suzie

    As a teacher, it is very frustrating to work with people who should not be in a classroom. Yet they are protected. The big question is, how do you grade them fairly? The most ineffective teachers in my building are in cluster positions and they do not get data reports. However, because they have more years in, I could face layoffs..and they are safe.

  • tj

    Why would anyone want to become a teacher now? I was drawn to the career thinking I could help kids learn (now we are forced to pass them and they don’t have to work or even show up to class), the job security (we’re losing tenure and now seniority rights), the comfortable middle class salary (why can’t I afford to buy a house when every teacher I knew growing up owned one?) and the summers off (I’m sure they will find a way to take that away)! If teachers lose seniority rights, I guarantee half the teachers who have been teaching for 15 years or more will be laid off. How are we going to find new jobs after losing a career you’ve worked for for nearly two decades. When will people wake up and realize this mayor cares about not ONE of us? Unless you’re a millionaire or billionaire, this mayor has done nothing to help citizens. What a shame this has become.

  • Mama Bear

    “In his speech, Bloomberg noted that laying off the schools’ most recent hires, who are also the cheapest employees, will mean losing more teachers than if the city laid off older, more expensive teachers. It will also mean larger class sizes, he said, in an unusual appeal to some parents’ concerns about overcrowding.”

    I have no problem with experienced teachers being paid more. It makes sense. I think there are plenty of ways to cut the budget and that’s looking at the DOE budget. I also don’t like the manipulation about class sizes. He hasn’t shown much concern for this before, I can’t believe by getting a cheaper, greener teacher over a seasoned one is going to help overcrowding. I also don’t think Bloomberg could prove that the greener teachers are better unless they’ve all got the easier students to teach. 

    I always find it scary in any industry when “seasoned” becomes synonymous with “no more to offer.”  

  • Invictus

    This is a blatant take by the Supreme Leader of implementing a dystopian type of world taken after Logan’s Run.  There will be major outrage in different Civil Service job circles if this is ever taken to vote.  The Supreme Leader as well as Andy in Albany are dreaming of the day when they would be able to get away with such of piece of legislation but then, they are executives and how will they attempt to control the legislative process, where is the balance of powers issue here?

  • Jeff S

    Correct me if I’m wrong….provisions for both excessing and lay off are covered in the UFT contract, are they not? By law, this contract remains in effect until a new contract is negotiated and ratified, is that not true? So contractually, can there be liegilsation that would violate these provisions of the contract (this goes for the ATR pool as well which is covered by the excessing rules). Hence, this is all a smoke screen by Emperor Michael I, he cannot unilaterally or even with the help of some of his hench people in Albany without negotiating with the UFT. Of course, this puts the onus on the UFT to make sure that he understands these two provisions are still born and I am shocked we don’t hear this from the UFT.

    Or perhaps I am missing something.

  • miss teacher

    Jeff, I seem to recall that one of the co-sponsors of Diaz’s/Bing’s bill (I forget the legislator’s name) pulled out because he questioned the legality of changing a municipal contract that both sides had agreed to. But the bill still exists, I believe. Should the end of LIFO for city teachers happen, however, I predict we’ll continue to see an exodus of teachers to the suburbs, and out of NY altogether. I told my husband tonight that in my department I will probably be the one to see the axe as I am the only one with a small child, which means that I no longer teach after school and on Saturday, and don’t put in as much time as I did when I was single and childless.

  • John G

    Well bloomberg has finally gone on the record with his wishes to get rid of seasoned teachers only because they cost more. After years of being accused of it, he has finally admitted it. Congrats to the murky, creepy little flat foot that we all call mayor.

    And he is the leader who oversaw countless hundreds of millions of new ed dollars into the city with little to no results on the achievement gap! He screws up the city’s school system and wants to fire the people who teach the city’s students because they cost more!!

    I hope he goes after LIFO! I could use a good walk across the Brooklyn Bridge, and would LOVE to watch the stubborn pri## be embarassed…. and i was a fan of his up to last year!

  • teacher

    Don’t call it LIFO.  Call it seniority rights.  LIFO looks like lifetime jobs.  Bad PR.

    Mulgrew is pissed.  Really pissed.  I was at the delegate meeting.  I’m not a fan of Mulgrew but he knows that this is on his watch and he sees what is happening in NJ.

    I think Bloomberg went too far.  I really think that people will see the truth, or I hope so.

    Every union worker should be frightened.  Every person who knows a union worker should be worried.

  • Vote NO

    In the long run ending LIFO would be more costly to taxpayers and society. Older teachers have families to support, and mortgages to pay. If they were to lose their incomes, it would result in greater numbers of people (possibly entire families) on public assistance. The real estate sector does NOT need any additional foreclosures added to existing inventory.

    The medicaid roles would certainly swell. There would be a greater need for food stamps, and unemployment benefits as older workers would most likely remain unemployed longer than young workers. All of these are costs to taxpayers which will have to be paid. This would more than likely take away additional money for education, which advocates for ending LIFO may think they could obtain by laying off veteran teachers.

    The damage to the teaching profession would be incalculable from losing all the veteran teachers, but that is another post. LIFO must remain in effect.

    What politicians should really be emphasizing is NOT laying off ANY MORE American workers.

  • wondering

    Let me get this straight a hiring freeze in schools for the past two years, so their were very few teachers hired in the past two years in the first place. Also then want to lay off teachers that make to much money which means they are bad according to Bloomberg.

    I have been trying to become a teacher for two years and now thank you Bloomberg for making a hiring freeze. Then layoff some of the best senior teachers and they can hire newbies like me, leaving no teachers to help us new teachers out because Bloomberg you are going to scare them all away. Thanx

  • Pogue

    This mayor has gotten crappy and fraudulent education results through the nine years he has been in charge of the public school system.

    He used these fraudulent scores and millions of his own dollars to steamroll term limits and buy a third term.

    He hijacks much of the CFE money the state directed to the city for smaller class sizes, and spent it who-knows-where-and how.

    He has been the official in charge through this mega-million City Time scandal.

    He disappeared during New York City’s time of need at this past blizzard and pooh-poohed it off while people died and were in danger.

    He hired an incompetent elitist to run our New York City school system.

    And, he now attacks senior workers who’ve given years of service to the children of New York through good times and bad.

    Any decent politician, union leader, journalist, or community leader ought to put this destructive dictator and his ideas down.

    Workers deserve a better present from Bloomberg and his corrupt ilk, and our children deserve a better future than what his oppressive ideas have in store for them.

  • Peter

    Jeff S:

    Layoff rules are part of the law, the contract says layoff will comply with the law.

    The Mayor should have handed out copies of The Lottery by Shirlry Jackson, or CDs of the Snows of Narayama, his solution is pretty simple, senior teachers line up, the ice floes are waiting … euthanasia as a budget cutting strategy …

  • Mama Bear

    “Our new schools chancellor, Cathie Black, has a deep understanding of the skills our students need to succeed in the job market — that’s why I picked her.”

    This statement has an ominous tone and strikes me as simplistic and superficial. We have no idea what the job market will look like in a few months from now let alone years down the line. Shouldn’t the children have a say in what the future looks like? Maybe they’ll have a better vision than what is now in front of us. It will be important for them to have jobs eventually, but shouldn’t education also help kids think for themselves and have their own ideas?  I hope children learn to think deeper than that. Are the kids going to have “What Color Is Your Parachute” as required reading in place of arts, science, music and literature?

    And if you take the statement to discuss her deep understanding of the skills our students need, then maybe she should teach high school journalism and help with the yearbook. I don’t see her magazine mogul experience translates into a deep understanding of what school children need for their future.

  • Michael M.

    Re: ““But this year, if we are forced to lay off teachers, we will be forced to lay off some of the most effective, and keep some of the least effective. State law says that the last ones to be hired – no matter how good they are – must be the first ones to go. By not allowing schools to take merit into account, the State would not only deprive our children across the city of great teachers, it would increase class size, because more teachers would need to be laid off, since the newest teachers get paid lower salaries.”

    Would the Mayor dare to make similar statements about FDNY or NYPD personnel? Younger and less experienced is always cheaper. For those departments as well.

    Since the mayor controls the budget, why would we be “forced” to lay off teachers at all, let alone ahead of any other city employees?

    His “some of the these” / “some of the those” syntax would be true even with his preferred “FIFO” — oop, forgot the code word “effective” — method.

    And it’s not “schools” but the “school SYSTEM” that would be making the decision: teachers are employed by the DOE, not the individual schools.

    As pointed out months ago, the debatable-value “value-added” scores the city is yearning to release are based on data some 3(?) years old. Which means newly hired (aka cheaper) teachers get at least a 2-year PASS, R-E-G-A-R-D-L-E-S-S of “effectiveness.”

    So on what basis are the rookies crowned “great”?

    Silly me: “great” means “cheap.” And for any parents slow on the Orwell, “increase(d) class size” is the stinger should we parent-taxpayers not already have pushed senior teachers off the plank.

    What the mayor forgot to mention is that class sizes this year went up ANYWAY. Or that Wall Street is having a boom year ($19 B in profits in 2010 — 4th most profitable year in the last 30). No “merit” badge for disclosure, I say.

    Over the last week, the administration was quick to walk back Chancellor Black’s “birth control” joke. Was her “Sophie’s Choice” comment made the same evening too toxic even to apologize for? Regardless of what it’s called, the mayor is trying to foist a pyramid of similarly false choices (and false logic) on the citizens, the parents, and worst of all, the students of this great city.

    Last, the Mayor continues to mock the Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit outcome, first decided in 2001 on Giuliani’s watch, and spent 8 years or so repeatedly appealing it — and its $5.6 BILLION PER YEAR incremental funding (which as manifested even in part in the Contracts for Excellence, Klein and Steiner conspired to divert) — even repeatedly at the level of the Court of Appeals, the highest court in the state. The plaintiffs who sued a generation ago — and won — did not get told they were entitled to a “sound basic education” only in years the state and city were running budget surpluses.

    In 2001, State Supreme Court Justice Leland DeGrasse noted the “systemic failure” of the SYSTEM — not of individual schools, nor of individual teachers. I wonder whether he’d say any different today.

  • Ms. S.

    Can a simple question be answered? If the city possibly plans to lay off 6,100 teachers, and we say an average class size is 30, that’s over 180,000 kids for those 6,100 teachers. I mean is someone going to answer the question of “What happens to these 180,000 kids?”. This is why this is another scam. This could never gappen because its impossible to do. Have no worries my teacher friends. There cannot be any layoffs due to non use of birth control. Wait aminute,Bloomburger should just raise the class size cap from 34 to 68. Why not just double it! Ahahahaha, what a mess!!!

  • EteacherE

    Someone should present Bloomberg and the public with the simple fact that he could have avoided all layoffs if he signed the early retirement legislation that the State passed last year.

    Why didn’t he do it? To paint the teachers and legislators into a corner…also to use the layoffs to negotiate a new contract.

    NOTICE: He cited the UFT as the only Union that negotiated to lower retirement benefits…ALSO THE ONLY UNION WITHOUT A 4% OVER 2-YEARS RAISE.

  • Gerry

    @ Ms. S,

    Whats going to happen is the twenty-something schools are going to close. Then, more schools will follow and close. All these teachers will become ATR’s. Guess what’s going to happen to the ATR’s Ms. S.? There’s your 6100!

  • EteacherE

    It’s utterly ridiculous! Our Union is doing a bad job publicizing this issue. Are they going to change the law so they can lay off the police officer who writes the least tickets? The sanitation worker who is slowest at picking up the cans? etc. If a teacher deserved to be fired, fire them…don’t backdoor it.

    NOTICE IT”S ONLY TEACHERS THEY ATTACK! Our pensions and medical costs are 1/3 Police and Fire alone…and that’s accounting for 5x’s the retirees in our pension system.

    Most private businesses run this way when layoffs are necessary: You look at what department you can cut, then you look at the least senior person in that department. You have 80,000 people doing the same job, you layoff the least senior.

  • afriend

    @EteacherE: Teachers are not the only union not to get the two 4% raises. The city took the funding out of the budget, so any groups that hadn’t settled by then are out of luck. Including hospital nurses and school custodians. You are not alone!

  • AMC

    At least the article is accurate in pointing out that this is a matter for Albany. Good luck getting any legislation passed anytime soon! The Senate and Assembly are in a mess. They can’t agree on anything and Senators are getting arrested every day on corruption. It will be years before they even try to change the NYS tenure law.

    People have to realize that unlike other professions where experience garners you contacts and other intangibles that make you “worth” your salary, educators do not have that. We need to fight to maintain what we have. Otherwise education becomes a throw away career, a “second” Carree or a hobby Carree.

  • Maria

    It is clear that Bloomberg is an arrogant, self serving, greedy, misinformed idiot who doesn’t understand public education at all or care about public school students, much less public school teachers. It’s also a shame that big money people like him can buy their elections. And it is probably even a bigger shame that New York has a Republican mayor! What do Republicans always do? In their campaigns they pretend that they will help make education better BUT as soon as they get into their offices, one of the first things they cut in their budgets is education. It is so sad that people like him can fool so many voters into voting for people like him who he doesn’t represent at all. The sharp tongued rhetoric of Republicans is so misleading yet so effective. They know how to spend enough money to spin their message in such a way that they convince many people to actually “vote against themselves”. Wake up New York City, you need a mayor who is not a Republican or Independent or whatever it is that people like Michael Bloomberg call themselves! Vote, organize and get more involved in elections and politics to put losers like Bloomberg out of office!

    How would doctors like it if bankers came in to run their hospitals and tell them what kind of surgery to do, when to do it and how to do it? Basically that’s what is happening these days in education. More and more people with no training or background in education are the ones who run our schools. It is time for teachers to be respected for the true educational professionals that they are and for their ideas to be implemented in how to improve public education – not the charlatans that don’t know what they are doing, who don’t care and who in effect, help to hurt millions of children because of their idiotic, moronic, “tax saving” ideas! 

    It is so popular in our present culture to vilify teachers and to blame them for all of the social ills of society. It’s criminal! I think NEA needs to get involved, be more vocal and help create some kind of plan so idiots like Bloomberg can’t get away with crap like this! We all love our children more than anything and want what’s best for them. Every child in the U.S. deserves the opportunity to receive the best public education possible!!! Who knows, maybe it needs to eventually get to the point that all public school teachers in this country need to stand together and strike for a month or a year or do whatever is necessary to demand fair treatment. 

  • Pingback: Wake Up Call | Last In, First Out? | Our Schools NYC

  • W. C. Smith Jr.

    I say right on to the Mayor. While I understand the need to protect people from abusive supervisors and unfair labor practices. I also understand that most of our large urban citiies, New Yourk being in the top ten percent have some of the highest dropoout rates and lowest graduation rates in the nation. There are very few professions where your job is protected just because you have been there a long time. If these great seasoned teachers would, as John Maxwell states, realize that having Talent is Never Enough,” and it doesn’t help the children in the classrooms today improve because you were a great teacher 20 years ago. These children today need teachers time, talent, patience, understanding and your willingness to go outside of the box. If you have been the classroom and number of years and you no longer want to do that then you should leave the profession and let those with more energy have those positions.

  • Peter

    Mr. Smith

    The recently released annual Quality Counts Report places NYS # 2 in the nation. Let’ not denigrate, we are doing better than 49 other states!

    In New York City we have not had teacher layoffs in 36 years. Rather than fighting to change the rules the Mayor and the Chancellor should be fighting with parents and teachers at their side, to avert layffs this year.

    As to the rules: there are no metrics to measure teacher quality. If teachers are inadequate they should be counseled out or discharged, and, the City and Union changed the rules to expedite the process.

    Both the Mayor and the Chancellor support changing the rules because senior teachers cost more, if you lay off senior teachers first you would have fewer layoffs. Of course the law may consider such a plan as a violation of discrimination laws..

    Employees in both the public and private sector are laid off in inverse order of seniority. It eliminates favoritism, racism, age-ism and gender bias.

    Half of all new teachers leave within five years, few teacher leave after ten years. Laying off from a pool, half of whom will be leaving makes sense.

    Teachers suspect that the attack on current layoff rules is actually an attack on the union, the one organization that had stood up to the Mayor and the Chancellor.

    Until the current administration see parents and teachers as partners instead of impediments the wars will continue.

  • Moe

    The mayor wants all 10yr+ people gone! He wants a revolving door of new teachers who he can intimidate and hold the “HONOR” of tenure over their heads. Once received, they will burn out and leave and new one’s will take their place. Principals are waiting for this as well. They can’t wait to get rid of the experienced teachers who know their rights and won’t cow tail to some of the rampant demands of the principal. My principal can’t wait for this to happen, he has his list ready! How do I know, I an Assistant Principal (AP’s are on their lists as well).

  • Kpsmove

    The mayor is off base the trend to evaluate everything by numbers does not always factor in a persons ability to do the intangibles. I often use Derek Jeter a shortstop for the NY Yankees his numbers tell you he is a below average short stop but if you ever see him play with your own eyes only then will you understand why he has 5 World series rings. Thats why I say a good teacher only looks good in person a great teacher is some one you would never recognize them until you have moved on in life.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

9 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031