GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

no worries

City tells parents not to worry about cheating investigation

City officials brushed off parents’ concerns over an ongoing cheating investigation at a Bronx high school last night, telling them that if the principal had really been changing grades, the school wouldn’t be failing.

In 2009, teachers at Herbert Lehman High School reported that executive principal Janet Saraceno was changing dozens of students’ grades in order to boost the school’s graduation rate. More than a year later, Saraceno remains under investigation and Lehman is teetering on the edge of being shut down by the city after receiving an F on its progress report. Yet when parents asked Department of Education officials about the investigation at a meeting last night, they were told to ignore it.

“Let’s let the investigators do their work,” said Juan Ruiz, a DOE official heading the team assigned to support Lehman. He told parents that if Saraceno had really been changing students’ grades from failing to passing, “we probably wouldn’t have an F.”

In fact, Saraceno is only under investigation for changing grades during the 2008-09 school year and Lehman’s progress report grade for that year was a B. A year later, after DOE officials became aware of the cheating and began to monitor the school more closely, its grade fell to an F.

Last night’s meeting was a chance for city officials to explain to parents what might happen to Lehman in the next year. Yet after an hour, parents began walk out, frustrated their questions weren’t being taken seriously.

“Where are the weaknesses? I want to know how it went from a B to an F,” said a parent.

Reading from the DOE’s fact-sheet, Bronx high school superintendent Elena Papaliberios said that Lehman students weren’t passing enough of their classes — one of the metrics the city uses to gauge how well a school is doing.

“Even as they finish their first year, they’re starting to struggle,” she said. “And if they don’t earn 10 credits per year, they’re going to fall short and they’re not going to be able to graduate.”

Parents of Lehman students have been stunned by the school’s precipitous decline, as it has long been considered one of the city’s best remaining large high schools. For 29 years, Lehman was run by former principal Robert Leder, who resigned in 2008. Since then, safety has become a problem and this year the school installed metal detectors. Teachers and students say the new principal rarely leaves her office and does not have the rapport with students that Leder used to keep the large population — 4,000 students — under control.

Ruiz said the city planned to reduce the school’s enrollment next year and that the metal detectors have already cut down the number of violent incidents.

Elvin Flores, the father of a Lehman freshman, said his daughter graduated from the school five years ago without incident. But from his son’s first day of school this year, there have been problems with safety.

“How the heck did you guys lose control of this school?” Flores asked. “For the years Leder was here, we felt safe. You guys need to take back this school.”

Parents at the meeting said when they visited the school during orientation, classroom walls were hung with students’ work that was two years old. Others said they’d gone to parent association meetings hoping to meet the principal, only to watch her rush out afterwards.

Saraceno sat at the front of the auditorium and did not speak, except to say that the school’s graduation rate was 52 percent rather than 49 percent, the number Ruiz gave.

“She’s sitting there and not saying anything,” said Lisa Mateo, whose daughter is a freshman at Lehman. “By now she should know she looks guilty.”

  • Ms. Teacher

    “we probably wouldnt have an F” did they really say that! We have degrees to earning an “F” – its probably a lot worse than the data is telling us! She changed hundreds of grades- to make a difference in a school of 5,000 she would need to change thousands of grades!
    She had no answers, or comments for the parents, that is sad. Saraceno why not leave now, if you have no plan to improve things this year why do they need you! Can’t you retire early? You got your bonus, go spend it!

  • Ubayed Muhith

    This may sound far-fetched to some, but I believe this is a fixed scandal from the Chancellor. Lehman for years has been recognized as an outstanding large school. In the past, schools were shut down for consistently performing below level. Lehman however is not a consistently performing low but rather recieved poor marks this year only.Nowadays the administration will look for ANY excuse to close down schools, as they are pathetically hungry for Lehman’s vast estate and area. All I have to say to the “glorious” administration is try, just step up and try Lehman. As a community of students, parents, and teachers, we will not go down quietly…nor will Lehman High School.

  • Jeff S

    Wonder how Bob Leder feels all about this. He was castigated constantly by the UFT and now the teachers are realizing things could have been far worse. And of course this Principal was specifically brought in uynder another of Klein’s bird brained ideas, the executive Principal. Because after all, if you can run a small school as a Principal, you can run a very large one..

  • Larry

    I think parents should stop trying to find a single source of blame for the decline of Lehman. Like most things in life, this has many factors that are constantly changing. Klein is out now, wasn’t that the boogie man before? Now there is a better target for blame in Black.

    I think parents would have much more success looking closer to home to make improvements. I attended Bronx Science and granted, it is selective but the students there took care of their own education. They didn’t need their parents to help them get a great education, they researched the colleges and studied for PSATs and worried a lot about when the SAT dates were. They knew the importance of their education and it created a very positive, if sometimes intensely competitive, environment.

    At Lehman I see very little of this. The students do not have a sense that working hard is important and many of them bring this to the school from home and the neighborhood.

    This creates a viscous cycle where the students don’t study, do poorly in school and the school drops its standards and this cycle repeats.

    So at the risk of sounding preachy; I would encourage all the parents who are complaining about the principal at Lehman and the Chancellors, whose actions are so many levels removed from your child’s day to day experience, to consider removing that TV in the child’s bedroom, getting rid of the video game system, limiting or eliminating the cell phone and discuss the importance of education with your child tonight and maybe pick up a copy of the book they are reading in school. These are the things I am trying at home to try to improve my child’s less than ideal performance in school. I think my time is much better spent working on these things than just complaining about principals or chancellors who even if they were replaced – the change would have very little impact on your child before they are done with High School.

    Just some thoughts from a frustrated parent trying to make the best of a less than ideal school setting.

  • hM

    who cares where you went to school- toot toot

  • pipi

    interesting school

  • D.V.

    Saraceno’s previous school dropped from an A to a B once she left. Many believe the new principal won’t do the things Saraceno did. Lehman went from a B to a grade of F in less than 2 years. How can Saraceno not resign or be fired? This is insulting to parents, students and teachers. Saraceno is a horrible principal and needs to go.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930