GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

the scoop (updated)

City could release individual teacher ratings this week

The debate that began in Los Angeles over whether it is ethical to release public school teachers’ effectiveness scores has made its way to New York City. The city’s Department of Education plans to give the ratings, which are based solely on test scores, to reporters this week.

According to sources familiar with the discussion, city officials are debating with the teachers union over whether to release the scores with or without teachers’ names attached. The union has announced that it plans to seek an injunction in order to halt the release.

“The union will charge in its lawsuit that the TDRs [teacher data reports] are ‘unreliable, often incorrect, subjective analyses dressed up as scientific facts,’ and the methodology’s calculations of individual teachers’ value-add is ‘a complex and largely subjective guessing game on the part of the DOE,’” union officials said in statement.

DOE press secretary Natalie Ravitz said the city plans to give reporters the ratings this Friday.

“It had been our intention to respond to those FOILs and release the information today. However, UFT lawyers informed us that they intend to sue us to prevent the release,” she said in a statement.

“While we respect UFT’s right to sue, we believe that the public has a right to this information under the law.  Therefore, unless we are enjoined by the Court, it is our intention to release the data on Friday afternoon to those news outlets who filed FOIL requests,” Ravitz said.

The release would cover all 12,000 city teachers who have value-added reports, which measure a teacher’s effectiveness based on how good she is at improving her students’ test scores from the beginning of the year to the end.

The reports are a relatively new way of measuring teacher effectiveness and have been criticized by some researchers for their wide margins of error.

About 85 percent of city teachers don’t have value-added scores because they teach subjects other than English or math that are not covered by the state’s assessments.

Reporters from the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, New York Post, Daily News, and NY1 submitted Freedom of Information Requests for the value-added scores. GothamSchools did not request the scores.

  • JohnG

    I am a teacher who has wanted to know my rating for a very long time. I cannot get ahold of this information no matter how hard I try.
    AND YET, the Department -WHO CLAIMS TO CARE ABOUT GOOD TEACHING AND THE EDUCATION OF OUR STUDENTS- will release it to the press.
    To the press goes the information of my ‘teaching quality’, but not to me; the one who wants to improve.
    Perhaps, just perhaps, the DOE cares NOTHING about teaching, but cares EVERYTHING about perception.
    How dare they not even offer this information to teachers? How dare they NOT make it easy for pedagogues to find this information out? and then release it to the press!
    I now believe my supervisors at Tweed care nothing about what happens in their schools, or to their students.
    I hope they go soon. My support is with my union.

  • miss teacher

    Like JohnG, I have been unable to access my report. I suppose I’d get into trouble if I somehow published things like some of my students’ records of lateness to school, or lack of homework, or the number of times I asked specific parents to come into school to talk about their kids’ progress and conduct. Once again, we’re reminded that we have all the accountability but little relative authority. And according to the head honchos who come into my building, “EVERY teacher is a reading teacher” but I suppose you can only be excoriated if ELA is your official subject.

  • EFM

    And exactly how will releasing this information help anyone?

  • http://charterreformer.blogspot.com John

    I hope those value added numbers are an average of several years. Year to year value added ratings can fluctuate tremendously year to year.

    http://www.aasa.org/SchoolAdministratorArticle.aspx?id=11794

    John G makes a great point.

  • hzelon

    uft has filed a lawsuit to prevent this release of info, according to a press release that went out about an hour ago

  • hzelon

    sorry, injunction, not lawsuit — regret the error

  • Joe Schmo

    Releasing this information to the public will not accomplish anything at all. Teacher evaluations are mostly only important to the individual teacher and his or her supervisor in relation to keeping or losing a job, or in the future, granting tenure. The ratings at this time are not being used to evaluate teachers. However, these ratings WILL be used to formally rate teachers in the 2011 school year. I predict that we will see plenty of teachers who teach NY State tested subjects “transfer” to teaching positions that at this time are not tested.

  • Only Human

    My wish in my professional life is to be allowed to do my job. I require only that my privacy be respected- on the job and off. I have no objection to parents in my school, and my school only, seeing my ratings, if they feel that the hocus-pocus being presented will actually be useful. In fact, in the spirit of sharing, I plan to release my Effective/Ineffective Parenting Ratings. I have a formula, although no one understands it, based on only one criteria. Sounds about right.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Joe Schmo,

    Unfortunately, releasing this information to the public will accomplish quite a bit, all of it negative: it will mislead a largely uninformed public, scapegoat teachers, and enable Bloomberg’s media megaphones to call for blood.

    Which is precisely the intention, and part of the Randi Weingarten legacy.

  • http://californiafather.com californiafather

    One of our teachers committed suicide after his rating came out.  All in the name of sensationalist journalism. Hope same doesn’t happen in NYC.

  • Pingback: Will New York City Make Teacher’s “Value-Added” Scores Public On Friday? | Larry Ferlazzo's Websites of the Day...

  • BX Teacher

    Is this the DOE’s formal declaration of war?

  • http://www.accountabletalk.com Mr. A. Talk

    To those who have been unable to access their reports, go here:

    https://tdi.wcer.wisc.edu/Login.aspx

  • Pingback: Remainders: Closer - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

  • Invictus

    BX Teacher, they have declared war a long time ago.  The issue was that our Union has been passive about things until it is forced into the confrontation.  

  • Ms. Smith

    Fire the union! Randi Weingarten capitulated to DOE demands from day 1 in return for higher pay. This was long before RTTT, and “Superman” for that matter. The contract of 2005 was a travesty for the union. I and everyone I know saw this coming as a result of that contract. Anyone with half a brain could. She knew exactly what would happen. Had she articulated what the union is forced to do now 5 years ago, we would not be in this position. The city would never treat its male dominated unions like it does this one and she thought we would lay down and take it for extra money and she was right. STOP defending them. There’s no sticking with the union. That’s not what they’ve done for thousands of ATR and teachers stuck with vindictive and unprofessional adminstrations. i have no doubt, they will sell us out again. This ‘outrage’ is just an act for the masses-to ensure their jobs and survival of their ’shell’ union.

  • Pingback: My Blood, My Pound of Flesh, and My Test Scores « Outside the Cave

  • ASTRAKA

    What Union! UFT sold us out in 2005.

  • http://FriendsOfMacombs.com Friends Of Macombs

    Nation

    LA Teacher Suicide Sparks Test-Score Debate
    By: Christina Hoag
    AOLnews.com | September 28, 2010 (Updated: 22 days 14 hours ago)
    http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/la-teacher-rigoberto-ruelas-jrs-suicide-sparks-test-score-debate/19651509?icid=main|main|dl1|sec1_lnk3|173922

  • Pingback: A Sociological Eye on Education | Is the Washington, D.C. IMPACT system for evaluating teachers above average?

  • wei

    Promulgating this scoring system minimizes the importance of early childhood teachers of reading and math, let alone the teachers of other subject areas. Until they come up with a way to figure the value of my child’s first grade teacher of reading – maybe the most important job in the school – let them hold their scores for the teacher and the principal alone to see. Publishing them incorrectly makes these the most important values. If we believe fourth and fifth grade reading and math scores are the most important things an elementary school does, then so be it. I just don’t buy that these are the most important things an elementary school does.

  • brian dougherty

    And next to the teacher ratings they should include a parent rating to show who parents the best and the worst.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

14 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930