GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

policy matters

The education governor’s race: A Paladino and Cuomo primer

You may have noticed that we have a governor’s race going on in New York. But amid the love children, viral cell-phone videos, and upsetting e-mail forwards, policy issues are getting even more overshadowed than usual — including where the two candidates stand on education.

To remedy this, I’ve compiled a brief primer outlining the education stances of the Democrat, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, and the Republican, Tea Party-ite Buffalo businessman Carl Paladino.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Andrew Cuomo, the state's attorney general, is in the Obama Democrat camp on education.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Andrew Cuomo, the state's attorney general, sides with Obama and Bloomberg on education. (Photo via ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/saeba/4015439957/sizes/m/in/photostream/##Flickr## user ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/saeba/##saebaryo##)

Andrew Cuomo

HIS CAMP: Cuomo is framing himself as the great hope that Democrats for Education Reform activists once dreamed David Paterson would be — a “Barack Obama Democrat” on education, as one source put it to me. (Or, you might say, an “ideolocrat.”)

Cuomo kept himself out of the Race to the Top legislative battle (at least publicly). But his published platform mirrors DFER’s insistence on raising the cap on charter schools, and it quotes charter supporters’ warning that a union-backed push for more public consultation before opening a charter school would have amounted to a “poison pill.”

WHAT HE MIGHT DO: Cuomo’s decision to affiliate with DFER, Mayor Bloomberg, and the entrepreneurial camp on schools gives him a potentially long education wish list. That’s because almost all of the changes favored by these reformers are legislative; teacher tenure, “last in, first out” firing patterns, teacher pensions, and charter school growth are all matters of state law.

While other state Democrats (namely Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver) have allied themselves with the teachers union, Cuomo could act as a counter-force pushing for more changes to the state’s education law. It’s worth noting that nearly all of the education agenda Bloomberg laid out this week on NBC would require changes to state law.

WHY HE MIGHT NOT DO IT: Cuomo’s probably in for a fight with Silver and other Albany lawmakers, but will education be at the top of his list? The tough budget climate might give him even less leverage to pursue his agenda. A case in point is Eliot Spitzer, who balanced his endorsement of a charter cap lift with ending the long-running stalemate over the Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit. But the millions Spitzer promised have substantially tapered in the ugly budget climate, making “sweetener” deals hard to imagine.

Republican gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino, a Buffalo businessman, favors charter schools, vouchers, and firing the Board of Regents.

Republican gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino, a Buffalo businessman, favors charter schools, vouchers, and firing the Board of Regents. (Photo via ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/azipaybarah/4901884630/sizes/m/in/photostream/##WNYC's Azi Paybarah##)

Carl Paladino

HIS CAMP: Paladino’s campaign didn’t return my phone calls requesting information about his position on education, so I had to rely on his public statements (especially this Daily News interview) and a brief (and occasionally alarming) rundown of his education positions on his web site.

The statements suggest he would take Cuomo’s entrepreneurial endorsements (pro-charter schools, pro-Race to the Top) and raise them a long mile by endorsing vouchers, attempting to fire the entire state Board of Regents, repealing the 3020-A law that governs how teachers are fired, and overhauling education funding streams. He has promised to cut the state government by 20%, but this week he told the Daily News flatly, “I will not cut education funding.”

WHAT HE MIGHT DO: Paladino’s education statement also suggests creating “residential charter schools” that would begin in kindergarten. Paladino’s vision:

To ensure that no child is left behind, Carl will create residential charters in the worst urban school district where children reside starting at kindergarten. These charters will tackle problems created by dysfunctional homes such as ensuring proper dress codes, food is supplied and overall conditions provide a learning atmosphere.

The candidate also has specific plans for the members of the Board of Regents, who the statement says will have to “submit to the Governor signed and undated letters of resignation as of January 1, 2011.” The statement goes on, “As Governor, Carl will accept the resignation of those who think protecting union leaders is more important than not leaving any children behind.”

Paladino’s plans for the remaining Regents members, who govern the state’s education system, include this “demand”:

Carl will demand that the Regents Board remove the School Board and Superintendents of all school systems presently achieving a less than 60 percent graduation rate or having more than 25 percent of its schools in any form of academic distress and replace them with a competent “Special Master” with full authority to implement the changes necessary to effectively and quickly address the dysfunction.

WHY HE MIGHT NOT DO IT: Education officials and state leaders have sometimes quietly imagined a kind of state version of mayoral control that would dismantle the State Board of Regents, which oversees the state education system. But such an overhaul would be an uphill battle given that the Regents are appointed not by the governor, but by the state legislature.

Demanding resignations letters from Merryl Tisch and her fellow Regents would be a bully-pulpit move, but not a real request, and Paladino certainly would not have the authority to dictate how Tisch deals with local superintendents — nor could Tisch unilaterally fire local school boards and superintendents.

By a “residential charter school,” Paladino may have in mind something like the SEED School in D.C., a boarding charter school that is featured in the film “Waiting for ‘Superman.’” But SEED begins in middle school, not kindergarten.

  • http://www.classsizematters.org leonie haimson

    I love the way you frame the debate between the “idealocrats” and the teacher’s union; kind of leaves out everyone else, including parents. Also, Paladino’s vision of charter boarding schools, a la Newt Gingrich, ignores the huge expense of such schools, which are not likely to be financed by a state that has been cutting its education budget.

  • http://incongressional.com Esteban Rodriguez

    Two ugly choices.  But there is an alternative!

    I’m voting for Green party candidate Howie Hawkins.

    Here is the platform:

    Community and local communities having more control of their schools.

    Citizen oversight of school finance and changes.

    Parental involvement in school governance.

    Curriculum should focus on individual needs, not one size fits all.

    On Testing:

    While we recognize the need for testing to help measure a studentʼs educationalprogress, we deplore that it frequently serves in subordinating individual needs to theneeds of a factional norm. We also recognize that testing often reflects the culturalbiases or limitations of those designing and administering tests. High stakesstandardized tests should not be used, since a variety of alternative forms ofassessment can better evaluate a studentʼs progress.

  • Batman

    Wow, they both sound like winners (NOT)

  • Peter

    The elephant in he room is the budget, ARRA dollars end, the State faces a budget abyss … for the past decade the governor and the legslature filled holes and avoided addressing the core issue – Medicaid. NYS has the highest Medicaid costs in the nation, 1/3 of the State budget, rather than a program for the indigent it has become a middle class program (soft eligibility rules on long term care).

    There are only so many fights, I believe education will drift to a back burner, especially since attempts by DFER and their ilk failed to depose charter critics in the legislature.

    For the legislature it is always easier to do nothing, RttT dangled $700 million, and, the legislature changed laws, with the involvement of the teacher unions. Without the lure of dollars, and with the oppostion of teachers it is highly unlikely that changes in tenure or layoff rules will prevail.

    BTW, refusing to vote, i.e., voting for the Green Party, is a vote for Paladino … who was the last pro teacher union governor … ? The defeat of Fenty was a clear lesson for all electeds … Did Cuomo notice?

  • http://incongressional.com Esteban Rodriguez

    Give me a break.  

    Peter’s framing of the argument “who was the last pro teacher union governor … ?” is familiar to the nonsense that is being spewed about on the national level:  Teacher’s unions are bad and stand in the way of helping students.

    It disregards that teacher’s union’s are made up of teachers; Teachers that care deeply about their students and want them to succeed.  

    I choose to vote for a third party candidate because he has good ideas for education, instead of the faulty “reforms” that the others espouse.   

    Should that crazy bigot Paladino win, at least I know he will get zero of his ludicrous agenda passed.  The Democrats in the legislature would not stand for it.

    Furthermore, by losing the Governorship of NY, a race where they should definitely have won,   the message to the democratic party will be resounding: don’t insult the public by sending fifth column candidates like Cuomo.

  • fed up

    I agree with Esteban- I was thinking this morning about how neither big-party candidate is worthy of my vote. And should I choose to vote for Hawkins, as opposed to writing in Snooki from Jersey Shore, I would hope that there would be enough votes to at least scare Dems and Repukes. To be honest, Peter, I don’t share your confidence about tenure and seniority being left alone. When it comes to the schools, it seems that the mayor and chancellor do what they want, and can buy what they want.

  • Peter

    Should that crazy bigot Paladino win, at least I know he will get zero of his ludicrous agenda passed. The Democrats in the legislature would not stand for it.

    As Patterson showed us Governor’s, not the legislature control the budget. By not coming to an agreement with the legislature, and forcong the legislature to pass monthly extenders, the governor ended up with his budget …

    We’ve had consecutive 20 years of governors hostile to teachers, we fight, we survive.

    Are you a registered Democrat? Did you vote in the primary?

    Do you visit your legislators offices?

    If you are not involved you are ceding power to those who are.

  • abandoned by the democrats

    I am a middle of the road Democrat and was going to sit out this governor’s race (I am still voting Attorney General–Schneiderman!)….but agree with Esteban…after looking at Howie Hawkins’ website and his stands, I am definitely voting for him.  Cuomo is too anti-public education and will be a tool of those who want to destroy public education and suck the money out of it for profits.

    I will urge others to vote for Hawkins instead of not voting. Most of the teachers in my school are disgusted by Cuomo and his disdain for public education (and other issues).  I will also feel that I feel so let down by Obama that if he runs again in 2012, I will vote for another third party candidate.  The Democrats have seemingly abandoned public education.  Shame on them!

  • abandoned by the democrats

    Oops….I guess I can’t edit my last comment.  I made a grammatical “boo boo” as I was distracted and did what I always warn my students not to do–submit an assignment, so to speak, without proofreading! 

    So let me correct myself–

    Delete “I will also feel that…” in the middle of the second paragraph…. :D

  • John G

    Teacher tenure and related items are NOT the problem with education today… An educational system that, like NBC this past week, uses the press as the ultimate authority are. A little (or a lot of) confusion among these people are in my better interest. If cuomo is elected, he’ll set achievable goals that may negatively effect my job. And he’ll achieve those goals. If Paladino is elcted, he’ll over-reach, achieve nothing, and i, as a teacher, will keep my tenure, my seniority rights and my pension for at least a little longer.
    So, it is in my better interest as a public school teacher to vote for paladino, urge my fellow uft-ers to do the same and hope that he’s elected..,, and causes so much chaos in Albany that me and my family are secure as i continue to work 13 hours a day teaching my students and hoping for a good scholarship report each June.
    I always knew id vote for a Republican someday. I gueas thia November is that day. I hope other teachers can do the math as well.

  • Peter

    John G

    Paladino does not need the legislature to drastically cut the budget … leading to substantial layoffs … I’d rather try and change Cuomo’s mind … after all he has ambitions to be the first Italian president

  • Esteban Rodriguez

    Peter,

    First off, Cuomo was unchallenged in the primary.

    Second, you seem to assume I have done nothing but complain about the course of educational policy.

    I have visited my legislators and wrote them letters, protested and marched for poor and middle class issues such as strong public education. In fact, I’ll be in DC tomorrow proudly marching for those progressive values.

    As far as changing Cuomo’s mind, it just isn’t going to happen. People have been trying to change the course of national educational policy. Yet the Obama admin will not change course despite scientific evidence that these reforms do not and will not work.

    Just like Obama, Cuomo’s mind is set. There is just too much private financial interest in exploiting poor and middle class children, families, communities and workers.

  • Peter

    Esteban

    Great … I’ll wave to you in DC.

    Change is incremental, Obama moved from “persistently lowest achieving” schools must replace staffs to the “transformation” model … schools change principals and retain staffs … his “Blueprint,” proposed changes in ESEA are also changing … every demonstration, every rally, every letter, every constituent visit has impact … defeating Fenty in DC, fending off the charterers who tried to depose three anti charter legislators, these are all significant steps …

    Spitzer and Cuomo had huge $$, they campaigned outside the democratic party structure …

    The UFT supports parent outreach committees in the borough offices, active parents and teachers that work with a wide range of community organizations under the Coalition for Education Justice banner (CEJ) … you shouls attend one of the meetings … grassroots organizing has enormous impact … lets hope that tomorrow’s DC rally begins a change in the direction of ed policy.

  • John G

    Pete,
    Tomorrow’s rally will begin a change in nothing. We are now living in a time of criminalization of teacher unions and the teachers who believe in them. For just over a year, it has been a bonafide banwagon against us.
    Cuomo’s mind will not be changed. He will achieve goals that will make my professional life less secure and he will call it education reform.
    At least the choas that a Palidono administration is sure to bring will amount to nothing getting done by way of taking my pension, or taking my union protections… Let him duke it out with Tisch so we cal all go back to teaching.

  • http://nyceducator.com NYC Educator

    Did Cuomo notice what happened in DC? He’s shown no evidence of it. I refuse to vote for an anti-union, anti-teacher governor, as should every teacher.

    Accepting such nonsense weakens us, makes us worthless. All the talk about people who vote against their interests, about what happened to Kansas. What happened was they voted for people who didn’t support their interests. Should we do that just because corporatists call themselves Democrats?

    It’s unconscionable. Further unconscionable is the endorsement of the Working Families party of a candidate who fails to support working families. No more automatic votes for Democrats from this Democrat.

  • ASTRAKA

    “–I’d rather try and change Cuomo’s mind …”

    Yeah, right! The way we tried to change Bloomberg’s mind, by not supporting Thompson.
    Great strategy.

  • NYCParent

    I was hoping Lazio would stay in the race, so that if those of us who wanted to vote for the Green Party might actually seen a run-off between Hawkins and Paladino.  Now THAT would have been interesting.  All the same, with this mishmash of options, parents who want their interests represented should vote for Hawkins.  After all, there are enough of us in NYS — he might win!

  • Eliza

    Hi commenters,

    I am a freelance reporter working on a story about the education issue in upcoming elections. I am interested in what I’m hearing from teachers who are so outraged with Cuomo that they are considering voting for Paladino, or at least for Hawkins which might hurt Cuomo’s chances to win.

    If you are willing to speak with me for my article I would love to get some of your voices. Feel free to call me at (617) 320-8123 – boston cell #, but i’m in Brooklyn – or email me at elizarh@gmail.com

    Hope to hear from some of you.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

10 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031