GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

making the grade

Most schools’ grades drop as city releases report cards

The percentage of elementary and middle schools to get A’s on their city-issued report cards fell this year from 84 to 25 percent — a drop precipitated by more students failing the exams and the city grading schools on a curve.

Of the city’s 1,140 elementary and middle schools, 35 percent (396 schools) received B’s, 35 (398 schools) got C’s, 4 percent (49 schools) got D’s and 1 percent (8 schools) got F’s. More schools scored low enough to get failing grades, but their final marks were buoyed by city officials’ decision to limit the amount by which a school’s grade could fall this year.

About 70 percent of schools saw their grades drop this year. Roughly 400 had their grades fall by one letter and about 340 dropped by two letter grades. Only 22 schools went up at least one letter grade.

Last year, students’ inflated scores on the state exams led 84 percent of schools to get A’s, 13 percent to get B’s, and two percent got C’s. Only two schools got F’s.

This year, as a result of the city’s limit on how far scores could fall, schools that got A’s in 2009 could not receive a grade lower than a C. A “B” school last year couldn’t be worse than a “D” this year.

The safety net may confuse parents hoping to use the grades to help them choose were to send their children. On a list of the city’s lowest-scoring schools, only two received F grades and the majority were awarded C’s, raising questions about what it means to be a “C” school this year.

For a handful of schools, the safety net was a saving grace. These schools’ scores in the three assessed categories — performance, environment, and progress — were so low that they would have earned D’s or F’s under normal conditions and could have motivated the city to close them. But because these schools got A’s on their progress reports last year, they couldn’t score lower than a C.

Ross Global Academy is one of these schools. The charter school, which opened in 2006, got an F in all three categories and the lowest overall score of all 1,140 schools. Its final grade this year is a C because in 2009, it was awarded an A.

Schools can face leadership changes or closure if they receive grades of D or F, or if they receive C’s three years running. A Department of Education spokesman said that the city would not change its criteria this year. Schools that would have received D’s or F’s, but whose grades were boosted to C’s, will only be considered for phase-out if they continue to receive low grades in future years.

15 Schools with Lowest Overall Scores

1.     Ross Global Academy Charter School: 0.1, overall grade C
2.     Brooklyn Collegiate: 4.4, overall grade D
3.     P.S. 118 Lorraine Hansberry: 5.1, overall grade C
4.     P.S. 55 Henry Boehm: 5.7, overall grade C
5.     P.S. 107: 6.3 overall grade D
6.     Cornerstone Academy for Social Action: 7.6, overall grade F
7.     Urban Assembly Academy for Civic Engagement: 7.9, overall grade C
8.     School for Environmental Citizenship (K-3): 8.5, overall grade F
9.     P.S. 115 Alexander Humboldt: 9.3, overall grade C
10.  School of Diplomacy: 10.1, overall grade C
11.  Harlem Day Charter School: 10.2, overall grade C
12.  P.S. 193 Alfred Kennedy: 10.9, overall grade C
13.  Institute for Collaborative Education: 11.0, overall grade C
14.  Mott Hall IV: 11.1, overall grade C
15.  Sisulu-Walker Charter School: 11.2, overall grade C

  • http://incongressional.com Esteban Rodriguez

    The overall rosy outlook on education by Bloomberg-Klein administration has been a complete farce.  

    The rising grades on school report cards and their precipitous drop prove they really are just tools to make these politicians and their cronies look good.  

    It is so sad that students have been denied vital help because of politicking.

    Mayoral control has got us nowhere!

  • !

    Actually, it’s gotten us somewhere. Only it’s a place that is far worse than before the Mayor and Chancellor placed their lying, incompetent and abusive hands on our children. And while those two incompetents and the equally incompetent US Secretary of Education are patting themselves on the back for doing nothing but wreaking havoc, it is getting a whole lot worse.

  • District 13 parent

    ICE? Ridiculous! They don’t do test-prep, but it’s a very strong and sought after school. 

  • Batman

    How much longer for Doomberg and Slime? It’s about 3 more years, correct? Don’t get scared fellow gotham teachers as Batman will save you! Not much can change and when it does (if it does) those two “jokers” will be onto bigger and better things. What’s important is who will our next mayor be and who will he/she bring in as a new chancellor? These grades are corny and mean nothing!

  • Michael M.

    The table above shows one level of continuing silliness: there is no ordinal match-up between overall numeric score and overall letter grade.

    0.1 to 11.2 is the numeric range of the weakest 15.
    At both ends, they get C’s. 11 C’s total.
    And there are two D’s and two F’s sprinkled through.
    And the two D’s did WORSE than the two F’s.

    Off-line, I looked up LAST year’s two F’s (2008-2009). One got a B this year (2009-2010).

    There’s a plummet limiter, DOE is happy to note, but no spike limiter. Go figger.

    Let the games continue.

  • Pogue

    The DOE, what a joke. An incompetent administration, chockfull of six-figured-salaried elitist business wunderkinds, amateur principals, and TFA resume builders…all while experimenting on and abusing the public school children of NYC.

    How do the daily rags let them get away with it?

  • http://newschool.edu/milano/nycaffairs/SchoolsAccountability_HowToReadASchoolProgressReport.aspx Clara Hemphill

    At the Center for New York City Affairs, we published a report in June that called these reports “seriously flawed.” If you want help reading them, take a look at this link:

    http://newschool.edu/milano/nycaffairs/SchoolsAccountability_HowToReadASchoolProgressReport.aspx

  • Green Hornet

    Those Charter Schools are doing a great job. — (Sarcasim in case you didn’t know).

  • http://www.classsizematters.org Leonie Haimson

    check out my critique of the entire system and why the grades are highly unreliable here:

    http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/2010/09/why-school-grading-system-and-joel.html

  • http://www.classsizematters.org Leonie Haimson

    Also check our the UFT’s calculation: A higher percentage of regular public schools got A’s or B’s than charter schools. 60 elementary/middle school charter schools were rated; 48 % of charters got As or Bs; 61% of regular public schools got As or Bs.

    According to their calculations, twice the percentage of charters got failing grades (8% compared to 4%) Perhaps GS can check the numbers and get back to us.

    If this is true, is it because of lower performance given the demographics and/or peer groups? In most cases, the environment grade is high, and according to earlier reports, the performance was no worse that district schools.

    Charters:

    A = 20 % (12)

    B = 28 % (17)

    C = 41 % (25)

    D = 8 % (5)

    F = .01% (1)

    Schools citywide (excluding charters)

    A -26 %

    B- 35%

    C- 35%

    D- 4%

    F – .006%

  • Teacher

    I understand that it’s the first time they’ve given Early Childhood schools a rating. What do they base the performance grade on since most of these schools are Pre-K (or Kindergarten) to 2nd grade and standardized testing doesn’t begin until 3rd grade. Do they actually take 3rd grade ELA and Math scores and then somehow determine the value added by the feeder schools the previous year(s)?? Is it valid to evaluate the value added by the feeder schools a year or more after the students have left that school?

  • Smith

    Do parents actually use these scores? I have no idea what grade my kids’ schools have gotten the last 2 years and it occurs to me now that we never looked at these scores when going through the middle school application process.

  • Michael M.

    Can someone explain why peer groups are defined differently for middle schools than elementary schools?

    Why are “% Black/Hispanic” and “% ELL” NOT considered in middle school peer groups when we know there’s a correlation between them and test results?

  • jack

    Sisulu-Walker is the oldest charter school in the city. How long can they last with their terrible scores? 

  • parent

    Instead of constantly looking at how many children are at the 2 or 3 level, the level of those scoring 4s should be taken into account. At my child’s horrible elementary school the principal has told me to my face that she doesn’t feel the need to teach to the 4 level. Hence most of the students are at the 3 level and all the budget and teacher attention goes to the remedial. There are no enrichment classes and if you can pass the test already, you are basically ignored. This makes PS 162 one of the worst performing schools in District 26 with a very low percentage of students earning a 4 in ELA. Most of the other schools in District 26 have over 50% of their students scoring at the 4 level. Oh well, I guess students can’t score on the highest level of the test when they are never taught the material.

  • Michael M.

    Parent,

    It pains me to defend DOE, but they are aware of that trap, and on first blush, the new “progress” method appears to be an improvement over the prior one.

    At the risk of oversimplifying, one of the upsides in the new method of calculating “progress” is to reward schools for moving kids up the “percentile growth” ladder, rather than the “you made it ‘over the bubble’ from 2 to 3″ method used the prior three rounds. To some degree this rewards moving a 3 to a 4, which got zippo previously.

    That being said, the current scheme STILL gives more weight to progress in the “lowest third” of the pool on two of the four parameters in the “progress” category weighted 60%. Further, this effectively double-weights progress for that lower third.

    They also changed from “average” to “median”, but I haven’t thought that one through. My hunch is that when you have 4′s maxing out easy tests, “median” (half did better, half did worse) is the better view.

    Principals remain incentivized to help lower performing kids more. As well they should, imho. This will remain true as long as better-performing kids can max out tests you can prep for, regardless of where the 1/2/3/4 break points are placed. However, these are ALL byproducts of a THRESSHOLD based, rather than an EXCELLENCE based system.

    The widget factory is looking for quality control, not superior widgets.

  • Pingback: Insideschools.org : Blogs

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

15 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031