GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Outside the Cave

The Conversation Needs to Change

I am going to be on stage with Brian Williams this Sunday at noon as part of NBC’s “Education Nation” Teacher Town Hall. The week-long Education Nation event, coming on the back of the release of “Waiting for ‘Superman‘” and Oprah’s two education specials this week, has received a lot of negative pushback from educators and parents who feel that their voices are being left out of the conversation. When I was approached, I knew I could not miss the chance to talk about great teaching before a national audience, and I hope I will have the chance to do so, because the current national conversation over education needs to change.

The first change we need is to get over the public vs. charter school debate. It makes no sense to be pro- or anti-charter; the only question that should matter is whether a school is helping students to learn. Until we focus on how to improve all schools, be them public or charter, nothing will change. There is nothing about being a charter that tells us anything about whether or not a school is effective. There are good and bad charter schools, just as there are good and bad public schools. Let’s stop wasting our breath over this debate.

The next change we need is a shift from talking about testing and accountability towards talking about curriculum and learning. There’s a ridiculous notion that bad teachers are bad because they are lazy, and if we could just hold their feet to the fire, they would improve, or leave. That’s simply not reality. Most struggling teachers simply don’t know any better. We need to begin conversations about what they should be doing in their classrooms before their students are assessed, and then figure out how to support teachers in doing this.

While we’re at it, we need to expand our understanding of the term “assessment.” Good and great teachers are constantly assessing their students in a variety of formal and informal methods. They know that a multiple choice exam will only reveal a very narrow slice of what students know and can do. Good assessments that really show what students’ abilities are are open-ended, allowing for students to take multiple approaches to show what they can do. As with most real-life work, they don’t happen in a 47 minute block of time, and students have the opportunity to get feedback and revise throughout the process.

Finally, we need to stop asking questions about teacher retention, because we know the answers. Teachers who feel they are successful will stay (unless they are enticed to move on to “bigger and better” opportunities), teachers who don’t will not. For more new teachers to be successful, they need smaller class loads so they have time more time to plan, reflect, and observe; just like students, they need frequent and regular feedback from both peers and supervisors; and they need to spend time in other teachers’ classrooms to learn from their triumphs and mistakes. I was extremely lucky: my teacher preparation program started with team-teaching a summer school class, where I was observed for the full three hours everyday. The 45 hours of observation and 15 hours of feedback I received that summer is more than my colleagues who entered the profession through Teach for America or the NYC Teaching Fellows receive in the first five years of their career. Then, as a student teacher, my program limited me to teaching two classes so I could sound the rest of the day observing other teachers. These three factors have served as the foundation for my subsequent successes in the classroom.

  • ATR

    These conversations have been taken place for years and no one is listening.  Linda Darling Hammond is one of the leading education researchers.  She has written about teacher training and retention exhaustively. I rarely hear her name mentioned.  We know what we have to do to “fix” failing schools but we don’t have the will to do it.  We want the quick fix because as a society, the kids we are failing are the most vulnerable and the least considered.  You work in the Bronx so you should know that first hand.  

  • ASTRAKA

    Stephen,
    the “conversation will change”, if experienced educators in each specific subject areas are consulted. You will not see any meaningful changes in education by individuals whose education experience is minimal. You will not see any meaningful changes when the workforce that you need is demonized and disrespected. The money that is spent on charter schools can not be and will not be spent for all public schools. The fact that charter schools exist has created a three Tier educational system.
    1. Private schools for the rich.
    2. Public education schools threatened with closure.
    3. Charter schools used for political purposes.
    Our economy has changed. The jobs available for our youngsters have been sent overseas.
    The efforts made for education reform are misguided. We should be focused on a new curriculum for a new economic reality, rather than on testing and flawed accountability.

  • http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/teacher_in_a_strange_land/ Nancy Flanagan

    Stephen,

    Like many hard-working teachers, I am sickened by the presumption being made by NBC in producing Education Nation: Public education has failed. The villains are bad teachers and the unions that protect them, the heroes are Teach for America and the solution is dismantling the great American idea of a free, high-quality education at public expense for all kids.

    This invitation was issued by David Nurnberg of NBC today: “We are excited to share with you the details for a very special Education Nation panel discussion with Brian Williams titled, “The Lessons of New Orleans: Does Education Need a Katrina?” At the fifth anniversary of Katrina, the rebuilt New Orleans school district is an incredible study in the power of resilience and the possibility of starting anew. This panel will examine the advantages to the New Orleans school district of starting over post-Katrina, and whether the lessons learned there can be applied across the country.”

    The “advantages” of wiping away an entire city’s school system? We “need” this?

    You have big shoes to fill, Stephen. Please remember that you are, quite literally, representing millions of hard-working teachers who are doing their best for kids under difficult conditions. I am impressed by your level-headed approach to school reform, but I fear you will be in the minority at this Town Hall. If NBC truly valued the voices of teachers, they would be front and center on the other panels.

    Best wishes.

  • Teacher G

    I agree with you on all points but one. There is a reason to expose the problems with charter schools.

    With so much “reform” focused on expanding charter schools it is important to realize that they are not the magic bullet many have made them out to be. You can’t compare Public and Charter schools in NYC, because the charters are playing by different rules with different students.

    Several high performing charter schools have changed the threshold for grade promotion from 65 to 80. Its not hard to have a 100% passing rate on standardized tests when only students that have 80′s in the class take the test. If a student has less than an 80, it is likely they will be transferring out of the charter to a public school, rather than being left back. That’s why the charter schools with high standardized test scores are also the ones with 30% attrition.

    In addition, we know that the charter schools that are enrolling fewer ELL’s and SPED students.

    Charter schools are also investing big money on PR and advertising. As a result we hear about the success of Harlem Success Academy or Harlem Village academy, but we don’t hear about the great work P.S. 83 is doing in the same district.

    The PR campaign has worked. Reform to many now means, expanding charter schools and providing them with huge (multi million dollar) donations. We can’t address the current reform movement unless we also address the fact that CHARTER SCHOOLS ARE NOT PROVIDING PUBLIC EDUCTION, but education for the top 2/3 of students. If we listen to their PR firms long enough we will forget that the bottom 1/3, the group of students our reform movement should focused on, are left out. I guess not all of them are left out. Some of them will attend P.S. 83 a high performing public schools that is humbly doing the job they were meant to do – Education all children.

    If we were to sit down with Geoffrey Canada for a drink he would tell us what reform really means. “Keep the kids that make your test scores and graduation rates look great. Create policies that ensure the low performing students transfer back to a public school. Once your numbers look good hire a PR firm to get you on Oprah.”

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

17 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031