GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

dueling memos

SUNY disputes city authority to mandate charter parent groups

One of the state’s charter school authorizers is putting the brakes on a city directive that would force all charters to form parent associations.

Yesterday, the head of the city’s charter school office issued a memo to all charter school leaders in the city — even at schools the city did not authorize — saying that state law required them to form parent groups. The city would oversee schools’ compliance with the new requirement, the memo said.

Hours later, the director of the State University of New York’s Charter School Institute, Jonas Chartock, issued a memo of his own. It said that SUNY-authorized schools can ignore the city’s directive. (Chartock’s full letter to SUNY charter schools is below.)

Charter schools are exempt from the law that governs the rest of the state’s schools, Chartock said. And because the new parent association requirement is part of that broader law, it does not apply to charter schools, he said.

The confusion centers on the minute details of amendments to a law that were hastily written in late-night negotiations in May. At the same time Albany doubled the number of charter schools allowed to open in the state, it also amended the state education law that governs mayoral control. The amendment requires the city to establish:

a parents’ association or a parent-teachers’ association in each PUBLIC school under the chancellor’s jurisdiction, and ensur[e] that the districts AND CHARTER SCHOOLS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY DISTRICT do the same. (The words in capital letters are the new amendments.)

The city is trying to comply with the second part of that paragraph, which requires the chancellor to make sure that all schools — district and charter alike — have parent groups.

“The way that we interpret the law is that the chancellor is obligated to monitor that each school has a parent association for all of the schools in his district, including charter schools,” said Aaron Listhaus, acting executive director of the city’s charter school office.

But SUNY reasons that the school governance law does not apply to its charter schools at all, since they are not under the chancellor’s jurisdiction and the SUNY Board of Trustees is the only body with oversight power over the schools.

“There’s actually not a disagreement,” said James Merriman, the head of the New York City Charter Center. The state mayoral control law does not apply to charter schools by design, Merriman said. But the chancellor does have to follow the law, which means doing everything in his power to make sure that all charter schools form the parent groups.

And there are ways the city can pressure charters into forming parent groups, even if the schools aren’t legally required to start them.

For example, Chartock’s memo notes that he expects the city to make forming a parent organization a condition for any charter school that wants city space. Alternately, if a charter school authorized by SUNY or the Board of Regents refused to start a parent group, the city could refuse to endorse the school when it goes up for renewal. Under the new law, the authorizers are required to take those endorsements into account when making its decisions.

It’s still unclear exactly how the city would proceed if a school authorized by SUNY or the Regents refused to start a parent association. But in the end, Merriman predicted this will be a minor issue since “virtually all” charters already have parent organizations (though no exact numbers were available).

From: Proctor, Cynthia

Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 7:38 PM

To: Charter Schools

Cc: Chartock, Jonas; Rossi, Ralph
Subject: IMPORTANT Msg. from SUNY Charter Schools Institute re: NYCDOE email sent earlier today
Importance: High

September 7, 2010

MEMORANDUM

To:     SUNY Authorized Charter School Leaders and Board Chairs

From:   Jonas S. Chartock, Executive Director, SUNY Charter Schools Institute

Subject:   NYCDOE Email Regarding Parent Associations

Earlier today (Sept. 7, 2010) the New York City Department of Education (the “NYCDOE”) distributed a memorandum to all charter school leaders in New York City that stated each charter school located in New York City must establish a parents’ association or parent-teacher association.  The NYCDOE then further instructed all charter schools located in New York City to report to its Charter Schools Office by October 1 regarding the establishment of such an organization.

Please feel free to disregard the NYCDOE’s memorandum in its entirety for the following reasons:

*       As a SUNY authorized charter school your school is an independent and autonomous public school not associated in any way with the NYCDOE or its Chancellor.

*       Under the Charter Schools Act, the only New York State or local entities that have oversight authority for your school (other than your school’s board of trustees) are the SUNY Board of Trustees (which acts through the Charter Schools Institute) and the Board of Regents (which acts through the State Education Department).

*       The New York City Schools Chancellor has no jurisdictional authority over your school.

*       The amendments to the Education Law referenced by the NYCDOE in its memo were not amendments to the Charter Schools Act, they were only amendments that affect the NYCDOE and its Chancellor.

*       Like many other laws and regulations applicable to NYCDOE schools, SUNY authorized charter schools are exempt from the parent association requirement by the clear language of Education Law subdivision 2854(1), which is part of the Charter Schools Act.  It states that unless the law or regulation relates to student health, safety, civil rights or assessment requirements, charter schools are “exempt from all other state and local laws, rules, regulations or policies governing public or private schools, boards of education and school districts.”

*       We recognize that all SUNY authorized charter schools carefully consider the most effective role for parents in their particular school community, whether via an association, representation on the school’s board of trustees, parent committees, and/or regular communication with parents.

Note:   As the New York City Schools Chancellor is still bound by the amendment to Education Law section 2590-h, it may be prudent for charter schools housed in NYCDOE space to respond to the memo as we expect the Chancellor will require it as a condition of remaining in NYCDOE space even though the NYCDOE has not yet announced that requirement.

Please feel free to contact Ralph Rossi, the Institute’s Vice President and General Counsel at ralph.rossi@suny.edu, or me with any questions or concerns.

Jonas S. Chartock
Executive Director
SUNY Charter Schools Institute
41 State Street, Suite 700
Albany, New York 12207
Phone:  (518) 433-8277
Fax:  (518) 427-6510
jonas.chartock@suny.edu
http://www.newyorkcharters.org


  • Ellen

    Aw, nuts! why not have a parent association? is there something to be afraid of in having a parent association? Or is CUNY so accustomed to being isolated from parents that they want the isolation to start before college? How silly he looks…and petty.

  • http://www.nycharterparents.org Mona Davids (NY Charter Parents Association)

    Hmmm, we were expecting this.  The law is clear, EVERY charter school in NYC is required to have a PA/PTA.  NYCPA will hold SUNY charters in NYC individually accountable to the law.  We’re not afraid of a court fight.

    Having PA/PTA’s is OUR CIVIL RIGHT!

    We will not accept OUR CIVIL RIGHTS being violated.

  • You Running Scared Jo?

    I see that Jonas and other authorizers/school leaders must be terrified on having parent involvement at these charters schools. How dare parents and teachers work in partnership to make a great enviroment for these children without the hedge fund millionaires/billionaires along with their puppets deciding what is best for OUR children!!!
    Clearly charter schools are in communities of color in which our black and latino children are the majorities at these schools. So what does that translate to? It means that Jo-BLOW-nas, Peter “Muffin” Murphy and the rest of the PROPOSED
    money making pocket educators do not care that black/latino parents have ANY input when it comes to having an independent voice for matters concerning THEIR child. I know that they will combat this statement as well as have SCRIPTED parents to voice the mission and vision of these money making educators oops I mean charters MISEDUCATING our black/latino children. If this isn’t educational racial profiling, I don’t know what else it could be!!!!!!!!

  • Michael Fiorillo

    You Running Scared JO?

    I love your racial profiling analogy.

    And it’s entirely correct: the ed deformers have targeted urban minority communities as a means of creating a wedge between unionized public schools (sidestepping the atter of improving the system as a whole) and privatized-but publicly-funded charters. Meanwhile, the children are culled, skimmed, cherry-picked and used as both props for the ongoing propaganda campaign, as a target population of regimented test prep intended to socialize them to the tedium and powerlessness of the jobs that await them in the future, and as guinea pigs in the cult-like behavior modification methods at charter chains like KIPP. 

    That they then deceptively wrap themselves in the mantle of the civil rights movement makes it all the more sickening.

  • Apple1

    I think you are missing one point. The csi email seems more about telling His Holiness that he can’t just go barking orders to schools he has nothing to do with. i have two kids in two different charter schools. both are run by csi which i knew because i get their reports about how the school is doing. one has a parent org which I stopped going to the meetings because they were a joke – there were people there who didn’t even have kids in the school – it was just a chance to talk while some parent — usually me — watched all the kids inthe back of the room. the other has a parent on the board of directors. I did have a big problem with one school and how strict it is. I called csi and they helped me.

  • Brian Baker

    I don’t get the hub-bub… Seems like more of a jurisdictional issue than one of ill-intent or discrimination on the part of the state authorizers.  Turf protection, pure and simple.  I just checked out the renewal “benchmarks” SUNY uses & it clearly emphasizes parental satisfaction (http://www.newyorkcharters.org/documents/renewalBenchmarks.doc) in section 2B. My understanding is that this group is the only one to have closed a number of under-performing schools (that were inadequately serving primarily Black and Latino children) and they use these very benchmarks to do so.  Seems to me that if these schools are smart, they’ll abide by the spirit of the DOE directive (knowing that they do not technically have to do so), and continue to value parental satisfaction per the terms of their charters. 

  • Robert

    Come on guys. If having a parent association was the answer then the district schools would be so good no parent would want to send their kid to a charter school. And I dont agree with the race charge. I put my son in a charter high school because my zone school had a graduation rate for black students at 21% and at the same time 61% of white students graduated. Its been that way since we were in school. Charters have more of our kids and they perform better.

  • http://blog.nycsa.org Peter Murphy

    “You Running Scared Jo” – whoever you are, please read what is actually written by me and others, since nowhere are we opposing the formation of parent organizations. By all means feel free to form them at charters. And how about identifying yourself?

    - Peter “Muffin” Murphy

  • Michael M.

    MF,

    Re “That they then deceptively wrap themselves in the mantle of the civil rights movement makes it all the more sickening.”

    Worse. In a May 2009 Huffington Post essay, Chancellor Klein (in so many words) BLAMES the TEACHERS themselves as the obstacles to minority kids’ civil rights, albeit behind the gauze of critiquing how they are “recruited, rewarded, and retained.” Because the current contract and performance metrics creates racist teachers?

    To whit: “Poor and minority students will never get their fair share of educational opportunity — and are far more likely to lead unsuccessful lives — until administrators and political leaders commit to fundamentally changing the way teachers are recruited, rewarded, and retained. The goal is as easy to articulate as it is hard to realize: that every classroom will one day be led by an effective instructor who demonstrably advances student learning.”

    On what basis does the Chancellor accuse the teachers — regardless of how they are recruited, rewarded, and retained — of such discrimination? Is Klein asserting that teachers work harder to teach white kids than black kids?

    A clarification is long overdue.

    http (colon) //www (dot) huffingtonpost (dot) com/joel-klein/transforming-the-teaching_b_200616 (dot) html

  • Carmen

    peter “muffin” murphy,

    Many people on this blog, including charter school leaders, teachers and parents don’t post their names. I’m a charter parent who will not post my name because I know my school leaders and charter chain will retaliate against me by targeting my child. Everybody knows that’s what they do to parents who question anything or lord forbid stand up for their rights.

    You lie when saying charters don’t prevent parents from starting parent organizations. My charter chain, Uncommon Schools sent parents a letter from their attorney threatening to sue the parents for wanting to start a PTA.
    How dare you and all the other white upper class charterpreneurs stand in the way of black low income parents having PTA’s?

    Michael Fiorella- you are 100% right about them training our kids to be their future servants, completely submissive to them. They’d never allow their kids to be mistreated and brainwashed the way OUR kids are by them.

    OUR kids are not chattel. Uncommon Schools will have PTA’s and we will have a voice in our schools!

  • http://blog.nycsa.org Peter Murphy

    to Carmen: If it’s so bad at Uncommon, why are you a charter parent? You don’t have to be one. This may be a wasted effort on my part, but someone with whom you disagree does not translate to that someone telling lies. Sheesh.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

19 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930