GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

NYC Green Schools

D.C. Said No To Chocolate Milk. Why Not NYC?

Earlier this summer District of Columbia school officials decided to ban chocolate milk from their schools. Proponents of flavored milk argue it’s the only way to get students to drink milk, which provides the calcium, protein and vitamin D that children need. But as Colorado school chef Ann Cooper has pointed out, “Saying we need to add sugar and flavoring to milk to get kids to drink it is like saying we need to feed kids apple pie if they don’t like apples.”

NYC Green Schools has proposed that New York City schools also get rid of chocolate milk as the daily consumption of sweetened drinks has no place in a child’s diet. Here’s the truth about the chocolate milk served daily to New York City’s schoolchildren: It contains 22 grams of sugar, which is more sugar than half a can of coke, and it is sweetened with high-fructose corn-syrup, which is listed as the second ingredient.

With 40 percent of city children either overweight or obese, why does the Department of Education’s Office of SchoolFood still insist on chocolate milk? The question is especially vexing because the city decided recently to eliminate sugary drinks from school vending machines, citing irrefutable evidence linking the increased consumption of sugary drinks with the rising rates of childhood obesity.

One SchoolFood official told us that the SchoolFood office is “in the business of food” and that chocolate milk sells. We can only assume this is the same rationale of the dairy industry for continuing to produce chocolate milk. Milk sold in schools makes up 7 percent of all milk sales in the country, and flavored milk constitutes 71 percent of the milk served in our nation’s schools. Neither the city nor the industry wants to risk losing “business” by serving only plain white milk, even though this is clearly the healthier option for our children.

The high-fructose corn syrup in the chocolate milk also poses a health risk to students.  The Washington Post reported last year that new studies had found that “almost half of tested samples of commercial high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) contained mercury, which was also found in nearly a third of 55 popular brand-name food and beverage products where HFCS is the first- or second-highest labeled ingredient.” In a prepared statement, the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy’s David Wallinga, a co-author of both studies, said, “Mercury is toxic in all its forms. Given how much high fructose corn syrup is consumed by children, it could be a significant additional source of mercury never before considered.”

In The Nutrition Deficit Disorder Book, renowned pediatrician William Sears explains that because high-fructose corn syrup does not occur in nature, the body might not know how to process it. Some researchers have expressed concern that the extra fructose in HFCS might be metabolized in the liver, causing damage there. Because the research is mixed, Dr. Sears, like many doctors, advises erring on the side of caution and eliminating high-fructose corn syrup from children’s diets.

As parents, we consider chocolate milk a treat, not a beverage our children should be drinking every day. We also believe that if only plain white milk and water were served in school, children would drink one or the other with their lunch. The daily consumption of sweetened drinks, whether in the form of soda or flavored milk, is harmful to our children’s health. It’s time for the city’s Office of SchoolFood to put our children’s health before “business.” No more excuses. If the District of Columbia can do it, so can New York.

  • John G

    Despite the 2009 article in the NYTimes (I remember reading it back then), sugary vending machine drinks were available in my school through the end of last year. Those machines were fully stocked this past Monday when I dropped supplies off for my classroom.
    Notwithstanding the possibility that my school may be one of only a few that still have vending machines like this, my concern is that removing sugary milk while the students have the choice to drink a sugary Snapple provides something akin to a moral dilemma for the students.
    Perhaps it would be better for the DOE to wait until all the vending machine contracts have expired before removing the chocolate milk choice?

  • http://www.anurbanteacherseducation.com The Reflective Educator

    I thought Jamie Oliver’s attempt to do this in West Virginia in his show, Food Revolution, was telling.

  • EFM

    Considering the serious problems that plague education today, the entire chocolate milk discussion is an absurd waste of time.

  • Jason

    When the DOE removed whole milk and strawberry milk a few years ago, along with reducing the frequency that chocolate
    milk was served, there was huge blowback. There was a full council hearing about it, led by Bill de Blasio. I believe the reaction was worse than the bake sale changes.

  • CarolineSF

    The chocolate milk debate goes on here in San Francisco, too. One important point: Our school district successfully pressured the vendor, the Berkeley Farms dairy, to reformulate the chocolate milk without high-fructose corn syrup. And, really, all SFUSD had to do was ask. Our district is tiny compared with NYC, so your district clearly has the clout to do that too, probably at the snap of your fingers. Of course I recognize that activists may not be interested in pushing for that rather than eliminating the chocolate milk entirely.

    It’s a tough one. The issue is not that offering chocolate milk is the only way to get all kids to drink milk, but that SOME kids will only drink milk if it’s chocolate, and those tend to be the kids who don’t get milk at home — who tend to be the kids at highest risk nutritionally (and in other ways). And it’s not generally comparable to the bake sale issue because the point is that milk provides essential nutrients, while baked treats most likely are entirely empty calories (unless these bake sales are all about whole wheat-carrot-zucchini-oatmeal cookies). Maybe it’s more comparable to cole slaw — cabbage that’s full of cancer-fighting phytochemicals, drenched in mayo and sugar.

    I’m really torn about the chocolate milk issue, because I’m not comfortable shrugging off the point that low-income children of color who don’t get milk at home are more likely to drink milk if it’s chocolate and may not drink any at all if only plain is offered. Yet obviously the sugar content is a big problem. It always seems to be my role to point out that things are more complicated than they seem, so here I go again.

  • bookworm

    Oh, please. This is a ridiculous argument. I am a teacher and a parent. I also am a career changer, my past career being in corporate wellness programs. I hold an M.S. in Nutrition and Exercise Science and my kids drink chocolate milk at school and most mornings at breakfast. But here’s the deal – we use fat-free milk and a small amount of reduced sugar syrup (that does not contain HFCS), so in each cup, my kids get about 5g of sugar (about 1 tsp). Add that to a breakfast that includes whole wheat toast (or oatmeal) and fruit, and you have a meal that is healthy and balanced without being over the top in fat and sugar. The chocolate milk my school district serves is lowfat (1%) and does not contain HFCS. Though it does contain more sugar than the milk we make at home, I balance it out by packing lunches that are low in sugar so the meal as a whole stays within limits.

    I think we need to look at the fat/sugar/salt composition of the meals as a whole rather than pick on one part of the meal and call it “bad”. What good is taking the chocolate milk off the menu if the kids are only eating the Doritos and brownie from the lunch tray?

  • CarolineSF

    Do your schools sell Doritos and brownies? Hmm, different planets…

    The HFCS-free chocolate milk in SFUSD schools is nonfat, by the way.

  • http://www.anurbanteacherseducation.com The Reflective Educator

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

21 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829