GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

the scoop

Space-strapped charter school sent students to factory space

photo-3-copy

Security camera footage captures students walking into a building that is not certified for educational use but houses the offices for the Believe Charter School Network.

Strapped for space, a Brooklyn charter school network sent its students to classes at a facility that was only approved for factory and office use — not educational purposes, according to security camera footage and interviews with people who witnessed students’ use.

The footage and accounts document students’ regular trips to the space this summer and during the last school year. A student at the school told me that the space, a former factory at 33 Nassau Ave. in Williamsburg, is known to students as “the art building.”

View the full footage in a slideshow below.

The charter operator, Believe High Schools Network, appears to have begun to send students to the office space after its plan to open two new schools in a private facility hit a snag in 2009. Forced to improvise, the network arranged to house both of the two new schools in the same district school building used by its original school, Williamsburg Charter High School, a former employee said.

That was despite the fact that the second floor office space at 33 Nassau Ave. is certified by the city Department of Buildings only for use as a factory, shipping, storage, or office space.

State education law requires that charter schools use buildings approved for educational use. For that reason, Believe officials originally used the 33 Nassau space only for offices, said Joshua Morales, a former consultant to Believe.

In the last month, both the city and state departments of education have launched investigations into Believe’s use of the 33 Nassau space. The city department oversees Williamsburg Charter High School, and the state department oversees the two new schools, Northside and Southside charter high schools.

Officials at Believe did not return several phone call and e-mail requests for comment today.

The arrangement highlights the risks of the city’s current charter school space situation. New charter schools open each year, but they are promised no space in city buildings, leaving school leaders to make arrangements on their own — either by haggling and politicking with city officials to get a few floors inside a district school or by finding some other space and signing a lease.

The city investigation launched when a city school official visited 33 Nassau Ave. for a meeting. Believe’s official fliers advertise that 33 Nassau is used only for administrative reasons, but the official found students there taking class, said a source with knowledge of the situation.

Photographs from security cameras inside the school, obtained by GothamSchools, show students walking up the industrial building’s concrete stairway, through Believe’s heavy second-floor door, and into rooms where they sat at tables together. The photographs hold a time stamp from May 2010.

On a visit that I took to the office space earlier this month on the last day of summer school, most desks in the mainly open-plan office space were filled with adults sitting at computers. But a sign taped to a door said “Algebra.” I didn’t see any students, but people who work near the building said they saw children discussing their algebra class outside just before I arrived. A student I found outside the building on his way to the subway said the building was used for art classes during the year and summer classes during July and August.

During the school year, photographs taken by a former employee show that a privately chartered bus with the company Orzan Tours shepherded students between the office site on Nassau Ave. and their official school building, P.S. 126 on the other side of the McCarren Park.

Jackie Rivera, Orzan’s office manager, confirmed that the company held a contract with Believe. She said Orzan was hoping to renew the contract.

In a statement, State Education Department spokesman Tom Dunn said, ”We are aware of the situation at the Believe Charter Schools and will investigate the matter thoroughly. Until that investigation is complete, we cannot provide further comment.”

  • Brooklyner

    Mona -I’ve always found that constructive collaboration is far more effective at bringing about change than needless adversarialism. Can you provide examples of how you are working constructively with charter parents and school leaders to better meet the needs of students? I see a lot of talk of lawsuits and “going after” money, and I have to wonder if you have sat down with charter leaders and existing PTAs to discuss Title I funding and its use in a non-divisive manner. I work in a charter with a very active PTA who does receive Title I funding. I would love to see your research that makes you so comfortable stating that not a single charter PTA in NYS has received their Title I funding.

    I’ll add that I have never heard of it being a requirement that parents have a say in how the total Title I funding is spent. Could you provide a reference? I wonder how many charter leaders, or district school leaders, are aware of this because it is something I haven’t seen happen in any of the charter OR district schools I have worked in. You seem to have a pessimistic and cynical viewpoint that leaders intentionally keep parents out of this process, when it might simply be a lack of awareness that could be addressed in a less adversarial manner.

  • http://www.nycharterparents.org Mona Davids (NY Charter Parents Association)

    @Brooklyner

    Constructive collaboration did not bring about the charter reforms NYCPA won with the revised charter law.  The charter lobby was not supportive of our reforms, especially every charter required to have a PA/PTA.  Those reforms should have been done a long time ago.  So, sometimes, you need to push and fight for your rights. 

    That said, I must say, if the PTA at your school is indeed receiving their Title One money, then that is one of the best surprises for me :-)

    All schools and PA/PTA’s must keep documentation of when the money was disbursed, what it was used for and the receipts and/or cancelled checks. This is all public information subject to FOIL.  Hopefully, the schools will voluntarily share it if they say they’ve been complying with Title One Regs or we’ll FOIL it.  

    As I said before, I’m a former SLT member and PA Co-President well versed in Federal Title One and Chancellor Regs.  Not only are PA/PTA’s supposed to receive the minimum 1% of the funding but also have a say in how the money awarded to the school will be used.

    I believe you have a very valid point in stating that (all) school “leaders may not be intentionally keeping parents out of the process and it may be simply a lack of awareness that could be addressed in a less adversarial manner.”

    I sincerely hope you’re right and we’ll soon enough find out.  The new school year is beginning, so let’s see what happens.  

    At our September monthly meeting, we’ll be discussing Title One, Title One PACs, the revised charter law etc., PA/PTA’s in charters you’re welcome to attend.  I’ll post the date this week on the GS events calendar.

    Please email me at mdavids@nycharterparents.org if you want to talk further. 

  • Jason

    I feel that people should stop wasting their time thrashing the school and show them some respect. THe Believe Network is trying to make an education for the children of the state of New York. Its hard being a charter school because they have no support. So of course with no support they need to put the kids somewhere. Mr. Melendez works real hard at what he does and should be given a great deal of credit. People should ask the students what THEY feel about this, not people who are lookin to give the school a bad name.

  • charterperson

    The evidence and comments are an overwhelming indictment and point over and over again to a lack of leadership. All these folks can’t be wrong about the leadership and the boards’ lack of accountbility and oversight. The numbers just don’t add up. How is that with the exodus and mass firings of former staffers, it’s all their fault? If they were all incompetent, then who did all the hiring? If the final say was with one leader, what does that say about that leader’s ability to make good calls and the right decisions? There is just one person at the center of all this controversy. It doesnt matter if folks were let go or resigned – the point is that the turnover is high and that speaks to culture and is a red flag about the organization. Each seperation is an individual story with its own truth and accuracy (or lack thereof), but there is one common theme – the leadership. Mr. Mitnik was thrusted from a teacher to a principal to a superintendent in a matter of 2 years; year 1 TFA member Eric Roa was made school leader of one of the new schools and now is gone; newly acquired principal Freob, has already left after 1 year of service; former Dept of Education Charter Office Director Morales was a consultant/COO and was gone after just a few months; the entire HR department was let go last month; former principal Spampinato was fired 2 years ago and brought back last month, and is already on a leave; board members serve as consultants and their children are given jobs working in the schools and the umbrella organiation; insiders and former employees are sending pictures and voicing their negative experiences… the list goes on. Does it really take a genius to get the point?
    This should only heighten accountability. But should not be a stain on the rest of the sector, as in the traditional public system. All industries have bad apples, or apples that turn rotten. The point is to use these examples as a springboard to make the sector better and more successful.

  • congrats

    congratulations Becca and Shah…good luck in your next life….who’s next?

  • Former employee

    Jacqui Lipson used to work for NYC DOE at the Office for Family Engagement and Advocacy and now is a vice president  for Communications and External Affairs .  She may be the only person he cannot fire.  He fires her and all her “connections” are gone.  Cronyism at its finest. 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

17 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031