GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

raising the bar

Principals plot how common standards will change school life

School staff reviewed sample student work that meets the common standards for kindergarten writing.

School staff reviewed sample student work that meets the common standards for kindergarten writing. More sample student work that meets the new standards is available ##http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_C.pdf##here## (pdf).

What will national standards mean for New York City’s classrooms?

For the past few weeks, groups of principals, teachers and staff members have been gathering with their school networks to begin answering that question.

Last week, a large group of principals, assistant principals and teachers met in the cafeteria of P.S. 129 in Flushing, Queens. They came in teams of three from each school in a Children’s First Network led by Diane Foley.

The state won’t begin to use the core standards to test students until 2014.

But, as Foley and her staff reminded principals, the first group of students who will take the new exams — 2014′s fourth-graders — are entering kindergarten this fall. Foley’s goal was to nudge schools towards the core standards by helping them think of small changes they can make immediately.

“Let’s find one or two things that schools can do this year,” Foley said. “It’s about the little tiny steps you can take.”

The first step last week was to figure out how far current writing instruction is from what the new standards dictate. One of Foley’s staff members, Debbie White, laid out three styles of writing assignments: persuasive opinion writing, explanatory texts and storytelling. She then asked each table to estimate what percentage of the writing that students at each school complete falls into each category.

“What does writing instruction look like in your schools?” White asked.

At one table, the principal, assistant principal and reading coach from Queens’ I.S. 93 huddled together and talked over their eighth grade writing assignments. At first, principal Ed Santos worried that his eighth graders don’t spend any time writing persuasive arguments. “There’s nothing,” he said.

Foley encouraged Santos and his staff to think about the writing students did in all of their courses, not just their English Language Arts classes. That increases the percentage a bit, Santos said, but not by much. When the groups re-convened, staff at other schools echoed Santos: their students write a lot of stories, but spend little time building arguments.

“We do a lot of essay writing, but I don’t think it really reaches what an argument is,” said one teacher. “I think it just scratches the surface.”

White then made the big reveal: Under the new standards, fourth graders should be spending nearly a third of their writing time constructing arguments. Narrative and explanatory writing should make up 35 percent of their assignments each. By the senior year of high school, 40 percent of writing assignments should be persuasive or explanatory writing. Only 20 percent of students’ time should be spent writing straight fiction and non-fiction narratives.

The new reading standards will prompt a similar shift. Principals and their staff compared the amount of time their students spent reading fiction and poetry to the time spent reading informational texts, like scientific articles and instruction manuals. The overwhelming amount of time was spent reading literature, principals agreed.

But under the new standards, fourth graders will be expected to spend half their time reading more instructive texts. By twelfth grade, only 30 percent of the texts a student will be expected to read should be literary, the common standards say.

That kind of shift won’t happen immediately at any school. But Foley and her staff encouraged the principals and teachers to think about small changes that will make the shift easier.

Staff at one school suggested that they add more magazines, articles and non-fiction to their elementary classroom libraries and add more non-fiction books to suggested reading lists. As students learn to read, schools can more actively encourage parents to have them read everyday signs and nutrition labels at the grocery store, volunteered a teacher at another school.

Schools can also begin to re-adjust the grade levels when they introduce many common books to students. Foley said. Her example: the novel “Sarah, Plain and Tall” is now thought to be written on a fourth or fifth grade reading level. Under the new standards, it will be considered a third grade-level book.

And schools should think about how to explain the changes to parents, Foley said. “Parents are going to have to understand, ‘why is my child coming home with more informational articles in her backpack?’” she said. “You need to come up with a clear reason.”

The answer, she said, is the common standards’ emphasis on building practical skills for college and careers. “I think parents are really going to relate to, ‘my child really needs to get a good job at the end of this, and what are we going to do to get her there,’” Foley said.

The shifts required by the new standards will be greater at some schools than at others. But Grace Sears, I.S. 93′s assistant principal, said she was encouraged by the new standards’ clarity.

“I think this will be better,” she said. “I think it will be useful for the teachers; I think it will be useful for the administration. We’re going to know exactly what should be going on in the classrooms.”

  • DS

    If you read the third grade writing sample about horses, the child stated that she likes horses because she rides them.  She mentioned that she goes to camp.  Clearly, the child that wrote this piece has been nurtured.  She has access to enrichment and leisure activities.  She was probably read to since she was a baby and the adults in her life are literate, and probably employed.  She probably eats three meals a day and is taken to the pediatrician when she’s sick and not the emergency room at the last minute when she’s comatose and dehydrated.  It is clear that these new standards are higher than what we’re used to.   How will they accommodate the children that do not go to camp, ride horses, get read or spoken to, see a doctor or dentist, get glasses if they need them, receive affection and nurturing from adults that set standards for good work ethic, or eat three decent meals a day?  I teach the kids that are yelled at, ignored, forced to eat cereal for dinner because mom is passed out drunk on her bed.  The ones that have at least 3 siblings all living in a one bedroom apartment.  The kids whose fathers are in jail and have a new stepfather every year.  The ones that have zero adult supervision after school and couldn’t get their parents to come to conference night if their hair was on fire.  The ones that miss over a month of school every year despite ACS breathing down mom’s neck.  Those are the kids I teach, and I’m curious to know how they will meet these new standards!!!

  • It Figures

    I wonder how many of your readers know that Diane Foley is the wife of the former principal of IS93, George Foley, and that he is now working for the “Leadership” academy teaching aspiring principals how to run or ruin schools, depending on your point of view. George was elected to the UFT Hall of Shame a few years back for his treatment of teachers. Incurious George was followed by the Ed Santos in your article, who is infamous among his staff for knowing little about ELA and Math. It isn’t a surprise that he had no idea that students should be taught to write persuasively because he has little grasp of the curriculum.
    I wonder how much Diane Foley gets for this kind of work–isn’t it some kind of conflict? Despite the fact that IS93 is an Americas Choice “model” school, their scores plummeted in the recent math and ELA exams, so perhaps its wrong to begrudge Santos some training.

  • miss teacher

    DS, excellent point. Many of my students deal with similar home environments. I’m sure the ed “reformers” will have lots of ideas, though, which will begin and end with giving up tenure and tying jobs to test scores.

  • Sarah

    As a parent, I say…Hallelujah! Does this mean the end of Teachers College Writers Workshop? Thank God. Since forever, parents I know have been complaining about the vast amount of time that has been spent requiring our children to write impressionistic pieces about meaningful personal experiences. Only in middle school has there been any real focus on constructing arguments. Actually, you can include constructing sentences and paragraphs in that statement. And my child went to a supposedly good District 15 elementary school!

    I am sure that the Teachers College Readers and Writers Workshop model has some good things in it, but boy, I so hated the way it was taught. For one thing, the curriculum barely changes from year to year. Ever year, we faced the same dopey instructional units: the “small moment;” the “personal narrative;” the short story; the poetry unit, the journalism unit … oh yeah, and my favorite, “historical fiction.” The parents used to joke that judging by the writing curriculum, the US must be facing a critical shortage of memoir writers and poets. The amount of actual writing instruction was minimal. Instead, the children were supposed to write these pieces, then work together to critique each other’s writing (NOT a meaningful experience), then “publish” them. In my experience this did not result in impressive writing skills.

    Maybe if my son hadn’t so hated these units I would feel differently. Anyway, I am very very grateful that the middle school my son is in now has really taken seriously the notion of the persuasive essay. I feel like kissing the principal’s feet whenever I see her.

    In answer to the question raised above by DS about how children from difficult home environments will be able to handle the new standards, I can only observe that I don’t find these new standards to be “higher” — just a whole lot more sensible. As a matter of a fact, my son got poor grades in ELA in elementary school. He was deemed to be a deficient writer because he could not “write fluently in a variety of genres.” In middle school, however, he is doing very well. The school gives very clear instruction on how to organize a written piece, instead of having the kids read “mentor texts” and then expecting them magically to reproduce what they’ve read. So for me, this is not a matter of higher standards, it is a matter of (a) teaching something useful and (b) teaching it in a comprehensible manner.

    My son may not grow up to be an engineer or scientist, but I sure know he is going to need to be able to organize ideas, muster evidence in a logical order, and write clearly, no matter what he does in life. Why shouldn’t that be true for all students?

  • Teacher

    I agree Sarah. Almost all of the teachers in my school despise the “Project” which is how Teachers College refers to its Reading and Writing Project. Time we toss this failed “experiment” and get back to a well-rounded curriculum that actually works for our students. It’s been especially detrimental to our ESL students and struggling students.

  • kk

    I am soooo glad that my smart, curious daughter just finished kindergarten so that she will not have to be judged by these kindergarten “standards”. Have these people read anything about the importance of play to kindergartners? Have they failed to realize that the common wisdom in the schools of many countries that perform better than ours is to start kids reading and writing LATER?

    For most kindergarten kids to write like those sampled, they will have to have had a very academic kindergarten experience, one in which they’ve had to forego precious play and exploration for the niceties of spelling, etc. Being in a “literacy-rich environment” does not mean having to actually read and write yourself at age 4 or 5! It means hearing a lot of stories, seeing how adults use books, the Internet, magazines, for pleasure, research, and the like.

    This is just another way to stifle a lifelong love of learning. Seriously, I don’t know how even the popular media can have story after story about the developmental inappropriateness of this approach and yet our taxpayer-supported DOE totally ignores it. A sad time to be a kid.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    KK,

    What you write is so true, and sad, and enraging.

    My youngest daughter just graduated from a NYC public high school, and my wife and I constantly discuss how relieved we are that our children have escaped the clutches of Bloomberg and Klein.

    Having had children in the city’s public schools since the early 90′s, we’ve witnessed up close – we’re both public school teachers, as well – the dishonesty, narrow-mindedness and mean-spiritedness of this regime. It’s gotten to the point where I question whether I would recommend that parents of young children send their children to the public schools now, given the soul-crushing environment that children must contend with.

    The hostile takeover of the public schools has many motivations: removing them from public control and placing them in the hands of private interests, and creating a voiceless, transient, at-will teaching workforce without pensions (in other words, having it resemble the rest of the US workforce).

    But the central and most unforgivable thing is how children are being socialized to accept the same powerless, absurd and dishonest world that they’re parents must now live in, for the social engineering aspects of education, and how the schools are a projection of society’s view of social relations, work and power, is the ultimate end of this takeover. It’s an explicit purpose of Bloomberg, Gates, Broad, et. al. to have the schools resemble the workplace these children will enter in the not-too-distant future: one dominated by centralized control that answers to nothing but the pinched, self-interested assumptions of its overseers, overly surveilled, subject to the whims of a demographically narrow management that uses technology and pseudo-science as a tool of control.

    I wish you and your daughter well. Let’s hope and struggle to take the schools back from the hypocrites and power mongers who are disfiguring them.

  • Diana Senechal

    While it is encouraging to think that students will be writing more persuasive arguments and fewer TC-style “small moments,” such writing needs a strong curriculum around it: true history courses, where students read primary and secondary sources and write research papers; true literature courses, where the focus is on the works of literature and not on “strategies”; and so forth. Establishing an excellent curriculum in these subjects will help ensure rigorous assignments.

    Just adjusting the curriculum to meet the standards doesn’t cut it; there has to be a vision for the curriculum, a sense of what matters. Literature should not be shortchanged. There is a big difference between reading serious works of literature and reading “leveled” chapter books and teen novels. Schools should do more of the former and less of the latter. English class itself should focus on literature, with some philosophy and other literary nonfiction. Other classes may include more nonfiction.

    It seems that these groups of principals, assistant principals, and teachers are paying a lot of attention to the ratio of one type of writing to another. Isn’t it more important to look at the substance of the courses? If the courses are first-rate, then the percentages will largely take care of themselves.
     

  • EFM

    to K.K,

    Teaching children to read and write earlier does not stifle their love of reading, or does it lower academic performance. On the contrary, it raises academic performance and increases a child’s interest in reading because they can choose from a larger selection of titles, earlier. I taught my child to read and write when he was three. He is finishing middle school now and is still an avid reader. with an excellent GPA. As for playtime, learning how to read and write, and yes, even do arithmetic, does not take over a young child’s playtime. Reading can not only expand a child’s playtime themes, but it can be playtime, when your child loves to read. As for the other kinds of playtime. There is plenty of time for those too.

  • kk

    @Michael Fiorillo:
    Thank you so much for your well wishes for my daughters and I (I have a rising 4th grader in addition to the rising 1st grader mentioned in my previous comment)  as we navigate this system. I admire your ability to write eloquently, compassionately, and with a sense of outrage about what you see happening in our schools. I can only imagine how hard it must be to teach in this climate and not just lapse into cynicism. Please keep up the good fight and your elucidating comments.

    @EFM:
    I  never said that teaching reading and writing earlier would lower academic performance. But, you know, academic performance isn’t all there is, and I would argue that it shouldn’t even be primary for a kindergartner. Kindergartners need attention in the development of their social, emotional, and motor skills. How do they interact with other kids? With adults? With the natural and built environment?

    5 year olds are naturally curious. My point is that they are going to learn more by doing a (rudimentary) science experiment than they would by writing a nonfiction piece about it. Codifying that writing in these standards is therefore counterproductive, in my opinion.

    For the record, I was an early reader. I don’t know about your son, but for me it wasn’t the healthiest thing. Reading did indeed become my playtime, as you say, and my mother would have to FORCE me out of the house to play with other children. I resented her for it and wasn’t so comfortable with the other kids (and their superior athletic skills), either.

    I am not disparaging reading, and if a kid comes to it on her own, I wouldn’t stop her. But I wouldn’t push it. When my older daughter was in K, she showed little interest in reading. She was, however, the Kate Spade of 5 year olds. She made bags, portfolios, backpacks, out of scissors and paper. She spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to make a belt that actually buckled using only paper and paper clips.

    Somehow, she just finished 3rd grade and while her school doesn’t rank, I’d be surprised if she weren’t one of the best readers (and writers and mathematicians) in the whole grade. That’s anecdotal, of course, but I believe there is research that confirms there is no rush to read and write early.

  • DS

    Sarah:

    I wouldn’t count on TC going away.  We may have a new set of standards, but that doesn’t mean that we will truly receive any guidance on how to reach them.  I highly doubt the curricula will be changed.  I’m 100% certain that with all the budget cuts schools are facing, there is no way they’ll let a literacy program like TC go.  We have the most irritating literacy program at our school and although the teachers have been complaining about it for years.  Our admins have said: we paid for it, and you’re gonna use it, no matter what.

    KK:

    In the past few years, all the kindergarten classes I have observed, including the classes at my school, are primarily academic.  There is little play, if any.  Admins are petrified that they will fail the test if they don’t start them in K.  In the suburban K classes I’ve observed, I’ve noticed that the kitchen play sets are thrown out and being replaced with Smartboards.  There are no finger painting easels, and no dress up corners.  They sit at tables and have reading/writing/math workshop!

  • HM

    I think anasthema has a good point.

  • Sarah

    DS – I agree about the classrooms being primarily academic from kindergarten up. The TC curriculum has the kids writing (or being told to write, anyway) starting in the first month or two of kindergarten. Not much play goes on. In fact that was one thing that particularly annoyed me about the TC stuff … it started so damn early. Of course, by third grade at least parents know what the heck the TC lingo was all about, but that just made it more aggravating. You’re comments about TC not going away make sense. The schools will probably just try to throw in a few more essays, but keep the rest of the crap. Once again I praise Buddha that my son is in a school with a sane principal. I won’t blow her cover however so don’t ask!

  • Barbara

    Sarah, it is unfortunate that you do not like Teacher’s College Reading and Writing Curriculum. As a teacher for 18 years I have not seen any curriculum that can surpass TC. I’ve spent many years in the classroom and then as a reading teacher and I’ve been through many reading programs. TC is the only model that I’ve seen that develops children’s reading and writing skills in a natural way.

    If the teacher is using all of the components of the workshop model then all the children will learn. The curriculum does change from k-2, 3-5 and 6-8. In education we don’t teach something one year and then forget about it. We teach it throughout the year and again the next year if needed, but going deeper with it and expand ideas every time it is taught.

    We teach our students to writing with a purpose, write to make a difference in the world and prepare them for the essay on the SAT. Teaching the writing craft is not minimal, but the most sophisticated writing strategies taught in any other program. Teachers don’t always teach well if they do not believe in what they are doing. If your child’s teacher was that unhappy with the curriculum or the model used to teach it, he or she should find a school that shares their educational philosophy. If your child is still in a school using TC I suggest you go to one of their parent workshops held at the college. The workshop model really is an excellent way to teach and TC really does have excellent curriculum, but anything in the wrong hands can be a disaster.

  • Pingback: Straight A, No Chaser

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031