GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

turf wars

State overturns one charter space-sharing plan, upholds another

The city must start over its controversial plan to let a Lower East Side charter school expand in city space but may proceed with another, the state education department ruled yesterday.

State Education Commissioner David Steiner threw out the city’s plan to allow Girls Prep Charter School to expand its middle school grades in the building it shares with two district schools, ruling that the city did not properly report the plan’s impact on disabled students who attend school in the building.

But in a separate ruling, Steiner argued that the city did provide enough information about its plan to let Brooklyn’s PAVE Academy Charter School expand in the building it currently shares with P.S. 15.

Both plans have prompted bitter space battles this year between the charter schools and teachers and parents at the district schools who share the buildings. Both charters want to expand the number of grades they serve; opponents of the expansion argue that the plans would squeeze the students at the district schools in the building.

The Girls Prep plan, which Steiner overturned, was complicated by the fact that one of the schools that shares the building is P.S. 94, a school for students with autism run by the Department of Education’s special district for severely disabled students.

P.S. 94 parents have complained that they were excluded from conversations about space sharing at the school from the start. And the final space sharing plan, which the citywide school board approved in February, did not detail how the change would affect P.S. 94 students.

When the city plans to significantly change the way a school building is used, it is required to prepare an “educational impact statement” (EIS) analyzing how the change will affect schools and students in the building. City officials argued that its schools for the most severely disabled students should be exempt from that requirement, since the city frequently has to re-locate programs to accommodate the students’ special needs. But Steiner responded that state education law requires the city to prepare an EIS for any change in school use.

“Accordingly, DOE’s contention that District 75 schools should be excluded is not supported by the plain language of the statute,” Steiner wrote.

A DOE spokesman said the city was reviewing the decision and its options to proceed.

Here’s Steiner’s ruling on P.S. 94 and Girls Prep. The PAVE and P.S. 15 ruling is below.


  • Ellen

    “..relocate to accommodate students special needs”
    The DOE should hang its head in shame….they don’t re-locate those students because of special needs! They re-locate students to accommodate a principal’s desire to “get them out of my building” or because “they take up too much room” or because “the rooms they have can be used for students who need them” or the biggest reason for relocating…..”They don’t belong to our community”
    Fie on them all. One day their tongues will all turn black and fall out of their mouths….just like my mother said would happen to me if I kept on lying.
    (Whoa, that was a some mental image!)

  • http://www.SpecialEducationMuckraker.com Dee Alpert

    Well, if I understand this decision correctly, according to Commissioner Steiner and the NYS Ed. Dept., the NYCDOE’s “footprint” and related standards are acceptable. Children with disabilities who receive related services in schools have no expectations of privacy for many of those services and receiving them in open closets and hallways is just fine.

    Do these services in these environments and under these conditions comply with the NYS Health Law and related codes? I doubt it.

    Just one more case where State Ed. works to insure that children with disabilities in schools are degraded.

  • Concerned Advocate

    The Comish should be ashamed of himself. His decision is weak, flawed, and does not even answer the substantive claims in PS 15 parents’ petition. It further upholds a seriously weak EIS and sets a precedent for the DOE to usurp the law and further subordinate special education students by upholding the DOE’s claim that they are “not required to allocate space for special education related services”. We should all be outraged at the political decision Mr. Steiner has engaged in. Hopefully other measures will be taken and the state legislature will finally wise up and make the laws regarding the mandated EIS stronger and also create legislation regarding space allocation needs. Parents, Students, Teachers you MUST rise up and demand that space allocations, co-locations, and the formulas and justifications used to mandate them take into account the needs of ALL children. Sadly, they do not, even more sadly we have a state ed comish in the pocket of a billionaire dictator who together, make choices to benefit their political interests, not the interests of what is best for children.

  • Dedicated Teacher

    As I read the line from Mr. Steiner’s statement “The petitioners have not met their burden on this issue” I couldn’t help but see the irony in these words. The petitioners HAVE met their “burden”….and their “burden” is PAVE Academy.
    The definition of burden:
    * a load, esp. a heavy one
    *a misfortune that causes hardship,anxiety, or grief
    *a nuisance
    Yes, we at PS15 have “met our burden”.. and unfortunately and unfairly, we will continue to meet it as we are coming up on yet another school year, set in unacceptable circumstances in the PS15 building.

  • Steiner should resign

    This is a sad day for public education in New York City and New York State. It is now completely obvious that Steiner does not make decisions based upon what is best for children, but rather what is best for Bloomberg and Klein’s misguided and destructive policies. Anyone with half a brain who reads the PS 15 decision understands that our ed comish ignored the merits of the case… the last section is just an embarassing and shows he put no real efforts into review, assessment, and deliberation of the facts nor did he evaluate properly the law and needs of children. Steiner has set a dangerous precedent with the decision, agreeing that space allocations for special needs students and their services are not needed. Federal Court anyone?

  • Pingback: Insideschools.org : Blogs

  • Pingback: School Space Emergency? Not for Now - City Room Blog - NYTimes.com

  • Pingback: Insideschools.org : Blogs

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031