GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

space wars

De Blasio: City fails to engage parents on school siting issues

Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, speaking today on the steps of the Department of Education's headquarters at Tweed Courthouse

Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, speaking today on the steps of the Department of Education

When two courts halted the city’s plans to close 19 public schools this year, judges ruled that the city didn’t follow state law that requires it to engage parents and report the impact that the changes will have on students’ educations.

Now Public Advocate Bill de Blasio is arguing that the city is making the same mistakes when it decides to place multiple schools in the same buildings.

In a report released today, de Blasio charges that the city did not give parents enough information about how changes to space usage would affect instructional programs or about public hearings on the changes.

“They’re just doing the minimum amount of parent outreach so they can say they did,” de Blasio said today.

De Blasio’s office and the Alliance for Quality Education surveyed nearly 875 parents at 34 schools, about half of those that the city proposed moving into new, shared space last year. (Roughly half of public schools citywide currently share building space with other schools.)

The survey included responses from parents at both district and charter schools. It also included several schools that were the sites of fierce battles over colocation last school year, including the Clinton School for Writers and Artists and the American Sign Language School; Girls Prep Charter School and P.S. 188; and PAVE Charter School and P.S. 15.

More than 40 percent of the parents who responded said that the city had not provided specific detail on how the school’s current offerings would change under altered space arrangements.

When the city makes any changes to how school facilities are used, state law requires it to prepare an “educational impact statement” (EIS) detailing how the changes will affect students and the surrounding community. Fewer than half of the parents reported that they even knew that the city had prepared an analysis of the changes, and only a quarter ever saw a copy of the analysis.

The court rulings threw out the city’s EIS’s for its 19 school closure proposals, but judges were silent on whether accompanying proposals to move new schools into those buildings would also be affected. In part to avoid another lawsuit, the city struck a deal with the teachers union to place fewer new schools in buildings alongside schools that had been slated to close.

Speaking at a press conference with de Blasio today, a parent leader at one of the schools affected by that deal complained that parents had been shut out of the process from the start.

“We never hear about the hearings,” said Yvette Chico, vice president of the parent association at he William H. Maxwell CTE High School. “They never let us know.”

De Blasio has staked out a cautious middle ground between the city and the union on education issues, endorsing the charter cap lift but also calling for a halt on siting them in city school buildings. Under a rallying cry of boosting the parent voice in the school system, de Blasio has made colocations his central education issue.

DOE spokesman Jack Zarin-Rosenfeld said that the city was always trying to improve how it engages with parents, but criticized de Blasio’s focus on the educational impact statements. City officials, including Mayor Michael Bloomberg, have frequently said that the importance of their school closing efforts outweighs the details of state law.

“We wish the Public Advocate showed the same amount of concern for our children stuck in failing schools as he does for DOE processes,” Zarin-Rosenfeld said.

De Blasio said that he did not know of any potential legal challenges to the DOE’s process of siting schools, nor did he challenge the legitimacy of school siting arrangements that were approved last year. Instead, he called for a moratorium on new school colocations until the city improves its process.

And Billy Easton, executive director of the Alliance for Quality Education, called on Albany to revise the school governance law to make explicit exactly what information the city needs to include in its impact statements.

Here’s the full report:

  • richard mangone

    Can you find out if Zarin-Rosenfeld was one of the interns that secured a favorable position by the Bloomberg administration. Or if he has ever stepped into a New York City public school.

  • Ellen

    Bravo for the Pubic Advocate! The EIS is more of an Environmental Impact Statement…..increased student population, less access to common areas, ugly comparisons between haves and have nots, artificial barriers between students and staff. Not a word about books or facilities or teaching methods or libraries. No indication of how the new configuration will improve the students’ learning.
    It’s a tough job to teach and tougher still when Mayors and Chancellors choose to flout the involvement of the school community. And, the devil is in the details, even when the powerful choose to ignore state law.

  • DeBlasio is a Sham

    Bill DeBlasio has no idea what it takes to build, run, or manage a great public school. He’s fighting to keep the absolute worst 19 schools in the city open, while preventing proven operators of the city’s best schools from opening. This is a clearly a shameless political ploy for someone who doesn’t care about actual kids, but poll numbers and easy political points. These 19 are DANGEROUS, TERRIBLE, SCARY, places for children and a true public advocate would be fighting to get the kids out of them at all costs. Only someone who had their victory celebration at UFT headquarters would think this a good idea.

    Sad, but not surprising that DeBlasio is leading this charge to keep failing schools failing for decades more.

  • Vote NO

    On this issue Bill de Blasio is RIGHT! Closing schools without any community involvement, or without any regard for what will happen to neighboring schools that will be forced to enroll “hi needs” students that the new small schools will not admit does NOT help the kids in the effected schools, or improve education in NYC.

  • Gideon

    The survey results cited in this report are ridiculous, and no good journalist should report them as meaningul. There is no way 873 completed surveys is representative of the thousands of parents with students at those 34 schools. The report itself states that: “The method of data collection used for this report was unscientific. Most of the forty-two schools from which at least one parent responded to the survey were elementary schools. The survey data is mostly drawn from parents who were able to pick their children up at school in the early afternoon. In addition, this sample is limited to those parents who were interested or understood the importance of responding. The parents who took the survey online or mailed in surveys elected to do so and were not randomly selected.”

    I could probably find 5% of the parents at those schools who believe Obama is Muslim and not an American citizen, but it would be irresponsible to report that in a serious news outlet as representative of what parents really think at those schools. Instead of repeating what advocates with an agenda say, how about trying to find out the truth.

  • I noticed that…

    It’s interesting that Bill De Blasio states in the article, “Instead, he called for a moratorium on new school colocations until the city improves its process.”

    I am wondering why Mulgrew did not demand a “moratorium on new school colocations” instead of compromising not to sue the DoE if they colocates “fewer” new schools. What does “fewer” truly mean to the DoE since they’ll eventually shove in more new schools (or should I say “fewer”), creaming off the best students from those phasing out schools and starving them by not providing fundings to help them succeed, and now with the term “fewer”, that the DoE will redefine to their convenience, they know that Mulgrew will not sue.

    I’m sorry but there should absolutely be no colocation of any new school until those 19 schools have been given the opportunity to succeed. The union just allowed themselves “fewer” chances of fighting the DoE at the next closing of the remaining large high schools.

    Here’s where the DoE will use semantics, as in the word “proficient”, to have “fewer” public schools.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

14 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031