GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

heads up

City picks 23 schools to close or overhaul, 11 to “transform”

Nearly two dozen struggling schools will be closed, turned into charter schools, or lose their principals and at least half of their teachers over the next several years, city officials announced today.

City officials released the list of 34 schools today that will be part of a three year federal grant program to “turn around” the city’s most struggling schools. Of those schools, 11 will use the “transformation” model — the least invasive option that relies on removing the principal, bringing in more support services, and changing how school time is used. But most of the schools — 23 in total — will undergo one of three plans set out by the federal government”, all of which require many teachers and principals be removed.

Department of Education officials said the transformation model was only being offered to schools that were already showing significant improvement. Many of these are vocational schools, such as William E. Grady Career and Technical Education High School and Automotive High School.

The other 23 schools will experience “very dramatic change,” said Deputy Chancellor John White.

That could include one of three plans: turnaround (in which all teachers are excessed and only 50 percent can be re-hired and the principal is replaced); restart (in which a charter school replaces the district school); or closure. Department of Education officials have yet to decide which of these schools will use which plans.

City officials acknowledged that all of these changes will increase the number of teachers in the costly absent teacher reserve — a pool of salaried teachers who work as substitutes while searching for full-time positions.

Transformation schools will begin making changes next year, officials said, meaning they will be able to hire teachers under the new titles of “master” and “turnaround” teacher as soon as this September.

Starting in the fall of 2011, the other 23 schools will be able to hire these teachers and begin the turn-around plans the city chooses for them. Officials said the reason for their later start is that many of the plans will include changes to how space is used, including school closure, that require a public approval process.

The city has already tried to close eight of the schools on the list, but was blocked by a judge’s ruling that the city had violated laws governing school closure. None of those schools were chosen for the transformation method, including W.H. Maxwell CTE High School, which the city planned to close but then decided to keep only its automotive program open.

Some advocates who have opposed school closures in the past today applauded the city’s move to provide some of the city’s struggling schools with more support. The Coalition for Educational Justice released a statement saying it was pleased that 11 schools would go through the transformation model, but wished more schools could do the same.

Over the course of the next few years, the city expects state education officials to add 20 to 30 more schools to the list of persistently lowest-achieving schools eligible for turn-around plans.

The 11 schools selected for transformation are:

Automotive High School
Bread & Roses Integrated Arts High School
Brooklyn School for Global Studies
Chelsea Career and Technical Education High School
Cobble Hill School of American Studies
Flushing High School
Franklin Delano Roosevelt High School
Long Island City High School
Queens Vocational and Technical High School
Unity Center for Urban Technologies
William E. Grady Career and Technical Education High School

The remaining 23 schools are:

August Martin High School
Beach Channel High School
Boys and Girls High School
Christopher Columbus High School
Fordham Leadership Academy for Business and Technology
Grace Dodge Career and Technical Education High School
Grover Cleveland High School
High School of Graphic Communication Arts
Jamaica High School
Jane Addams High School for Academic Careers
John Adams High School
John Dewey High School
John F. Kennedy High School
Metropolitan Corporate Academy
Monroe Academy for Business/Law
Newtown High School
Norman Thomas High School
Paul Robeson High School
P.S. 065 Mother Hale Academy
Richmond Hill High School
Sheepshead Bay High School
Washington Irving High School
W.H. Maxwell CTE High School

  • Pingback: City picks 23 schools to close or overhaul, 11 to “transform” | GothamSchools #edu « Parents 4 Democratic Schools

  • http://Gotham Queenie

    I am a teacher in one of the schools that was not chosen to implement the transformation model. We have a very good school with excellent stats for all but the four year graduation rate. We have more than a 30% ELL student body and a large number of special ed students. It is a known fact that students who come from other countries need five years to acquire a new language. It is unfair and punitive that our school is being targeted for this and is in danger of being closed. The City gave us a well-developed rating which is the highest a school can receive. The teachers here have been under the microscope and have risen to the occasion to implement small learning communities which will start in the fall. The students who go to this school receive wonderful educations and should not suffer the injustice of having their school turned upside down. The Federal government is not looking out for the welfare of the students and it is a shame.

  • Akademos

    Your point needs to be trumpeted to the highest ranks responsible for this mess.

    The close’em ’cause the schools are dangerous and the system is too recalcitrant and full of corruption crowd became the close’em for educational revolution crowd. But this latter crowd really seems to be the close’em/transform’em ’cause we don’t understand how to assess or compare the progress of children of first and second generation immigrants, children of poverty, and children with learning and/or behavioral challenges. Charter Schools could have been an answer, if they had been used specifically for these students, however they are now more of a way to skirt the issue by distracting and fooling the public.

  • anathema

    Wow, next year’s atr pool will be in the thousands. Just in time for Kleinberg to negotiate a new contract with our sellout union to get rid of all atr’s, thus thousands of careers are ruined simply because teachers were in the wrong school at the wrong time.

    By the way, anyone know what happens when a public high school closes and a charter school moves in? Do they hire a completely new staff or are some teachers retained in the charter school?

  • Vote NO

    anathema,

    With this many prospective people being placed in the ATR pool, and the many thousands of former ATRs, the union will have a near impossible time of getting a contract passed by the members which sells out the ATRs. Too many members have either experienced the horror of being an ATR, or know colleagues who have experienced it, or have ATRs in their buildings to vote for a contract which would “throw them under the bus.”

  • Miss Teacher

    I am in one of those 23 schools and am currently excessed. I am in the middle of work with students that I planned to continue next year. The targeting of our schools is disruptive and harmful to our students. I have poured my heart into their education. I don’t want to desert them. Our school also has high standards, yet we do serve a large population of English Language Learners and High Needs students. No one from the DOE or state gave us any support this year after the state released the list. This whole educational reform movement that equates four year graduation rates and test scores with success forces schools to inflate pass rates and weed out high needs and at-risk students. We take those students, especially after the closing of other large schools in our area. Please let your voices be heard. Save our schools. Don’t turn your back on our students. Give us support to succeed.

  • Invictus

    Vote No, talking about the Union not selling out the ATRs, there is a fissure between the membership, large groups of primary and middle school teachers who have not necessarily felt these changes really affecting them.  Then, there are many veterans who are close to retirement. The biggest reason why a contract will NEVER pass or no one would mind signing it is that there is nothing the City can give in terms of $$$$$.  Remember that the contract of 2005, there was xx% increases of salaries and there were many things that were negotiated such as seniority based transfers.  Now, the pantry from the UFT and its members is so incredibly bare that unless someone figures out where to get $$$$$$ for financial incentives, no members will give out seniority, tenure and other written protections.  

    It is not that the membership will never sign a contract due to the ATRs, they would never sign it because they have nothing financial to gain from it.  

  • anathema

    Let’s hope so… another thing is look at these side deals the union has negotiated- the student test scores and the rubber room situation. Our members didn’t even have a vote on that… who’s to say that the same won’t happen soon for atr’s? Funny thing is, my school is on this closure list and not even the union rep is aware of it or what’s going on. Our members are poorly informed when it comes to a situation which could destroy many careers… and I’m in a large high school with a staff of over 300 and over 4,000 students. After next year all chaos is going to break loose with so many students having to find new schools and thousands of teachers without jobs.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Regarding the closing schools: it’s smash and grab: public schools will be closed, their facilities increasingly turned over to privateers, and their staffs cast to the tides.

    Notice how the chain works: Far Rockaway was closed, which undermined Beach Channel. Now they haven’t even waited for Beach Channel to close its doors before targeting John Adams. It’s a geography of expropriation, as the regime “dumps” unwanted students from one school into the nearest one, thus destabilizing it and laying the groundwork for its future closing and transfer to private interests.

    Watch out, elementary and middle school teachers: the pace of closings, given financial incentives by Obama and Duncan, and blessed by ed deform courtier Randi Weingarten, will intensify, and you’ll be next.

    As for the ever-expanding pool ATRs, as their numbers grow the political pressures on the union to “do something” will increase. Of course, for the UFT leadership, “doing something” means removing a PR problem, not defending its members or public education.

    In front of the membership, Mulgrew has put on his tough guy act and stated publicly that he will “never” sell out the ATRs. But selling off pieces of the contract and member rights is the only way that Unity Caucus knows to reach an agreement with the DOE. My prediction is that Klein and Mulgrew will work out a deal that grandfathers current ATRs in some weak-tea fashion, while throwing future ATRs, those to be created by already-planned-but-unannounced school closings, to the dogs. That way, at the time of announcement, he will claim with a straight face that all (current) ATRs have been protected and that he did his job. Left unsaid will be the reality that Bloomberg and Klein intend to close or reorganize at least half of the schools in the city, and that thousands of teachers will be cut loose.

    The union leadership believes that the dues machine will keep humming forever, regardless of the demolition of the schools and the contract.

    Perhaps they should take a look at what collaboration with management has meant for the UAW.

  • Vote NO

    Invictus,

    Regarding, there being no money for the city to offer. I do agree with you! However, I would like to think the membership is not that shortsighted and foolish, to give up their careers, for a few extra dollars in their paychecks. (I realize I could be very wrong about this) Regarding “old timers” who will vote for any increase knowing they will be retired before the consequences are felt, That may have been true in 2002, and 2005. but most of those people are gone. The reality is there just are not that many senior teachers anymore. More than half of the membership has less than 10 years of service.

    With the increase in the charter school cap, more and more elementary school teachers will be feeling the ATR horror. The city has to find places for those new charter schools, and its highly unlikely there will be many new buildings constructed in the next few years. Since most charter schools operate for the primary grades, I can only imagine the “space wars” in the elementary schools will increase with more co-locations, and many public elementary schools forced to downsize thus putting more elementary school teachers in the ATR pool.

    Michael F.

    Any side deal allowing ATRs to be terminated after a certain time period because they “haven’t found a position” would very likely be a violation of state law. Where is the due process? What have these teachers done wrong? If they have seniority, and there is a need for layoffs, the LIFO layoff law is still in effect. Less senior teachers who are not ATRs would still have to be laid off first.

    I’d imagine UFT leadership has to realize that they as well as the city would probably be facing class action lawsuits by the effected members. The city for violating state labor laws. The UFT for a breech of service by not protecting these members rights which are encapsulated in state law.

    My Chapter leader is a “Unity mouthpiece” and even he said that if the union ever gave in on the seniority layoffs, or the ATRs “it would cease to be a union….his words, not mine.

  • Vote NO

    sorry… should be “breach”

  • Vote NO

    and “members’ rights”..heat getting to the brain! :)

  • Akademos

    No corrections necessary, considering the blunders and blunderheads at work. For NY1’s take on this story go to

    www dot ny1 dot com backslash content backslash news_beats backslash education

  • Akademos

    Or just Google “NY1 23 schools”.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Vote No,

    I’d like to think you are right, but my fear – one that is not far-fetched, given the malicious trends at work – is that ruling class aggression and impunity, combined with UFT leadership collaboration, will result in rights won over the course of many decades being washed away in waves of successive attacks. Are we not already seeing this happen here and elsewhere around the country, at an accelerating pace, and implemented in a bipartisan fashion? Yes, there may be more weaknesses to the deformers position than generally realized, and things can change rapidly, but at the moment that’s the direction.

    As for the mechanics of selling out the ATRs, that’s an easy one: state law can can be changed if both parties (union and DOE) lobby for it. Remember, we’re not talking about layoffs here, but teachers excessed by the DOE’s use of school closings and reorganizations as a labor relations tactic, combined with the charter school cap continuing to be expanded or eliminated altogether. Their ultimate plan is to whittle down the number of public schools to some minimal number, so as to either keep it as a rump system for the “lesser” (to use Alan Simpson’s indiscrete but revealing term regarding Social Security) students or small enough to drown in the bathtub. Again, my prediction is that Mulgrew will negotiate some jive grandfathering for current ATRs – thus giving him the semantic opening to say that they’ve been protected – while selling out ATRs-to-be. After all, if they’re not yet ATRs, then they can’t have been sold out, right?

    As for class action lawsuits: perhaps, but on what basis? It’s extremely hard to successfully sue a union for non-representation: the bar is set very low for them to prove that they did the legal minimum for the membership.

    Also, keep in mind that UFT power in Albany is now solely concentrated in the person of Sheldon Silver. Patterson will soon be gone, Cuomo is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the venture capitalists who are promoting charter schools, and the Senate has turned on the union. Should something happen to Silver, or should he make a political calculation that loyalty to the UFT no longer outweighs the drawbacks, then their vaunted political power in Albany will have totally collapsed.

    As for due process and fairness, that’s so 20th century, and is but a whisper as Mammon tears through the schools.

  • http://www.newsweek.com/feature/2010/americas-best-high-schools/list.html Seth

    I just find it ironic.
    Newsweek ranked John Dewey No. 1558 last week as one of the top high schools in the country. That’s the top 6 percent in the nation according to the report. Either Newsweek is off or the accountability that the mayor wants and the closing of the schools just doesn’t make sense.

  • http://Gotham Queenie

    Wow! That is amazing. It just goes to show how Klein and our mayor have their own agenda. Let’s face it, they are trying to break the union. Let’s not allow them to do it. I’m not sure how to do that but we have to try.

  • Alex

    A bit confused..anyone know if the decision is out yet on the appeal of the original 19 schools (of which 8 are on this list?)

  • Bob

    Seth, Newsweek is definitely off. :) I worked at two terrible schools it had high on its list. Look, the bottom line is if you don’t get out, you’ll be put out. Or, you maybe if you’re a teacher in one of the listed schools, you’d like to ride the wave as far as it takes you and see how far it takes you and hope for the best as the walls are closing in.

  • Senseless Spending….

    Yes ther is fear. Fear is felt by all that are in the jaws of the rabid squirrel. Yes quite oximoronish but it is all rediculous. Ask any of those finger pointing. People that are making these desicions how many of those schools did they walk into asked what they needed

  • http://yahoo.com Concerned student

    This is absolutely ludicrious. i attened john dewey high school and i dont feel thatbit should be shut down. if anything it should be reconstructed. yes people need to be fired and yes things need to be changed but shutting the school down completely wont solve anything. that would only make the problem worse. the problem lies within the low gradgution rate. when lafayette closed down all the low achieving students transfered to dewey. Dewey was once one of the best schools in Brooklyn but now its suffering. things need to be changed people need to be fired non hardworking students need to be kicked out. people who have not gradguated on time need to be watched carefully and closely. the problem is that no one seems to care not the city because if they did they would start helping not resulting to such cowardice…

  • squeers

    “Their ultimate plan is to whittle down the number of public schools to some minimal number, so as to either keep it as a rump system for the “lesser” (to use Alan Simpson’s indiscrete but revealing term regarding Social Security) students or small enough to drown in the bathtub.”

    Your posts Michael are always of interest, but I disagree with your analysis above. I see a national strategy unfolding here where Weingarten will hold the line on high performing urban, suburban and rural school and let the charters take over the rest, including in time what you describe as the “lesser students”. Then a linkage will develop between private for profit schools, reform schools such as those run by Camelot Schools LLC, Abraxas Education, the Geo Group and prisons. This was already started as far I can tell under Paul Vallas when he ran the Philly system.

  • Former Charter employee

    Where are all these students going to go?? Bloomberg will not stop until he fully privatizes the schools and destroys the unions.

  • Michelle

    The goal is to obvious lower the number of public schools in existance. Bloomy is slating all these schools to make room for the charter schools. They are writing public schools and letting them know as we speak unutilized space will be used. See this is all about dismantling the public schools. Like a large corporation trying to take over the small companies and downsizing. Once the whole system is chartered, he will be happy. No union!!! See he know he cant just get rid of the public schools so he has to show they are not doing anything. The sad part is now the students teachers and principals are displaced. The students will now go to other public schools and be overcrowded . Then that school will be slated for closure. Like a domino effect! Sad but true. The only reason why they meet with the public is because they have to do everything by the book . But the panel is made of Bloomy yes people. They already know which way they are voting. How is that fair! SOOOOOOOO sad! Why do u think Bloomy fought so hard for an extended term. Oh and another thing. If Charter schools are taking public and private funding. They take away from public schools. I believe if they are getting public funding especially they should have to take special need children. Not just targeting the level 3 and 4 students. You cant honestly compare public and charter until there is an equal balance. The public schools take all and only recieve public funding. So in my book it is not an equal balance! If u have all the level 3 and 4 of course u will be doing well. Lets see what happens when all students are eventually in charter. U will have all the same students and nothing will change. So if they get rid of the public schools keep in mind all students will be in charter yes, but I bet u those test scores will not be as high! When children are acting up they discharge them and send them to the public schools. Must be NIce! Oh and did I say receive public funding !

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

16 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930