GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Ken Hirsh

The Good Old Days

I highly recommend reading the new report released by the New School’s Center for New York City Affairs on “Empowerment and Accountability in New York City’s Schools.” It is detailed, balanced, and extremely educational. Reviewers have focused on the report’s conclusion that the DOE’s grading system is “deeply flawed,” perhaps the report’s most important conclusion.

Within the report’s 68 pages, though, are some powerful reminders of our system’s recent history:

When I [author Clara Hemphill] visited 30 schools in District 7 in the South Bronx as a reporter for the Insideschools.org website early in Mayor Bloomberg’s first term, the schools, with a few noteworthy exceptions, were in a sorry state. I met principals who routinely called for an ambulance to take an out-of-control child to the nearest psychiatric emergency room because they didn’t know what else to do. The middle schools were chaotic, with children wandering aimlessly in the hallways as teachers lectured to half-empty classrooms. Some of the elementary schools were sweet, warm places with kindhearted teachers doing their best — but the children didn’t know how to read. While I saw pockets of good instruction, some parents complained to me that their children were taught mostly in Spanish for as many as five or six years, learning almost no English. Books and supplies were scarce.

Returning to a dozen of those District 7 schools recently, I found much has changed. Books and supplies are abundant. Most of the schools I visited were orderly, with children in classrooms rather than roaming the corridors. Instruction is mostly in English … Principals are now appointed from the applicant pool selected by Tweed, rather than by the district office. Some of these new principals have a wealth of talent and experience … The principals … say it’s easier to recruit and retain staff largely because teacher salaries are substantially higher than they were before the Bloomberg-era increases … District 7′s test scores started at the absolute bottom in 2002 and made some of the most dramatic gains of any large district in the state…

Looking even further back, the report tells of the dark side of past governance:

… District 7 had a long history of hiring driven by patronage and nepotism … According to a 1996 report by the city’s special commissioner of investigation, the district superintendent, Pedro Crespo, hired unqualified friends and relatives of school board members and approved expensive junkets and perks. In one instance, Crespo appointed a principal with a poor command of English who had failed eight licensing exams. Teachers and principals were pressured to buy and sell tickets for large parties organized to raise campaign funds for local politicians.  School board meetings regularly erupted into shouting matches during which, for example, school board members were accused of stealing computers from the district office.

Reports of corruption and nepotism declined after a 1996 state law limited the powers of the city’s community school boards and expanded those of the chancellor. Still, achievement in District 7 remained pitifully low. Although overt political influence declined, principals still paid homage to elected officials: In 2002, five District 7 principals made contributions to the re-election campaign of Carmen Arroyo, a longtime member of the state Assembly; in 2005, six principals did, according to financial disclosure reports filed with the state Board of Elections.

To be clear, the report suggests that there is much work still to be done:

Yet for all these gains, significant problems remain. While some schools have a rich curriculum, others offer bare-bones instruction narrowly designed to help children pass standardized tests. Many of the newly hired principals have had minimal teaching experience and almost no administrative experience, and struggle mightily with basics like student discipline. While middle school attendance has improved, attendance in District 7 elementary and high schools has not improved significantly since 2002 … Little progress has been made in special education … and, while high school graduation rates have increased markedly, a number of principals openly acknowledge that their students have met only the bare minimum requirements for graduation and are poorly prepared for college.

  • Darryl Strawberry

    I was in District 7 as a teacher in the late 90s. One of the most currupt, depressing, ans vile systems imaginable. The worst. Perfect poster child for the way the DOE used to be.

  • Smith

    I wouldn’t include the fact that the curriculum has been narrowed in order to focus on test prep under a heading that suggests that schools are improving but have “much work” to do. Test prep is a conscious step in the wrong direction and is dictated by the needs of the adults (Klein and Bloomberg) rather than the needs of children.
    Now that Klein has won the battle over using test scores in teacher evaluations, the researchers will likely find that schools have moved even further in this direction the next time they visit these schools.

    Nor would I include in this section the part that suggests a rising graduation rate is not an indication of improved achievement. I think words like “fraud” or “deception” might better describe what’s going on in high schools.

  • Andrew Wolf

    Worthy of note is that the central figure in the corruption of the decentralized District 7 – perhaps for a long as 40 years was Assemblywoman Carmen Arroyo who until recently was running two charters through her grandson and former chief-of-staff, Richard Izquierdo.

    Izquierdo pled guilty to corruption charges and had to resign as chair of the charters and will shortly be off to prison. Many charters are sinkholes of corruption.

  • http://MoreThoughtful.blogspot.com ceolaf wolfhelm

    Ken,

    So, what you are saying is that despite the fact that the new system is incredibly flawed (perhaps even in its basic assumptions) we have to remember that the old system had enormous flaws which we fixed.

    How is that different that saying, “Yeah, we through out the baby. But remember, we ALSO threw out the bathwater!!”

  • http://MoreThoughtful.blogspot.com ceolaf wolfhelm

    (sorry. That “though” obviously should have been a “threw.”

  • Bronx teacher-lady

    While I’m glad to hear that many of these schools have improved in some ways, it means very little to someone whose school has gone in the opposite direction under Bloomberg/Klein. When I started in my high-poverty Bronx school in 2000, it ranked 2nd in the district in state test scores, had a wonderful, caring administration and some of the hardest working, self-motivated, competent and experienced teachers I’ve ever encountered. It was a true “safe haven” for children physically, socially, and emotionally, with a calm and orderly environment. I actually opted to work here after receiving an offer to work in a much better-respected district, I was so impressed when I visited. After the administration was pushed out by the end of 2006 (Bloomberg/Klein’s first year), we had 4 different principals in two years and have wound up with a Leadership Academy grad and got a “D” on our first report card. Though supposedly our test scores and report card grades have steadily improved, the school has become chaotic and even dangerous at times, serious behavior problems are rarely addressed and blamed on the teacher, and the same teachers from 10 years ago are exhausted, demoralized, and constantly harrassed if they haven’t opted for an early retirement or been “pushed out.” There have been numerous complaints by both teachers and parents to the superintendent, the UFT, and local politicians, including a parent protest that made a local news channel a couple of years ago — yet these conditions continue and the principal keeps her job. I don’t care how many schools have marginally improved under Bloomberg/Klein…if even one like mine exists and is allowed to continue to function in this manner, especially in light of how it used to be before they took over, they should be utterly ashamed and held accountable.

  • Pogue

    Ahh, the good, old days – Arista, A.P. classes, Mock Trial Teams, Debate Teams, School plays, Woodworking shop, Metal shop, Automotive shop, Photography class, Music appreciation, School band, Choir, Dance club, Bowling team, golf team, strong sports teams, cheerleaders, Honor Society, School Newspaper…

    HEY!

    Stop your foolish reminiscing, put your head down, and bubble in that answer sheet!

  • http://www.sinksalive.blogspot.com KitchenSink

    …unchecked gang activity, sex in the stairwells, community school board graft to the tune of millions…

  • http://MoreThoughtful.blogspot.com Alexander Hoffman

    I believe that this is called “cherry picking.”

    I believe ken’s labeling of these excepts as being the “system’s recent history” is quite misleading in more than one way. First, the report makes clear that the city’s schools are now in their third new structure since since Bloomberg and Klein got control of the schools. Therefore, those quotes that Ken pull out refer to conditions many reorganizations ago. Second, they are not offered as being typical of the whole system, but rather as the state of a single district out of thirty-two.

    Of course, there are various other issues in the report as well (e.g. the failure of the DOE to replace the ineffective leader of one of the very worst schools in the city for at least 5 years). But heart of the report is right here in these two paragraphs:

    “Klein’s reforms have allowed some very talented principals to turn around failing schools or create new schools from scratch, to forge their own vision and assemble their own faculty without bureaucratic interference. These principals have succeeded in bringing order, discipline and solid teaching to some of the city’s most troubled schools.
    “At the same time, the reforms have left inexperienced or ineffective principals to manage without much guidance or direction. Some principals receive high marks on the city’s Progress Reports even though their schools offer little more than a thin gruel of test prep. Meanwhile, the city’s accountability system makes it nearly impossible to tell which schools offer children engaging instruction and a rich curriculum. This, in combination with the fact that there is no day-to-day oversight of principals and their schools, means it is often unclear which schools are struggling but moving in the right direction—and which are so distressed that dramatic action, such as the removal of a principal or the closing of a school, is in order.”
    Of course, it is not the least bit uncommon for supporters of these kinds of educational “reforms” to defend their ill-considered, inappropriate and ineffective programs based on the old need for improvement. We see it here again, by Ken. 

    What so many seem to miss is that testing, measuring and reporting is NOT a program for improvement, EVEN IF IT IS VALID, RELIABLE AND APPROPRIATE. The real question is what is going to be done once poor performers are identified? 

    The report does not simply make clear that there is much work to be done. It makes clear that the entire system is broken. The tests are not appropriate for the uses to which they’ve been put. Scores are inflated. Schools and principals that offer poor educations for their students are not identified. There is no program that ensures that ineffective leadership is supported to improve. And the whole system fails to respond to communities’ concerns (i.e. is not democratically accountable). It is a failure on EVERY level, and is tantamount to an abandonment of the moral and legal responsibilities with which Bloomberg and the DOE have been charged.

  • Smith

    Pogue, you forgot recess (for lower grades).

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031