GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

fact-check

How scared should SUNY’s Charter School Institute really be?

Was the State University of New York’s ability to approve and oversee charter schools truly at risk during last month’s charter school cap debate? The lead vignette of today’s Times profile of city lobbyist Micah Lasher suggests that it was:

Just when Micah C. Lasher thought it was safe to finally sleep one recent morning, three words appeared in his in-box: “It’s a sham.”

Mr. Lasher had stayed up all night helping write a bill to increase the number of charter schools in New York, a cornerstone of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s education agenda. But amid the frenzy, a highly contentious provision had slipped by him: the State University of New York would lose its power to approve charter schools.

If SUNY’s Charter School Institute really was only saved during a middle-of-the-night wrangling, that could be a bad sign for the organization’s future: the Institute is currently facing budget cuts that might gut its operations.

But all of our information suggests that lawmakers supported keeping SUNY’s ability to oversee charters. The provision that could have revoked SUNY’s chartering authority was the result of a manic bill drafting process and late-night fatigue, not an attack on the widely-praised charter school overseers.

“The Assembly was on the same page as us, in that the goal all along was to preserve SUNY’s chartering authority,” Lasher told GothamSchools today. “At worst, the language folks were concerned about was an ambiguity.”

That jives with what I heard the day the bill was passed from Jonas Chartock, the head of the SUNY Charter Schools Institute, and Assemblyman Sam Hoyt, one of the bill’s main proponents and the sponsor of the chapter amendment that clarified that SUNY would remain an independent authorizer of charter schools.

And even Richard Ianuzzi, the head of the state teachers union who has been skeptical of current charter school oversight practices, is on the record opposing cuts to the Institute as long as they maintain chartering authority.

  • Gideon

    The fact that the language was even floating around and was “accidently” in the bill suggests there were powerful interests pushing to neuter CSI. The Regents, led by Merryl Tisch and appointed by the Assembly, have long detested CSI’s independence; they want to control all education in the state, despite their own state education departments lackluster oversight of charter schools. And while NYSUT might have opposed cuts to CSI “as long as they maintain chartering authority,” the UFT is on record recommending “Establish the Board of Regents as the single chartering entity for all charter schools statewide as the way to promote a single and high standard of quality.” While they might get a single standard of quality that way, it certainly wouldn’t be as high as what CSI provides.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

46 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

  • Frank Thomas, DOE spokesman just told me no arrests have been made tonight at PEP despite confrontation between protesters & police earlier. 23 mins ago
  • RT @leoniehaimson: It's been shown repeatedly that as one schl closes another overwhelmed w/ high needs kids that small schls won't take 28 mins ago
  • Shael: the suggestion that kids are moved around (to large, struggling high schools) just isn't accurate. 30 mins ago
  • @SchoolBook: Manhattan rep @PSulliv and mayoral appointee Lisette Nieves get into an argument she tells him to get off his "soapbox” 32 mins ago
  • Mayoral appointee Lisette nieves chimes in on an increasingly irate @PSulliv she says he's being rude. 33 mins ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>