GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

bell lap

Close to a deal: Charter cap to rise, RFPs, space-sharing rules

After negotiating late into the night, the Assembly, Senate, Mayor Bloomberg, and city teachers union are closer than ever to a deal on how to make New York more competitive for Race to the Top. But even the seemingly final bill introduced today may not be the last version. An Albany source said there are already plans to amend the bill.

The full text of the bill in the most updated form we know of is here. Background on Race to the Top is here.

This bill would raise the cap on charter schools to 460 from 200, but change the way schools are opened. Prospective charter school operators would have to respond to Request for Proposal documents, like contractors, rather than applying on their own. Exactly how this process would work is unclear, but one effect could be slowing the pace of charter school growth. The bill puts a cap on the number of newly approved charter schools that could open by September 2011 — 32.

The deal also aims to ease the tensions (and sometimes all-out wars) that have happened when charter schools are placed inside traditional public school buildings. Now, before schools are placed together, the city’s Department of Education would have to write up a new document called a “building usage plan” outlining exactly which rooms would be used by which schools, and proposing how the schools can share common spaces like cafeterias, libraries, playgrounds, and auditoriums.

The two schools would also have to set up a “shared space committee” — comprised of representatives from each school — to make sure they follow the plan. As far as I can tell, though, in this version of a deal charter school critics lost their battle for parents at the traditional public school get a say in whether or not charter schools can move into their buildings.

Finally, the bill as it’s now written explicitly allows the state comptroller to audit charter schools. It also ramps up regulations forcing charter schools to reach demographic targets that match nearby public schools. That means that charter schools would be expected to have similar numbers of special education students, students still learning English, and students eligible for free lunch because of family poverty.

  • Tim

    My gosh is it ever hard to read the bill the way it is presented online.

    Maybe I’m just feeling giddy going into a long weekend, but doesn’t this bill do about as much as it possibly could for both pro-charter and anti-charter camps? 

  • http://www.nycharterparents.org Mona Davids, New York Charter Parents Association (NYCPA)

    NYCPA is pleased that the majority of the reforms we advocated for are included in the assembly bill.

    However, we really hoped the co-location process would be improved. There already are building councils at all co-located schools so the recommendation in the bill for the council to include a parent will not make a difference. We need a better process.

    The reinstatement of the chancellor’s authority in authorizing charter schools is a shame. DoE authorized charters are the ones with the least oversight and the most corruption, financial mismanagement, corporate chicanery and incompetent boards. Parents complain to the DoE about the mismanagement and pushing out of Sped students and they are ignored.

    NYCPA will continue to advocate for TRUE charter school reform. We will continue to work in partnership with district parents to make ALL schools great schools.

  • miss teacher

    I must admit to not reading the whole bill- but I do have a question: Suppose, despite all these efforts, NY still does not win any RttT money? Are we then still on the hook for implementing these changes since they will be law by then? And if so, where will the money come from?

  • http://theline.edublogs.org Dina Strasser

    I share Miss Teacher’s question. My thought is that if a bill is passed into law, it’s the law, regardless of whether we receive RttT funds as a secondary result. However, should those laws become (become? ha) controversial, I would think that a lack of RttT “glue” would increase the chances of those laws changing or being repealed in the future.

    Just blogged on this very topic myself.

    http://theline.edublogs.org/2010/05/27/race-to-the-top-hits-home/

    I found our local union president, at the Ravitch speech given in my hometown recently, very reluctant to commit himself to the agreements of his state higher-ups, citing local bargaining as a primary concern. I have no doubt that whatever gets passed in Albany will be near unrecognizable in some local forms, if not blocked altogether.

  • charter parent

    Mona David continues to be outright wrong about her characterization of DoE authorized charter schools. Whatever her personal reasons for attempting to paint all DoE charters with the same brush might be, given her position in her organization I would expect she would be more diligent in her research and careful about the rhetoric she expouses.

  • Michael M.

    I’m very interested in the co-location rules.

    That Community District Education Councils (CECs) will have no say in whether there are incoming co-located charters makes an utter mockery of one of the few real CEC powers: zoning approval.

    It is meaningless — and an end run of the renewed Mayoral Control law — for CECs to nominally have the power to approve a school catchment zone… while DOE is effectively and unilaterally shrinking the number of seats available to zoned kids.

    Nice zone. Have a nice lottery.

  • http://www.mvschooltalk.net Charles Stern

    The past 6 months have been an eye opener on how Albany works, for me. In my own Mount Vernon, New York our schools are severely impacted by loss of state aid. We have high concentrations of children who could benefit from charter schools. The only way our local legislators can justify their “no” votes on this legislation is if they believe voter ignorance and apathy will keep them in office, indefinitely. Are urban schools just a jobs program? We drifted in that direction, and charter school can help knock it back if they’re executed well.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

50 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

  • Despite some tense confrontations between protesters and police, nothing ever got physical and a lieutenant just said there were no arrests. 50 mins ago
  • He's been frozen in that stoic position all night MT @lisafleisher: A protester speaks with his middle finger. http://t.co/xLar4NRU 52 mins ago
  • Last of the occupy protesters just walked out together, shouting expletives and insults on their way out. #toughcrowd 56 mins ago
  • Frank Thomas, DOE spokesman just told me no arrests have been made tonight at PEP despite confrontation between protesters & police earlier. 1 hr ago
  • RT @leoniehaimson: It's been shown repeatedly that as one schl closes another overwhelmed w/ high needs kids that small schls won't take 1 hr ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>