GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

MARGIN NOTES

Two men and the union in a room, talking charter cap

Maybe we’ll have a charter cap deal after all.

We’re hearing that the mayor’s top political aide, Howard Wolfson, is in Albany right now meeting with Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and representatives of the city and state teachers unions. They’re all trying to hammer out a deal that would allow 260 more charter schools to open in New York State. And they’re racing against a super-tight deadline: June 1, next Tuesday, when the state’s second application to the federal Race to the Top competition must be delivered to the U.S. Education Department headquarters in D.C.

Sticking points in today’s negotiations, we hear, include a continued effort to push against allowing SUNY to act as an authorizer of charter schools. Charter school supporters, led by the Bloomberg administration, say that snatching SUNY’s power is a poison pill that would force them to drop out of negotiations. They say the same thing about a proposal on the table that would mean charters could only open through an RFP-like process.

But our source says that the mayor’s side has given in on at least two key issues: a ban on for-profit companies managing charter schools and permission for the state comptroller to audit charter schools.

We’ll keep you posted as we hear more.

  • Ellen

    Were their parents in this room? I guess not. what the heck, they just provide the raw material for the magic

  • http://www.classsizematters.org Leonie Haimson

    what’s the status of parents having a voice on the co-location issue? I think that’s far more important than whether SUNY or the Regents is the authorizer. Neither one does a good job on this, if you ask me.

  • JB

    SUNY has been recognized nationwide as one of the more successful authorizers with one of the most rigorous processes.  If you ask me, it’s the Regents which has failed to prove their muster as an authorizer, not SUNY.

    My question is, what’s the evidence SUNY should not be an authorizer?  The great thing about having multiple authorizers is we have competition and accountability.  If one authorizer is doing a poor job, then, and only then, should the state shut it down.  By having multiple authorizers we can compare the results of the two authorizing processes as well as find each authorizer pushing to make those processes more streamlined to attract new management organizations.

    Competition and choice are two key elements of charter schools.  Why are we afraid of these two ideas when it comes to authorizers?

  • http://www.SpecialEducationMuckraker.com Dee Alpert

    Allowing the NYS Comptroller to audit charter schools is a straw man issue, at best. The NYS Comptroller currently has the authority to audit school districts but has no authority to require districts to correct identified shortcomings and outright illegal financial shenanigans. Only NYSED has that authority. According to a recent USDOE OIG audit, NYSED allows districts to ignore negative Comptroller’s audit findings and continue their financial misconduct ad infinitum. So essentially, the Comptroller’s audits are advisory, at best. Indeed, since the NYS Comptroller finished the first round of audits of all school districts and BOCES in NYS, a program of follow up audits has been implemented to see whether corrective action plans had actually been implemented. And, unsurprisingly, the Comptroller reports a significant proportion of the most important corrective actions have gone by the wayside or were tossed into the circular file.

    If and when the Comptroller is given the authority to audit charter schools, it will be same old-same old. If financial wrongs are identified … so what? NYSED doesn’t care and won’t do a thing about it. All allowing the Comptroller to audit charter schools will mean is that more paper with more findings will be issued … and ignored.

    What Klein and Bloomberg may really be afraid of is that if the NYS Comptroller doesn’t get the authority to audit NYC charter schools, NYC Comptroller Liu may wind up garnering that authority. And Liu will not keep his negative findings to himself – including those which show that the NYCDOE’s supervision and monitoring of schools it has chartered is substandard, at best, negligent for the most part, and complicit in corruption, at worst.

    We could use a little nuance here. Let the NYS Comptroller audit non-NYCDOE charters: let the NYC Comptroller audit NYC charters, and – please! – let the public read all the audit reports these offices produce. And then read and compare them with audits of school districts and the NYCDOE produced by the same offices. What we’ve really got at the moment is a fine case of the pot calling the kettle black.

    There is nothing corrupt, sleazy, or improper which anyone has identified in a NYS charter school to date which was not already identified as going on in a NYS public school district or BOCES. And there is nothing corrupt, sleazy or improper which any entity has reported about in a NYS public school district or charter school which NYSED has not tacitly approved by failing to use its authority to stop the misconduct – except in those cases where NYSED itself did the audit … and covered up the thefts and corruption its own auditors found. Albany BOCES thefts, anyone?

    As long as NYSED is the only authority with the power to actually do something when public school or charter audits – by any group of auditors – document financial misconduct, arguing about who can do them is simply a Trojan horse. The issue is “who is going to do something if audits show financial misconduct?” Since the answer right now is “no one,” the argument is, at best, academic.

  • Ellen

    chill out Dee…just cause there is a blank space doesn’t mean you have to fill it up

  • Vote NO

    I hope any final bill kills co-location. It shouldn’t just be against charter schools, but against using any one building for multiple schools.

  • fedup

    We MUST DEMAND

    1. No Colaocation of charter schools that does not allow the local community via CEC /PTA and SLT to vote to allow them in.

    Charters can rent space on their own dime-not muscle out community schools.

    2. A No Saturation clause that will cap the number of charters in individual districts.

    If parents want charters fine-let them vote them in-the Mayor can not be allowed to give real estate to private firms via “portfolio” office.. I never thought i wouold see the day our public schools would be turned into a real estate “portfolio”
    but then again-we work for an “education” secretary who never taught a day in his life and would not know how, but played B rate basketball in the European leagues and a prosecutor
    who serves at the pleasure of a billionaire mayor who was reelected over the stated will of the people… Stay strong for 3 more years!!!

  • fedup

    Advisory committees suggested by Union and mayor would be a BIG mistake.. This mayor is a dictator who threw a hissy fit when told he could not have a veto proof majority on the PEP.. In th end everone caved and now they vote for anything they propose (and there have been some doozies-no more bake sales, 5 million dollar contract with NTP while we are laying off teachers)

    Any charter bill MUSt have parent/community veto power to say NO to big bucks bloomy

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031