GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

MARGIN NOTES

Assembly approves new teacher evaluation system

Another day has gone by without the State Assembly voting on a charter cap bill, but that doesn’t mean the members are twiddling their thumbs. They voted today to approve the new teacher evaluation system that came out of a deal between the state and teachers union earlier this month.

The system would make students’ test scores a factor in teacher evaluations, a change that state officials believe will improve New York’s bid for Race to the Top funds. It would also give principals the choice of labeling teachers one of four options — highly effective, effective, developing, and ineffective — rather than the current choices of satisfactory or unsatisfactory.

City education officials have criticized the new system for being vague and forcing districts to work out some elements of the system with their local teachers union. While the agreement calls for 20 percent of a teacher’s evaluation score to come from her students’ test scores, it requires another 20 percent to come from local assessments, which districts and unions would have to negotiate.

ENHANCED TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM APPROVED BY ASSEMBLY

Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and Education Committee Chair Catherine Nolan today announced that the Assembly passed legislation creating a comprehensive statewide evaluation system for teachers and principals (A.11171/Nolan).

Under the legislation, 40 percent of the evaluation would be based upon student achievement. The remaining 60 percent would be comprised of locally-developed measures, including classroom observations. These annual professional performance reviews would be a factor in promotion, retention, tenure determination, termination and supplemental compensation.

The reviews would rate the effectiveness of teachers and principals as highly effective, effective, developing or ineffective. The legislation would require that improvement plans be developed for any educator who receives a rating of developing or ineffective, and that a pattern of ineffective teaching or performance – two consecutive annual ratings of ineffective – would constitute significant evidence of incompetence and could form the basis for just cause removal through a newly established expedited hearing process.

“We have an obligation to New York State’s children to provide them with the best education possible,” said Silver (D-Manhattan). “This overhaul of the way we evaluate educators will provide for a more objective, student-centered rating system and help to ensure that under-performing schools, teachers and principals are given the assistance they need to improve.”

“This legislation enhances the current system of teacher evaluations, which only categorizes educators as satisfactory or unsatisfactory,” said Nolan (D-Queens). “It’s crucial that a number of factors are taken into consideration when reviewing a teacher or principal’s performance, including student achievement. By instituting more rigorous guidelines, we will make New York State an even stronger competitor in the next round of federal Race to the Top funding.”

The new evaluation system would be phased in at the start of the 2011-2012 school year for teachers in grades 4 to 8, and their respective principals. In 2012-2013, the new evaluation standards would become applicable to all teachers and principals.

This legislation would also authorize the board of education of a school district or the Chancellor of the New York City school district to contract with an educational partnership organization for up to five years to manage schools identified as persistently lowest-achieving or under registration review. The contract would be required to outline expectations for academic outcomes and district expectations, and stipulate that failure to meet those expectations may be grounds for termination of the contract.

  • http://southbronxschool.blogspot.com Bronx Teacher

    “This legislation would also authorize the board of education of a school district or the Chancellor of the New York City school district to contract with an educational partnership organization for up to five years to manage schools identified as persistently lowest-achieving or under registration review.”

    Awesome. This is just a way for yet another “consulting firm” to reap in hordes of no bid cash.

    “The contract would be required to outline expectations for academic outcomes and district expectations, and stipulate that failure to meet those expectations may be grounds for termination of the contract.”

    Again, how high is the bar set?

  • Pogue

    Wonderful.  And, this is all to get that RttT money that can’t be used against layoffs or enhancing educational programs other than testing?  Congratulations UFT Leadership, you have laid down again.  Next up?  The destruction of the ATR’s and senority.

  • experienced and talented teacher

    I am so sad to hear this disheartening news. Pogue-does this mean it’s a done deal?

  • I noticed that…

    To all the bloggers, it’s a DONE deal and we can only hope that this new teacher evaluation is truly fair and it does not destroy the teaching profession.

    If it does, then the teachers are DONE!

  • Jeff S

    Bye bye tenure. Thanks UFT; you did your members well (unless you got something in exchange).

  • Math Teacher Bklyn

    The DOE wants teachers as commodities they wont tenure to end it has most states almost already why not in new york (I’m being sarcastic)

  • An Effective Teacher Says…

    Thanks UFT – I’m glad you allowed your members to vote on this issue… oh wait you did it by a secret meeting where our elected delegates never even polled our schools. Excellent! Well Done! Just like a mob-run union. Why not hold another secret vote to raise union dues too? Maybe you can buy more artwork for your beautiful building.

    I want my union dues back – all of it. Where can I sign up for the class action lawsuit against the UFT??? No Automatic UFT Deductions without Representation!

  • Veteran Teacher

    One could not create a better plan to undermine tenure than this. This a dream Klein might have but then wake up and realize destroying tenure is an impossible dream. Congrats UFT leadership, with your help the impossible in not only possible—it happened!!

  • AMC

    At the risk of being called naive and being berated, I will say that I like this new rating system. We rate the students will a 4 point rubric. We as professionals should also be able to be rated on our strengths and weaknesses. I have always been wary of the all or nothing S or U rating system that is in place. There is no middle ground. Now struggling teachers and administrators have that middle ground – if it’s used effectively …

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

2 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031