GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

human capital

Bronx president urges no vote on teacher recruitment contract

Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. called on the citywide school board to postpone or vote down a contract that would pay an outside group to recruit new teachers, saying today that it “does not make any sense” with impending layoffs.

The contract, which the Panel for Educational Policy will vote on at tomorrow’s meeting, would pay The New Teacher Project a maximum of $4.9 million to recruit and train New York City Teaching Fellows. In a statement sent to reporters, Diaz said the money should be used to stave off layoffs rather than bring in new teachers. If Diaz’s appointee votes against the contract, she’ll likely be joined by panel member Patrick Sullivan, who criticized the contract in the Daily News.

But Department of Education officials have said that new teachers will be needed to fill vacancies in areas like science and special education regardless of layoffs. To meet this anticipated need, the roughly 450 Teaching Fellows who will enter the job market this summer will only be certified in either of those two subjects.

The majority of them plan to work in special education and 100 will teach science. Of those with special education licenses, 225 will look to work in secondary special education, 100 in District 75 schools, and 25 in bilingual special education.

Because the city pays TNTP based on how many of its recruits it eventually hires, the payments have dropped significantly over the last several years as school budgets have tightened and hiring has slowed. This school year, the city paid the organization $2.8 million, down from $4.1 million in 2007.

The payment next school year will be even smaller, said Ann Forte, a spokeswoman for the DOE, as the incoming group of follows has gone from 705 this year to 450 next year.

Forte said having The New Teacher Project — an non-profit that also studies teacher job markets around the country —  manage the recruitment process saves the department money.

“The teacher recruitment office does not have the capacity to read through several thousand applications, coordinate alumni interviews, and respond to these people,” Forte said. “If they did, they’d have to bring in additional staff they maybe wouldn’t need for the next year. It gives us a very flexible staffing model.”

STATEMENT FROM BRONX BOROUGH PRESIDENT RUBEN DIAZ JR.

RE: Panel for Educational Policy Contract Vote

“Tomorrow, the Panel for Educational Policy will be voting on 24 vendor contracts, one of which is a nearly $5 million contract to recruit and train new teachers as part of the New York City Teaching Fellow’s program. I do not understand why, at a time when we are facing the loss of thousands of teachers due to budget cuts, we are not using these funds to preserve the teaching positions we currently have.  This does not make any sense, and illustrates extremely poor planning and judgment by the Department of Education.  Instead of spending $5 million looking for new teachers, I would think that the DOE should spend that money keeping the ones we already have.

“I have asked my representative to the Panel for Educational Policy to call for a postponement on voting on this item at Tuesday’s meeting and am hopeful that the Department of Education will seriously consider our request. If that postponement is not forthcoming, I have asked her to vote against this contract,” said Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr.

  • http://nyceducator.com NYC Educator

    If they don’t pay The New Teacher Project 5 million bucks, where will they find a similarly objective and impartial group to support all the chancellor’s ideas about hiring teachers?

  • Smith

    NYC Educator is right. This money is being spent for political purposes.

  • Jason

    This will work out well for the Bronx when our schools can’t hire certified special ed and science teachers.

  • anathema

    They should be hiring more teachers that way they can be firing them teachers who is lazy and self fish who won’t be taken no 10% salary cut. Look at what Chris Christ be doing in jersey. Fire them greedy teachers who won’t take no pay cut and make there budgets fail. You teachers MUST make SACRIFICE just like all us do.

  • http://nyceducator.com NYC Educator

    I just sacrificed a goat in my backyard. The neighbors complained but when I said you told me to do it they understood. Also I cut not 10, but 20 percent of my celery because that’s the kind of guy I am, and we were making a salad anyway. I really wish, though, you wouldn’t bring up Jersey when we’re eating.

  • anathema

    Why do you teachers got such a hard time making sacrifices like everyone else’s. Just cuz the ecomony is bad don’t mean you can go making you’re fat paychecks and you’re fat pentions, and you’re fat health benefits. Do it for the children. We ALL MUST make SACRIFICES. You aint no different.

  • anathema

    oh and i brung up new jersey cuz they have a government who care about the common folk. Christ aint gonna let the state workers nor the teachers continue to maketh all this money and all this generous benefits and pentions, instead he stands up for the taxpayer.

  • miss teacher

    Jason, I have a feeling that there will be plenty of newly certified science and special ed teachers coming out of the assorted colleges in the city, on LI, in Westechester, etc. (not to mention the kids who are metro-NY area natives and will be returning home from upstate NY schools, again, with certification and student teaching experience). There are few jobs to be found anywhere so I’d imagine many of them would gladly take NYC jobs. You may counter than those teachers may eventually move on to greener pastures when the economy improves, but maybe not. And how many Fellows/TFA teachers REALLY stay? I see no reason at all to spend $5 million dollars.
    And Anathema, I consider reading your post to be enough sacrifice. My head hurts now.

  • bookworm

    Instead of spending 5 million dollars on recruiting new teachers, how about using some of that money to help those of us in ATR limbo to fill vacancies in shortage areas? If they can pay for Master’s degrees for Teaching Fellows who leave after two years, why can’t they pay to make the teachers they already have more versatile? When I worked in the private sector, I worked for a large company that offered tuition reimbursement and I used that to get my M.S. in Nutrition and Exercise Science. This helped me to expand my role in the company and become a more versatile employee. I have one teaching certification right now (Literacy), but would be interested in getting another if I could get some help with the tuition (which I can’t afford right now, especially if I have to save up for when I am laid off).

  • Math Teacher Bklyn

    How about people like me who worked their butt off to get teachers certification the long way 3 years of undergrad math ed now working on my masters but do to hiring freeze cant get a job. However teaching fellows still ended up finding jobs this year. Explain that one

  • An Effective Teacher Says….

    I agree. – Jason, there must be ATRs out there with science and special ed that can be hired.

    The $5million spent on hiring new teachers means a potential 100 currently employed, current tax-paying teachers will be pulled from their assignments. The loss of even one effective teacher from a school due to layoffs can be devastating. Last year we had to let go of a math teacher and our school hasn’t recovered – our classes are all at 34, three teachers have a 6th class, and we’re using a teacher out of license. None of this is good for the students and their parents.

    They are only hiring another 500 or so from the teaching fellows (TF), yet paying them $5million to do so. There are other programs (such as Teach for America) that provide new teachers, as well as non-alternative paths for certification. The TF program doesn’t make sense (cents) in the light of our deficit – and even in first in/first out policy. How many TFs are now going to laid-off this summer who were hired in the last two-three years???

  • Jason

    I tried to hire two science teachers out of the ATR pool last year. There were a limited number of science teachers generally, in non-shortage areas. I’ll put aside issues I’ve previously raised with the fact that they didn’t respond to job postings, and the few who called me back were unwilling to work in my school due to location. (They literally would not come out for interviews.) Science and Special Education are shortage areas nationally. Nobody is at risk for being laid off in those areas (at least in the specific science subjects that are shortage areas) here and the same thing is true in other districts. Jobs in those fields will be open in Westchester and Long Island and across the country. And if we bar using fellows then schools like mine — the highest-need schools will revert to the good old days where we couldn’t get qualified staff. (Schools in Tribeca and Park Slope will have no problem getting the teachers they need.) I find it particularly ironic that the Bronx Borough President is making this call when the Bronx has the highest percentage of special education students in the city, and is probably the hardest-to-staff borough generally.

    I will add to Miss Teacher that the retention rate for Fellows (not TFA, but they’re not at issue here) is higher than traditionally certified teachers. This is true both at the end of their TFA guarantee period (3 years) and after five years. I don’t find this particularly shocking. It seems perfectly logical that older career changers are likely to be pretty sure of what they want and at a point in their lives and careers where they’re seeking stability.

    Finally, as noted in the story, this contract works like many other DOE and government contracts. It’s set as a ceiling but it’s paid out based on use. So if fewer teachers are needed and fewer teachers are hired, the contractee gets a lot less money. If 200 teachers are hired because that’s what the need is, then the amount of the contract is paid out proportionally. I used to work for a non-profit group that had a $250,000 contract with the DOE. We worked with individual schools who hired us as needed/wanted, for programs that cost roughly $5000 a piece. We typically earned $50-75K in a year, but if there had been a flood of interested schools wanting to purchase our services, we would’ve been able to meet that need up to the $250K ceiling. Same thing here.

  • CWT

    Jason

    Are you in need of a certified Earth Science teacher? I know someone (BS in Earth Science, MS in Education) not in the ATR and not a Teaching Fellow but who has been trying to find NYC employment for a couple months now for next year. Principals seem to be sacred to talk to her because of the hiring freeze (which doesn’t apply to her) and that she is out-of-state trying to move to NYC. Anyone… any principal…need an earth science teacher? How come, if there is such a shortage, she can’t land more interviews? Heck, she emailed over 100 principals with her cover letter and resume and got three responses. Jason, since you are a principal, what is going on that these principals won’t write back even with such a shortage in science?

  • Mikeremhead

    Honestly is there anyone who does not believe there are enough qualified Special Ed and Science folks out there? The TFA at this point is clearly a politicial plum to ensure that Klein brings in more young teachers into the system to push out older higher salaried staff members. At least have the guts to admit this.

  • BXSSTEACHER

    I am still looking for a social studies teaching position after 2 years.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

22 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829