GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

doomsday date

Timing of district’s hiring patterns key to how they weather layoffs

Most city teachers hired since the fall of 2007 will lose their jobs if current draconian budget cut predictions come through. But that cutoff date could change — and where it falls will determine not just which teachers are laid off, but which neighborhoods lose the most teachers.

State law and the city union contract dictate that the newest teachers must be laid off first. Because of that system, schools and neighborhoods with the most new teachers — hard-to-staff districts with high teacher turnover and areas that have seen jumps in their enrollment — would take the nastiest blows.

Right now, it’s still unclear exactly how many teachers will have to be laid off as the city waits on a state budget that is six weeks overdue. The exact number of layoffs dictates how many years and months of hiring the city will have to wipe out.

In March, when the city was projecting a worst-case-scenario of 8,500 layoffs, Chancellor Joel Klein outlined projections of how many teachers each community school district would lose. Under the latest estimates, which call for 4,400 pink slips, the Bronx would still be hardest hit. But neighborhoods in Manhattan — whose new teachers are on average slightly less new — are seeing greater relief.

In the earlier projections, for example, both District 7 in the Bronx and Manhattan’s District 2 were slated to lose around 20 percent of their teachers. In the new estimates, the percentage of teachers lost in District 7 has shrunk to 14 percent. But the share of teachers that could be laid off in District 2 dropped to 9 percent — down 10 percentage points, the largest dip in any district.

The shift reflects the timing of districts’ hiring patterns. District 2′s hiring boom started slightly earlier than hiring upticks in other areas of the city, said Department of Education spokeswoman Ann Forte.

And if that time-line cutoff shifts as the city adjusts the number of teacher positions it decides to ax, it will also shift how the layoffs are spread around districts, depending on when their hiring sped up.

“The situation is really fluid and it’s amazing when you start changing numbers how the situation changes,” Forte said. “A couple of weeks would make a difference.”

Here are the city’s most recent estimates of how many teachers each district could lose:

  • Peter

    The chart above is a very rough worst case scenario estimate, it does not take into account:

    * dollars rolled forward into next year’s budget

    * retirements, resignations, terminations, etc.

    * cuts in non-school based staff, Tweed, Network Teams, CFNs, etc.

    * the layoff total is a domms day scenario, at some point a State budget will be done, probably better than the Patterson budget and a City budget, also will not be as dire as the Bloomberg budget.

    After all the budgets are in place the legislature can return in July/August, a retirement incentive to avert layoffs … the “game” is afoot.

  • B

    I’m ignorant – what are districts 71-97?

  • Peter

    71-97:

    all high schools, GED Plus, schools for severely handicapped (D 75)

  • Roget

    How about putting a 50% tax on the cost of advertising by politicians (running for election) or printing and mailing self-promotional material–as a way to raise money dedicated to supporting the public school system. The 50% tax should also apply to all costs incurred by the UFT and other educationl lobbyists in producing their newspapers, flyers, pamphlets, etc., as well as on expense accounts used to wine and dine legislators to gain their backing. While we’re at it… every dollar that anyone contributes to political campaigns should be matched dollar-for-dollar by money that goes directly into the educational budget.

    This One-for-the-Fools and One-for-the-Schools campaign combined with the 50% tax will provide two benefits: 1) Millions and millions of dollars will be raised for public education. (Think of half of the $85 million Bloomberg spent on his re-election going to support our schools.) 2) It will cut down on the obscene amounts of money that are wasted by politicians and special interest groups on noxious communications that pollute the air with lies, propaganda and other debasing material.

    In effect, for once, put a tax on the same politicians whose only solutions to problems is to raise taxes. Believe me, this will do more to reform campaign financing than all the empty talk that has produced no reforms for decades–and it will provide an new source of revenue for the schools.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

51 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

  • Despite some tense confrontations between protesters and police, nothing ever got physical and a lieutenant just said there were no arrests. 1 hr ago
  • He's been frozen in that stoic position all night MT @lisafleisher: A protester speaks with his middle finger. http://t.co/xLar4NRU 1 hr ago
  • Last of the occupy protesters just walked out together, shouting expletives and insults on their way out. #toughcrowd 1 hr ago
  • Frank Thomas, DOE spokesman just told me no arrests have been made tonight at PEP despite confrontation between protesters & police earlier. 1 hr ago
  • RT @leoniehaimson: It's been shown repeatedly that as one schl closes another overwhelmed w/ high needs kids that small schls won't take 2 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>