GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

divining the future

Guessing at size of state cuts, city plans for drastic layoffs

Mayor Michael Bloomberg proposed cutting 6,400 city teaching jobs today — but he said without action from Albany, the exact number of layoffs is still anybody’s guess.

The mayor’s annual budget proposal would leave 2,000 teaching jobs unfilled and lay off another 4,400 teachers. And Chancellor Joel Klein urged principals to begin preparing for massive reductions that could cause classes to grow by nearly 20 percent.

But Bloomberg and Klein emphasized that all of the numbers could change depending on what happens in Albany, where legislators are now a month overdue in setting a budget for the state.

The city based its budget proposal on the governor’s proposed state budget, which cuts nearly $500 million from school aid to New York City and is more severe than the State Assembly’s proposed plan.

“If we don’t have any specificity in Albany, we have to act on what is a conservative best guess,” Bloomberg said.

Bloomberg said even if the state passes a less austere budget after teachers are already laid off, the city might not use the extra funds to hire the teachers back. “I’m not sure it’s worth a second round of disruption,” he said

In an email sent to schools today, Klein said principals would get preliminary budgets by June 1 but should start planning now for cuts that far exceed this year’s nearly 5 percent reduction. Klein told reporters today that the layoffs could mean an increase of three to four students in elementary school classes.

Bloomberg said that there is “no drop-dead date” for determining exactly how many teaching positions will eventually have to go. “We certainly don’t have to do anything before the budget is approved at the end of June,” he said.

Klein and Bloomberg used the draconian budget predictions to reiterate their wish for legislative changes to end the “last in-first out” requirement for teacher layoffs. The mayor also issued a warning that if the state budget ends up more dire than predicted, the city may have to reduce its commitment to raises for city teachers even further than it already has. In January, the city halved funds budgeted for 4 percent teacher pay raises to mitigate mid-year school budget cuts. Teacher raises are among the items at issue in the city’s current contract negotiations with the union, which are stalled.

The latest layoff estimates are lower than Bloomberg and Klein’s earlier estimates that the city would lose 8,500 teaching positions under the governor’s proposed cuts to state school aid. The reduction comes in part from more refined estimates and from a city commitment to help cover some of the DOE’s pension and benefit costs from its wider budget, spokeswoman Ann Forte said.

Here’s the full letter that Klein sent to principals today outlining the current budget plan:

From: Klein Joel I.
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:08 PM
To: &All Principals
Subject: Budget Update

Dear Colleagues,

Earlier today, Mayor Bloomberg released the City’s proposed budget for the coming fiscal year. While the Mayor has done his best to insulate schools during these tough economic times, our Department still faces a cut in State funding as large as $500 million. As a result, we will need to absorb substantial budget cuts for the 2010-2011 school year.

OUR BUDGET SITUATION

Lawmakers in Albany have yet to pass a budget, even though their own deadline was April 1. For that reason, our fiscal picture remains uncertain. I do not yet have all the answers about how our budget will ultimately be resolved, but I do know that the coming school year will be extremely challenging for us all. We continue to have cost increases that are beyond our control for mandated special education services, contractual pay differentials for educators, facilities operations, and transportation services. As in past years, these rising costs come in addition to funding cuts from the State, and therefore make deeper school-level budget reductions unavoidable.

As you know, over the last two years, we have already endured several rounds of budget cuts. Each time, we’ve made every effort to protect schools and students. We have cut the central administrative budget by more than $116 million, or 18 percent-that’s double the percentage of cuts taken by schools. This includes headcount reductions of 550 positions in central and field offices. For the coming school year, we will cut an additional $38 million from our administrative budgets and eliminate another 5 percent of our current positions. The central budget, however, represents only three percent of the Department’s total spending. Facing a loss of $500 million from the State, we have no choice but to find significant savings in our schools and classrooms.

SCHOOL BUDGETS

We plan to send you your preliminary 2010-2011 school year budgets by June 1. Based on what we know now, which may change depending on what happens in Albany, you will likely see a budget reduction significantly greater than the 4.9 percent cut you absorbed for the current school year.

I know that a cut of this magnitude will undoubtedly be painful, but I am confident that you will make the least-harmful choices-albeit ones I wish you didn’t have to make-for your students. Even before budgets are finalized, I want you to begin planning for the coming school year. You will need to evaluate your overall expenditures, including personnel, professional development, and after-school programs, to set spending priorities that will best support your students’ academic needs. In some cases, this may mean excessing teachers to retain after-school programs or cutting school aides to save teaching positions.

STAFFING

Unfortunately, given these budgetary realities, we must assume that it will be necessary to layoff thousands of teachers. We currently anticipate that we’ll need to let go of 4,400 school-based personnel in addition to losing even more positions through attrition. No one, not you nor I, wants to lay off teachers. And, while we would prefer to do layoffs in a way that minimizes the negative consequences for our schools and students, current State law ties our hands from doing so.

As you know, teachers have to be laid off in reverse order of seniority. According to our analysis, this seniority requirement would force us to have to lay off most of the elementary school teachers hired since the fall of 2007.

This “last in, first out” requirement fails to consider school needs as well as differences in teacher effectiveness and their real impact on the lives of our students. We all know that experience can translate into real results in the classroom-but it is not the only criterion that should be considered.

Instead, these tough decisions should be based on existing ratings from evaluations. The 1,600 teachers who received U-ratings last year should be among the first to be laid off. I also believe that teachers in the ATR pool should be let go before teachers who are currently in the classroom. Additionally, when making layoff decisions, we should consider principal observations, absentee rates, impact on student learning, and contribution to school community. If we are indeed in the unfortunate position of having to let go of teachers, I am confident that we could work together to carry out the layoffs in a manner that would be better for our schools, rather than relying on seniority alone.

I will continue to advocate for a more rational lay off system that would allow you to protect your best teachers and the best interests of our students. I remain hopeful that the State and union will come to the table with us to work out a better layoff system. As in almost every other professional organization across the country, we should base layoffs on a rigorous evaluation of performance and system needs. Our priority should be to protect our most effective teachers from layoffs.

In the meantime, our Human Resources team will be working through the layoff process. We will notify you about how layoffs will affect your individual school soon after you get your school budget.

Lastly, I want to reiterate that hiring restrictions remain in place. We could, however, be in a position this coming school year where we need to hire teachers in certain license areas, such as special education, at the same time we are laying off teachers in other areas. If you anticipate a vacancy, you can network with and screen candidates, but you should not make any offers or commitments to external candidates at this time.

NEXT STEPS

We all have many questions and concerns. I invite you to participate in an interactive Web cast about our budget situation at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, May 12. At that time, we will discuss how we can work together to manage challenging budget times. Please click on the following link to get the call-in information and to RSVP: http://www.learningtimes.net/chancellor.

The coming fiscal year is shaping up to be one of the most difficult our school system has ever had to endure. Our schoolchildren aren’t to blame for the financial mess we’re facing-and it’s unacceptable for them to bear the brunt of the State’s budget shortfall. As budget negotiations continue in Albany, you can be confident that I will keep fighting for more money for our schools.

I look forward to talking with you next week. And, as always, thank you for your hard work.

Sincerely,

Joel I. Klein

  • anathema

    You wanna fix this budget mess. Fire ATR’s teacher’s pool, Fire all Unsatisfactry rated teachers, make all teachers take a 10% pay cut, make all teachers pay for there health benefists, and make all teachers pay for there retirement. Than there won’t be no financial crisis in new york city. Open more charter schools and hire people who aint teachers to work in them- make them like a corporation bizness. Teachers are greedy and self fish.

  • Richard

    Yikes, anathema. Your language skills are deplorable. You can’t spell and you have terrible grammar. Until you learn to express yourself in a more educated fashion, your opinion really doesn’t matter. You are probably one of the thousands of applicants who can’t pass the state tests to get a teaching certificate. Therefore, you’re bitter and frustrated.

  • anathema

    I speaketh the truth. Teachers need to feel pressure to perform. There fat and lazy and getting rich. We need to keep an axe to there throat each year and make sure that there students do good on test scores, if there students dont do good on test scores they need to fire them teachers or make them work for 20% decrease in salary. Acountability is the society we live in now. Teachers is living in the 1890′s.

  • Richard

    Please learn the difference between “their,” “there,” and “they’re.”
    Then perhaps we’ll care what you have to say.

  • anathema

    sorry for my spelling miss takes, but i learned how to spell from a teacher. teacher’s are to blame, finally we gots people like duncan, klein, bloomberg to make sure they (teacher’s) don’t just do what they want no more.

  • anathema

    By the way… how many days a year do you teachers work? you guys is off like 280 days a year! And you be getting snow days, holidays, staff lunch days, regents days, weekends, you teachers is off more then you is on!

  • http://nyceducator.com NYC Educator

    I too am disturbed by teachers who sell fish. And don’t panic, they’re there. If anyone cries to you they’re not, just tell them there, there, they’re there. But sometimes there’s just no “there” there, is there?

  • Mustafa

    Rupert Murdoch, you can’t fool me. I see past your “anathema” disguise.

  • Bovine

    While the first comment might not have been grammatically correct, don’t discount the point. NYC has a decreasing population and thus a decreased tax pool. Our salaries and benefits are not sustainable any longer. You can disagree with that until you are blue in the face. Sometimes facts are inconvient, but it is the truth. Our parents were lucky. They enjoyed the fruits of a flawed system. While pensions are a wonderful idea, in practice, they are not only impractical but also unstainable. We should be taking a pay cut. If you were really in this for the kids, you would understand taking a hit for the greater good on this one.

  • anathema

    Bovine- you exackly right! you teachers all need to take a paycut and y’all need to pay 10% of you’re salary for you’re retirement, we can’t afford no tax dollars going to pay for rich teachers sitting on a beach in retirement after only twenty years. In case you ingorant teachers haven’t noticed, we living a long time now- teachers should have to work until there 70 like the rest of us. That will make things equal. You teachers can make this financial mess go away, we need more of you like Bovine to do it and save our children.

  • Joe Schmo

    I’ll have to partially disagree with you on this Bovine. I’ll accept a pay freeze because I understand how difficult the budget situation is. However, a salary cut is asking too much for a civil servant to give up during these difficult times. Just my two cents of course.

  • anathema

    Joe- you obviously don’t care for you’re students. if you did, you would be willing to take a pay cut and pay for you’re retirement. every profession in this country is getting layed off or taken pay cuts, teachers is the only one left to maketh this sacrifice, and you must take a pay cut to save our children.

  • anathema

    being a teacher is a noble professional. what you teachers need to realize is that children learning is more important then getting payed. you should be satisfied by students success and test scores not you’re fat paychecks and days off.

  • Green Hornet

    Anathema you should be first deputy to Chancellor Numbnuts

  • miss C

    Anathema: after reading your comments I can only guess you
    receive your information about teachers from one of NYC’s “fine”
    hometown papers. First off do not blame your inability to write
    with proper spelling and grammar on a teacher since we are forbidden
    by the DOE from teaching spelling and grammar. Next, teachers can not
    (unlike cops and fireman) retire after 20 years. Retiring before eligible
    brings penalties. Lastly when I graduated college I became a teacher. Other
    friends were hired for jobs getting three times the salary I received. Now ten
    years later my friends still make more money than me however have had four jobs
    to my one. I went in to teaching to make a difference and for stable salary, benefits
    and pension. Those who do not have personal knowledge of teaching nor how to subtract
    should comment on the job teachers do. I never claim anyone else career is easier than
    anyone else’s. Don’t hate the pension and benefits of teachers just because you chose
    a career without these benefits.

  • anathema

    hey anathema, you right! don’t let them teachers hated on you, by the way the new york post is the only hometown newspaper who speaketh the truth. teachers should open there eyes and read it sometimes.

  • http://themortonschool.blogspot.com Miss Eyre

    People, don’t feed the troll.

  • anathema

    now ima troll? you teachers is mean, i hope you aint’ calling you’re students mean names! y’all just mad cuz you know im right and you are now gonna face realty. remember when bloomberg say “the golden age of teaching is over”. that’s right you’re golden cow is gone to greener pastures and you’re powerful teacher’s union gonna crash and fall. since ima troll i gonna crawl back into my cave and leave me alone.

  • insiderknowledge

    I love the you should do it for the kids argument anytime salery and teaching is brought up.. Ok I’ll take a 10% cut if you pay my mortgage.. Does that sound fair? Maybe I can call the bank and tell them of my noble profession and say I work for the kids of NYC and have since moved to a barter system where the kids bring me food and clothing in exchange for their education therefor instead of the usual 2,000 a month I pay you i will have to pay you in plantaines and cotton underwear.. IS that ok? I mean I work for the kids right?..

  • Bovine

    The “do it for the kids arguement” is legit. How can you argue with the facts? A decreased tax pool means you have less money. The system needs to adjust all around. So if the union is pissing and moaning about increased class size. Well I have a nifty idea. Cut the salaries to retain the bodies needed in the room. When class size increase, don’t complain. Your greed trumps your ability to reason.

  • insiderknowledge

    Well like I said.. Negotiate a way for me to not pay my bills and I’ll take a pay cut otherwise shove it where the sun doesn’t shine.. How about we first get rid of the ridiculous waste that is the consultant budget and then go back to large high schools with 1 principle instead of 4 smaller ones with 4 principles.. The small schools are a joke.. I teach in one.. you know how small my classes are? 33 on average..

  • veteran

    Dear Comrades in Arms in the field of urban education: the protected jobs and status of civil servants that we enjoyed since the rise of UFT is OVER, really OVER! Just like the UFT is “finito”, it is now essentially just another “department” of NYC Administration, managing its own money. Nowadays brothers our jobs will be just as insecure as everybody else’s in this US of A. That is to say, we are all temporary “help” working at the pleasure of the “boss”, sort of like modern slaves… Except, of course, that we have to believe that we are actually “free”… So keep it real, sell excess furniture and stuff because you will need to travel a lot, you know, looking for sustenance …

  • insiderknowledge

    Bovine you are as intelligent as your moniker suggests.. Since when does working and making 60,000 equate to greed? Especially when we live in one of the most expensive states in the union. SO let me get this straight.. I should work for free and live in a card board box because I chose to be a teacher? And for all that I can be an at will employee with the weight of a whole community on my back? Doctors go into medicine to help the sick.. surely a noble cause.. I don’t see anyone clamoring to cut their saleries by 10%….

  • Bovine

    The reason that we take a cut is simple economics. The city does not take in enough tax revenue. So when you take in less you spend less. Learn to live a simpler life. The DOE should get rid of wasteful programs. As great as Aussies are, the are not needed. You might not need your cellphone or any other luxury good as much as you think btw.

    Also, I’m a teacher because I enjoy what I do. I didn’t choose this profession because of a “stable salary” and pension as you say. Also, when you choose to be a public employee, you serve at the pleasure of the public.

  • Math Teacher Bklyn

    Do you know what it is like teaching in class of 38+ students absolute mayhem.
    Maybe a pay-freeze for this year I would go for.
    Its after 25 years or teaching or when ever you reach 55 you can retire what ever comes later to avoid penalties.
    Teaching is one of the lowest paying jobs that requires a masters degree. Teachers are not rich nor are we selfish.
    Their are lazy teachers, but that is true for all professions.
    Not every person should teach or even can teach. So please do not claim you can teach until you have actually taught.
    Most of my days off I’m usually grading tests, writing lesson plans or thinking more innovate ways to teach different ideas. So we are getting paid for those hours to in my opinion.

  • Bovine

    I think it’s horrible that you teach 38+ students in a class. Even more reason to do everything we can to retain bodies.

    Again people we are in dire straits. When hard economic times hit before, people sacrifice a bit. The public treasury has been spent. It’s gone. Don’t forget what funds our salaries.

    To make the point even clearer. When salaries were raised from the 20s to the 40s (starting) we were experiencing decent growth. Since then the tax pool drained and hasn’t come back. You can’t artificially raise salaries and expect good times forever. If you do, you really need to refresh your economic and historical knowledge. The constant increase in the standard of living is a myth.

  • Bronx teacher-lady

    Bovine…I agree with you…partially. Facts are facts and the city really doesn’t have the money for the 4% raises the UFT is demanding w/out major layoffs that would be devastating to our schools and students. I would gladly accept a smaller or no raise or even take a cut and/or contribute to my health benefits to avoid such devastating consequences, and I think most other NYC teachers would, too. People all over the country are making sacrifices and this is definitely not the time to be, or at least look, greedy. But, unfortunately, by accepting less than what the other civil servants’ unions did in this round of bargaining (4%) would be breaking “pattern bargaining,” and doing so would be completely devastating not only to our union’s salary bargaining power from now on, even in better economic times, but to other unions as well. Once we break the pattern, it’s broken for good, and all unions and the most basic of rights that have been fought for so hard over many, many years will suffer for years to come. And do not think for one minute that weakening labor and unions is not at least a small part of Bloomberg’s agenda. Also, while those in the private sector do not have the type of job and salary stability teachers may have, and often not the health/pension benefits, this is a known trade for more meager salaries. Notice that he same people who bemoan teachers’ job stability and benefits in our current economic climate would never consider it as a profession in better times…they would have to permanently modify their lifestyles more than is comfortable for them. Yes, our salaries have improved dramatically over the last 2 contracts (although never at greater than the pattern-bargaining rate…hence the huge time givebacks in the 2005 contract; it wasn’t a raise..it was more money for more time). Yet as a person with 10 years in the system and no dependents, I still cannot afford to live in most NYC neighborhoods, I drive a modest vehicle and am lucky if I can take one small vacation a year. I also pay over $1000 a year to park my car near work and about $2000 a year on supplies for my class. I work 60-70 hours a week under extremely challeging conditions, with very challeging students and a hostile and often abusive administration. I do my job well. Don’t I deserve my job stability and regular, inflationary-based salary gains given that I will never make much more than what I’m making now?

    Still, I go back and forth over whether we should make some salary/benefit concessions. The money just isn’t there, and it looks as if Bloomberg sees serious budget cuts, with a large amount of teacher layoffs, as his only solution.

  • anathema

    hAha bovine you must be a gym teacher than. i think teachers is the greediest and most self fishish professional yet if the ecomony was going great back seven years ago than by you’re method they shoulda been making mad loot. i aint even got me a high school diploma and i was laffing at my friends cuz i was making twice as much money then them while they was becoming teachers and they had a pay student loans too! now i aint got no job and my unemployment gonna run out this month. i can’t pay for my family or find a job and i dunno how ima survive?

  • Math Teacher Bklyn

    Please Anathema please start checking the spelling in your posts all computers have spell check.

    I’m in my first year as NYC Public School Teacher, and lucky enough have got a job during a hiring freeze, and I’m most probably going get laid off. I have school loans, and dependents to deal with. Also, I ride the train ride from Brooklyn to the Bronx for almost 2 hours each way every day just to teach my students. I have 2 classes of 38+ students and 3 other classes of 33 students each. Also I have administrators that except miracles from me. Teaching may be for kids, but the teacher does not think about themselves a little a bit the kids will get hurt to.

  • Fred

    get rid of compulsory education and voila! less students.

  • Invictus

    Fred, you forgot to add, more bird brains posting with ridiculous errors in both spelling and logic in these boards. We cannot afford to have more Anathemas on board but surely things are more entertaining.

  • Concerned IVI

    Bovine, if you are so concerned about the children, perhaps you should volunteer to pay 10% more in taxes. That’s the same thing as asking people to take a 10% pay cut. Either that or home-school your children; though I fear then they’ll turn out like anathema.

    So go ahead and volunteer to pay more in taxes. Pay an extra 10% or 20% in state & city taxes “for our children”.

    The needs of the city continues to grow. Public services (not just in education) of our city continues to grow. Even without a “financial” crisis being the rallying cry, without an increase in the budget and taxes to meet this growth we’d still have a deficit to contend with.

    Asking people to take a pay cut is outrageous. If your company demanded you take a 10% pay cut this year, would you?

    What kind of new teachers would NYC be hiring if they went back to a 30k or lower starting salary? Would it be “good” teachers with a higher education? No! We’d have crappy teachers who barely can babysit our children. A higher salary means more competition for the positions available. More competition means better teachers.

  • JJV

    Teachers across the state are at risk of losing 15,000 of their jobs due to budget cuts. The state Senate plans to pass health and education cuts that could severely affect the future of the teaching profession. Education is being impacted by the decisions of those that chose to put their own agenda ahead of the most important topic at hand, our children’s education.
    Most of the jobs being cut statewide are right here in New York City. Mayor Bloomberg has said that up to 8500 educational positions will be eliminated if budget cuts go through as currently proposed. Bloomberg and his colleagues are not offering any solutions. It has been reported that roughly 4% of teachers will be let go in NYC. That equals increased classroom sizes in an already crowded environment and less student electives like art, music, and physical education. If our students receive less attention in our public schools, this could spell disaster for the future of education in our city.
    Elective programs motivate students by giving them a creative outlet. These courses help to keep kids focused while providing inspirational lessons rich in culture and history. It’s very distressing that public school administrators and state government officials would even consider dismantling any program related to the fine arts from the public school curriculum.
    The state budgets call for non-teacher layoffs of roughly 6%. Add that to the 4% of teachers lost & that number becomes a vast 10% of all public school jobs. Something needs to be done to ensure that our students continue to have access to a well-rounded education enriched by elective programs & well-trained teachers who are truly passionate about their profession.
    Governor Patterson has proposed that a so-called “Sin Tax” on sugary drinks & increasing the already high tax on cigarettes by an additional dollar. He expects these new taxes to raise enough revenue to help close the budget gap. I find this expectation somewhat unrealistic as from everyone in my circle, including my own household, has cut back on non-essentials due to the current state of the economy & how it has impacted us on a personal level. Considering this, how can we expect that sales will remain consistent? Taking into account NYC’s ubiquitous anti-sugary drinks & anti-smoking media campaigns, I do not believe that this is a reliable revenue stream for the public school system’s budget.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

2 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031