GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

MARGIN NOTES

City, union agree to close rubber rooms by December

Teachers accused of incompetence or misconduct will soon be put to work instead of languishing in reassignment centers known as “rubber rooms.”

The city and teachers union announced today a deal to clear the rubber rooms by changing the way charges against teachers are reviewed. The cost-cutting process, which officially takes effect in September, mixes a shorter time limit for the city to file charges, more arbitrators hearing cases during more hours, and work assignments for teachers whose cases are pending. The agreement doesn’t give the city flexibility to pull all teachers awaiting trial off payroll, as a list of contract proposals the city made earlier this year demanded.

Maura was at the press conference and will have more details soon. For now, here’s the city’s press release:

MAYOR BLOOMBERG, CHANCELLOR KLEIN AND UFT PRESIDENT MULGREW ANNOUNCE BREAKTHROUGH AGREEMENT TO ELIMINATE “RUBBER ROOMS” 

Streamlined Disciplinary Process to Return Good Teachers to the Classroom and Provide for Efficient Removal of Others from Payroll

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, Schools Chancellor Joel I. Klein and United Federation of Teachers (UFT) President Michael Mulgrew today announced a landmark agreement to eliminate temporary reassignment centers, or “rubber rooms,” where teachers accused of misconduct or incompetence are assigned pending resolution of their cases. Under the new agreement, most teachers accused of misconduct or incompetence will be assigned to perform administrative work in Department of Education offices or given non-classroom duties in their schools while their cases are resolved.

Despite everything we’ve accomplished together to improve our City’s public schools, we still have major reforms and improvements to tackle–and that is exactly what we are doing,” Mayor Bloomberg said.  “Fixing this broken process gets us all back to what we want to be doing, giving our kids the education the need and deserve.”

“The rubber rooms are a symptom of a disciplinary process that has not worked for anyone-not the kids, not the schools, and not the teachers,” UFT President Mulgrew said. “This agreement is designed to get teachers out of the rubber rooms and to ensure that they do not have to wait for months or years to have their cases heard.”

“The rubber rooms were the result of a broken and protracted teacher discipline process. This deal goes a long way in improving the way the union and the department deal with teachers accused of and charged with wrongdoings,” Chancellor Klein said. “We are committed to adhering to the timetables outlined in the new agreement and confident that in the end our kids will benefit from this better process.”

There currently are some 550 teachers assigned to these rubber rooms, costing the City $30 million each year.  Using this new process, cases that once may have lasted several years will now be resolved within a few months. After removing a teacher from the classroom, the Department will have 10 days to file incompetence charges or 60 days to file misconduct charges depending on the nature of the case.

If reassigned teachers investigated for misconduct are not charged within the 60-day window, they will be returned to their classrooms. Similarly, teachers accused of incompetence who are not charged within 10 days of reassignment will also return to their schools. Investigations can continue after a teacher is back in the classroom, however, and the teacher may still face charges.

In some “non-termination” cases where the Department is seeking a suspension at reduced or no pay, the agreement allows the Department to use an expedited, three-day disciplinary process.

Additionally, the agreement expands the list of charges for which the Department can suspend teachers without pay following a probable cause hearing to include violent felony crimes. When charges are not substantiated against educators, they will be entitled to back pay. 

Under the new agreement, the number of arbitrators will increase from 23 to 39, and arbitrators will now hear incompetence charges seven days a month rather than five. Additional arbitrators will be hired to hear non-termination cases in the expedited disciplinary process. 

While the agreement will not take effect until September at the start of the 2010-2011 school year, the Department and UFT have agreed to begin immediately addressing the backlog of cases of teachers now in rubber rooms, with the goal of resolving all current cases by December.

The provisions of this agreement will be enforceable under the grievance procedures of the UFT contract. A copy of the agreement is attached.

  • QueensParent

    The NY Times Article on this says that the City has only removed THREE teachers for incomptence in the last two years. So there are only three incompetent teachers out of more than 85,000 in New York City. The NYC public schools must have the highest bar for incompetence then. Out of my three children over more than two decades, I can name at least five teachers that would merit firing for incompetence and they only found two in the entire system.

  • Jeff S

    QP…If that is so, then your argument is with the Principals who fail to do what is required of them namely work with teachers and if they are truly incompetent, there are procedures laid out in Section 3020A which a competent Principal should know how to follow (but who says many of the Principals the incompetent, disgraceful lawyer masquerading as an educator running the NYC school system are really competent enough to properly evaluate, improve and if necessary move to terminate teachers). In addition, many many teachers either leave on their own or are discontinued during their probationary period and do not appear in these statistics so before you go ripping the teachers, learn the facts.

  • Ken

    Really interesting!  The press release refers to “a copy of the agreement” being attached.  Does anyone have a link to it?  I couldn’t find it on the DOE website.

  • Loren Steele

    QP, you’re making progress… At least this time you didn’t blame the UFT. Same song with slightly different lyrics. The important question is: How many teachers did the DOE actually TRY to find incompetent? Oh, 3?

  • http://southbronxschool.blogspot.com Bronx Teacher

    QUeens Parent, can you please describe to us what is an incompetent teacher?

    I find this agreement highly coincidental considering today was the day of the federal court hearing to close the Rubber Rooms. Tweed probably felt that it would lose and settled rather than risking a precedent.

    Hopefully with this and the courts keeping the 19 schools open this is the beginning of the end.

  • QueensParent

    I think an incompetent teacher must be like the famous definition of pornography, to paraphrase, “can’t say exactly what it is but I know it when I see it.” One thing is for certain, this certainly put an end to the union’s argument that every teacher in the rubber room is there because of some out of control principal out to get them, that none of the teachers in there deserve to have been removed from the classroom. This process will force both parties to put up or shut up.

  • Jeff S

    Now you see QP, we found something we can agree on. Nobody wants an incompetent teacher in the classroom and if the DOE was not so quick to use the rubber rooms for all sorts of trivial things as well as the more serious ones, they could do the job of getting rid of incompetents. I still go back to what I said, if incoimpetents get turned, I mean truly incompetents, blame the Principals not the system.

  • http://www.twitter.com/Teachers_Speak teachersspeak

    Now fix the reserve pool issue next – get this $$ back int he schools

  • Peter

    A major step, in spite of acrimonious contract negotiations the parties can reach a resolution of a long standing dispute, a resolution that appears to be a win-win … the ATR issue is still out there, and, of course, the contract.

    Until the budgets at the State and City level are resolved I doubt much progress will be made on the ATR or contract issues. Also lurking in a corner are the “persistently lowest achieving schools” identified by the State Ed Dept … and, of course the charter cap/charter transparency conundrums.

    This is a good beginning, hopefully this new enlightenment will continue.

  • Smith

    QP, could you provide us a link that would show an example of the UFT making the “argument” you paraphased? Then could you tell us what the “this” is that “puts an end” to the argument?

  • Smith

    Philissa,
    My reading of this is that by scrapping the rubber rooms and streamlining the process, the DOE has finally given into the UFT demands on this issue. Am I correct? Can you provide us with some context?

  • Observer

    Queens Parent: No teacher has ever made the argument that all the teachers in the rubber room are competent or innocent. The argument I heard is that most of them are there due to a vindictive or hypersensitive principal who has invented or exaggerated offenses to remove them from his/her school. At the same time, a minority are there for actual incompetence or serious misconduct. Interestingly, DOE created this problem and once the Rubber rooms became an expensive embarassment the DOE has agreed to shut them down. I suspect that the UFT might, if they play their cards right, enable the majority of teachers to return to their permanent clasrroms with some sort of professional development to ease themm back into a permanent classroom, compensation for their trouble and some sort of guarantee of no retailation/retribution in exchange for an agreement to ‘hold harmless’ DOE/ no lawsuits.

  • Ellen

    Oh stop! There are less than 1000 individuals in the rubber rooms. There are over 84,000 teachers in the system. What is that, less than one percent of the staff? And don’t start mumbling about there should be more. That is innuendo and scandal. Prove it, don’t hint at it. This is a discussion to distract folks from the real issues: learning learning learning. The next big push will probably be to assign kids to the rubber rooms because they won’t learn, not because the DOE refuses to institute practises that will help learning: smaller class sizes, better prepared teachers and adequate space in well maintained buildings.

  • Cruisin

    There is a “teacher” currently in a rubber room that was removed 1.5 years ago. He has been sitting there in a building watching DVDs and reading the paper and napping. All while collecting $70,000 a year ON YOUR DIME !!! Wanna guess why he is there? Reported drug use is one reason. Probably did not pass the drug test either. But that is NOTHING compared to the real reason he is there. He was turned into NYC DOE Investigators for taking nude photos of himself in the children’s bathroom of the school he taught in. He also took pictures of his exposed parts with his cell phone in the classroom. He emailed these photos out to several people. He was also using his cell phone to access “latina girls” type porn sites IN THE CLASSROOM that he was teaching his 80% latin students in. He even went as far to access such site on the school computers that YOUR TAX DOLLARS paid for when he bypassed the security proxy. So he has sat back for 18 months, collected over $100,000 while you all went out and busted your you know whats to pay his salary. I really hope his trial is expedited and he is given the boot from public schools. He needs to be punished for these disgusting deeds. Paying him $70 a year is a reward, not a punishment.

  • anathema

    We need to held these teachers acountability. Its about time we stop them from getting payed to do nothin. now we needs to stop paying them teachers who aint doing nothing in the classrooms too. if the teachers dont wanna take no pay cut than we must cut there jobs and replace them with parents like me who woud be willing to work for free. give me a call chanceller klien, i will replace them no good bums.

  • OUCHIE!!!

    @anathema

    Very nice gesture to offer to “replace them no good bums” but I don’t think NYC schools can afford to have you teach English. YIKES! It was painful for me to read your entire post…I assume you meant: “Chancellor Klein”, “accountable”, “It’s”, “paid”. And “AINT????, their not there” …I really cannot go on. My brain hurts. Please, tell me you are a product of the New York City School system, and therefore, we can all rest our cases!

  • jodama

    Anathema, you write like my 9th graders. No matter how much I work on there, their, and they’re – they are oblivious to it – along with the spelling of many other homophones. I suppose English can be tricky that way. I don’t wanna take no pay cut, and I don’t think I should have to, when I spend all day correcting students who write and speak like you.

  • http://linkpostdirectory.com/testing.php Cordell Hesby

    You are good in link building knowledge.

  • http://www.haydenwinters.org Hayden Winters

    I am having a lot of problems getting to load this blog. I visited it many times before & never got anything like this, but now when I try 2 load the blog it just idles for for some time & then just stops. I have tried both with www & without. Do you know what is the problem? Please ask your host support… I hope to be able to come back soon.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

17 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031