GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

location location

City trades one plan to re-locate disabled students for another

The city is swapping a plan that would have relocated nearly 100 disabled students to a new building for a plan to disperse the students into special education programs throughout the city.

Under the Department of Education’s original proposal, roughly two-thirds of the students at P.S. 138, a school for severely disabled students, would have moved to share space with the American Sign Language and English Secondary School, a middle and high school that gives admissions preference to deaf students.

That plan was scrapped after P.S. 138 parents and elected officials protested that the new site posed safety risks and that students would not be able to get around the school easily.

Some parents are saying that the department’s new plan is not much better.

In an email sent to principals this afternoon, less than two hours before a scheduled public hearing on the previous relocation plan, the DOE announced that rather than move P.S. 138 students to a new location as a group, the students would distribute them among open seats throughout the city.

Mirandy Rodriguez-Brown, the mother of a 7-year-old student with autism who attends P.S. 138, said that the city has yet to give a good reason to justify re-locating P.S. 138 students at all.

“These children don’t handle change well,” she said. “They need consistency, they need familiarity. Some children will take a year to handle these changes; some children will regress.”

DOE spokesman Danny Kanner said that the new plan will allow P.S. 138′s students to attend school either closer to their homes or in programs that are more well-suited to the students’ instructional needs.

The plan was originally developed as a way to ease overcrowding in the Chelsea school building that currently houses P.S. 11 and the Clinton School for Artists and Writers, a middle school. P.S. 138 students would have moved out of their shared space in P.S. 33 to make room for the Clinton School, which would then move into that building. The second arm of the plan, moving the Clinton School to P.S. 33, remains intact.

Susan Kramer, a Clinton School parent who heads its relocation committee, said that the DOE is moving too hastily to alleviate crowding in P.S. 11 without thoughtfully addressing the needs of other students in the building.

“DOE is just really scrambling to placate one school and they’re kind of hurting two other schools,” Kramer said.

Kramer and other representatives from the Clinton School met last week with Deputy Mayor Dennis Walcott to present an alternate proposal that would allow P.S. 138 students to stay where they are, and allow the Clinton School to remain at P.S. 11 until the city finalizes a plan to give that school a new building. Under the parents’ plan, incoming kindergartners who would have been assigned to the overcrowded P.S. 11 would instead attend nearby P.S. 33.

Tonight’s public hearing was scheduled for public comment on the city’s original plan, in advance of a citywide school board vote scheduled for Wednesday. Because the plan was altered so soon before the hearing, Kanner said, the city decided to hold a question-and-answer session on the new proposal rather than cancel the hearing altogether.

A hearing on the issue has been scheduled for March 11, Kanner said, and a vote on the proposals has been postponed until the March Panel for Educational Policy meeting.

Here is the revised impact statement detailing the new plan for P.S. 138 students:

From: Panel for Educational Policy
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 5:11 PM
Subject: AMENDED PUBLIC NOTICE: PROPOSALS FOR SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN SCHOOL UTILIZATION

Amended Notice

February 22, 2010

Joel I. Klein

Chancellor

Re-siting of P.S. 138 (75M138) from School Building M033

I.       Description of the subject, purpose and substance of the proposed item under consideration and identification of all substantial revisions to the item.

This is a revision to a proposal to relocate the majority of the P.S. 138 @ M033 (75M138, hereinafter referred to as “P.S. 138″) program from school building M033 to school building M047.  P.S. 138 is an existing District 75 school that is sited in multiple locations.  M033 is located at 281 Ninth Avenue, Manhattan in District 2.  M047 is located at 223 West 25th Street, Manhattan, also in District 2. Since the proposal was initially posted on January 8, 2010, the Department of Education (“DOE”) has received several comments from P.S. 138 parents and local elected officials raising concerns about the limited number of wheelchair students that could be accommodated at M047.  As a result of these concerns, the DOE has revised its proposal.

In the 2010-2011 school year, rather than move P.S. 138 to M047, P.S. 138 will relocate most of the students currently located in school building M033 to other existing P.S. 138 sites, new sites, or other existing District 75 sites.  These moves will locate students closer to their homes, in buildings with age-appropriate general education populations, and provide greater focus on these students’ Individualized Education Programs (“IEPs”) and instructional needs.[1]

Of the 100 students currently served at M033:

·         Twenty-seven students would remain at M033.  Twenty of these students have IEPs that call for integration in a hearing environment that does not use sign language.  Seven of these students are already enrolled in inclusion classes at P.S. 33.  This site will now serve only students with cochlear implants and students in full inclusion classes.

·         Thirty-nine students would move to the main site of P.S. 138, located at M030 at 144-176 East 138th Street in District 5.  Twenty-eight of these students reside in Districts 4, 5 or 6; the M030 location is significantly closer to their homes than M033.  This site serves multiply handicapped and students with autism.

·         Thirteen students would move to the new site for P.S. 276, the Battery Park City School, located at 55 Battery Place in District 2.  This is a newly constructed facility opening in September 2010.  P.S. 276 is a zoned school that will serve PK-2 and 6th grade in 2010, expanding grades each year until reaching full scale of PK- 8th grade.  The P.S. 138 students moving to this location live in Districts 1, 2, and 3, and are age appropriate for the grades served at PS 276 in 2010. The program to which these students will transfer will be a new site for P.S. 94, an existing District 75 school with multiple sites.  All students moving to this site will be in 6:1:1 classes and are typically students with autism.

·         Eleven students would move to the new East Side Middle school building located at 331 East 91st Street in District 2.   This is a newly constructed facility opening in September 2010 that will house East Side Middle School, a District 2 middle school choice school.  The P.S. 138 students proposed for this location are age appropriate for middle school.  All students moved to this site will be in 12:1:4 classes and are multiply handicapped.

·         Ten students who do not live in Manhattan would be provided seats at schools in their home boroughs.

The DOE has proposed that the space vacated by the P.S. 138 sections that would leave M033 be used to house M.S. 260 Clinton School for Writers and Artists (“Clinton”), a District 2 middle school serving grades 6-8.  This proposal is the subject of a separate educational impact statement that will be voted on by the Panel for Educational Policy at its March 22, 2010 meeting, along with this proposal.  As stated above, twenty-seven P.S. 138 students, whose needs call for integration in a hearing environment that does not use sign language, will remain at M033.

The move of most sections of P.S. 138 from M033 will address the need to create additional elementary capacity in the West Village and Chelsea areas of District 2, by allowing Clinton to move from its current location in the M011 building located at 320 West 21st Street to M033.  The Clinton move will allow P.S. 11, an elementary school serving zoned students and District 2 gifted and talented students, and also located in M011, to expand.  The Clinton move is temporary while the DOE and School Construction Authority (“SCA”) acquire or construct a new facility for Clinton.  Once Clinton moves to its permanent facility, the space at M033 would be used to address District 2 needs at that time.

II.        Summary of all public comments received following the initial public notice.

The DOE received four written comments and no oral comments on the proposal to move P.S. 138 to M047.  Three letters were from parents who opposed the move. One letter noted the following: (1) the move of P.S. 138 students is a violation of their right to a free and appropriate public education; (2) the M047 site has bussing problems and bringing children with disabilities to this site will cause longer waits and increase congestion;  and (3) M047 is an old building with old elevators that will cause long waits for children in wheelchairs, thus violating their rights.  The second letter was from a parent of an I.S. 47 student.  In her letter, the parent stated that the loss of space at I.S. 47 in M047 to accommodate P.S. 138would be detrimental to I.S. 47 students.  The parent stated that progress has been made for hearing and non-hearing students at I.S. 47 and the school should be allowed to continue and to grow.  The third letter was submitted by a parent asserting opposition to the proposal for moral, legal and personal reasons.  She noted that the students at P.S. 138 have legally binding IEPs as mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.  Also, the parent noted that the change could have an adverse effect on a child with autism.  She further noted that the M047 building is an inappropriate location for P.S. 138 students. The fourth letter was received from local elected officials, who felt strongly that M047 could not accommodate the additional wheelchair and mobility impaired students that were proposed to move into that location.

In addition to these written comments, thirteen speakers at the hearings for the Clinton relocation proposal on February 8 and 9, 2010 spoke about their concerns for the related P.S. 138 relocation proposal.  The comments included their concerns about the safety and accessibility of the M047 site for the proposed number of wheelchair students, as well as general concerns that the program would be located from a location where it has been successful for many years.

III.       Information regarding where the full text of the proposed item may be obtained.

The Revised Educational Impact Statement can be found on the Department of Education’s Web site:

http://schools.nyc.gov/AboutUs/leadership/PEP/publicnotice/Proposals_March_Vote

IV.  Submission of public comment.

Written comments can be sent to D02Proposals@schools.nyc.gov.

Oral comments can be left at 718-935-4415.

V.       The name, office, address, email and telephone number of the city district representative, knowledgeable on the item under consideration, from whom information may be obtained concerning the item

Name: Kim Wong

Office: Office of Portfolio Planning

Address: 52 Chambers St

Email: Portfolio@schools.nyc.gov

Phone: 212-374-5049

VI.       Date, time and place of joint public hearing for this proposal.

Please note that the hearing scheduled at 225 East 23rd Street (M047) on February 22nd at 6:30 has been cancelled. The hearing scheduled at 281 Ninth Avenue, Manhattan (M033) on February 22nd at 6:30 p.m. has also been cancelled; however, due to the late notice, it will be conducted as an information session and question and answer period for all interested parties and not as a joint public hearing on the revised proposal.

The date, time, and place of the joint public hearing for the revised proposal are as follows:

March 11 at 6:30pm

281 Ninth Avenue, Manhattan

VII.     Date, time and place of the PEP meeting at which the Board will vote on the proposed item.

March 22, 2010
6:00pm

The Michael J. Petrides School

715 Ocean Terrace, Staten Island

Re-siting of Clinton School for Writers and Artists (02M260) and Co-location with Existing Schools in School Building M033

I.    Description of the subject, purpose and substance of the proposed item under consideration.

In the 2010-2011 school year, Clinton School for Writers and Artists (02M260, “Clinton”), an existing school serving students in grades 6-8, will move from its current location in Community School District 2 (“District 2″) to school building M033 (hereinafter referred to as “M033″), located at 281 Ninth Avenue in Manhattan, also in District 2.  M033 currently houses P.S. 33 Chelsea Prep (02M033, “P.S. 33″) and P138M (75M138, “P.S. 138M @ M033″).  This will be a temporary location for Clinton while the Department of Education (“DOE”) and School Construction Authority (“SCA”) work to identify and acquire or construct a new facility for Clinton.

Clinton is currently housed at M011 (“M011″), located at 320 West 21st Street in District 2, where it is co-located with P.S. 11 William T. Harris (“P.S. 11″), a zoned elementary school serving grades PK-5.  P.S. 11 will continue at this location.  The capacity made available by the Clinton move will serve elementary students from the P.S. 11 zone.

The 2008-2009 target utilization rate of M033 was 75%, and its target capacity is 576.  In order to accommodate Clinton in M033, the DOE is also proposing to move most of the P.S. 138M @ M033 program currently located at M033 to other existing P.S. 138 sites and other District 75 locations.  This proposal is the subject of a separate educational impact statement and will be voted on by the Panel for Educational Policy (“PEP”) at its March 22, 2010 meeting, along with this proposal.  P.S. 138M @ M033 serves children with hearing disabilities, autism or multiple handicaps.  Two classrooms of P.S. 138M @ M033 will remain at M033; these classes serve children with cochlear implants, whose Individual Education Plans call for integration in a hearing school environment that does not use sign language. M033 has sufficient space for Clinton, P.S. 33, and the two remaining P.S. 138M @ M033 classrooms to operate at full organizational capacity.

The move of Clinton will address the need to create space for growth in elementary school demand in District 2 by allowing P.S. 11 to expand. In M033, Clinton will expand enrollment by one section.

This amendment reflects a new date for the PEP vote on this proposal.  The proposal was originally scheduled to be voted on by the PEP at its February 24, 2010 meeting.  However, because this proposal is connected to the DOE’s proposal to re-site most of the P.S. 138 @ M033 program and the DOE has substantially revised that proposal, both proposals will now be presented to the PEP for a vote at its March 22, 2010 meeting.

II.    Information regarding where the full text of the proposed item may be obtained.

The Amended Educational Impact Statement can be found on the Department of Education’s Web site:

http://schools.nyc.gov/AboutUs/leadership/PEP/publicnotice/Proposals_March_Vote

III.  Submission of public comment.

Written comments can be sent to D02Proposals@schools.nyc.gov.

Oral comments can be left at 718-935-4415.

IV.      The name, office, address, email and telephone number of the city district representative, knowledgeable on the item under consideration, from whom information may be obtained concerning the item

Name: Kim Wong

Office: Office of Portfolio Planning

Address: 52 Chambers St

Email: Portfolio@schools.nyc.gov

Phone: 212-374-5049

V.        Date, time and place of joint public hearing for this proposal.

Two joint public hearings previously took place for this proposal:

February 9 at 6:30pm

320 West 21st Street, Manhattan

and

February 8 at 6:30pm

281 Ninth Avenue, Manhattan

VI.       Date, time and place of the PEP meeting at which the Board will vote on the proposed item.

March 22, 2010
6:00pm

The Michael J. Petrides School

715 Ocean Terrace, Staten Island

[1]   Parents of those P.S. 138M @ M033 students who will be moving from M033 retain all rights afforded to them under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and state law.

  • http://nyceducator.com NYC Educator

    Another smart move by Tweed. Move a bunch of kids who don’t respond well to change to make room for another one of their new schools.

    A PEP hearing? Is that what these families get? They may as well stay home.

  • yomister

    Utterly reckless and negligent planning.

  • Ellen

    Please be advised that this is not the only program for disabled students that will be affected by the DOEs plans to move schools. There are issues at P188 on the Lower East Side and P 30 in Harlem. Both of those schools are being affected by the move in of two charter schools: Girls Prep at P 188 and Harlem Success Academy II at P 30.
    It is my belief that this is only the beginning of a wholesale move of children who have disabilities. The hardest part is to know that these programs were in the three schools mentioned when all three schools were considered to be failing schools. Now, as these schools are scoring As and high Bs, children with disabilities are being moved out. In effect, having students with disabilities in the buildings for all of those unsuccessful years saved the schools from closing. Now, as victims of the success of these general education schools, the same types of kids who kept the building open are being moved. Where was the leadership in those instances? Where was the co-operation between colleagues? Or was it fear of contamination?
    This is a system that proudly announced an increase in graduation rates for students with IEPs from 19% to 22%. Eight years of Mayoral control of education has brought students with an IEPs the increase of 4% in graduation rates and an opportunity to be moved out of schools that are beginning to succeed.
    If a society is to be judged by how it treats the neediest among us, we are, indeed, in a great decline. In the coming years, when students study the decline and fall of Rome they will have a current failure of society for comparison.

  • Michael M.

    Re “The DOE received four written comments and no oral comments on the proposal to move P.S. 138 to M047.”

    Not exactly.

    At the CEC2 Calendar Meeting held on Wednesday, January 27, coincidentally at PS33, at least two PS138 (at the PS33 site) parent leaders speaking on behalf of their school’s community provided quite eloquent and compelling “oral comments” strongly opposing the proposed move from PS33 to M047, The American Sign Language and English Secondary School, as described in the original EIS dated January 8.

    As I recall, there were DOE officials present at that meeting.

    Further, I believe more PS138 parents would have spoken on the topic, as well as more Clinton Middle School, PS11, and PS33 parents, but the evening’s agenda was packed and not designed to be a full hearing, and unfortunately, public — and CEC — comment on ALL topics, including Lower Manhattan rezoning, had to be limited.

    As to the official hearings, there was to be a PS138 hearing on Wed Feb 10 at M047 (after the Clinton hearings on Feb 8 and 9), but that was rescheduled due to the Great Blizzard. It was, for a time anyway, rescheduled for tonite, Monday Feb 22, the very same night as the other PS138 hearing… at PS33. Two hearings, same school move, same nite, opposite sides of town. Eek. At least now, there will be one consolidated PS138 hearing, on March 11.

    For my money, the Clinton hearing at PS33, and the PS138 hearing at PS33 could have been and should have been combined from the get-go, as these moves are totally inter-related; no one would be talking about relocating PS138 out of PS33 were it not to make room at PS33 for Clinton.

    Please note that in the above EIS statement paste-in, there are actually TWO revised EIS’s strung together. The one for the Clinton Middle School move starts with:
    “Re-siting of Clinton School for Writers and Artists (02M260) and Co-location with Existing Schools in School Building M033.”

    Michael D. Markowitz, P.E.
    Member, CECD2

  • http://nyceducator.com NYC Educator

    I wish I could say I was surprised that the situation was worse than it originally appeared. I met an ATR teacher who told me about a job interview. The job entailed discouraging kids from being placed in special ed. This teacher was supposed to somehow work with the kids and discourage those who’d place them, looking for reasons not to.

    This administration is getting away with murder in more ways than one.

  • Susan Kramer

    Thank you, Maura Walz, for your thorough coverage of this story. Too bad the mainstream press has no interest. It’s just another way these kids are being marginalized.

    I learned from this article that DOE spokesperson Kanner said, “the city decided to hold a question-and-answer session on the new proposal rather than cancel the hearing altogether.” At the session last night DOE said that it was no longer a hearing but just a meeting. I guess it was a meeting about the EIS which was issued by Joel Klein at 5:11 pm before our 6:30 pm meeting. I imagine that we were supposed to have read and examined this EIS and come up with questions regarding it. This is a joke, right? There was no Q & A session, just a lot of concerned and angry parents asking the DOE questions as they sat there mute. They made no comments, gave no answers, gave no information. DOE couldn’t get their act together to just cancel the whole thing and not waste our families’ time and energy.

    DOE is supposed to hold hearings at all affected schools, hence the two meetings for PS 138@33, one of which was canceled but never rescheduled. Let’s not forget the the hearing held at PS 11/Clinton was not accessible to any of the PS 138 students in wheelchairs. Now DOE’s Elizabeth Rose is saying that they don’t need to hold hearings at the new locations they’re proposing to move the PS 138 students to because they’re not really affected in any significant way! One more excuse to quash anyone speaking out. And the PEP vote is being held on Staten Island–not exactly convenient for families with students who have serious mobility issues. It boggles the mind.

    The EIS is still full of holes. You would think that the Bloomberg admin. would at least know how to put together what is essentially a business plan, but this is shameful and disrespectful to all.

  • John Hancock

    Susan,

    Regarding the part of your observation where you say “Let’s not forget the the hearing held at PS 11/Clinton was not accessible to any of the PS 138 students in wheelchairs.”

    All I can say is Holy Sh*t that is messed up.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

  • RT @sarcasymptote: Just realized I will be starting the trig unit on valentines day. My valentine to my kids is 6 weeks of hell. 5 hrs ago
  • ” you don't want to come to class? Have a packet. You don't like your teacher? Have a packet” - @leoniehaimson 7 hrs ago
  • .@leonileoniehaimson brings letters from anonymous teachers with damning tales.of credit recovery: giving out CR ”packets” like skittles.. 7 hrs ago
  • At credit recovery town hall hosted by Regents. Testimony so far by principal, and 2 former teachers. Principal support; teachers critical 8 hrs ago
  • Our report about the city's decision to keep two schools open, complete w/ co-location worries & political speculation: http://t.co/RO59PMh1 8 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>