GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

MARGIN NOTES

New York State releases details of its Race to the Top bid

New York State’s Education Department has put aside its anxiety about releasing its Race to the Top application and finally posted the document on its website today.

Initially claiming that releasing the state’s bid to win $700 million would compromise its ability to compete in the second round, New York became one of four states (out of about 40 competitors) to withhold its application. Now SED has changed its mind after officials from the U.S. Department of Education said they’d make all states’ applications public in April before the second round of the competition began.

“Recent information from USDE indicates that releasing the application will not compromise New York State’s competitiveness,” said the department in a statement released today.

According to the City Room blog, the state’s application run some 1,000 pages.

  • Gideon

    Fascinating.

    The RTTT application claims that the charter cap in New York is currently set at 4,740 or 104 percent of all schools. How do they arrive at that claim: by saying that all public schools in the state can convert to charter, so the cap is equal to 4540 existing district schools that could convert plus 200 newly formed charter schools. Talk about magical thinking. In the last 10 years all of 6 district schools have converted.

    The application also promotes “New York as a leader in providing charter autonomy” and quotes a federal report’s finding that “SUNY has been a particularly effective authorizer. It has taken its authorizing duties seriously—both in approving and in overseeing charters—and has not been afraid to close charters that haven’t lived up to their promises.” Ironically, the recent Sampson/Silver bill would have done the opposite: reduce autonomy by letting State Ed Department decide where charter schools can go, and eliminating SUNY and NYC as independent authorizers.

    It’s also interesting that the application makes frequent reference to the innovations of Charter Management Organizations, like KIPP, Achievement First and Uncommon Schools, and holds up Steiner and King, both charter school supporters, as leaders in the race to the top.

    The appendix contains a list of all signatures on MOUs in support of the RTTT application. A huge number of local teachers unions refused to sign, including big cities like Buffalo and Rochester. According to a summary table, 100% of superintendents signed on, 92% of school boards, and only 61% of local unions. I can’t imagine how the state can promise transformation of schools without union support.

  • http://www.SpecialEducationMuckraker.com Dee Alpert

    Thanks for helping force NYSED to make its RttT application public. For some reason, the appendix (or sub-appendix, in NYSED’s intentionally over-complex format) listing all of the stakeholders and outfits from which it (allegedly) secured input appears to be missing. Or perhaps I just couldn’t wade through the document correctly? Hmnnn. Why do I think it doesn’t include legitimate parent and taxpayer input?

    For the most part, the app. appears to be same old-same old, but with new spin and names for the folks and outfits whom NYSED has previously paid to do the same kinds of things. The goals for NAEP improvement are appallingly low, which is what the same old-same old crowd can be expected to actually produce … again.

    There’s nothing in the application which indicates that NYSED did what it should be forced, kicking and screaming, to do, which is to analyze why it has failed so abysmally, and expensively, in the past, much less set out precisely what it is going to do differently in the future. In fact, if you read the p.r. nonsense carefully, you’ll see that everything NYSED has done in the past is just fantastic and all its staff and officials are highly competent professionals. Not! Since the system is so good, I suppose we must all conclude that the real problem is that NYS’ children are defective. But … I don’t see anything in the application aimed at doing much about that, either.

    There’s also no nod to the numerous USDOE OIG audits, NYS Comptroller audits, and similar exposes which have shown – consistently – that while NYSED pays lip service to following the law, and to its own program applications filed with USDOE, in fact, all it really does is throw money at districts and BOCES and lets them do exactly what they please with it, as per the deals Shelly Silver and the State Senate leadership work out for slicing up the federal money pie in advance.

    If Arne Duncan funds this application, the whole project should be re-named “Race to the … Flop,” fer sure, and Duncan should be given the moniker “Flunkin Duncan.”

    Wait!

  • Roget

    I’d like to piggy back on Dee Alpert’s point: There’s nothing in the application which indicates that NYSED did what it should be forced, kicking and screaming, to do, which is to analyze why it has failed so abysmally, and expensively, in the past, much less set out precisely what it is going to do differently in the future.

    No. There must be an accounting of the misguided and misleading ELA and Math Test scores–the entire testing program from 2002 to 2009–in which NYSED and CTB were partners in perpetrating a massive fraud.

    Before Merryl Tisch and David Steiner go skipping along with promises to reform testing (having dispatched Richard Mills, who could no longer sustain the lies) there must be an independent analysis of the defective testing instruments that have been used, the hocus-pocus setting of the cut scores and the exaggerated reporting of the results.

    Eight years and counting of educational negligence, directed by NYSED under the guise of NCLB must not be allowed to go unexamined or unpunished. There is real culpability on the part of CTB and Albany.

  • http://www.SpecialEducationMuckraker.com Dee Alpert

    Roget – it’s worse than that, and the blame lies squarely at NYSED and the Regents’ well-manicured feet. NYS Comptroller DiNapoli published an audit report in November 2009 which showed that districts inflate the grades they give their students’ Regents exams and that although State Ed. knows all about it, it does exactly nothing to stop this pervasive fraud. This audit report merely repeated the same findings issued by then-NYS Comptroller Edward Regan back in 1991. State Ed. may have selected a bad firm to create and grade the grades 3-8 exams, but you can be sure that it did so in conformance with its unwritten policy of allowing testing and grading scams at all times, in all places and in every way possible.

    Given these audit reports, it is amazing that State Ed. has the sheer brass to cite Regents exam scores, and resulting graduation/dropout rates, in any document it submits to the US DOE for any purpose whatsoever.

  • http://www.SpecialEducationMuckraker.com Dee Alpert

    Someone was kind enough to send me the list of outfits and people NYSED met with when concocting its RttT application. I was right. There are no legitimate parents’ groups. There are no legitimate disability groups. And, of course, given NYS’ horrific outcomes for kids with disabilities, there are no groups representing the parents of kids with disabilities in NY schools.

    What the list is composed of, for the most part, are adults who are paid members of the NYS education industry, directly or indirectly. None of whom would have the sheer nerve to tell NYSED the truth: it is incompetent, its infrastructure is incompetent, and it can’t even get all the schools in the one district it does operate – Roosevelt – up to snuff despite dogs’ years of trying and despite $ millions in extra taxpayer dollars … which its hand-picked superintendents have wasted, bigtime. I’m not even going to mention that there are no representatives of taxpayers.

    When it comes both to parents of kids in NY schools, and taxpayers, NYSED’s operant line seems to be “Shut up, pay up, lie back, and enjoy it. Or else.”

    In this economy, no matter how much NYSED can impose its spin on the multifarious beneficiaries of its largesse, the fact remains that our school system is incredibly expensive and largely incompetent to do what really needs to be done, which is educate all children to reasonably high levels. This is impliedly admitted in the pitifully low goals NYSED has inserted in its RttT application for improvements on test scores it can’t manipulate, i.e., NAEP scores. Dismal! Appalling! Race to the Bottom.

    I expected nothing more from NYSED and the Board of Regents, none of whom can be held legitimately accountable for their abject failures on account of the way NYSED is governed. Shelly Silver rules. Children, their parents, and taxpayers are the ruled.

    Time for a change. A drastic one. Now.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

15 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031