GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

film studies

Harlem charter schools…coming to movie theaters everywhere

A film premiering at Sundance today from the director of "An Inconvenient Truth" strongly features Geoffrey Cananda and the Harlem Children's Zone.

As the Sundance Film Festival kicks into high gear this afternoon, mingling among the movie stars and directors will be a New York education celebrity — the Harlem Children’s Zone’s Geoffrey Canada.

Canada is attending the Park City, Utah festival for today’s world premiere of “Waiting for Superman,” a new documentary directed by Davis Guggenheim, who won an Oscar in 2007 for helming the Al Gore climate change film “An Inconvenient Truth.”

Guggenheim’s film is one of two new documentaries that feature Harlem charter schools prominently and cast them in a glowing light. The other is “The Lottery,” which will be released in May and which follows a group of families seeking entrance into Eva Moskowitz’s Harlem Success Academies.

“Waiting for Superman” follows five children from around the country as they navigate the public schools system. None of them are Harlem Children’s Zone students, said an HCZ spokesman, Marty Lipp, but Canada offers commentary throughout the film. In an interview, Guggenheim calls Canada “perhaps the strongest voice” in the film.

Canada will also speak at the festival tomorrow on a panel called “Can’t Be Done!” The panel characterizes public education (along with poverty and global warming) as a problem conventional wisdom deems “too entrenched to remedy.” Canada will appear alongside Nobel laureate microcredit lender Muhammad Yunus and environmentalist Lester Brown to discuss how supposedly intractable problems can be solved.

Canada is a popular figure in the media, with observers like Anderson Cooper and David Brooks celebrating the Harlem Children’s Zone’s successes in boosting its Harlem students’ third grade test scores to above or beyond those of their suburban counterparts.  But some critics, including GothamSchools commentator Aaron Pallas, wonder if it’s perhaps too early to conclude that Canada has solved the problem of public education.

While the first official screening of the film is today (even Canada hasn’t seen it yet, Lipp said), it seems clear that Guggenheim is firmly in the Canada fan club. The director is pitching the film as being about education reform, but he’s using the term “reformer” with a very particular meaning, one that has been hotly debated on this site. A promotional description of the film describes its slant this way:

[E]mbracing the belief that good teachers make good schools, and ultimately questioning the role of unions in maintaining the status quo, Guggenheim offers hope by exploring innovative approaches taken by education reformers and charter schools that have—in reshaping the culture—refused to leave their students behind.

In addition to Canada, the film also features D.C. Chancellor Michelle Rhee, Bill Gates and KIPP co-founders David Levin and Mike Feinberg. This group, along with Moskowitz, Chancellor Joel Klein and Teach for America’s Wendy Kopp, all advocate broadly for high stakes accountability for schools and teachers and often clash with teachers unions.

When “An Inconvenient Truth” was released, it was accompanied by a strong off-screen anti-global warming advocacy campaign, and it looks like “Waiting for Superman” will have an off-screen activism element as well. (There’s already an advocacy social media site set up for the film where highlighted news headlines include Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s push to tie student test scores to teacher tenure.)

“Waiting for Superman” was the first Sundance film this year picked up for distribution by a studio and should hit theaters this fall.

Here’s an interview with Guggenheim, in which he predicts that Canada will be greeted as a “rock star” at Sundance:

  • Jack

    Of course the KIPPsters will be greeted like rock stars. They are masters of the trend to counsel out underperformers. For example, KIPP Star will expand to a full high school within three years – but only for those students on track to attain a Regents diploma. All others will wind up in non-charter public high schools (or Opportunity Charter School, if they’re still around).

    ELL’s and children with low IQ’s can hit the lottery to gain admittance, but what will the kids actually win when they realize they’re not graduating with their high achieving friends? Then Messrs. Levin and Feinberg will have their stars permanently affixed on Hollywood Boulevard after their former students have been successfully repopulated elsewhere.

  • J. Cavanagh

    I may be sick. Propaganda anyone?

  • Dedicated Teacher

    The title “The Lottery” brings to mind Shirley Jackson’s short story in which winning the “lottery” has a different connotation than one might suspect.
    Perhaps, someday, people will realize that the “prize” is tarnished and short-lived…and comes with a hefty price tag: the abolition of creativity, spontaneity, and genuine substance, all at the expense of the majority of school children in America, who are losing resources due to this “charter trend”.

  • CarolineSF

    Of course the TFA folks and their buds are all about portraying innocence, youth and brand-newness as vastly superior to contemptible things like experience, professional training and the wisdom gained therefrom. That sounds like a version of the attitude that was widely aimed at Al Gore during the 2000 campaign, including the sneers of the press (hello, Maureen Dowd and Co.) at his crusade about global warming.

    So it’s ironic that Guggenheim has swung around to celebrate that attitude too.

  • Dave Seeley

    It’s really tragic that charter school fans and those who see them as a threat seem to be gearing up for a full-scale war. Charters can be either a stimulous for badly needed change in public education or a threat to it, depending on whether we can develop a shared vision for effective public education and the politics needed to get us there. Such a vision has been developing in recent years, but it is constantly drowned out by battles that distract us from developing that vision. The media of course love wars, and can be counted on to report the drama they provide. But those who really care about getting us to quality education for ALL American kids have got to focus on building and fighting for that vision. Those who attack charter schools are right to be worried, but their bleatings too often sound like defenses for school systems that, despite decades of supposed “reforms,” have clearly not brought us the quality education for all that they claim to want. Enough already with that kind of that kind of unproductive dialogue.

  • Joe Schmo

    I taught at a KIPP school for 1 1/2 years. It was the most horrible, miserable, unprofessional place I have ever set my foot in. They completely treat their teachers like slaves. I got suckered into thinking it might be a great place to work. Boy, was I wrong. A huge percentage of charter schools such as KIPP have a massive teacher turnover rate every year. The word will get out sooner or later that working in these charter schools requires a person to completely forget about having a personal life.

  • http://perdidostreetschool.blogspot.com reality-based educator

    Maybe we should let the charter school advocates win. Let them convert every unionized urban school to a non-unionized charter school. Let them force 10 hour school days/6 day school weeks/48 week school years on everybody. Let’s see

    a) how well they educate the at-risk students they now own because there are no public schools to kick them to

    b) let’s see what the drop-out rate looks like with the grueling 18th century work schedule they promote

    c) let’s see what the burn-out rate of teachers and staff looks like

    d) let’s see what happens to the test scores when they’re forced to educate children who are at risk, who are ELL, who need support services, who do not have motivated parents providing extrinsic motivation for the kids.

  • http://nyceducator.com NYC Educator

    Ah, the lottery. You gotta love a “documentary” that not only interviews people on only one side of an issue, but actually sends you unsolicited email listing their educational demands, the ones they arrived at after interviewing people on only one side of an issue. Or perhaps before. Who knows?

    “Our film illustrates how adult politics are being allowed to stand in the way of the interests of our children.”

    Actually, your film illustrates adult politics–specifically the kind that exposes and allows only a single unexamined point of view.

  • http://seattle-ed.blogspot.com dora

    To Joe Schmo and others, I would love to get information on your experiences as teachers in charter schools.

    Here in the state of Washington we, as parents of school aged children, are battling against merit pay and charter schools.

    We have a blog, http://seattle-ed.blogspot.com, and would appreciate being able to post the experience that teachers have had in charter schools.

    If you would be willing to send us your story to be posted, please contact me, Dora, at seattle.ed2009@gmail.com.

    It infuriates me that just a few wealthy individuals, like Gates and Eli Broad, neither being educators or ever having children in public schools, can set a national agenda on our childrens’ education.

  • jlp_that’s_me!

    Michelle Rhee recently said the teachers she laid off in Oct were sexually abusing children. I wonder if that is in the movie.
    And hey, didn’t Bill Gates sponsor that 21 million dollar Rand Corp study that showed charters and public schools were basically performing about the same. I bet that’s a secret Gates will want keep away from the public.

  • Ryan

    As a teacher in a charter school whose experience is inconsistent with every critique above, I have one question: What reforms do you propose? Instead of constructive counter-proposals, the Gotham Schools comments are filled with the same talking points we hear from the institutionalized education establishment. Longer days, longer school years, and higher expectations all seem to be off the table. I would like to hear your suggestions: what do we need to do to fix public education?

  • http://perdidostreetschool.blogspot.com reality-based educator

    I’ll give you some meaningful reforms, Ryan. Let’s try smaller class sizes. Right now I have 34 a class – 170 in all. Let’s try school buildings that aren’t falling apart. I have a hole in my ceiling with exposed piping showing through that is the size of Geoffrey Canada’s ego . In fact, the entire top floor of my school floods. Next, give me updated technology, computers in my classroom, some money to buy new books. Give me the funds you guys get and the new facilities too.

    My school , a Title 1 school, has 93% on the ELA Regents and 90% on the math. But if we had the resources you have (rather than endless budget cuts), we’d be doing even better.

    And that’s without your extended day or your extended year.

    You know, I have high expectations for my students. I tell my kids progress used to mean you get to make more money and work fewer hours. That’s how it worked for my grandfather and father’s generation. I tell them that’s what they deserve to, not the serfdom the charter school proponents want for them.

    But you charter school advocates and the corporate money that backs you want to have everybody working their lives away, too exhausted to realize how they’re getting screwed economically.

    A bridge to the 19th century, Ryan. That’s what you’re bringing.

    BTW, how long you been working the charter. Plan to do it for 20+ years or is this just a temporary gig before you move on to your “real” job.

    Cuz’ that’s what so many of the teachers at charters do.

  • Eva Gonzalez

    Finally, a documentary that focuses on families and the struggle to get into a good school. No one claimed that charter schools were perfect but for a lot of families, it gives them a choice. I know many families that are enrolled in both district and charter schools. The agony that some parents go through when they have enroll their child in a failing zoned school is heart-breaking. And I noticed that none of these comments focuses on parental choice but I guess no one really cares about the kids.

  • Joe Schmo

    REALITY-BASED-EDUCATOR hit the nail right on the head. How many charter school teachers really plan on staying in the profession for 20 plus years? I have 17 years experience as a regular public school teacher. The 1 1/2 years I worked in a charter school was the biggest mistake I made in my life. I am so happy to know that I started working in a public school system and that I am now back working in a public school system. The 1 1/2 years that I was away from a unionized school system have made me so angry at the way charter schools operate. Please understand I am not anti-charter school on the basis of existence. However, I am against the way that they treat their teachers. I have no idea why any educated, professional would want to work in what I consider a “sweat shop” of a school. And trust me, that is what a charter school is. I have NEVER met any teacher who plans on staying 20 years in a charter school. No pension, no job security, no say in the day to day operations of your job? Forget about it. The same competition that charter schools claim is so important will be the arrow through their hearts in the long run.

  • http://nyceducator.com NYC Educator

    Personally, I’m not remotely offended when people who don’t know me at all tell me I don’t care about kids.

  • http://seattle-ed.blogspot.com dora

    The one aspect of this school that is unique is that it looks at all factors in a child’s life, the family life and socio-economic factors. That makes this school produce successful students.

    It’s not the typical KIPP factory that cranks out kids who can at least answer questions on a test.

    You cannot make the assumption based on the success of this school that all charter schools are good. They are not. What I take from this is that we need to look at the whole child and not simply force feed a student in preparation for taking a test.

  • Pingback: SBC Charter Roundup 83 – Schools Building Communities

  • JulieAnn

    I have hopes for a day when most of us can focus on good schools for all of our kids, whether it be public charter schools or traditional public schools. I’ve taught at both… a traditional district high school with a majority of low-income students/kids of color AND at a KIPP school serving an even larger percentage of low-income kids of color and many SPED students, despite the myths about that. KIPP is hard, no doubt… hardest job I’ll ever have, but it was amazing at the same time. No, I couldn’t do it for 20 years, but I think that’s OK. When was it decided that one had to do the same thing for their entire career? Isn’t it better to find someone really, really good at teaching who is willing give everything for 3, 5 or 10 years vs. someone who might be mediocre and hope they shape our kids’ futures for their entire careers? As for KIPP, don’t feel sorry for us… we choose to work there – no one makes us do it and it’s not the right fit for everyone, but we hope for a better way or at least a different approach that creates better educational outcomes and opportunities for kids in underserved communities.
    My two public school teaching experiences were night and day. At KIPP, our small staff was a team from top to bottom, and there was no union, I felt, that created an us against them mindset. Not every KIPP school is amazing, but I was surrounded by people who cared more than many people thought reasonable, and I experienced an absolute focus on what was best for kids, not adults. I had heard the stories – that KIPP creamed and kicked kids out who weren’t performing at high enough levels, or we just focused on test taking. I found the opposite… it was an attitude of “if we can’t save this child, maybe no one will,” so we recruited in the projects and uniformly believed that every child could go to college, regardless of poverty and family circumstances. It was up to us to get them there. No excuses. If kids weren’t learning, then we weren’t teaching. My colleagues were pretty amazing and they taught me and supported me to become a better teacher….I felt a level of support and pressure at the same time that I never felt at the district school, but it’s what I chose. In the end, is that a bad thing?

  • Chris

    Here in Wisconsin our charter schools are part of the district so the teachers have the same union as the public schools. The reason for charter schools is to address that various learning styles and subjects that each child wants/needs. We have schools that cater to technology, Montessori, careers based, project based, enginerring based, arts based, etc.
    It would be nice with small classes but that takes money, since the teachers get the majority of the tax dollars it is the buildings, class size, etc. that go by the wayside. Society hasn’t helped much either. If education was #1 in this country along with personal responsibility this wouldn’t be such an issue. Education doesn’t stop once you leave school it should continue the rest of your life.

  • http://www.sinksalive.blogspot.com KitchenSink

    Hi Reality,
    Sorry but if you wanted the money that we (charters) get, you would probably have to give up your pension. We get less money than you do.

    And when the stimulus money was going through and flowing to districts last year and the law stated that charters were supposed to have an 8% increase in per pupil funding (based on the two year lag formula), NYSUT lobbied the legislature to freeze our funding.

    You can ask Caroline Kennedy where all of money she raised went in the Fund for Public Schools. She did some of the same things we are trying to do to bring more resources to poor communities. Except it’s unclear to me which schools saw the benefit of her connections.

  • insiderknowledge

    hey kitchen sink why not ask the your grossly overpaid executive to cut his/her salery from 400,00o to 200,000 if you needed more money. no one in the public schools even comes close to their salery.

  • Unfair

    Only if the charter schools were forced to accept ALL the students that attend local public schools (including those with special needs and ELLs) would you fairly compare their performance with that of the public schools. and….only certain types of parents (motivated, etc) apply to charter schools – well, their kids are successful anywhere they go! As an educator whose public school shares the space with the charter school I see that the TOP students in the 4th grade get into the charter school each year. Those few who do not fit that category and are get accepted are weeded out by the middle of the year

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

21 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829