GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

scrambling to the deadline

Race to the Race to the Top: Live-blogging Albany’s debate

With just hours before the state’s Race to the Top application is due in Washington, legislators in Albany are scrambling to deal with the cap on charter schools, considered a make-or-break component of the application. Anna will be sending updates from Albany today.

6 p.m. Now the city stakeholders are weighing in. Here’s the response from Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who in recent days launched a strong public relations offensive against Sampson and Silver’s bill:

“Sadly, some 36,000 New York City students on waiting lists for charter schools – and thousands more who need and deserve better educational choices – were told today to wait longer, because help is not on the way. The Governor proposed a bill that would create options for those children and help the State win $700 million in federal money. It was the only bill that had the support of a majority of Senators, yet the Democratic leaders of the Senate and Assembly defeated it without even a vote – on the same day the Governor’s budget presented a $1 billion cut to school aid statewide. While others played Russian roulette with our children’s futures, great credit is due to Senate Republican Leader Dean Skelos, the members of his conference, and Democratic Senator Craig Johnson – the sponsor of the Governor’s bill – who fought to make New York’s Race to the Top application as strong as possible. And while I rarely hesitate to speak my mind when I disagree with someone, I also try to give credit where it is due and want to thank Senator Ruben Diaz, Sr. for his help on this important issue. Our children and their parents are owed a second chance from the Legislature. They deserve nothing less.”

And here’s the response from city teachers union president Michael Mulgrew. The UFT issued a report earlier this month on how charter schools serve the city’s neediest students, and many of its recommendations were echoed in the legislature’s bill.

“New York State had a chance to address the glaring inequities in charter school admissions, to increase the transparency of charter operations and to force profiteers out of the charter business,” Mulgrew said. “But charter advocates and their allies resisted these desperately needed reforms, to the point where the Legislature was unable to act.”

5:45 p.m. Senate Republicans are signaling they will use the legislature’s failure to act today as a weapon against Democrats who run for re-election.

“I am extremely disappointed that the Governor’s legislation to enhance New York’s opportunity to secure federal education funds was not brought up for a vote in the Senate,” Senate Republican Leader Dean Skelos said in a statement. “I’m confident it would have passed and strengthened the state’s application for the Race to the Top program.”

“Once again, when an important deadline was upon us and action was needed on an important issue, the Democrats in both houses were unable to act,” he said.

5:30 p.m. A side not heard much today from those who did not want to see the charter cap lifted at all. In that camp is Senator Bill Perkins, who says he’s concerned about “the charter wars” and the high concentration of charters in his Harlem district. Perkins said he didn’t believe lifting the cap was a prerequisite for a New York Race to the Top win.

5:00 p.m. Senators from both sides of the charter school divide are looking for a bright side in today’s debacle.

“In my opinion, nothing being done is better than a bad bill getting done,” Senator Craig Johnson said, echoing James Merriman. “The Silver bill would have been bad for education reform.”

Asked if not voting had hurt the state’s chances more than voting for the Silver bill, Johnson said, “the Silver bill would have hurt us even more. The governor’s bill would have been perfect.” (Johnson introduced the governor’s bill to the Senate last night.)

Like Johnson, Sampson said that “imprudent legislation” would have put the state at a competitive disadvantage in the federal competition. But he disagreed about which bill was imprudent — he favored the one he sponsored.

“The bill I sponsored with Assembly Speaker Silver would have maximized our eligibility for federal funds, while bringing greater transparency, accountability, and parental input to the charter school process,” Sampson said in a statement.

“We are working towards a bipartisan, bicameral solution today,” Sampson said. “We support the State Education Department’s application as it stands, and hope our federal officials can help us secure Phase One financing. If not, we will reapply for Phase Two, and try once again later this year to bridge the partisan divide to get New York’s school children the funding they need, and property taxpayers the relief they deserve.”

4:20 p.m. Today could have gone worse for charter school advocates, according to a statement just released by James Merriman, head of the NYC Charter School Center.

“While state lawmakers could not a pass a good reform bill today, we can be thankful they did not pass a disastrous one,” Merriman said. “Charter schools should commend Senate Republicans and Democratic Senators Craig Johnson and Ruben Diaz, who stood up for public charter schools and stopped a bill that would have severely damaged the charter schools movement.”

4:00 p.m. Anna reports that the Senate is still in conference. Senators are preparing to end their session, a Senate source told Elizabeth Benjamin.

“There were people saying raise the cap and people saying don’t raise the cap, or do it with restrictions. We have to balance all these things out and we couldn’t achieve that in our conference,” a Senate official told Anna. The official said the Senate did not want the governor’s bill to come to the floor because the Assembly would not pass it.

Asked whether the Silver/Sampson bill was meant as a political hit on New York City Schools Chancellor Joel Klein, the official said: “this was not an anti-Klein bill.”

3:40 p.m. And the Assembly has adjourned for the day, without taking action on either of the charter cap bills. It’s over, education committee chair Cathy Nolan confirms. Anna reports that no one is quite sure whether the Senate is still conferencing.

3:10 p.m. Anna reports that a rumor is spreading among legislators that the U.S. Department of Education extended the deadline. A USDOE spokesman, Justin Hamilton, said no, it’s not true.

3:00 p.m. The Alliance for Quality Education, an advocacy group that fights for equitable funding for schools across the state, just sent out a statement criticizing charter school advocates for blocking the Sampson/Silver bill.

“The charter cap bill has stalled because apparently it is more important to the charter school industry to keep accountability, transparency, and meaningful parent and community input out of charter schools than it is to have New York State compete effectively for $700 million in federal Race to the Top funding,” the statement reads.

2:55 p.m. Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch told me today that if the legislature fails to vote to raise the charter cap today, it would be a “serious black mark” on the state’s Race to the Top application. Her view contrasts with that of the city and charter school advocates, who argue that passing the Sampson/Silver bill would be worse than doing nothing at all.

When I spoke to her this morning, Tisch expressed optimism that legislators would raise the cap today. Otherwise, she said, they will have to answer to voters about a missed opportunity in a dismal budget year.

She also played up other elements of the state’s application, which include, among other things, significant changes to the way teachers are trained and certified.

“I think [NYSED has] articulated a bold strong application and when people in this state understand how good it is…they will be infuriated that this opportunity is slipping through their hands,” she said.

2:15 p.m. The New York Post says parents are angry about the Sampson/Silver bill, but Anna reports that there are no charter school parents or students present at the debate today. Charter advocates said they thought about bringing people, as they have to other hearings, but they already have a lobby day scheduled for February 2nd and there wasn’t time to rally the forces. As it stands, Anna reports, there’s no face to this issue in the building — either in favor of charter schools or opposed.

1:50 p.m. John Sampson is asking Sheldon Silver not to pass the bill in the Assembly unless there are enough votes for it to pass in the Senate, reports Elizabeth Benjamin at the Daily News.

1:45 p.m. I just checked in with Tom Dunn, NYSED’s spokesman, how the application was getting to Washington, D.C., where it is due in hard copy at 4:30. “We are completing the application and will deliver it,” he said. But no word yet on how it’s getting there.

1:35 p.m. Senate Republicans, who have also come out in support of the governor’s bill, apparently are planning to introduce an amendment from the Senate floor to substitute Paterson’s bill for Sampson and Silver’s. (Last night, the Republicans tried to bring Paterson’s bill to a vote and were ignored by Senate Democratic leaders.) Now it seems that Senate Democrats are looking for a way to avoid bringing the bill to the floor, rather than be embarrassed if a hostile amendment passes, Anna reports.

1:20 p.m. Walking into the room, Senate President Malcolm Smith was asked if he thought the Senate would bring the bill to a vote today, Anna reports. “I don’t know, I don’t think so,” he said.

1:10 p.m.: The fate of the charter cap fight appears to be resting with the State Senate.

The bill to raise the cap to 400, proposed by Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and Senate Democratic Majority Conference Leader John Sampson, faces much greater opposition in the Senate than it does in the Assembly. The Assembly appears likely to pass the bill this afternoon.

The key players are Senators Craig Johnson and Ruben Diaz, Sr, Anna reports. Both support the compromise bill that Governor Paterson introduced yesterday, which would lift the cap to 460 and ditch many of the provisions in Silver’s bill that charter advocates oppose. Johnson introduced the governor’s bill on the Senate floor, and Diaz issued a statement today calling on Sampson and Senate President Malcolm Smith to bring the governor’s bill to a vote.

A vote on the governor’s bill looks unlikely, though, so Johnson has just told charter advocates that he or Diaz may introduce a hostile amendment to the Silver/Sampson bill. The two senators are currently huddling with charter school advocates and Micah Lasher, the city Department of Education’s director of external affairs.

Charter school advocates are arguing that as far as the state’s Race to the Top application is concerned, no bill is preferable to the Silver/Sampson bill because the restrictions the bill places on charters would inhibit charter growth and cause the application to lose points. Silver has said he does not think the restrictions would harm the state’s application.

  • QueensParent

    I love that particular ‘democratic swagger’ of Sens. Smith and Sampson, who, when there are indicators that a bill will pass, they simply refuse to let it come to a vote. Hows that for the will of the people? Two cheers for Democracy!!! There was a lot of this last summer during the debate on the school governance legislation. When there were indications Mayoral control had enough votes to pass, the ‘leadership’ simply used other means to block it from coming to vote. Love to see these imbeciles in action.

  • Brian Baker

    A pox on both their houses – especially Shelly’s. Governor Paterson and a few brave Senate Democrats appear to be the only heroes in this entire scenario. Shameful.

  • http://www.sinksalive.blogspot.com KitchenSink

    Apparently, there will be more fuel for the fire to clean house entirely and gut the legislature this fall.
    As someone who has voted nearly or all Democratic in every election, I’d rather take my chances with complete turnover than have one of these irresponsible self-aggrandizers back next year.

    I’d feel more comfortable having the intergalactic senate from Star Wars make decisions than Perkins and company.

  • http://www.sinksalive.blogspot.com KitchenSink

    I just have to comment on this statement: “The charter cap bill has stalled because apparently it is more important to the charter school industry to keep accountability, transparency, and meaningful parent and community input out of charter schools than it is to have New York State compete effectively for $700 million in federal Race to the Top funding,”

    HOW ON EARTH IS REMOVING SUNY, POSSIBLY THE MOST EFFECTIVE AUTHORIZER IN THE COUNTRY, HELPING ACCOUNTABILITY, TRANSPARENCY AND MEANINGFUL PARENT INVOLVEMENT?

    Forgive me for shouting, but putting all the charters through SED is taking this jewel of a reform initiative and returning it to same old, same old.

  • http://www.classsizematters.org leonie haimson

    I’d like to know how charter school supporters can possibly oppose the ability of the state comptroller to audit their use of public funding — unless they do oppose fiscal transparency and accountability? And obviously keeping SUNY as an authorizer has absolutely nothing to do with providing parent or community input.

  • QueensParent

    Leonie just imagine for a moment that the Legislature decided to pass a bill mandating specific class sizes in every class for every school district in the State, no exceptions. Of course, there’s no money to pay for any such legislation but imagine for a moment that we knew there was the votes to pass the bill in both the Assembly and the Senate, yet such a bill never came to be voted on because the “leadership” of both houses decided that they PERSONALLY didn’t like it. That’s what I’m talking about. I’m talking about putting one or two people’s wills over the consensus of an entire legislative body. That is what is going on here.

  • Liz

    I just wanted to thank Gotham Schools for blogging live on this important issue.  

  • Gideon

    Why would anyone support redundant oversight? It’s this kind of red tape that has stifled public education, not made it better. Charter schools have better things to do, like educate students, than submit to state comptroller audits when they already have to pay for annual independent audits, submit quarterly financial reports to their authorizer and financial statements to State Ed, and go through renewal every five years to determine if they’re financially sound. And charter schools are totally transparent: they are public and anyone can request to see their budgets.

  • http://www.sinksalive.blogspot.com KitchenSink

    Leonie, there are now thousands of kids being educated in SUNY charters, and likewise in Regents charters. Talk to any parent or parent group from a SUNY charter and ask about transparency and availability. Then talk to a Regents charter parent. You’ll have your response to your “obvious” statement.

    At your conference on Saturday, there was a long-winded (deserverdly so) discussion of the obfuscated DOE charter school website. How does one get information about non-SUNY charters? It’s almost as impossible as getting information about non-charter public schools. But with SUNY, ANY parent at ANY time with an internet connection or library card can download the complete history of reports for ANY SUNY authorized charter. It’s all right there at http://newyorkcharters.org/parentSchoolList.htm.

    The most meaningful input a parent can have in a school is the choice of where to enroll his or her child. Every day I thank our parents for having the courage to risk the scorn of their peers and enroll in our school, trusting us with the most important people in their lives. SUNY allows that choice to be fully informed.

  • http://www.sinksalive.blogspot.com KitchenSink

    Leonie, exactly what kind of “fiscal accountability and transparency” do you find lacking in charter schools?

    Maybe you are mistaken and you are really talking about school districts, such as the pre-Klein NYC BOE with its Kafkaesque website. By comparison to districts, charters have a severe case of over-oversightitis. SUNY has closed 25% of its schools up for initial charter review. Every charter school’s audit is available for free online thanks to Ken. What other form of accountability is there? Do you want a complete listing of how many pencils are in each classroom?

  • http://edintheapple peter

    The charter school establishment decided that no bill was better than the Silver/Sampson bill, the 700 mill be damned. With the exception of Malcolm Smith, the # 1 charter school vote in the Senate, and maybe Johnson and Diaz the other 60 or so NYC-based State legislators supported Silver/Sampson, in fact, many thought the bill went too far on the charter school side.

    Let us not forget charter schools are public schools funded with public dollars, in theory “laboratories for innovation” the fear of scrutiny begs the question, “Is what you have to hide so serious that you are willing to punish all the schools in the State?”

  • Gideon

    Peter,

    To what fear of scrutiny are you referring? Is it the evaluations of charter schools that result in detailed analysis of their leaders, boards and programs and lengthy reports that get posted on their authorizer’s websites? Is it the independent audits that get posted on their authorizer’s websites? Is it the financial statements they have to send in to State Ed Department? Is it the fact that charter school students take the same tests every other public school has to administer and their results are as public as the next school. Is it the renewal process every charter school has to go through every five years in order to stay open? Where exactly do you see charter schools hiding anything?

  • Pingback: Gotham Gazette - The Wonkster » Blog Archive » The Charter School Non-Vote

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Peter,

    “Is what you have to hide so serious that you have to punish all the schools in the State?”

    Precisely.

    As (witting or unwitting) fronts for Wall Street’s hostile takeover of the public schools, they care nothing about the overall destruction they cause. It’s smash and grab, and all about the re-direction of power and resources away from (however imperfect) democratically-controlled implementation and oversight, to private government.

    Publicly funded, privately-managed infrastructure.
    Publicly-funded, privately-managed schools.
    Publicly-funded, privately-managed prisons.
    Publicly-funded, privately-managed armies.

    It’s the investment opportunity of a lifetime.

  • UWS Dad

    Now what’s really the clever thing here is how the Sampson bill supporters tried to make it the fault of the charter school advocates that nothing got passed. It would be one thing to just say “raise the cap” and leave it be. But these people weren’t into that. They were into raising the cap and adding more regulations and restrictions. These are the same people who have been crippling public education for decades, who believe that adults are more important than children, who think that one can regulate and audit their way to having students graduate, who are still championing the same “pilot projects” that they know won’t work but will bide them enough time until their pensions kick in. And it was shown today that they have plenty of political allies in Albany who believe in the same thing. So yes, I do think it was worth foregoing $700MM for that. Having the State’s application go down for consideration with that kind of crap in it wasn’t worth it. It would have been a bald lie to put the kinds of restrictions that Sampson called for in an application and call it “innovation.” Just a bald lie, or in union speak, “a pilot project.” There are plenty of other school districts and states in the U.S. who understand what innovation is that are more deserving of these funds.

  • Gideon

    The NYC DOE website actually has pretty good information about its charter schools. It took me about 20 seconds to find a page called “Accountability” ((http://schools.nyc.gov/community/planning/charters/Accountability/default.htm) and there you can find annual reports, site visit reports, audits, and progress reports for each school authorized by the DOE.

  • http://www.sinksalive.blogspot.com KitchenSink

    If you’re talking to me, Gideon, I was referring to the Board of Ed website before the Klein administration.

    (And by the way, it’s only five seconds to find that information for SUNY schools. But it would increase transparency and accountability to remove SUNY as an authorizer?)

  • http://edintheapple peter

    Gideon:

    I was checking out that transparent data re charter schools but I couldn’t find which friends of Malcolm Smith held jobs at the Merrick Charter School, or, the relationships between contracters and charter school owners, or which relative of funders of charter schools had jobs in the schools, guess I just didn’t look hard enough …

    and, those lotteries, how many parents had their names picked out of the hat but whose kids weren’t accepted because they have handicaps, or just plain weren’t the right people … I’ll have to look more closely

  • http://www.classsizematters.org leonie haimson

    I want to thank Anna and Maura for doing such a great job in reporting on this day in Albany — making me feel like I was there. Actually I probably understood alot more about what was going on than if I were there!

  • Gideon

    Peter,

    If you’ve got that kind of information for any public schools or boards of education, I’d love to see it. While charter school board members have to file annual conflict of interest forms with the State Ed department, I think this is definitely one area their authorizers should scrutinize more carefully and board members with clear conflicts should be kicked off those boards. How would you suggest making them more transparent? As a start, I’d like to see their conflict of interest forms posted on their authorizer’s website.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

  • Despite some tense confrontations between protesters and police, nothing ever got physical and a lieutenant just said there were no arrests. 3 hrs ago
  • He's been frozen in that stoic position all night MT @lisafleisher: A protester speaks with his middle finger. http://t.co/xLar4NRU 3 hrs ago
  • Last of the occupy protesters just walked out together, shouting expletives and insults on their way out. #toughcrowd 3 hrs ago
  • Frank Thomas, DOE spokesman just told me no arrests have been made tonight at PEP despite confrontation between protesters & police earlier. 4 hrs ago
  • RT @leoniehaimson: It's been shown repeatedly that as one schl closes another overwhelmed w/ high needs kids that small schls won't take 4 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>