GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

a raise for tweed

DOE to award $12 million in raises to central office employees

At the same time city schools are poised to suffer mid-year budget cuts, the Department of Education is awarding $12 million in pay raises over the next two years to non-union department employees, Chancellor Joel Klein announced this afternoon.

Central office employees have gone two years without raises and are getting less than the city set aside for them. Under the original plan, they would have received two four percent pay raises over two years, at a cost of $30 million total. DOE officials said today the $18 million savings would be used to soften budget cuts’ blow to schools.

In a memo this afternoon, Klein told employees they deserve raises, but following significant budget cuts to schools and the layoffs of hundreds of other central employees and school-based staff, he could not justify granting the full four percent raise.

“[A]t a time when the Department and our schools will have no choice but to make further large reductions, I cannot in good conscience fully fund raises, especially for people who are already earning substantial salaries,” Klein wrote. “We are in this together, and our schools in particular must be spared to the extent realistically possible.”

The $18 million saved by cutting the raises will cover only a fraction of the amount the DOE needs to cut from its budget. For the 2010 fiscal year, the department needs to reduce its budget by just over $113 million, and for 2011, the target cut is nearly $317 million.

Employees who earn over $70,000 are having their raises capped at roughly $2,800, while those earning less will receive a two percent raise to their salaries. The increases are being awarded to employees who do not have raises otherwise written into their contracts, and affect employees from among the lowest pay grades to the highest.

Doug Turetsky, chief of staff of the New York City Independent Budget Office, said that other managers working in city government received four percent raises earlier this year. “DOE managers didn’t, and now they’re making good on part of that,” he said.

When the four percent raises were originally announced by the mayor in July, the DOE was not included because it is not legally recognized as a city agency. The raises were later approved for the department, months after raises for other city managers went into effect.

DOE managers last received slightly more than a four percent raise in 2007; that followed a two percent raise the year before. The current raises include $4 million in retroactive payments and $4 million in salary increases for the next two years.

The raises come at a time when the city is negotiating a new contract with the city teachers union. At issue in those negotiations are pay raises for teachers, though UFT president Michael Mulgrew said that raises for non-unionized DOE managers are a separate issue.

“The Chancellor has the right to make his own judgments about what his managers deserve,” Mulgrew said in a statement.

David Bloomfield, professor of education at Brooklyn College, said that while the capped raises sound reasonable, it was hypocritical of the chancellor to give managers a raise paid irrespective of their performance, while demanding merit pay plans for teachers.

“Isn’t this another example of, ‘do as we say, not as we do?’” he said.

  • Citizen

    Now if Bloomberg had led the way and asked all city managers and employees to do “more with less” there would have been many $millions more to offset the cuts. But wait…Oh yeah… it was election year! Could he have gotten re-elected without those 8% raises and retroactive payments?

  • Jason

    David Bloomfeld, give me a break. These are COLAs (and at this level, not even that). Teachers get automatic annual salary steps based on years of service. The salary levels at each step also increases annually to reflect COLA adjustments. Two separate things. Additionally, central managers can be fired on the spot for incompetence. They also can be promoted (with raises) based on meritorious service. You are a smart guy. I have to believe you know that.

    Citizen – COLA adjustments for city managers followed the same pattern as union employees. Should we have asked all the union employees not to get a COLA so we could save money and keep programs and services? There are 80,000 teachers and only a few thousand DOE managers — think of the savings if teachers didn’t get their COLA adjustments! (Note – I don’t think that should happen — I’m just saying that it’s a lot to begrudge city managers the modest COLA adjustment that union employees got when — like teachers — most of us could make a hell of a lot more money in the private sector, when we don’t get paid a dime for the extensive overtime we put in, etc. Oh, and even though as a DOE manager I’m one of a few thousand city employees not getting the 4% adjustment, I am okay with that. I don’t love it. But, like teachers and principals, I didn’t take this job for the money.)

  • http://www.davidcbloomfield.com David Bloomfield

    Managerial employees are not entitled to automatic COLA adjustments. DOE management salaries are already inflated compared to comparable city positions. In addition, in the face of system-wide belt-tightening, flat test scores and almost 2 dozen school closures, these across-the-board raises seem ill-conceived and hypocritical when contrasted with the Mayor’s and Chancellor’s merit-pay rhetoric.

  • Ellen

    Jason, get off the cross, we need the wood.

  • Judy

    David Bloomfield your quote” these across-the-board raises seem ill-conceived and hypocritical” is very funny when your whole profession is selling your consulting services to school districts, i always find it interesting that its always the consultants criticizing DOE raises (when they themselves charge ridiculous amounts).. Don’t worry there will always be money left for you guys. 

  • JB

    Come on David! DOE managerial salaries are inflated when compared to rest of city? Not when you take out the mandated superintendents and the pedagogic managers. You know that when you compare DOE adminstrative managers to the similar managerial titles used in rest of city DOE managers are at similar level. Unlike you David , a Bklyn College prof who gets regular increases through the Professional Staff Congress ( the union for professors ) ,city managers only get a cost of living increase when the Mayor grants it to them.

    The issue is not whether test scores are up or down or the Mayor is championing merit pay, but whether hard working DOE managers deserve the same cost of living increase as every other manager in the city. The mayor thought they did but the Chancellor did not. The fact that Klein has chosen to send thisnot will serve him badly in the years to come. By the way I bet the Bklyn College profs didn’t turn down the 4 % increase they received in 08 or the 3 % increase they received in Oct 09, which is very close to what the Mayor gave city managers.

  • Kevin

    Poor Joel, I’m so sorry for the poor wimp; it was so hard for him to make the decision to screw the people who work the extra hours for him and who lead the organization which makes him look good. He sounds pretty pathetic. All other city mgr got 4 percent in ’08 and 4 percent in ’09. Not us. Singled out. On one hand he tells us we are the best group he has ever worked with and on the other he slaps us down. Our last raises were in 2006 and paid in 2007 so it has been 3 years. Just not right. WE did not take the jobs for the money but we have families. They take and take. These raises came out in June by the Mayor, they were approved by the Mayor & but Joel knows best. Just the arrogance of the man & the ignorance of the man. We are the people who sacrifice our evenings and weekends with our families to do the noble work of the Department of Education. We are dedicated employees who believe in trying to help the city children to have a better chance than those that went before them. But he tells us we are worth less and less important than other city managers. I know we are in tough times but everyone else got paid. Why were his best and brightest singled out? Especially with the things that they choose to spend our precious city tax dollars on. The Education Department blew almost $375,000 on a New Age management consultant who brags about being a master hypnotherapist and earning a degree from an online university. And that is the tip of the ice berg. Just my humble civil servant opinon.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

18 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

  • We're headed to Cobble Hill to The Schools for International and Global Studies; parents say they are suing Eva Moskowitz, co-location plan 2 hrs ago
  • MT @NYDNBenChapman: Chancellor Dennis Walcott said he spoke with FBI agents at PS 243 this a.m. where aide is accused of molesting students 2 hrs ago
  • RT @NYDNBenChapman: Schools chancellor Dennis Walcott just arrived at PS 243 where teacher aide allegedly filmed kiddie porno in school 2 hrs ago
  • Says a Robeson senior: “Teachers will let us eat during class, but it’s just chips, not a full meal. You can’t live off chips alone.” 2 hrs ago
  • At Paul Robeson High School, which is phasing out, students start at 8:35 a.m. but don't eat lunch until after 2 p.m.: http://t.co/VeMk5hLH 2 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829