GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Eye on Education

Just How Gullible is Anderson Cooper?

What is it about the Harlem Children’s Zone that causes pundits and reporters to suspend disbelief?  Perhaps it’s the deep desire for evidence that the large and persistent racial gap in educational achievement can be overcome.  The enduring racial inequalities in educational and social outcomes in the U.S. are a blight on our society, and evidence that these inequalities can be eliminated, however, tenuous, can be elevated into the feel-good story of the year.

Last night, Anderson Cooper reported on the Harlem Children’s Zone for the CBS newsmagazine 60 Minutes.  “For years, educators have tried and failed to get poor kids from the inner city to do just as well in school as kids from America’s more affluent suburbs,” he began. “Black kids still routinely score well below white kids on national standardized tests. But a man named Geoffrey Canada may have figured out a way to close that racial achievement gap.”  Cooper asked Canada, “So you’re trying to level the playing field between kids here in Harlem and middle class kids in a suburb?”  “That’s exactly what we have to do,” Canada replied.

As is customary, Cooper spoke with Harvard economist Roland Fryer, who has analyzed the achievement of students attending the HCZ Promise Academy charter schools.  Fryer said, “At the elementary school level, he closed the achievement gap in both subjects, math and reading.”   

“Actually eliminating the gap in elementary school?” Cooper asked.

“We’ve never seen anything like that. Absolutely eliminating the gap. The gap is gone, and that is absolutely incredible,” Fryer said.

I suppose that one can look selectively at the most recent achievement data available—the 2009 state assessments in English Language Arts and math—to draw this conclusion, but boy, is it a stretch.  The figure below shows the 2009 English Language Arts and mathematics achievement of students at the HCZ Promise Academy and HCZ Promise Academy II, for grades three, four, five and eight.  This achievement is contrasted with New York City citywide averages for Asian and white students.  The group differences are represented in standard deviation units, using the citywide standard deviation for the scale scores on the respective tests.

hcz-cooper

In grade 3, HCZ students score higher than the citywide average for white students in both ELA and math, a remarkable accomplishment.  They also outperform Asian students in ELA, but are about a quarter of a standard deviation below the citywide Asian average on the math assessment.  Were we to limit our attention solely to third grade, one could, without too much hyperbole, claim that HCZ had eliminated the racial achievement gap within New York City.

But there are other elementary and middle school grades on which to compare HCZ and white and Asian students across New York City, and the story is quite different for these other grades.  In grades four, five and eight, HCZ students score consistently about .6 standard deviations below white and Asian New York City students on the state ELA exam.  The gaps are also large in mathematics, although the eighth-grade gap is considerably smaller than those in fourth and fifth grades.  In fifth grade, HCZ students score .9 standard deviations below white students citywide, and 1.1 standard deviations below Asian students.

Taking all of these data together, there is virtually no basis for claiming that the Harlem Children’s Zone has eliminated the racial achievement gap in elementary and middle school.

The data that I’ve presented compare HCZ students with New York City students.  But recall that Geoff Canada’s objective is to level the playing field relative to middle-class suburban kids, who may be higher-achieving than the white and Asian students attending NYC public schools, as a good fraction of the most affluent children and youth in New York City attend private schools.  How do things look if we compare HCZ students with students in Scarsdale, the economist’s suburb of choice for claims about closing the achievement gap?

As the figure below indicates, the math gaps look about the same, since Scarsdale students score in the same ballpark as white and Asian students in New York City.  Thus, HCZ third-graders outperform even Scarsdale third-graders, but there are large gaps in grades four and five, and then a smaller, but still substantial, shortfall in grade eight, with Scarsdale students scoring .36 standard deviations higher than HCZ students.  However, the gaps in English Language Arts are much larger at every grade level, because Scarsdale students score considerably higher on the state ELA exam than do white and Asian students in NYC at every grade level.  In grades four, five and eight, HCZ students score from .97 to 1.22 standard deviations lower on the state ELA exam than do Scarsdale students, a huge gap.  Score differences of this magnitude indicate that the typical HCZ student might score at the 15th percentile of the Scarsdale distribution of performance in these grades.  

scarsdale

In the 60 Minutes segment, Roland Fryer used a football analogy to describe the accomplishments of HCZ.  “We’re ten touchdowns down in the fourth quarter,” he said. “We kick a field goal and everyone celebrates, right? That’s kind of useless. We’re still 67 points down … What Geoff Canada has shown is that we can actually win the game.”

But here’s the problem.  We’re not in the fourth quarter.  We’re in the first quarter, and most of the game still lies ahead.  The Harlem Children’s Zone is not a mature intervention.  No child has gone through his entire childhood and youth exposed to the intervention, and we don’t know what the outcomes will look like until that occurs.  I am hard-pressed to conclude, based on the most recent data available, that the results are, in Cooper’s terms, “nothing short of stunning,” or that the gap is gone for good.  The 2009 results for third-graders are terrific;  those for students in grades four, five and eight are not.  These latter grades show large and persistent gaps within New York City in both English Language Arts and mathematics, and even larger gaps with the affluent students in Scarsdale, particularly in English Language Arts.  If the third-grade pattern were to persist through the end of high school—on assessments we can trust—that would truly be nothing short of stunning, and well worth celebrating.  But it’s still too early to declare victory.

  • Philip Nobile (use name)

    My granddaughter Kate is a white public school fifth grader in Scarsdale. The other day her younger sister Sierra arrested and handcuffed her during a game of police. As Kate was being led away, I said to Sierra, “Did you tell Kate she has a right to remain silent?” Kate answered back, “And my right to habeas corpus.” Such is the depth of education in Scarsdale.

    My point beyond but in the key of Mr. Pallas: the achievement gap between poor black kids in Harlem and affluent white kids in Scarsdale cannot and should not be measured by standardized tests alone. 

    See below a stupefying list of student clubs at Scarsdale High School.  This cultural gap will never be closed while NYC schools remain hypersegregated a`la Plessy. While I salute Roland Fryer’s mission, I wish he would comment on the apartheid part of the problem which the DOE and the UFT never confront. 

    4 Our TroopsA cappella For Good MeasureAid For AidsArt TherapyAutism SpeaksAstronomy ClubAxis Dance GroupBlack Awareness ClubBreast CancerBusiness ClubChess ClubChild Soldier AwarenessCooking for a CauseCutting EdgeDrama ClubFuture Business Leaders of AmericaFree The ChildrenHabitat for HumanityHarvesting for HopeH.E.L.P. AnimalsHuman Rights CoalitionInternational ClubJust Do It ClubKnitting ClubMake It GreenMedical Aid FoundationMidnight RunMock TrialModel UN ClubOperation SmileOutdoors ClubPediatric Cancer ClubPublicolorPuzzle ClubRubik’s ClubStraight and Gay Alliance (SAGA)Scarsdale Broadcasting Co. Scarsdale Teen CenterScience OlympiadSending Hope ClubSHS Rocks!SHS Ski & Snowboard ClubSpanglish ClubSpanish ClubSpectrum of FriendsSTEP ClubStudents Against LeukemiaYearbook (Bandersnatch)

  • http://stuartbuck.blogspot.com Stuart Buck

    You’re looking at citywide averages, not controlling for anything. But Fryer was comparing lottery winners and lottery losers, and his IV analysis was instrumented on geographic location (in both he controlled for FRL). Apples and oranges.

  • Aaron Pallas

    Stuart,

    Sure, apples and oranges in the sense that Fryer’s study is addressing a different research question than the data I present. I’m not commenting on his study, part of which is about the impact of attending HCZ Promise Academy charter schools on student outcomes. I’m commenting on the claim that the students attending the HCZ Promise Academy charter schools have eliminated the achievement gap. The best evidence on that point is the direct comparison of the performance of HCZ students with citywide white and Asian students, and with Scarsdale students.

    When students compete for access to selective colleges, or other desirable positions, we don’t look at their regression-adjusted performance. We look at their actual academic records. That’s what I’m commenting on.

  • http://stuartbuck.blogspot.com Stuart Buck

    Well, it’s still pretty darn important. There are numerous studies finding that there’s an achievement gap even when controlling for SES and any other observables that the researcher can think of. If that remaining achievement gap can be made to go away — such that there’s no longer an achievement gap when controlling for SES — it would be a separate question to worry about how to equalize SES.

  • http://www.quickanded.com Chad Aldeman

    Aaron,

    The Fryer and Dobbie piece says the HCZ closed the black-white achievement gap after controlling for income and gender. Your graphs are misleading because they include income, so what shows up is the black/white AND the low-income/ high-income gaps. It’s like comparing apples to apples plus oranges.

    More here: http://tinyurl.com/yfslxna
    And here: http://tinyurl.com/yhr2czl

  • Aaron Pallas

    Chad,

    I’m not talking about the Fryer and Dobbie claim about closing the achievement gap after controlling for income and gender. Please show me where in the 60 Minutes piece there was any attention to controlling for income in the claims about closing or eliminating the achievement gap. You may think it cynical for a sociologist to attend to the persistent and pervasive effects of social class on socioeconomic outcomes, but these effects are real, and it’s what we study. Surely “leveling the playing field” does not mean ignoring family income.

    As is true of most research, the question is, “compared to what?” Compared to how the children and youth attending HCZ Promise Academies might have fared in the absence of HCZ, the evidence that Fryer and Dobbie present is powerful: this intervention is having a large impact on the academic achievement on these youth (at least in terms of state assessments that we now know have lots of problems). Compared to the performance of the typical Asian and white student in New York City, or the typical student in Scarsdale — with whom the HCZ youth will be competing for entry into college, among other things — the data I report show the HCZ youth well behind. These data are a snapshot, to be sure, and HCZ is an evolving program; but they are not, in my view, a distorted response to the question to which they are addressed.

  • GGW

    Stepping back to the big picture, I agree with Skoolboy’s general theme.

    Even though I think he often gives short shrift to schools which are legitimately driving huge gains in achievement, he’s right to police claims of “fully” closing the gap.

    Our charter school’s state test scores are indeed higher than white and Asian students (and gigantically higher than the “lottery losers” who applied to our school and didn’t get in). But…

    But our SAT is lower than national average. And our AP Calc scores are at national average (though that is with unbelievable AP Calc teacher…not sure we can hold that performance if he retires).

    Our actual college success rate (black and Hispanic kids from low-income families) seems to be higher (white and Asian national averages), but too early to tell. No idea about labor market outcomes.

    Per the earlier commenter, I suspect when one of our younger kids plays cops and robbers, none would invoke habeas corpus (more realistically depict an arrest). This stuff is hard to fully measure.

  • Smith

    Chad, thanks for making that point. Though it wasn’t your intention, I think your comments show how misleading these claims about HCZ are.

  • Brad

    I’m really disappointed in 60 Minutes, to display such uncritical reporting. However, the misrepresentation of educational achievement is a pervasive problem. I worked in a research department at a large city school system and administrators would carefully select the data to be disclosed. I also looked at a report of the large city schools in the U.S. It reminded me of Garrison Keillor’s public radio show in the mythical land of Lake Wobegon, where “all the children are above average”.

  • Michael M.

    Kudos to P. Nobile (first comment).

    Add to the layers of irony the liklihood that “poor black kids in Harlem” are more likely to be both victims of crime as well as confronted by police — in school even — than “affluent white kids in Scarsdale.”

    Hey fellow New Yahkers, got Brown v Board of Ed?

  • Ben L.

    Help me understand how your graphs and the graphs in Figures 3A and 3B (page 32 of the Dobbie & Fryer paper) can say such different things?

    The paper is available here: http://scienceblogs.com/appliedstatistics/upload/2009/11/001_hcz%25204.15.2009.pdf.

    The 8th grade year on Dobbie and Fryer’s graph should be the same 8th graders in your graphs. They seem to totally contradict each other. Somebodies got to be incorrect here….

  • Aaron Pallas

    Ben L.,

    You’re looking at the April, 2009 Dobbie & Fryer paper, which goes through the 2007-08 school year. The November, 2009 version includes the 2008-09 school year, which is the year that I report in my graphs. I haven’t looked yet to see if the data line up.

  • Deborah Meier

    Interesting analysis. But what none of this tells us is what Canada’s students can accomplish besides scoring well on tests. Multiple choice test scores in two areas (math and ELA) are a limited notion of being a well-educated person. What the real measure is will need to wait until we see how these youngsters perform in life. We could get a hint at it by visiting their classes and listening to students analyze and describe their ideas, evidence and reasoning. Some of that will become evident through work in colleges and on the job. We could mimic some of this in interviews with kids about books, current events, interesting dilemmas. The portfolios used in many Coalition of Essential schools are an important effort to model this kind of definition of being well-educated. It would be nice, someday, if we tried to better examine that kind of learning on a larger scale and if Canada would lead the way–because the prepping to “look good” on such examinations might actually require us to engage in good education for its own

  • http://ljohnson562@charter.net Linda/Retired Teacher

    I would not want to criticize Mr. Canada too much because he is doing what I believe should be done with very disadvantaged students: Providing them with “whatever it takes,” i.e. health care, preschool, parent ed, nutrition, a good school etc. But I have several concerns:

    Canada himself admits that his students did not do nearly as well on the more objective Iowa Test of Basic Skills. Why is this? Were the children drilled on the state test? If so, those results are invalid.

    Privileged children learn a great deal from home. Many are read to on a daily basis, taken on yearly vacations and given many opportunities to pursue their interests. Are Canada and others implying that these family activities don’t count?

    Finally, as the Scarsdale grandmother suggests, it is foolish to compare populations based on test scores alone. As most of us know (or should know) many privileged children learn so much, so quickly that it often dazzles the mind. There is a virtual explosion of knowledge, most of which is probably untested and untestable.
    My own grandchildren, ages 8, 6, and 2 are actually beginning to know some things that I don’t know because of their exposure to their scientist dad and mom.

    What Mr. Canada is doing is, in my opinion, the very best that can be done for the children he serves. However, somewhere I read that his own son is in a middle-class school mainly because of the intangibles that the school (and its population?) provides. Exactly.

  • Ross E. Mitchell

    Setting the record straight, so to say, is at the heart of the matter here. Aaron Pallas sets us straight on the matter of whether the “achievement gap” has been closed. At the same time, Philip Nobile, GCW, and Deborah Meier highlight the fact that there are a number of ways to demonstrate knowledge, skills, and abilities–not to mention dispositions–and these alternative indicators may be more important when it comes to “external validity” (that is, being important for creating life opportunities after K-12 education). What I think is missing here, however, is the recognition that access to higher education in many places is a matter of surpassing a threshold or minimum performance requirement rather than winning a performance competition. What we have to worry about most, especially now that there will be precipitous decline in the number of students graduating from high school over the next several years–the Baby Boom Echo is over–is whether students are eligible for admission (and able to finance their education) because there will be a surplus of “slots” (unless colleges and universities make a U-turn on their expansion rather than simply have expansion come to a grinding halt). If HCZ has allowed its students to cross the threshold then, indeed, they have done wonders. (But does anyone know where that threshold is located when looking at performance indicators among elementary school children?)

  • http://www.eduleadership.org Eduleadership

    I believe you are interpreting the data backwards. You failed to ask why the 3rd grade scores are so much better than the scores for older students, but this is addressed quite clearly in the This American Life story about HCZ: The 3rd graders were the first cohort whose parents went through the HCZ “Baby College” program, which started in 2000.

    The older students may receive some services from HCZ, but have not been exposed to the full program. So, rather than cast doubt on the claim that HCZ is closing the achievement gap, these data actually show that HCZ’s full program is working remarkably – and that Baby College is an essential part of its success, as Mr. Canada says in the TAL story.

  • http://stuartbuck.blogspot.com Stuart Buck

    Deborah says: What the real measure is will need to wait until we see how these youngsters perform in life. We could get a hint at it by visiting their classes and listening to students analyze and describe their ideas, evidence and reasoning. Some of that will become evident through work in colleges and on the job.

    I agree in the broad sense, but it’s really hard to know whether teachers and schools are doing a good job if we have to wait 20 years to find out in retrospect.  

    Wouldn’t it be nice if we had a proxy that could give us some idea now whether teachers and schools are managing to impart any knowledge to children?  Say, whether those children were able to compute math problems and read passages about history and science (as on many reading tests)?  

  • Kate S

    Eduleadership made the exact point I was preparing to make myself. Canada is clear about creating a “Conveyor Belt” the starts at birth and takes kids through college graduation. Given what we know about brain development and early investments in kids and families, it makes sense that the third graders, who have been riding the Conveyor Belt (and by the way, I do hate that terminology) from the beginning are performing on the same level as their white and asian counterparts in New York City schools.

    The real test will be whether or not this is sustained for that cohort on a large scale. Even if it’s not, it will be important to note whether the achievement gap has narrowed by some degree – reasonably, it would take a few classes moving through the Promise Academies before the kinks get worked out and we can see the results we all want.

  • Aaron Pallas

    Eduleadership and Kate S.,

    HCZ is a complex initiative, with multiple components. Only a fraction of the students attending the HCZ Promise Academy schools participated in Harlem Gems or the Baby College, so one cannot conclude that the third-grade reading and math achievement of the students in the Promise Academy are due to these programs. Dobbie and Fryer note that, unlike the lotteries used for selection into the Promise Academy schools, children self-select into Harlem Gems and Baby College in ways that make it difficult to assess the causal impact of these programs. With many caveats, they report that their point estimates for participating in these programs suggest that they decrease third grade math and ELA scores, although these decreases are not statistically significant.

    I doubt if participation in Harlem Gems of Baby College actually has a negative impact on test scores, but there’s certainly no evidence that they increase test performance, and thus no evidence that they can account for the reduction of the achievement gap. Overall, Dobbie and Fryer conclude that the HCZ community programs are unlikely to explain the test performance of students attending the Promise Academy schools, and that therefore it’s either the schools themselves or the interaction of the schools and the community investments that explain the test performance.

  • http://www.eduleadership.org Eduleadership

    Thanks for the detailed and thoughtful response.

    If Baby College doesn’t make a difference, to what to you attribute the enormous difference between the 3rd and 4th grade scores?

    I realize it’s a complex program, but Baby College is enrolling 150 people a year, which is not a small number.

  • Peter Meyer

    Though he has certainly done good things for students in Harlem, Canada is also good at PR. I attended part of the recent HCZ conference in NYC — at the Sheraton in midtown — and was impressed by the turnout of corporate chieftans, high-level Obama administration officials, and education leaders from across the country. Paul Tough, the New York Times Magazine editor and journalist who “discovered” Canada, was there signing copies of his book on the man. There is clearly something there, and I think Canada’s “pipeline” strategy of joining social services and education services is a laudable one. But there are better examples of successful charter school initiatives. One of the best is the Brighter Choice Charter School network in Albany, which I wrote about in a recent issue of Education Next (http://educationnext.org/brighter-choice-charter-schools/).

  • Pingback: The Week’s Best Blog Posts at The Core Knowledge Blog

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

10 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031