GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

making the grade

High school report cards won’t be covered in “A’s,” officials say

Department of Education officials are tamping down expectations before next month’s release of the annual high school report cards.

Testifying at a hearing before the City Council’s Education Committee, the DOE’s chief accountability officer Shael Polakow-Suransky said today that the reports will not show the preponderance of A’s that dominated the elementary and middle school reports released in September.

“You’re not going to see the big changes in the high school level that you saw at the elementary level,” Suransky said. “We didn’t see dramatic gains in the same way.”

That could be a good thing for the department, which saw its main accountability measure widely criticized when it announced that 84 percent of elementary-and middle-schools had earned an A.

Suransky explained that the elementary-and-middle-school report cards reflect year-to-year improvement on state standardized tests, so that when students’ scores on the math and English exams rose, so too did the number of high marks given to schools. High school report cards focus on schools’ graduation rates, credit accumulation rates, and Regents-passing rates, which did not show the same level of improvement, he said.

In 2008, 40 percent of the city’s high schools earned an A.

Councilman Robert Jackson, who chairs the education committee, aimed his criticism at the elementary-and-middle-school report cards.

“In essence, you must admit the standard that you set is extremely low,” Jackson said.

“In hindsight, if we could have predicted the future, we would have set the cut scores differently,” Suransky said.

  • EFM

    So there are to be less A’s for the high schools. Interesting that the lower grades will come out after the elections.
    How about revising the middle school and public school grades, so that they are more in tune with reality?

  • Michael M.

    The DOE couldn’t perdict the grade inflation? Baloney. Maybe THEY couldn’t, or didn’t WANT to. It WAS predicted. Read up on the interaction — years ago in Fall 2007 after the first set of School Progress Reports came out — between me and Liebman at a CEC2 meeting in Beth Fertig’s new book (cheap at Strand), “why cant u teach me 2 read?”

    “[Liebman] then proceeded to explain how the system would eventually include three years’ worth of data of every school , so teh risk of big fluctuations from one year to the next wouldn’t be such a problem. Then, just like a law professor, Liebman told Markowitz why “the main point you got an applause on was not correct.”
    – Beth Fertig

    Problem is… history not only proved Liebman wrong, the facts now show he didn’t even do what he said he would do. (Perspective: Professor Liebman deserves angel’s wings for his life work for death row inmates. But not on this subject.)

    First, DOE did NOT use three years of data, even now in the third year of the report (when it total, four years of data could be used).

    As a subset to that, on a number of internal metrics, a number of schools show scores outside the bounds of the prior year’s min-max range. Nonsensical. Why weren’t the ranges RESET, even if based only on the most recent year’s data?

    Second, the wild fluctuations I predicted indeed happen. Regularly. Frequently. Often. Predictably. PredictED. The number of schools that bouce from C to A to F to A is inexplicable… if you think the teaching changes that radically, I have a bridge to sell you. The system is a “random letter generator.”

    Third, this was all BEFORE the state tests getting dumbed down and the scores jacked up. Had anyone said in 2007 that the tests would get easier to pass, 100% of the schools showing nominal “progress” would have been a GIVEN.

    And I won’t even get into what’s wrong with the “peer group” approach in this comment, or the increase after the inaugural year in weight on “progress” when many of us demanded more weight on “performance.”

    Who could have predicted the Emperor’s New Clothes would be thread-bare in a mere two years? Well, a LOT of people who undserstand the scam, actually. (e.g., Aaron “Skoolboy” Pallas, Jennifer “Eduwonkette” Jennings, then-CEC2 President Matthew Levey, Class Size Matters’ Leonie Haimson, yours truly, and others.) Just none who work for DOE. Pronounced “DOH!”

    Thanks to Councilmember Jackson for hosting this hearing — on the biggest fraud of the Kleinberg administration — on the eve of the election. Eight is more than enough.

    Is our children learning?

    Does our schools all gots A’s?

    P.S. Will re-curving the high school grades reduce the number of grads who need remedial classes at CUNY? Moreover, why didn’t they re-curve the K-8 letters when they saw what they were about to release? This is no different morally than the Bronx Principal accused of changing grades. The Office of Accountability…. has itself never been held accountable. Irony is alive and well at Tweed.

  • I noticed that…

    MM,
    Thank you for always providing such well-detailed, comprehension information. Bloomklein, with some help from his politico croonies who want term limits eradicated forever, has pulled the wool over the eyes of the public except for those few, like yourself and others, who know when there’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The Tweeders know how to look for those loopholes in the state law and use it to the disadvantage of the children of NY. They know that any monetary incentives placed in front of principals will bring about cheating and corruption. Case in point, Saraceno, the superstealth, supersurreptitious principal. Morality and Money don’t go hand-in-hand, as history has proven time and time again (Ponzi Scheme – Bernie Madorf).

    It is good to know that you keep such extremely good account of the Tweeders’ actions and decision. The public should be grateful that you are there to pull the wool off that big, bad DoE wolf. To Robert Jackson, thank you, too, for exposing the DoE for their fraud, and distortion of the data and for being actively involved in the children’s right to a good education.

  • Michael M.

    You’re too kind.

    I do it for the kids — as opposed to the cronies.

    Throw out Darth Term Evader. Elect the man decrying the fraud.
    Bill Thompson for Mayor.

  • http://www.classsizematters.org Leonie Haimson

    Not sure what Suransky’s comments mean since they did raise the cut scores considerably — but not enough to counteract the extreme amount of test inflation that occurred. Perhaps he meant that if they had predicted how much ridicule they would encounter they would have set the cut scores even higher.

  • http://highschooljobinfo.com Londa Condra

    The current job economy sucks for high school and college students. I know that I have had a really hard time finding good jobs for people in college. So much so, in fact, that I’ve written a website devoted to making it easier. If you’re in the same situation, check out my site.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

  • Despite some tense confrontations between protesters and police, nothing ever got physical and a lieutenant just said there were no arrests. 4 hrs ago
  • He's been frozen in that stoic position all night MT @lisafleisher: A protester speaks with his middle finger. http://t.co/xLar4NRU 4 hrs ago
  • Last of the occupy protesters just walked out together, shouting expletives and insults on their way out. #toughcrowd 4 hrs ago
  • Frank Thomas, DOE spokesman just told me no arrests have been made tonight at PEP despite confrontation between protesters & police earlier. 5 hrs ago
  • RT @leoniehaimson: It's been shown repeatedly that as one schl closes another overwhelmed w/ high needs kids that small schls won't take 5 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>