GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

More Thoughtful

Who the Heck Is Ted Sizer?

Ted Sizer was a critic and trouble maker. He looked at our schools, all of our schools, and said in essence, not good enough and we are doing it wrong.

He didn’t mean the bad schools. And he didn’t mean achievement gaps. He meant all schools. He meant the good schools too, even the best schools.

So, who the hell was Ted Sizer? He was a visionary educator and critic of our schools, a real giant who was influential enough to get a 1000+ word obituary in yesterday’s New York Times and numerous other tributes and articles this week.

His doctorate was in the history of education, and I believe his disseration was about how the high school credits thing evolved. Forty years ago he was the Dean of the Harvard Graduate School of Education. After that he was the Headmaster at Philips Academy in Andover, Massachuetts. Then a professor of education at Brown. He also helped found a charter school in the middle of Massachusetts, and late in his life was co-principal of it with his wife Nancy. He had credibility in the most powerful of circles.

In 1983, the famous report A Nation at Risk was released by the Reagan administration. It warned of “a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people and declared that “If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.” You see these quotes all over the place, and it is easy to say that this report marked the beginning of the standards and reform movement.

Ted’s Horace’s Compromise was published the next year. He neither defended the status quo nor focused on our obviously failing schools. His critique was nothing like that of A Nation at Risk. Rather, he attacked the very foundation of how our high school works, looking at the basic compromise between teachers and students, an agreement that if students do not create trouble for teachers that teachers will not create trouble for students. This compromise infects what is taught, how it is taught, and the expectations for what learning really is.

What is education? “The worthy residue that remains after the lessons have been forgotten.” When the students forget the explicit contents of today’s lesson – and we know that they will – what is left? Anything? What happens after they forget the difference between atomic number and atomic mass? What is left after they forget the difference between the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? After they forget the rhyme scheme and meter of a Shakespearean Sonnet or the relationship between sin, cos and tan?

I read this stuff and was amazed. Someone else out there saw what I saw, the essential hypocrisy in “schooling” in America! Even at our allegedly best schools (e.g. The Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Stuyvesant, Andover) we were not doing the right thing, and yet people wanted the other schools to be more like the “best” schools.

But how to provide an education that remains meaningful beyond graduation? Twenty-five years ago, Ted Sizer founded the Coalition of Essential Schools, a voluntary association open to any school that wanted to be a member. CES was built around these link: www.essentialschools.org/pub/ces_docs/about/phil/10cps/10cps.html ten principles, though there was no exam or inspective for Coalition schools.

  • Learning to use one’s mind well
  • Less is More, depth over coverage
  • Goals apply to all students
  • Personalization
  • Student-as-worker, teacher-as-coach
  • Demonstration of mastery
  • A tone of decency and trust
  • Commitment to the entire school
  • Resources dedicated to teaching and learning
  • Democracy and equity

These principles, when put in to action, change the nature of school and of schooling. Talk to those who are hoping open new schools – be they charter or otherwise – and you will see Ted’s thinking throughout their visions, whether they realize it or not.

I was enormously lucky. I got to study with Ted. I got to talk with him for dozens hours about the design, aims and goals of the American high school. (He once called something I said “Quotable!” and I cannot begin to tell you how great that made me feel.) I already knew about Deb Meier’s work, but he gave me enormous new insights and understandings. Though Ted, I learned so much about the idea of teaching Habits of Mind rather than skills or knowledge.

I do not think that most members of the Coalition even come close to Ted’s vision, and I know nothing about Ted’s school, the Parker Essential Charter School. But I recognize that it is amazingly difficult to overturn decades or centuries of understanding about what school should look like and aim towards, and that even falling short of his vision can constitute a huge step forward for our students. And so, Ted Sizer gave us all an ideal of what meaningful schooling could mean, something to work towards, even while the forces around us push us to schooling as the most structured, reductive, temporary value, baby-sitting and crowd control. I know that I’ve been known to be critical of aspirational goals, but every step towards his vision constitutes real improvement and additional life long value for students.

  • teach11372

    A couple of years ago, I had the pleasure of having dinner with Ted and Nancy, along with my school principal and handful of educators from different states and different school models. What was remarkable was, at a table so obviously full of admirers who hung on their every word that they uttered, how curious Ted and Nancy were about what was happening at each of our schools. Their empathy for other educators and the kids that they serve, and their desire to learn more, sticks with me and in my mind defines the notion of a “lifelong learner.”

    My condolences to Nancy and their family, we’ve lost one of the good ones.

    Best,
    Nicholas

    Nicholas Tishuk
    Director of Programs and Accountability
    The Renaissance Charter School
    teach11372 @ gmail.com

  • http://MoreThoughtful.blogspot.com ceolaf

    I, too, love Ted — and Nancy, too.

    And I’ve had some disagreements with them, too.

    Ted and I agree that for schools to succeed, every child must be known well by at least one adult. This is why reducing student load is so important to both of us. (Note that the CES explanation of principles that Mr. Hoffman links to does not address class size, per se. Rather, it addresses “direct responsibility” and clearly refers to total number of students, without saying anything how how they are distributed though the day or week.) He, however, thought that small schools lead to that kind of reduced loads, without ever explaining his logic. Sometimes, I almost felt like I had him convinced that it is not a school size thing, but I never quite got there. And he never convinced me, either.

    We also disagreed about charter schools, at least on the surface. He worried about a lack of choice for students and their families. However, he also worried about how choice might work away from major cities with the kind of public transit coverage that we have in NYC and Boston. As Mr. Hoffman mentions, he was worried about suburban & rural schools, too. He didn’t know how charter schools in those areas could be as accessible to the entire population as traditional public schools, with their fleets of school buses. That was something that I had not even considered.

    Unfortunately, some of his students — though they respected him greatly — did not think as highly of his class on Redesigning the American High School. He was asking a great deal of them, to rethink fundamental aspects how secondary schools are structured and their goals, and those who have grown up in our system — and especially those who have done well in it — might not even understand the depth of rethinking he was pushing for.

  • Pingback: Inheriting the Trade | The passing of a man who made a difference: Theodore Sizer (1932-2009)

  • http://www.kirstenolson.org Kirsten Olson

    Alexander, This is a wonderful remembrance of Ted, the superbly modest and engaging radical educator. I remember Ted from my first year at the Harvard Graduate School of Education in 1996, when he was speaking to a standing-room-only crowd about a new book The Students Are Watching (?) in which he said, “Schools are like coral reefs.” He was meaning to suggest, I think, how ecologically interconnected all parts of schools are, and ultimately, how fragile. We all depend on each other, and “swim” in the same water.

    I just posted a link to your remembrance on my website, and thank you for the wonderful other links too. I remember Ted as always helpful, always interested in what you, whomever you were, had to say, willing to mentor and listen, willing to change his mind. HIs great wife Nancy, too, who spoke openly about her passages to becoming “equal partner” with Ted–claiming her space as equal intellect and collaborator, also are vividly remembered by me.

    Thank you for this Anthony, and I’ll now be on the lookout for your blog.

    Kirsten
    (author of Wounded By School, Teachers College PRess 2009)

  • Marge Russo

    Ted Sizer…I don’t see it. I’m not dirnking the Kool-Aid. This is Columbus Syndrome: just because Sizer discovered it doesn’t mean it wasn’t already there. I’ve known people that work with Sizer and look at him like a god. “you know what, he loved teachers,” one friend who worked with him said to me. Somehow, from his Harvard and Andover Academy pedigree, I have the feeling he felt very self-important doing things ‘for’ a community, not ‘with’ them. It sounds very “by the grace of Sizer’s hand” to me. Most of the things that Sizer wanted done are the same things teachers fight for every damn day. In public school, though, it’s a budget problem, typically, not an issue of desire for change or innovation. As much as his advocates would like to think otherwise, he was NOT on the front line with teachers when they have to deal with parents and school committees that fight you every step of the way. He was a politician out to sell a box of cereal with his name on it, when you get right down to it. – Marge

  • http://MoreThoughtful.blogspot.com Alexander Hoffman

    Margo,

    That’s a lot to respond to. 

    1) Did you ever meet with or talk to Ted? Did you ever hear him speak? Upon what do you base this idea that he was self-important? 

    2) Actually, Ted wanted a lot of things that schools and teachers do NOT do every day. He was critical of the fundamental institution of schooling — at least on the secondary level. The kinds of things that he was really talking about are things that no individual teacher can do; the require that entire school to provide a different kind of education that one that can be so completely split into different courses. Moreover, he was as critical of Andover and Stuyvesant as of our worst urban schools — often far MORE critical. 

    Yes, much of what he spoke and wrote of were things that he learned from speaking with, working with and listening to teachers. But his revolutionary ideas are NOT found in today’s schools.

    Were the original to him? Well, I must admit that I had them, too, and long before I ever heard of Ted. And that certainly implies that others must have had these ideas, too. And I can trace some of them back to Dewey quite easily, and back to Socrates just easily. But Ted address American secondary schooling as it existed at the end of the 20th Century. Dewey and Socrates could not do that. He brought these ideas to bear, expressed them well, advocated for more fundamental change than you appear to realize, and worked to keep the nation’s attention on a kind of education reform that did not dumb down or narrow education. So, he gets credit for some of the ideas, a lot of the application and an enormous about of advocacy. 

    3) We have raised per-pupil funding for schools enormously since 1985, even adjusting for inflation. How much have the institution and goals of schooling changed? Are children from our best educated, hardest working and smartest families really challenged as they should be? Have we really changed the curriculum? Do we still ignore the fact that we know that students will forget the explicit content of today’s lessons? Do we still continue with the same compromise that that “Horace” discovered? 

    How much more funding do you want? What is it that you think we lack the funding for? Those are serious and literal questions. 

    We have more money, and secondary schooling still suffers the same fundamental problems in our most “successful” schools. Within-state differences in education funding between districts are vastly smaller than they were in the 1980s, while funding in the richest districts has continued to grow. Though we certainly need more money for the physical plant — and I knowledge that we will never be able to pay teachers competitively with other fields requiring the same abilities, education, experience and hard work — what is it that you think lack of funding is holding us back from? 

    4) One of the last things Ted did in his life was to run a charter school that needed to be turned around. He returned to his old role of headmaster, of a sort. In fact, he released a book about this experience with his co-principal/wife (Nancy) and another principal, called “Keeping School: Letters to Families from Principals of Two Small Schools.”

    So, how could you think that he wasn’t on the front lines? He was there every day as a school leader, again. And in his last years he was working with local service providers to figure out how they could take a more cohesive approach to delivering those services to needy families. Again, on the front lines.

    Rest assured, he was incredibly committed to public education. I was put off by his Harvard/Andover/Brown resume, but look at what he actually wrote, what he actually said, what he actually criticized and what he actually did. 

    5) What box of cereal with his name on it do you think he was selling? He endlessly gave credit to others, to their idea and to their work. Part of his brilliance was his ability to bring people together and get them to listen to challenging ideas about education. There’s record of self-promotion. He advocated for ideas and did not do it to make a profit for himself. 

    *****************

    Frankly, Margo, your objections to Ted Sizer appear to lack a basis in fact. 

    If I am wrong, I’d love to learn about your experiences with him, or about the things he said or did with which I am not familiar. 

    So, if you know things that I do not, please share them. And if you do not really know his work, try actually reading it. I stand by Horace’s Compromise as worth anyone’s time. And if you want to know about his work with teachers on the front lines, perhaps read Keeping School. There are plenty of others, too.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

21 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829