GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

last day

DC 37 accuses education department of “union-busting”

Today was the last day of work for more than a hundred school aides whose union says they were laid off because of mismanagement rather than budget cuts.

District Council 37, the city’s largest municipal union, attacked the education department this afternoon for what they called “a clear case of union-busting.”

In a statement, Veronica Montgomery-Costa, president of DC 37′s Local 372 chapter, accused Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Chancellor Joel Klein of diverting resources out of the school system into no-bid contracts.  The union also resurrected the summer’s fight over parent-funded school aides, saying that those privately-funded positions undercut union jobs, resulting in the loss of over 700 positions.

Education department spokeswoman Ann Forte disputed the union’s numbers and characterization of the layoffs.

The 127 DC 37 workers leaving their jobs today are mostly central department employees not being taken out of schools, Forte said. She added that these workers found out in June that they were among 475 workers whose jobs were eliminated in the mayor’s city-wide budget cuts.

Last Friday, 587 school aides received letters telling them that they may be included in the next round of layoffs, which will go into effect on October 16, Forte said. Today, 530 of those aides found out that they would definitely lose their jobs.

Because principals determine how budget cuts will fall in their schools, each principal individually made the decision to either cut school aide positions, excess teachers or eliminate other expenses, Forte said.

After principals made these decisions, the education department summed the total number of positions lost in each district. The most junior aides received pink slips, with those with more seniority will be shuffled among schools to fill in vacant positions.

Forte did not rule out the possibility of further rounds of layoffs, but said that she expected the current round to comprise the bulk of eliminated positions.

Responding to the union’s criticism of the department’s decision to retain the parent-paid “substitute school aides,” Forte said that the school aides were not competing with parent-funded assistant positions for their jobs.

“The parent-funded positions are not school aides and they are not supplanting the jobs of school aides,” Forte said.

The union has launched a public relations offensive against the education department and the mayor in recent weeks. A month ago, the union began running radio ads highlighting the importance of school aides and attacking the Bloomberg administration for the budget cuts.

Here’s the full text of DC 37′s statement on the layoffs:

DC 37 Outraged Over DOE layoffs of Over 700 School Support Staff

DC 37 Executive Director Lillian Roberts and Local 372 President Veronica Montgomery-Costa voice outrage over the DOE layoffs of 714 school support staff

At a time when the NYC Department of Education continues to squander millions on outside contracts, it is laying off over 700 school support staff for budgetary reasons.

This first round of layoffs is taking place today and will see 127 workers lose their jobs. The workers are Substance Abuse Prevention and Intervention Specialists (SAPIS), Community Associates, Community Assistants, School Neighborhood Workers, Computer Service Technicians and others.

On October 16, the second round of layoffs is slated to take place. That round will include 587 school aides.

Veronica Montgomery-Costa, President of Local 372 of District Council 37, says, “I am outraged that these workers who play a critical role in the education of our children are losing their jobs. This does not have to happen. In the wealthier districts the Chancellor has been willing to allow parents to provide funds and hire parent-funded aides – a form of privatization. The Mayor also wants to divert taxpayer dollars and raise the cap on charter schools rather than pouring resources into the city’s 1,400 public schools that educate our 1.1 million school children. Why is it that when budget cuts occur, children’s needs come last and support services are the first to be cut?”

Cynthia Dowdy, Chapter Chair of Local 372’s SAPIS workers says, “How can the city lay off workers who help parents, protect our children, especially at a time when drug abuse among our city’s young people is on the rise. For example, without the one SAPIS worker assigned to IS 296 and IS 162 in District 24, the 1,218 students in those two junior high schools will have no one to stand between them and the increasing number of drug dealers that are trying to seduce them. These layoffs are a tragedy.”

DC 37 Executive Director Lillian Roberts said, “This is a clear case of union–busting. These layoffs come at a time when the NYC Department of Education continues to squander millions in taxpayers’ dollars on no-bid contracts to private companies. Many of these contracts go to companies outside the city.  The Administration continues to ignore the Civil Service system’s rules and regulations.”

  • http://edintheapple peter

    Are the lay off of DOE school aides and the retention of “privately funded” school aide positions a violation of contract and civil service law? I would expect DC 37 to challenge the DOE lay offs … Can a school hire “privately funded” full time teachers and in times of excess and layoff retain those teachers?

    These are serious issues with serious implications … will be fascinating to follow … especially since the laid off school aides are all of color and the the retained “privately funded” aides primarily NOT of color … could become a major issue in the countdown to November 3rd … in an election with a low turnout a large turnout of voters of color could tighten the race …

  • canwetalk

    Peter, excellent point. Here’s where the voters have the power to put an end to this social injustice. If DC37 members don’t take advantage of this opportunity to end the reign of Bloomberg’s administration on November 3rd, then they have to accept their economical punishment.

  • yes

    finally,dc 37 is saying something about the layoffs.its about time.they should never have allowed it to get this far.

  • Michael M.

    I have a few questions question about the mechanics of job elimination.

    How can the Mayor identify “475 positions” to be cut back in November 2008, give layoff letters to that many plus another 55 this week, and then… lay it off on the principals?

    Next, on what basis were these particular aides selected, and how will that effect coverage? By seniority? If so, what will come of the functions being performed at those implicitly more-junior staffed, and my guess less-attractive and therefore more-needed slots?

  • http://edintheapple peter

    Michael:

    Principals received their budget and staffed their schools, in many cases reducing the number of school aides.

    The DOE approves the budgets, and counts up the numbers of excess teachers and other titles, including DC 37 school aides.

    The no layoff policy ONLY applies to teachers; paraprofessionals and school aides cane laid off.

    The lay offs are by seniority, with “bumping” from school to school. A “bottom of the list” school aide may not have been excessed by School A, s/he would be laid off and another aide from another school would fill the slot.

    A messy and ill-thought out policy.

  • Michael M.

    Peter,
    Thanks.

    But I’m still stumped as to how Bloomberg could pre-ordain 11 months ago the number of eliminated positions that would be AIDE positions.

    Ferrexample, and I could come up with more, he could have said, “Cut your budgets 5%!” and principals could have swapped out teachers to end up with a school full of teachers earning — in total — 5% less of the budget. Or cut other non-aide, non-teacher costs to make that 5%.

    Messy is putting it kindly.

    To be clear, I am opposed to ALL these cuts. I just think it’s phony to lay it all on “principal as CEO.” The slashing of the aides still appears pre-ordained from on high.

  • henry scire

    i thought there budget cuts that means no money right so then why is mr klein giving his people raises and 530 of us school aides got laid off real nice hay klein show some fairness thanks for ruining the holidays for 530 familys

  • henry scire

    the govener says budget cuts so why is klein giving his people raises that money could be used to bring people that were layed off back to work they make 4times what a school aid makes real nice

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

42 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

  • Public comment period ends. Moving much faster than what was expected. Most protesters didn't speak and UFT got here too late to sign up. 37 mins ago
  • Update: they're back in now and there is a.considerable police presence near the stage. Crowd has thinned considerably #warofattrition 47 mins ago
  • An activist just drew gasps from his fellow protesters. ”I hope your kids get their asses kicked by all the kids here” he tells the panel. 1 hr ago
  • NYPD has closed auditorium doors. Students protesting in lobby are now locked out of the meeting. 1 hr ago
  • ... & a mom says the city transferred her son from KAPPA VII, which is staying open, to ABCD, which could close, after he was bullied. 1 hr ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>