<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the archives, Ronald Reagan&#8217;s 1988 speech to students</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tashina Ghaziani</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-337795</link>
		<dc:creator>Tashina Ghaziani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 04:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-337795</guid>
		<description>I’d should examine with you here. Which is not something I often do! I take pleasure in studying a publish that may make folks think. Additionally, thanks for allowing me to remark!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d should examine with you here. Which is not something I often do! I take pleasure in studying a publish that may make folks think. Additionally, thanks for allowing me to remark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marg Divoll</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-310291</link>
		<dc:creator>Marg Divoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-310291</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting view for sure and I appreciate it so this is a little something for all...
Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off now. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting view for sure and I appreciate it so this is a little something for all&#8230;<br />
Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off now. <img src='http://gothamschools.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Area</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-300878</link>
		<dc:creator>Area</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-300878</guid>
		<description>Outstanding article. I enjoy reading your blog for the reason that the writers often provide well thought out articles about computers and new technology.  Great work once again. I think I will subscribe to your feed.   I have already add this website to my favorites list.Thank you..Hey, my favoritist home decoration is shag carpet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding article. I enjoy reading your blog for the reason that the writers often provide well thought out articles about computers and new technology.  Great work once again. I think I will subscribe to your feed.   I have already add this website to my favorites list.Thank you..Hey, my favoritist home decoration is shag carpet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawood</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-241376</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-241376</guid>
		<description>He was one of the greatest presidents in the history of US and probably the most loved and respected by people in 20-th century. And that&#039;s not just my opinion. 

Look what famous world leaders said about Ronald Reagan:   http://www.tributespaid.com/quotes-on/ronald-reagan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was one of the greatest presidents in the history of US and probably the most loved and respected by people in 20-th century. And that&#8217;s not just my opinion. </p>
<p>Look what famous world leaders said about Ronald Reagan:   <a href="http://www.tributespaid.com/quotes-on/ronald-reagan" rel="nofollow">http://www.tributespaid.com/quotes-on/ronald-reagan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M.</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194430</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194430</guid>
		<description>So.... the reasons to object to President Obama being beamed into classrooms now include the horrendous decisions he has been making.

Like appealing to bipartisanship?  Like trying to make sure all Americans have access to affordable health care?  These, btw, aren&#039;t even decisions per se: he&#039;s trying to get the kids in the sandbox known as Congress to make the decisions.  He&#039;s got the fountain pen ready to sign a deal -- too quick for some tastes on the LEFT even.

As if anyone&#039;s subjective political opinions detract from his role as The President.

Sheesh.

Everyone who objected has their own reasons.  Fine.  Not all are racist.  Fine.  Some who ARE racist wouldn&#039;t even recognize it.  Fine.


NYC classes (with the exception of some charters) weren&#039;t even in session yet on the Tuesday in question.

Let&#039;s Move On.

Or read the transcript of the speech and then tell me what&#039;s wrong with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;. the reasons to object to President Obama being beamed into classrooms now include the horrendous decisions he has been making.</p>
<p>Like appealing to bipartisanship?  Like trying to make sure all Americans have access to affordable health care?  These, btw, aren&#8217;t even decisions per se: he&#8217;s trying to get the kids in the sandbox known as Congress to make the decisions.  He&#8217;s got the fountain pen ready to sign a deal &#8212; too quick for some tastes on the LEFT even.</p>
<p>As if anyone&#8217;s subjective political opinions detract from his role as The President.</p>
<p>Sheesh.</p>
<p>Everyone who objected has their own reasons.  Fine.  Not all are racist.  Fine.  Some who ARE racist wouldn&#8217;t even recognize it.  Fine.</p>
<p>NYC classes (with the exception of some charters) weren&#8217;t even in session yet on the Tuesday in question.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s Move On.</p>
<p>Or read the transcript of the speech and then tell me what&#8217;s wrong with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194426</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194426</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s silly -- classrooms routinely had televisions in the &#039;90s. It wasn&#039;t the dark ages. In fact, Chris Whittle was doing Channel One, in fact (for-profit in-class educational TV), and making SURE that classrooms had televisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s silly &#8212; classrooms routinely had televisions in the &#8217;90s. It wasn&#8217;t the dark ages. In fact, Chris Whittle was doing Channel One, in fact (for-profit in-class educational TV), and making SURE that classrooms had televisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in NY</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194423</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff in NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194423</guid>
		<description>The only ones who say GW Bush (part 1) didn&#039;t address school kids are those, like you, with their heads in the sand about what their &quot;heroes&quot; do.  I do not suffer such issues.  You may also want to consider, 18 years ago, very few classrooms had televisions, where as today almost every class in every school has cable television.

Caroline, you must be racist too, because you hate white people.  After all, since you disagree with me and I am white, then by your own logic, you hate all whites.  I have zero problems with the President&#039;s race, other then liberal idiots like you throwing it in the face of anyone who disagrees with something he does.  I disagreed with a lot of the stuff Bush Jr did and voiced my opinion then.  I guess, by your logic, I hate white people too.

The only people who bring up race are the ones doing it to try to stifle criticism of the horrendous decisions he keeps making.  Keep trying, and I will keep pointing out the ones talking race are your ilk, the rest of us are talking facts and issues.

KThnx Bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only ones who say GW Bush (part 1) didn&#8217;t address school kids are those, like you, with their heads in the sand about what their &#8220;heroes&#8221; do.  I do not suffer such issues.  You may also want to consider, 18 years ago, very few classrooms had televisions, where as today almost every class in every school has cable television.</p>
<p>Caroline, you must be racist too, because you hate white people.  After all, since you disagree with me and I am white, then by your own logic, you hate all whites.  I have zero problems with the President&#8217;s race, other then liberal idiots like you throwing it in the face of anyone who disagrees with something he does.  I disagreed with a lot of the stuff Bush Jr did and voiced my opinion then.  I guess, by your logic, I hate white people too.</p>
<p>The only people who bring up race are the ones doing it to try to stifle criticism of the horrendous decisions he keeps making.  Keep trying, and I will keep pointing out the ones talking race are your ilk, the rest of us are talking facts and issues.</p>
<p>KThnx Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194421</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194421</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not really worth pursuing this idiocy, but it&#039;s not true that Democrats were enraged when Bush addressed the nation&#039;s schoolchildren. There was apparently a small ripple of comment over the cost to taxpayers of broadcasting the speech, which got no traction and no media attention whatsoever. Plus, of course, half of you folks are still insisting that Bush never addressed the nation&#039;s schoolchildren to begin with.

Actually, yes, I do think the objections are based in racism, and that has nothing to do with Obama&#039;s calling West a jackass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not really worth pursuing this idiocy, but it&#8217;s not true that Democrats were enraged when Bush addressed the nation&#8217;s schoolchildren. There was apparently a small ripple of comment over the cost to taxpayers of broadcasting the speech, which got no traction and no media attention whatsoever. Plus, of course, half of you folks are still insisting that Bush never addressed the nation&#8217;s schoolchildren to begin with.</p>
<p>Actually, yes, I do think the objections are based in racism, and that has nothing to do with Obama&#8217;s calling West a jackass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Crawford</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194411</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe that just because I didn&#039;t think the speech was a good idea for MY particular situation, that you all think I must be racist.  Was The President being racist when he called Kanye a &quot;Jackass?&quot;  He must be, because Kanye is black too!  One of the great things about America is that we have the right to our opinion, and just because it doesn&#039;t agree with yours, doesn&#039;t mean I&#039;m wrong.                                                                                                                                 
However, I do have to ask, wasn&#039;t the speech supposed to be aired in ALL the schools?  elementary included?  these children will not be voting in the next election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe that just because I didn&#8217;t think the speech was a good idea for MY particular situation, that you all think I must be racist.  Was The President being racist when he called Kanye a &#8220;Jackass?&#8221;  He must be, because Kanye is black too!  One of the great things about America is that we have the right to our opinion, and just because it doesn&#8217;t agree with yours, doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m wrong.<br />
However, I do have to ask, wasn&#8217;t the speech supposed to be aired in ALL the schools?  elementary included?  these children will not be voting in the next election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M.</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194410</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194410</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

Got &quot;Occam&#039;s Razor&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>Got &#8220;Occam&#8217;s Razor&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in NY</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff in NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194407</guid>
		<description>I pointed out the facts.  No past President addressed the impressionable youth of this nation and had anything to gain by so doing, UNTIL now.  I know the liberals in this country prefer that it become the sole domain of the government to educate our children, including their political views, but it is not.  To consider it unlawful detention for me to keep my children from attending school because they are not sick?  Last time I checked, they were my children, not the state&#039;s.

Let&#039;s not even talk about the DoE violating the legislation that established the its&#039; existence.  Public Law 96-88 Sec 103 (b) - &quot;No provision of a program administered by the Secretary or any other officer of the Department shall be construed to authorize the Secretary or any such officer to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational institution, school, or school system, over any acorediting agency or association, or over the selection or content of the library resources, textbooks, or other instructional materials by any educational institution or school system, except to the extent authorized by law.&quot;

Democrats were enraged when Bush addressed students, but parents cannot be enraged when a Democratic President addresses students?  What hipocrasy!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pointed out the facts.  No past President addressed the impressionable youth of this nation and had anything to gain by so doing, UNTIL now.  I know the liberals in this country prefer that it become the sole domain of the government to educate our children, including their political views, but it is not.  To consider it unlawful detention for me to keep my children from attending school because they are not sick?  Last time I checked, they were my children, not the state&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not even talk about the DoE violating the legislation that established the its&#8217; existence.  Public Law 96-88 Sec 103 (b) &#8211; &#8220;No provision of a program administered by the Secretary or any other officer of the Department shall be construed to authorize the Secretary or any such officer to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational institution, school, or school system, over any acorediting agency or association, or over the selection or content of the library resources, textbooks, or other instructional materials by any educational institution or school system, except to the extent authorized by law.&#8221;</p>
<p>Democrats were enraged when Bush addressed students, but parents cannot be enraged when a Democratic President addresses students?  What hipocrasy!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194389</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194389</guid>
		<description>Jeff in NY, that&#039;s ridiculous. By that token, a president shouldn&#039;t make any speeches at all, ever, since it might influence voters in the next election. In fact, no one should. In fact, no news or information should ever be disseminated out, ever. Oh, and school? Better get rid of it entirely or kids might learn something that would influence their future votes.

Also, I&#039;ve followed this discussion with interest, partly because the tinfoil-hat folks give a whole array of different rationalizations for objecting to Obama&#039;s speech. The one I love best is that their kids might be influenced to admire or agree with Obama if they don&#039;t shelter those poor potential victims from ever seeing him in any way, shape or form. 

I think Calvin Trillin may possibly have put his finger on the real issue in his poetry collection describing the 2008 campaign:

&quot;And to be frank, they pointed out, he&#039;s black.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff in NY, that&#8217;s ridiculous. By that token, a president shouldn&#8217;t make any speeches at all, ever, since it might influence voters in the next election. In fact, no one should. In fact, no news or information should ever be disseminated out, ever. Oh, and school? Better get rid of it entirely or kids might learn something that would influence their future votes.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve followed this discussion with interest, partly because the tinfoil-hat folks give a whole array of different rationalizations for objecting to Obama&#8217;s speech. The one I love best is that their kids might be influenced to admire or agree with Obama if they don&#8217;t shelter those poor potential victims from ever seeing him in any way, shape or form. </p>
<p>I think Calvin Trillin may possibly have put his finger on the real issue in his poetry collection describing the 2008 campaign:</p>
<p>&#8220;And to be frank, they pointed out, he&#8217;s black.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in NY</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-194383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff in NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-194383</guid>
		<description>The issue was never with Obama&#039;s speech, but the content of the &quot;Original&quot; speech he intended to give to students.  In 4 years, these &quot;students&quot; will be &quot;voters&quot; in the presidential election.  Reagan was on his way out of office in 1988 and these students will not be voters in the upcoming election.  Same with GW Bush in 1991.  The election would be complete before the audience would become &quot;voters&quot;.  So, as most of you failed to realize the BIG difference, there they are.

So, in closing, maybe I helped you understand or maybe I didn&#039;t.  You cannot deny that Reagan nor GW Bush would gain nothing by addressing the children when they did, yet Obama is addressing the voters in his next election.  Think long and hard before you reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue was never with Obama&#8217;s speech, but the content of the &#8220;Original&#8221; speech he intended to give to students.  In 4 years, these &#8220;students&#8221; will be &#8220;voters&#8221; in the presidential election.  Reagan was on his way out of office in 1988 and these students will not be voters in the upcoming election.  Same with GW Bush in 1991.  The election would be complete before the audience would become &#8220;voters&#8221;.  So, as most of you failed to realize the BIG difference, there they are.</p>
<p>So, in closing, maybe I helped you understand or maybe I didn&#8217;t.  You cannot deny that Reagan nor GW Bush would gain nothing by addressing the children when they did, yet Obama is addressing the voters in his next election.  Think long and hard before you reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gravity&#8217;s Rainbow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What I&#8217;ve Noticed</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-192961</link>
		<dc:creator>Gravity&#8217;s Rainbow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What I&#8217;ve Noticed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-192961</guid>
		<description>[...] the action &#8220;unprecedented.&#8221;  I guess they weren&#8217;t paying attention during similar speeches given by Reagan and George H. Bush.  (Though perhaps if they&#8217;d paid better attention in school they would have developed some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the action &#8220;unprecedented.&#8221;  I guess they weren&#8217;t paying attention during similar speeches given by Reagan and George H. Bush.  (Though perhaps if they&#8217;d paid better attention in school they would have developed some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M.</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-192544</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-192544</guid>
		<description>Bryan,

The point to the majority of Americans is not who&#039;s president, but that whoever it is IS &quot;The President.&quot;

Funny thing about Alan Keyes and standing for the un-popular -- which as a general concept I respect though I may personally disagree with the individual positions taken.

Yet the more people get to know Alan Keyes, the less &quot;popular&quot; he seems to be, having nothing to do with media twist.

Most recently, he is a plaintiff in at least one lawsuit challenging President Obama&#039;s citizenship and presidency.

But even that has a further, and ignoble, context: as an until-then non-resident of Illinois -- who had previously criticized Hillary Clinton for &quot;carpet-bagging&quot; when she ran for U.S. Senate in NY (Keyes&#039; nominal home state de jour) -- Keyes ran against Obama for the Illinois U.S. Senate seat in 2004.  And we know how THAT turned out.

When principles are self-serving, or sacrificed when not self-serving, they may not be racist, but I fail to see the principle.

Our Constitution is principled.  Alan Keyes can wrap himself in the flag and espouse his religious values until the cows come home... but principled he ain&#039;t, even if he&#039;s not a racist.

(Note that Keyes is not color-blind: he has advocated income tax forgiveness for blacks as slavery reparation.  Agree or not, that&#039;s not color-blind.)

I dare say your sense of principles may be stronger than Alan Keyes&#039;.

Question:  Would you have felt differently had a President McCain been the one attempting to address school kids?

(Note for trivia buffs: McCain himself was not born in the United States proper.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,</p>
<p>The point to the majority of Americans is not who&#8217;s president, but that whoever it is IS &#8220;The President.&#8221;</p>
<p>Funny thing about Alan Keyes and standing for the un-popular &#8212; which as a general concept I respect though I may personally disagree with the individual positions taken.</p>
<p>Yet the more people get to know Alan Keyes, the less &#8220;popular&#8221; he seems to be, having nothing to do with media twist.</p>
<p>Most recently, he is a plaintiff in at least one lawsuit challenging President Obama&#8217;s citizenship and presidency.</p>
<p>But even that has a further, and ignoble, context: as an until-then non-resident of Illinois &#8212; who had previously criticized Hillary Clinton for &#8220;carpet-bagging&#8221; when she ran for U.S. Senate in NY (Keyes&#8217; nominal home state de jour) &#8212; Keyes ran against Obama for the Illinois U.S. Senate seat in 2004.  And we know how THAT turned out.</p>
<p>When principles are self-serving, or sacrificed when not self-serving, they may not be racist, but I fail to see the principle.</p>
<p>Our Constitution is principled.  Alan Keyes can wrap himself in the flag and espouse his religious values until the cows come home&#8230; but principled he ain&#8217;t, even if he&#8217;s not a racist.</p>
<p>(Note that Keyes is not color-blind: he has advocated income tax forgiveness for blacks as slavery reparation.  Agree or not, that&#8217;s not color-blind.)</p>
<p>I dare say your sense of principles may be stronger than Alan Keyes&#8217;.</p>
<p>Question:  Would you have felt differently had a President McCain been the one attempting to address school kids?</p>
<p>(Note for trivia buffs: McCain himself was not born in the United States proper.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-192517</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-192517</guid>
		<description>Bryan, I think the ideas of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush are destructive (to be clear, my politics are rather different from yours), but I wouldn&#039;t consider preventing my kids from hearing them speak. Or Alan Keyes either, should they have the opportunity.

The notion of &quot;protecting&quot; your kids by preventing them from hearing any opinion you disagree with is doomed to be futile, so what would be the point? Is that really an effective child-rearing philosophy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, I think the ideas of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush are destructive (to be clear, my politics are rather different from yours), but I wouldn&#8217;t consider preventing my kids from hearing them speak. Or Alan Keyes either, should they have the opportunity.</p>
<p>The notion of &#8220;protecting&#8221; your kids by preventing them from hearing any opinion you disagree with is doomed to be futile, so what would be the point? Is that really an effective child-rearing philosophy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-192516</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-192516</guid>
		<description>To Kristina Dixon. ....


Your comment is highly offensive and totally assuming on your part.  It makes you look prejudiced yourself.

I don&#039;t have kids, but if I did, they would not be listening to Obama&#039;s speech.  Not because he is black, I could care less what color he is.... but apparently you notice he is black and make sure to point that out and say anyone not support him is racist.

I personally voted for another &quot;black&quot; man this past election  - Alan Keyes..... a true American that actually looks at the constitution for how to legislate rather than what is popular or twisted in the media.  

I don&#039;t support Obama - not because of color - but because his ideas are ridiculous and takes this great country down a road that many of our grandfathers fought against in our past.  It takes us down a path that I believe is going to lead to total destruction of this country if we don&#039;t get these fools out of office.

That is why I wouldn&#039;t allow my kids to watch this speech....nothing to do with racism.

While I am sure there are some that are racist and let that stupidity run their lives, that is not the case for me.... and your comment stating that all of these people are racist is just not fair and down right a lie and you know it - that is unless your own racism has hidden that from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Kristina Dixon. &#8230;.</p>
<p>Your comment is highly offensive and totally assuming on your part.  It makes you look prejudiced yourself.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have kids, but if I did, they would not be listening to Obama&#8217;s speech.  Not because he is black, I could care less what color he is&#8230;. but apparently you notice he is black and make sure to point that out and say anyone not support him is racist.</p>
<p>I personally voted for another &#8220;black&#8221; man this past election  &#8211; Alan Keyes&#8230;.. a true American that actually looks at the constitution for how to legislate rather than what is popular or twisted in the media.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t support Obama &#8211; not because of color &#8211; but because his ideas are ridiculous and takes this great country down a road that many of our grandfathers fought against in our past.  It takes us down a path that I believe is going to lead to total destruction of this country if we don&#8217;t get these fools out of office.</p>
<p>That is why I wouldn&#8217;t allow my kids to watch this speech&#8230;.nothing to do with racism.</p>
<p>While I am sure there are some that are racist and let that stupidity run their lives, that is not the case for me&#8230;. and your comment stating that all of these people are racist is just not fair and down right a lie and you know it &#8211; that is unless your own racism has hidden that from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M.</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-191598</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-191598</guid>
		<description>Back to doing your own typing I see. 
&quot;Include.&quot;  Fixed it for ya.  Free.  That&#039;s socialism for ye.
;- )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to doing your own typing I see.<br />
&#8220;Include.&#8221;  Fixed it for ya.  Free.  That&#8217;s socialism for ye.<br />
;- )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-191592</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-191592</guid>
		<description>Haha, that was a great comeback Michael. I&#039;m glad to see none of us are so serious that we forget to exclude humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, that was a great comeback Michael. I&#8217;m glad to see none of us are so serious that we forget to exclude humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M.</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2009/09/04/from-the-archives-ronald-reagans-1988-speech-to-students/comment-page-2/#comment-191590</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=22623#comment-191590</guid>
		<description>So, Mark, now that your &quot;true colors&quot; are showing, let&#039;s talk.

How much did you have to pay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Mark, now that your &#8220;true colors&#8221; are showing, let&#8217;s talk.</p>
<p>How much did you have to pay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

