GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

preview

Progress reports could prove a double-edged sword for Klein

The city schools are likely to be heaped with praise tomorrow when Schools Chancellor Joel Klein announces this year’s progress report grades. But a dearth of low grades could actually turn out to be a double-edged sword for Klein.

When the progress report initiative was first announced, Klein said the grades would be used to determine which schools to close. This year, if the chancellor decides to close more schools, he could find himself in the position of arguing that his own accountability system did not accurately reflect a school’s shortcomings.

The grades are also sure to add to the scrutiny currently being given to the test scores that account for most of each school’s grade. The vast majority of a school’s progress report grade — 85 percent — depends on its students’ scores on state math and reading tests, with the bulk of that based on how much each student’s scores increased since 2008. (The remaining 15 percent of each score is based on attendance data and the results of surveys given to parents, teachers, and students.)

Under this formula, this year’s citywide jump in test scores could give rise to a significant jump in progress report grades. Indeed, we’ve heard from several sources that most elementary and middle schools are getting very high grades, and only a handful are getting failing grades. Last year, nearly 70 elementary and middle schools got D’s or F’s last year, and 79 percent got an A or a B.

But several recent studies have suggested that the state tests have grown easier to pass. On top of that, scholars have argued that the progress reports’ formula is not statistically sound. The formula has also delivered results in the past that contradict widely held perceptions: Some low-performing schools have received high grades, while other schools that are considered highly desirable got low ones.

Not every school will receive a progress report tomorrow. High school grades, which incorporate August graduation data, won’t come out until at least next month, according to Andrew Jacob, a department spokesman. Last year, high school grades were released in mid-November, just weeks before eighth-graders’ high school choices were due. The grades will come out earlier this year, Jacob said.

And the department’s new “parent-friendly” version of the reports, which showcase a stripped-down set of numbers, also won’t be ready tomorrow, Jacob said. Those reports, developed in response to criticism that the original reports were too complicated for the average parent to understand, will come out before parent-teacher conferences later this fall, he said. The first set of parent-teacher conferences, for high schools, happens at the end of October.

  • Fort Tryon Teacher

    Here’s a quote from Steven Brill’s (wildly biased) New Yorker article on teacher evaluation:
    ——————————–
    In seven years, Klein has increased the percentage of third-year teachers not given tenure from three to six per cent. Unsatisfactory ratings for tenured teachers have risen from less than one per cent to 1.8 per cent. “Any human-resources professional will tell you that rating only 1.8 per cent of any workforce unsatisfactory is ridiculous,” [Dan] Weisberg [of the New Teacher Project] says. “If you look at the upper quartile and the lower quartile, you know that those people are not interchangeable.”
    ——————————–

    Time to turn that criticism on its head: Joel Klein’s progress reports are already tending toward the “ridiculous.” I can’t believe that 80 percent of schools in New York City deserve an A or B. Schools are graded on a curve, and Klein and his ever-growing “accountability” office decide what that curve is. Guess what: the same way that union pressure (and a screwed-up system) is bloating teacher ratings, political pressure from the mayor and others are bloating progress report grades.

    I’m probably generalizing a bit unfairly there, but I think the gist is true. And the DOE’s inability to create a decent school evaluation system leaves me skeptical of their ability to create a decent teacher evaluation system. I support the Gates Foundation move, but teachers and our union have got to be diligent in creating a system that works. Otherwise, we’ll get whatever “ridiculous,” politically-motivated system the DOE is pumping out.

  • Michael M.

    Well said, FTT.

    Re School Progress Reports, either they’ll have to:
    a) dial back on the weight of the “progress” metric to provide more weight to the “performance” metric,
    b) gerrymander the curve’s cut points further, or
    c) brace for many good schools getting mediocre scores.

    It’s simply not reasonable to expect more than a year’s worth of progress at already-good schools year in and year out. Especially when the proficiency-oriented tests are easily maxed out. (Average plus one lucky guess gets you a Level 2, but perfect minus one boo-boo drops you out of Level 4, etc.)

    The average lifetime speed of a Porsche and a Yugo may be different, but the average lifetime acceleration is the same.
    I’m preparing for regression to the mean, or, a meaningless mess.

  • http://www.pressurepump.org pressure pump

    Being a new blogger, I would like to tell you that you have given me much knowledge about it. Thanks for everything.
    pressure pump

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

17 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930