Post a comment about the budget cuts at your school on our interactive comment map. more »
Okay, so we’re posting lightly instead of not at all. Here’s this week’s news so far from New York City:
And beyond:
I gotta stay with and comment on the ‘harbor’ school opening at Governor’s Island and the 125k school about to open. What an exciting time to be commenting on GothamSchools. Whether these small schools do well or not, the creativity and excitement is definitely stepping up (at least a little) this fall.
I’m not sure if there’s a fishing or marine plant life Regent’s Exam though…
The Harbor School is not moving to Governor’s Island until next year. According to the article and the school website, they’ll be moving in 2010.
Thanks for the clearing up Jr. High, I’m sure it’ll be interesting to see it develop regardless, and I’m happy to see the city put the island to good use.
Sure thing. I’ve visited Governor’s Island several times on weekends, and more than once, I’ve seen Harbor School students there, working on arts projects or weaving fishing nets. They seem enthusiastic about the school. I hope everything works out for them. I can imagine the biggest obstacle will be transportation. I’m guessing it will be tough to get all those students to commute from Brooklyn and the rest of NYC by ferry to Governor’s Island every morning, September through June. But (speaking of putting the island to good use) there are a lot of vacant army barracks on the island that could be converted to dormitories. Could the Harbor School become a public boarding school? That would be exciting.
Also, don’t miss the New Yorker article. It’s heinously slanted to favor the Bloomberg/Klein administration. Writer Steven Brill almost totally dismisses the possibility that teachers are rated poorly or falsely accused for personal or political reasons. Here’s how he frames it: “Should a thousand bad teachers stay put so that one innocent teacher is protected?” Actually, that’s deputy chancellor Chris Cerf’s logic, which Brill just repeats to Randi Weingarten, apparently without any analysis of his own.
That said, it was surprising to find out just how long and costly the incompetence (3020a?) hearings are. It should not take a full year and hundreds of thousands of dollars to dismiss just one teacher. That is beyond “due process.” Ineffective teachers should be supported–and I mean truly supported with a mentor and with vocal affirmation from administrators–not just getting U’d and written up all the time. But if a year or more of support has happened and the teacher continues to show poor classroom management and poor instruction, it’s time to give that teacher an expedited hearing in front of an independent arbitrator and let that settle it.
I’ve seen a principal trump up charges against experienced teachers primarily because of their (totally appropriate!) outspokenness and union activism. But I don’t see why the hearings have to take so long and be so costly, just because of due process.
Anybody got more insight on this? Are there things I need to read about these hearings from people other than the obviously biased Steven Brill?
Jr. High Teacher - I had the same reaction and the same questions. The piece was dreadful. Brill basically quoted DOT sources without rebuttal while cherry picking a couple of rubber room cases that illustrated his thesis. He blames the union for the drawn out process but was vague about the reasons. I guess he doesn’t want to trouble the reader with context.
ONE book should change the gifted programs in NYC? There are other books, Genius Denied for example, that state testing should begin before third grade.
In countering some of the results of this latest book, here’s someone’s take on it. http://giftedexchange.blogspot.com/2009/08/can-gifted-kids-become-not-gifted.html
Ineffective teachers should be supported–and I mean truly supported with a mentor and with vocal affirmation from administrators.
9 Comments
Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack