GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

A mayoral control deal; next step, get senators on board

The Bloomberg administration and Senate Democrats reached a tentative deal on school governance last night, with the mayor agreeing to some extra oversight of police in schools, a $1.6 million parent training center, and a new citywide panel on arts education, sources familiar with the deal confirmed this morning. The deal would also require the city to add a new factor in superintendents’ reviews of principals: the quality of instruction and curriculum.

Hashed out by Deputy Mayor Dennis Walcott and the two top Senate Democrats, Malcolm Smith and John Sampson, the agreement is several steps away from being finalized. The rest of the Senate’s Democratic conference will have to sign onto the agreement — and so will the state Assembly. Even more difficult, for the deal to become law before the next school year, both houses of the legislature will have to return to Albany this summer to pass legislation.

The Assembly already passed a bill renewing mayoral control of the public schools, with some tweaks, before the end of its regular session. The bill enjoyed the support of the Bloomberg administration, but senate Democrats, once they solidified their thin majority, pushed back against signing onto an identical copy. They pushed for extra tweaks including  a way to guarantee parent involvement in the public schools.

At the heart of last night’s deal is the parent training center, which, according to the deal, will be housed at CUNY. Even this decision has not been without controversy. Initially, senators advocated for the center to be lodged at NYU’s Metropolitan Center for Urban Education, but the mayor and schools chancellor Klein objected, centering their concerns on a retired scholar, Debbie Meier, who has criticized Bloomberg’s education policies and has office at the Center.

The Center’s director, Pedro Noguera, said he wasn’t sure if Meier was the real reason the parent training center is going to CUNY. “NYU didn’t like being in the middle of a controversy,” Noguera said, adding that high-level administrators at the University were “all very sensitive about alienating the mayor.”

As for why Klein and Bloomberg opposed the placement: “I think they might be scared of a center in a place they feel they can’t control,” Noguera said. Bloomberg administration sources have said that CUNY was chosen because senators wanted a center with arms in all five boroughs.

  • brooklynmom

    Does anybody know where at CUNY? and who might be involved? Pedro Noguera would have been a great leader for such a center. CUNY has some fantastic folks too, but who?

  • Michael M.

    Better-trained parents shouting at the castle walls is not what most activist parents I’ve spoken with had in mind.

    How about a training center… for DOE?

    How about a formal role for CEC’s in policy review — as per BP Stringer’s proposal?

    How about a partnership — as per the Parent Commission on School Governance’s proposal?

  • Ellen McHugh

    How about NYU gives unbaised time to the CECs to help them understand their roles and actually act in their roles!
    My biggest fear is thathere will be a bouhaha over this money. People get a little nutsy over money and all that will do is lessen the impact of any attmept to prepare parents as advocates.

  • http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ Norm

    In years to come when nothing has really changed as BloomKlein flout whatever rules there are, the same old discussion will arise again. Lisa Donlan who heads CEC 1, whose statement I just piblished at Ed Notes, says:

    Bloomberg’s entire autocratic, bullying, intolerant, name-calling response to his lack of political control over just one elected body of government is THE REASON we must end mayoral control and work for a democratic partnership in its place.

    Dictatorship under any form is unacceptable.

    Moreover, its not even like the trains (or yellow buses) even run on time.

    We have no accountability, transparency or balanced decision making of any kind; no evidence that the schools are improving and that students are learning more, or that equity and social justice have increased in any way.

    So just what have we traded all this control for anyway?

    Lisa Donlan
    CEC One

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Recently Posted Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

  • Several readers have asked us to change our site so that external links open in a new browser tab. Anyone disagree? Anyone agree? 12 hrs ago
  • 12 NYC schools on @Newsweek's list of best 1,000 American high schools (not the same as last week's list): http://t.co/1tqx9o2C 13 hrs ago
  • Dennis Walcott runs, sings in a church choir, and makes the week's meals on Sundays: "I can do everything except sew." http://t.co/vVOBRp5G 17 hrs ago
  • @JBrownDPost: surprised to see that federal gov. doesn't have a way of deciding "what worked" for the SIG schools over 3 yrs process. #EWA12 1 day ago
  • .@tkonz: Of 18 SIG schools, only about 4 teachers were recruited from strong schools because they "wanted to be part of a big change" #EWA12 1 day ago
  • More updates...

Archives

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031